Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0515117-093030 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0515117-093030
論文名稱
Title
治理與發展關聯之探討─以緬甸佤邦鴉片禁令為例
Interrogating the Interrelationship between Governance and Development: Opium Ban in Wa State, Myanmar
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
76
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2017-05-25
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2017-06-15
關鍵字
Keywords
治理、發展、鴉片、佤邦、緬甸
Wa State, opium, development, governance, Myanmar
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5990 次,被下載 401
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5990 times, has been downloaded 401 times.
中文摘要
本研究之目的在於探討緬甸佤邦在2005年的鴉片禁令之後,佤邦當政者如何在其所控制之領土內進行治理,而當地農民的發展又是如何受到佤邦當政者的治理所影響。統治佤邦的民族武裝軍「佤邦聯合軍」為一極權政權,在緬甸民族衝突中扮演極重要之角色。
本研究探討之主要關注在於佤邦領導人在鴉片禁令後的治理決策思維,此禁令對佤邦當地農民的生計與發展皆造成極大影響,因此在探討佤邦的治理與發展關聯之際,了解佤邦的鴉片禁令更是格外重要。
此研究計畫的研究方法包括文獻分析、訪談以及參與觀察法,訪談的執行時間為2016年11月至12月,地點包括台灣、泰國、緬甸,訪談的方式為滾雪球抽樣,訪問形式為開放式提問法。目的在於了解平民對於在佤邦內治理與發展關聯之想法。
研究發現,「叛軍治理」作為分析框架,無法充分反映當地農民的困境;佤邦鴉片禁令對於當地農民的政治發展幾乎毫無助益;替代發展計畫增強了佤邦的軍事化;佤邦領導人與中國的友好關係可能使佤邦的現況惡化。
Abstract
The purpose of this research project is to find out how the governance of Wa State, an authoritarian rebel organization which is heavily involved in drug trades and very influential in the politics of Myanmar, is practiced within its controlled territory and how it affects the development of local civilians after the 2005 Opium Ban.
The investigation focuses on the governance decision-making mindset of the Wa authorities on the ban on opium introduced in 2005. The ban on opium is a policy that has brought major impacts on the livelihood and development of local population in Wa State and thus an essential subject for investigating the interrelationship between governance and development in Wa State.
This project is partly conducted through interviews in Taiwan, Thailand and Myanmar from November to December 2016 using snowball sampling with open-ended questions to shine light on the link between governance and development as conceived by civilians.
The findings of this research include: rebel governance as an analytical framework is insufficient to address the grievances of local farmers; there is almost no political development brought by the Opium Ban in Wa State; alternative development projects strengthen militarization in Wa State; and the close relationship between Wa leaders and China may worsen the situation.
目次 Table of Contents
論文審定書 i
致謝 iii
Acknowledgement iv
中文摘要 v
Abstract iv
Table of Contents

1. Introduction 1
1.1 Research Background 5
1.2 Research Purpose 6
1.3 Research Questions 7
2. Literature Review 7
2.1 State, Governance and Development 7
2.2 Rebel Governance 20
2.3 Political Development and Theories 22
3 Methodology 25
4 Findings and Analysis 33
4.1 Conflicts and Drugs 34
4.2 Wa Before State-making 39
4.3 The Formation of the Wa State and Its Governance 42
4.4 The Ban on Opium, Alternative Development and Opium Farmers 51
5 Conclusion 60
6 References 64
參考文獻 References
Bourdier, Frédéric, MaximeBoutry, JacquesIvanoff, andOlivierFerrari. 2015. From Padi States to Commercial States: Reflections on Identity and the Social Construction of Space in the Borderlands of Cambodia, Vietnam, Thailand and Myanmar. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Boutry, Maxime. 2014. “The Maung Aye’s Legacy: Burmese and Moken Encounters in the Southern Borderlands of Myanmar, 1987-2007.” In Burmese Lives: Ordinary Life Stories Under the Burmese Regime, eds. Wen-ChinChang andEricTagliacozzo. New York: Oxford University Press, 147–73.
Brook, Timothy, andBob TadashiWakabayashi, eds. 2009. Opium Regimes: China, Britian, and Japan, 1839-1952 鴉片政權 : 中國、英國和日本. 1839-1952年. He Fei: Huang Shang Publishing House.
Brunet-Jailly, Emmanuel. 2013. “Power, Politics and Governance of Borderlands.” In Theorizing Borders Analyses of Power Relationships, eds. PeterGilles, KoffHarlan, CarmenMaganda, andChristianSchulz. P.I.E. Peter Lang.
Burnell, Peter, andVickyRandall, eds. 2008. Politics in the Developing World. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
Burnell, Peter, VickyRandall, andLiseRakner, eds. 2014. Politics in the Developing World. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chan, Yuk Wah, andBrantlyWomack. 2016. “Not Merely A Border: Borderland Governance, Development and Transborder Relations in Asia.” Asian Anthropology 15(2): 95–103. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/1683478X.2016.1214352?needAccess=true (April19, 2017).
Chang, Wen-Chin. 2009. “Venturing into ‘Barbarous’ Regions: Transborder Trade among Migrant Yunnanese between Thailand and Burma. 1960s-1980s.” The Journal of Asian Studies 68(2): 543–72.
Chin, Ko-lin. 2007. “Into the Thick of It: Methodological Issues in Studying the Drug Trade in the Golden Triangle.” Asian Journal of Criminology 2(2): 85–109. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11417-007-9038-8 (May12, 2014).
———. 2009. Global Drug Trade Insider 全球毒品交易內幕. Taipei: Business Weekly.
Chouvy, Pierre-Arnaud. 2010. Opium: Uncovering the Politics of the Poppy. 2nd ed. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Christopher, O’Hara, andNielsSelling. 2012. Myanmar’s Ethnic Insurgents: UWSA, KNU and KIO. Singapore: ISDP. http://isdp.eu/content/uploads/publications/2012_ohara_myanmar-ethinic-insurgents.pdf (April17, 2017).
Cornell, Svante E. 2007. “Narcotics and Armed Conflict: Interaction and Implications.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 30: 207–27. http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=uter20 (January10, 2017).
Davis, Anthony. 2016. “China Weighs Up Its Role in Myanmar Peace Talks.” Bangkok Post. http://www.bangkokpost.com/opinion/opinion/1009561/china-weighs-up-its-role-in-myanmar-peace-talks (June18, 2016).
Derks, Hans. 2012. History of the Opium Problem. BRILLS. http://www.brill.com/cn/history-opium-problem (November21, 2014).
Dukalskis, Alexander. 2015. “Why Do Some Insurgent Groups Agree to Cease-Fires While Others Do Not ? A Within-Case Analysis of Burma / Myanmar , 1948 – 2011.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 731(February): 841–63.
Fisher, Jonah. 2016. “Into the Peripheral, Mysterious Myanmar, the ‘Fake China’ 記者來鴻:走進緬甸邊陲神秘的「山寨中國」.” BBC News Chinese. http://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/trad/fooc/2016/11/161121_fooc_burman_secret_state (May18, 2017).
Fiskesjö, Magnus. 2010. “Mining, History, and the Anti-State Wa: The Politics of Autonomy between Burma and China.” Journal of Global History 5(2): 241–64. http://www.journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S1740022810000070 (October26, 2014).
Fuller, Thomas. 2015. “Myanmar Returns to What Sells: Heroin.” New York Times: A6. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/04/world/myanmar-returns-to-what-sells-heroin.html?_r=0 (March16, 2015).
Green, December, andLauraLuehrmann. 2007. Comparative Politics of the Third World: Linking Concepts and Cases. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Grindle, Merilee S. 2007. “Good Enough Governance Revisited.” Development Policy Review 25(5): 533–74.
Grundy-Warr, Carl, andElaineWong. 2001. “Geopolitics of Drugs and Cross-Border Relations: Burma-Thailand.” IBRU Boundary and Security Bulletin Spring: 108–21. http://www.tourismtransparency.org/sites/default/files/reports/Geopolitics of drugs, Burma- Thailand.pdf (April17, 2017).
Held, David. 1989. Political Theory and the Modern State: Essays on State, Power, and Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Higgott, Richard A. 1983. Political Development Theory. 3rd ed. London: Routledge.
Huntington, Samuel P. 1965. “Political Development and Political Decay.” World Politics 17(3): 386–430.
Hydén, Göran, Julius.Court, andKennethMease. 2004. Making Sense of Governance: Empirical Evidence from Sixteen Developing Countries. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Jelsma, Martin. et al. 2005. Trouble in the Triangle : Opium and Conflict in Burma. Silkworm Books.
Koehler, Jan, andChristophZuercher. 2007. “Statebuilding, Conflict and Narcotics in Afghanistan: The View from Below.” International Peacekeeping 14(1): 62–74.
Kramer, Tom. 2007. The United Wa State Party: Narco Army or Ethnic Nationalist Party? Singapore: ISEAS Publishing.
Kramer, Tom, MartinJelsma, andTomBlickman. 2009. Withdraw Symptoms in the Golden Triangle- A Drugs Market In Disarray.
Lawi Weng. 2017. “The Rule of the Wa.” The Irrawaddy. https://www.irrawaddy.com/opinion/editorial/the-rule-of-the-wa.html (May18, 2017).
Lone, Sai. 2008. “The Political Economy of Opium Reduction in Burma : Local Perspectives from the Wa Region.” Chulalongkorn University.
Mampilly, Zachariah Cherian. 2011. Rebel Rulers : Insurgent Governance and Civilian Life during War. Cornell University Press.
Meehan, Patrick. 2011. “Drugs, Insurgency and State-Building in Burma: Why the Drugs Trade Is Central to Burma’s Changing Political Order.” Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 42(3): 376–404. http://www.journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S0022463411000336 (October5, 2014).
———. 2016. “The Political Economy of the Opium/Heroin Trade in Shan State, Myanmar 1988-2012.” SOAS, University of London.
Michaud, Jean. 2010. “Editorial – Zomia and beyond.” Journal of Global History 5(2): 187–214.
Osieyo, Marion. 2017. “Reading Between the Averages: A Review of the 2016 UNDP Human Development Report.” http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/reading-between-averages-review-2016-undp-human-development-report (May10, 2017).
Pierre, Jon, andB. GuyPeters. 2000. Governance, Politics, and the State. New York: Macmillan UK.
Renard, Ronald D. 2013. “The Wa Authority and Good Governance, 1989–2007.” Journal of Burma Studies 17(1): 141–80.
Reuters. 2017. “Leadership Change Looms for UWSA.” The Irrawaddy. https://www.irrawaddy.com/news/leadership-change-looms-uwsa.html (May18, 2017).
Ross, Michael L. 2002. Oil, Drugs, and Diamonds: How Do Natural Resources Vary in Their Impact on Civil War?
Ross, Michael L. 2004. “How Do Natural Resources Influence Civil War? Evidence from Thirteen Cases.” International Organization 58(1): 35–67. http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S002081830458102X (November3, 2014).
Scott, James C. 2009. The Art of Not Being Governed: An Anarchist History of Upland Southeast Asia. Yale University Press.
Scott, James George. 1900. Gazetter of Upper Burma and the Shan States Part I.- Vol. II. Ragoon: The Superintendent, Government Printing, Burma.
SDSN. 2015. World Happiness Report 2015. eds. JohnHelliwell, RichardLayard, andJeffreySachs. New York.
Sherman, Jake. 2003. “Burma: Lessons from the Cease-Fires.” In The Political Economy of Armed Conflict: Beyond Greed and Grievance, eds. KarenBallentine andJakeSherman. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 225–55.
Siaroff, Alan. 2005. Comparing Political Regimes: A Thematic Introduction to Comparative Politics. Ontario: Broadview Press.
Smith, B. C. 2007. Good Governance and Development. Palgrave Macmillan.
Smith, Martin. 2007. State of Strife: The Dynamics of Ethnic Conflict in Burma.
Thomas, George. 2011. “What Is Political Development? A Constitutional Perspective.” The Review of Politics 73(2): 275–94.
TNI. 2010. Alternative Development or Business as Usual? China’s Opium Substitution Policy in Burma and Laos.
Tuan, Cheng-en. 2004. “The Relationship the Yunnan-Burma Border Area Guerrillas and Opium and the Ma Gang in Oral History 從口述歷史中滇緬邊區游擊隊與鴉片、馬幫之關係 (1950-1961).” Bulletin of the Historical Association of the Republic of China 36: 285–314.
UN. 2015. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.
UNDP. 2013. “Human Development Report 2013 - The Rise of the South.” : 21. www.undp.org.
Weber, Max. 1946. “Politics as A Vocation.” In From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, eds. H. H.Gerth andC.Wright. New York: Oxford University Press, 77–128.
Winborne, Warner R. 2008. “Modernization and Modernity: Thomas Hobbes, Adam Smith, and Political Development.” Perspectives on Political Science 37(1): 41–49.
Woods, Kevin. 2011. “Ceasefire Capitalism: Military–private Partnerships, Resource Concessions and Military–state Building in the Burma–China Borderlands.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 38(4): 747–70.
World Bank. 2011. Conflict, Security and Development-World Development Report.
Yimou Lee, andShwe Yee Saw Mynt. 2016. “UWSA Say Drug Label ‘Not Fair.’” The Irrawaddy. https://www.irrawaddy.com/news/uwsa-say-drug-label-not-fair.html (May19, 2017).
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code