Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0706118-165344 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0706118-165344
論文名稱
Title
幸福感與創新行為之研究-以官僚文化為調節變項
The Relationship Between Well-Being and Innovative Behavior: Using Bureaucratic Culture as the Moderator
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
64
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2018-07-12
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2018-08-06
關鍵字
Keywords
創新行為、幸福感、情緒幸福感、社會幸福感、心理幸福感、官僚文化
innovative behavior, emotional well-being, well-being, psychological well-being, social well-being, bureaucratic culture
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5784 次,被下載 67
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5784 times, has been downloaded 67 times.
中文摘要
近年來,由於資訊科技的進步與產品生命週期的縮短等影響,創新行為成為國內外日趨重要的研究議題,企業必須透過創新才能在國際間與產業間保有競爭力。然而在台灣整體生活水平上升之際,企業除了以優渥的薪酬與獎金鼓勵創新之外,員工幸福感的經營更是組織投資員工創新行為的長遠之計。此外,因組織文化的差異在員工創新的過程中會帶來不同的結果,而台灣企業大多又以官僚文化為主,本研究決定進一步檢視幸福感、官僚文化與創新行為之間的關係。

本研究之主要目的是在探討幸福感對員工創新行為的影響,並找出情緒幸福感、心理幸福感、社會幸福感,三種層次的幸福感,何者對員工創新行為有較強的影響力。另外,官僚文化對創新行為的影響力,及官僚文化分別對三種幸福感與創新行為的調節效果也是本研究的目的之一。

研究結果顯示,情緒幸福感、心理幸福感與社會幸福感,都會正向影響員工創新行為的表現,尤其心理幸福感與創新行為的正向顯著關係最為強烈。而官僚文化與創新行為沒有直接關係,但在調節效果方面,官僚文化對情緒幸福感與創新行為有正向調節作用,對心理幸福感、社會幸福感與創新行為則沒有顯著調節效果。最後本研究將依據結果,提出理論貢獻與管理意涵。
Abstract
In recent years, due to the advances in information technology and the shortening of product life cycles, innovative behavior has become an important research topic worldwide. In order to be competitive in global and their professional fields, enterprises must be able to innovate. Besides, as the rises of living level in Taiwan, in addition to using incentives and bonuses to encourage innovation, the management of employee well-being is a long-term plan for the organization to invest in employee innovation. In addition, due to differences in organizational culture might bring different results to employee innovation, and Taiwanese companies mostly rely on bureaucratic culture, this study decided to further examine the relationship between well-being, bureaucratic culture and innovative behavior.

The main purpose of this study is to explore the relation between well-being and employee innovative behavior, and to find among emotional well-being, psychological well-being and social well-being, which has the strongest influence on employee innovative behavior. Moreover, the relation between bureaucratic culture and innovative behavior, as well as the moderating effect of bureaucratic culture is also important in this study.

The results show that emotional well-being(EWB), psychological well-being(PWB) and social well-being(SWB) have positive effects on innovative behaviors. In particular, SWB has the strongest effect. Furthermore, bureaucratic culture has no direct relation with innovative behavior. However, it has a positive moderating effect on EWB and innovative behavior, and there is no significant moderating effect on PWB, SWB and innovative behavior. Finally, this study will provide theoretical contributions and management implications based on the results.
目次 Table of Contents
論文審定書............................................................................................i
致謝......................................................................................................ii
摘要.....................................................................................................iii
Abstract...............................................................................................iv
目錄......................................................................................................v
圖目錄..................................................................................................vi
表目錄..................................................................................................vii
第一章 緒論..........................................................................................1
第一節 研究背景與動機........................................................................1
第二節 研究目的...................................................................................3
第二章 文獻探討...................................................................................4
第一節 幸福感.......................................................................................4
第二節 創新行為..................................................................................10
第三節 官僚文化..................................................................................12
第四節 變項之間的關係.......................................................................14
第三章 研究方法..................................................................................17
第一節 研究架構與假設.......................................................................17
第二節 研究流程..................................................................................18
第三節 研究對象與施測程序................................................................19
第四節 研究工具..................................................................................21
第四章 研究結果..................................................................................29
第一節 敘述性統計與相關分析.............................................................29
第二節 迴歸分析..................................................................................31
第五章 結論與建議...............................................................................38
第一節 研究結論..................................................................................38
第二節 管理意涵與建議.......................................................................41
第三節 研究限制與未來研究建議.........................................................42
參考文獻..............................................................................................44
附錄:研究問卷...................................................................................51
參考文獻 References
李旭梅、蔡碧珊(2016)。職場友誼與離職意圖關係之研究:以幸福感為中介效果。 明新學報,42(1),125-141。
李建興(2007)。幼兒教師的自我韌性與幸福感之相關研究。樹德科技大學幼兒保育學系碩士論文,高雄。
房美玉(2002)。台灣半導體產業之組織文化對於內外工作動機與工作績效及工作滿意度間關連性的影響。管理評論,21(3),69-96。
林明杰、李信達(2011)。組織社會化程度、授權賦能認知對個人創新行為影響之研究:顧客導向行為的中介效果。科技管理學刊,16(2),53-80。
林相吉(2005)。組織文化、領導風格與工作滿足關係之研究-以海軍軍士官為例。義守大學工業工程與管理學系碩士論文,高雄。
林美莉(2014)。企業文化、家長式領導與工作滿意度關聯性之研究-以中華電信為例。淡江大學企業管理學系在職專班碩士論文,台北。
唐永泰(2008)。轉換型領導、交易型領導與員工創新行為之關係。創新與管理,5(1),53-81。
徐苹甄(2013)。企業社會責任與員工幸福感-深度休閒之志工角色認知之調節與中介效用驗證。國立高雄師範大學人力與知識管理研究所碩士論文,1-54。
許婼涵(2016)。政府官僚系統下領導者創新行為、信任、政治技巧與部屬創新行為之關係。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文,高雄。
彭懷中(1994)。河野豐弘原著(1992),改造企業文化,台北市:遠流。
蔡昆憲(2007)。以正向觀點探討資訊人員職場幸福感之研究:擴展-建立理論觀點。國立高雄大學經濟管理研究所碩士論文,高雄。
蔡啟通、高泉豐(2004)。動機取向、組織創新氣候與員工創新行為之關係:Amabile 動機綜效模型之驗證。管理學報,21(5),571-592。
蕭靜雅、賴于婷(2015)。國際觀光旅遊員工之職場幸福感、留任意願之相關性研究-以工作滿意度為中介變數。觀光與休閒管理期刊,3(2),31-42。
謝佩伶(2017)。幸福在哪裡?幸福企業獎之探討。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文,高雄。
謝廷豪、林益永、鍾瑞國、楊雯惠、陳盈臻(2013)。創造力人格特質對創新行為之研究-以幸福感為中介變項。修平學報,27,61-77。
謝孟蓉(2012)。高績效人力資源實務、員工幸福感及員工態度與行為之關係,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文,高雄。
蘇琬婷(2014)。從領導者政治技能及個人創新行為探討官僚系統下的創新績效。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文,高雄。
Agut, S., Peiró, J. M., & Grau, R. (2009). The effect of overeducation on job content innovation and career-enhancing strategies among young Spanish employees. Journal of Career Development, 36(2), 159-182.
Alegre, I., Mas-Machuca, M., & Berbegal-Mirabent, J. (2016). Antecedents of employee job satisfaction: Do they matter? Journal of Business Research, 69(4), 1390-1395.
Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1297-1333.
Ayala, Y., Silla, J. M. P., Tordera, N., Lorente, L., & Yeves, J. (2017). Job Satisfaction and Innovative Performance in Young Spanish Employees: Testing New Patterns in the Happy-Productive Worker Thesis—A Discriminant Study. Journal of Happiness Studies, 18(5), 1377-1401.
Baregheh, A., Rowley, J., & Sambrook, S. (2009). Towards a multidisciplinary definition of innovation. Management decision, 47(8), 1323-1339.
Blau, P. M. (1956). Bureaucracy in modern society.
Böhnisch, W. (1991). Anreize für passiv Innovierende. Handbuch Anreizsysteme in Wirtschaft und Verwaltung, hrsg. v. Günther Schanz, Stuttgart, 705-731.
Borins, S. (2002). Leadership and innovation in the public sector. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 23(8), 467-476.
Cameron, K. S. (1988). The conceptual foundation of organizational culture.
Campbell, A. K. (1982). The institution and its problems. Public Administration Review, 42(4), 305-308.
Chen, H.-L., & Hsu, W.-T. (2009). Family ownership, board independence, and R&D investment. Family business review, 22(4), 347-362.
Cheng, S.-T., & Chan, A. C. (2005). Measuring psychological well-being in the Chinese. Personality and Individual Differences, 38(6), 1307-1316.
Clarke, N., & Mahadi, N. (2017). Mutual recognition respect between leaders and followers: Its relationship to follower job performance and well-being. Journal of business ethics, 141(1), 163-178.
Daniels, K. (2000). Measures of five aspects of affective well-being at work. Human Relations, 53(2), 275-294.
Den Hartog, D. N., & Belschak, F. D. (2012). When does transformational leadership enhance employee proactive behavior? The role of autonomy and role breadth self-efficacy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(1), 194.
Dulaimi, M. F., Y. Ling, F. Y., Ofori, G., & Silva, N. D. (2002). Enhancing integration and innovation in construction. Building research & information, 30(4), 237-247.
Egbu, C., Henry, J., Kaye, G., Quintas, P., Schumacher, T., & Young, B. (1998). Managing organizational innovations in construction. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference of the Association of Researchers in Construction Management (ARCOM), Reading.
Fernandez, S., & Moldogaziev, T. (2012). Using employee empowerment to encourage innovative behavior in the public sector. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(1), 155-187.
Ford, C. M. (1996). A theory of individual creative action in multiple social domains. Academy of Management review, 21(4), 1112-1142.
Frese, M., & Fay, D. (2001). 4. Personal initiative: An active performance concept for work in the 21st century. Research in organizational behavior, 23, 133-187.
George, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2002). Understanding when bad moods foster creativity and good ones don't: the role of context and clarity of feelings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 687.
Getz, I., & Robinson, A. G. (2003). Innovate or die: Is that a fact? Creativity and innovation management, 12(3), 130-136.
Graen, G. B., & Scandura, T. A. (1987). Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing. Research in organizational behavior.
Greenberg, J., & Baron, R. (1995). Behavior in Organization, Englewood Cliff. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. Gronroos, C.(1990). Relationship approach to marketing in service contexts: the marketing and organizational behavior interface. Journal of Business Research, 20(1), 3-11.
Hackman, J. R. (1980). Work redesign and motivation. Professional Psychology, 11(3), 445.
Hall, R. H. (1963). The concept of bureaucracy: An empirical assessment. American Journal of Sociology, 69(1), 32-40.
Hartley, J. (2005). Innovation in governance and public services: Past and present. Public money and management, 25(1), 27-34.
Hurley, R. F. (1995). Group culture and its effect on innovative productivity. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 12(1-2), 57-75.
Imran, R., Saeed, T., Anis-Ul-Haq, M., & Fatima, A. (2010). Organizational climate as a predictor of innovative work behavior. African Journal of Business Management, 4(15), 3337.
James, L. R., James, L. A., & Ashe, D. K. (1990). The meaning of organizations: The role of cognition and values. Organizational climate and culture, 40, 84.
Judge, T. A., Thoresen, C. J., Bono, J. E., & Patton, G. K. (2001). The job satisfaction–job performance relationship: A qualitative and quantitative review. Psychological bulletin, 127(3), 376.
Kavanagh, D. J., & Bower, G. H. (1985). Mood and self-efficacy: Impact of joy and sadness on perceived capabilities. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 9(5), 507-525.
Keyes, C. L., & Magyar-Moe, J. L. (2003). The measurement and utility of adult subjective well-being.
Larsen, R. J., Diener, E., & Emmons, R. A. (1985). An evaluation of subjective well-being measures. Social indicators research, 17(1), 1-17.
Larson, J. S. (1993). The measurement of social well-being. Social indicators research, 28(3), 285-296.
Leifer, R., O'connor, G. C., & Rice, M. (2001). Implementing radical innovation in mature firms: The role of hubs. The Academy of Management Executive, 15(3), 102-113.
Levine, C. H., Rubin, I. S., & Wolohojian, G. G. (1981). The politics of retrenchment: How local governments manage fiscal stress (Vol. 130): SAGE Publications, Incorporated.
Locke, E. A. (1976). The Nature and Cause of Job Satisfaction, in MD Dunnette Handbook of Industrial and Organization. ed. Marvin D. Dunnette,(Chicago: Rand McNally), 1300.
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). Work motivation and satisfaction: Light at the end of the tunnel. Psychological science, 1(4), 240-246.
Madjar, N., & Ortiz-Walters, R. (2009). Trust in supervisors and trust in customers: Their independent, relative, and joint effects on employee performance and creativity. Human Performance, 22(2), 128-142.
McLeod, S. (2007). Maslow's hierarchy of needs. Simply Psychology, 1.
Meißner, W. (1989). Innovation und Organisation: Die Initiierung von Innovationsprozessen in Organisationen: Verlag für Angewandte Psychologie.
Nerkar, A. A., McGrath, R. G., & MacMillan, I. C. (1996). Three facets of satisfaction and their influence on the performance of innovation teams. Journal of Business Venturing, 11(3), 167-188.
Nieto, M. J., Santamaria, L., & Fernandez, Z. (2015). Understanding the innovation behavior of family firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(2), 382-399.
Ramamoorthy, N., Flood, P. C., Slattery, T., & Sardessai, R. (2005). Determinants of innovative work behaviour: Development and test of an integrated model. Creativity and innovation management, 14(2), 142-150.
Reiß, M. (1997). Instrumente der Implementierung. Change Management: Programme, Projekte und Prozesse, Stuttgart, 91-108.
Renee Baptiste, N. (2009). Fun and well-being: Insights from senior managers in a local authority. Employee Relations, 31(6), 600-612.
Rusbult, C., & Lowery, D. (1985). When bureaucrats get the blues: Responses to dissatisfaction among federal employees. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 15(1), 80-103.
Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of personality and social psychology, 57(6), 1069.
Ryff, C. D. (2014). Psychological well-being revisited: Advances in the science and practice of eudaimonia. Psychotherapy and psychosomatics, 83(1), 10-28.
Schneider, B., & Reichers, A. E. (1983). On the etiology of climates. Personnel psychology, 36(1), 19-39.
Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of management journal, 37(3), 580-607.
Shalley, C. E., & Gilson, L. L. (2004). What leaders need to know: A review of social and contextual factors that can foster or hinder creativity. The leadership quarterly, 15(1), 33-53.
Tan, H. H., & Tan, C. S. (2000). Toward the differentiation of trust in supervisor and trust in organization. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 126(2), 241.
Thompson, V. A. (1965). Bureaucracy and innovation. Administrative science quarterly, 1-20.
Verhoest, K., Verschuere, B., & Bouckaert, G. (2007). Pressure, legitimacy, and innovative behavior by public organizations. Governance, 20(3), 469-497.
Vigoda-Gadot, E., Shoham, A., Schwabsky, N., & Ruvio, A. (2005). Public sector innovation for the managerial and the post-managerial era: Promises and realities in a globalizing public administration. International Public Management Journal, 8(1), 57.
Wallach, E. J. (1983). Individuals and organizations: The cultural match. Training & Development Journal.
Warr, P., Cook, J., & Wall, T. (1979). Scales for the measurement of some work attitudes and aspects of psychological well‐being. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 52(2), 129-148.
Waterman, A. S. (1993). Two conceptions of happiness: Contrasts of personal expressiveness (eudaimonia) and hedonic enjoyment. Journal of personality and social psychology, 64(4), 678.
Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology (Vol. 1): Univ of California Press.
Wright, T. A., & Cropanzano, R. (2000). Psychological well-being and job satisfaction as predictors of job performance. Journal of occupational health psychology, 5(1), 84.
Yuan, F., & Woodman, R. W. (2010). Innovative behavior in the workplace: The role of performance and image outcome expectations. Academy of management journal, 53(2), 323-342.
Zahra, S. A., Hayton, J. C., & Salvato, C. (2004). Entrepreneurship in family vs. Non‐Family firms: A Resource‐Based analysis of the effect of organizational culture. Entrepreneurship theory and Practice, 28(4), 363-381.
Zang, X., & Bartol, K. (2010). The influence of creative process engagement on employee creative performance and overall job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 826-873.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code