Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0015119-141853 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0015119-141853
論文名稱
Title
高階經營團隊性別多樣性對廠商之競爭與合作行為的影響:環境動態性之干擾效果
The Effects of TMT Gender Diversity on Firm Competitive and Cooperative Behaviors: Moderating Role of Environmental Dynamism
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
59
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
李慶芳
Ching-Fang, Lee
口試委員
Advisory Committee
施智婷
Chih-Ting, Shih
口試日期
Date of Exam
2018-06-08
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2019-01-15
關鍵字
Keywords
高層理論、高階經營團隊性別多樣性、動態競爭理論、競爭積極性、對手合作性
Competitive aggressiveness, TMT gender diversity, Competitive dynamics, Upper-echelons theory, Rival cooperation
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5753 次,被下載 0
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5753 times, has been downloaded 0 times.
中文摘要
性別平權意識抬頭,社會上開始關注不同性別的特質和優點,因此與女性相關的研究漸漸出現。本研究以高層理論與動態競爭理論為基礎,探討高階經營團隊(top management team)的性別多樣性對「競爭積極性」與「對手合作性(rival cooperation)」的影響,同時也檢視「環境動態性」的干擾效果。
研究採問卷方式蒐集上市櫃企業之高階團隊成員資料,有效樣本包含172家公司的474位高階主管資料,統計方法包含評分者間信度、驗證性因素分析與層級迴歸等。分析結果顯示:(1)高階經營團隊性別多樣性與競爭積極性有負向關係,與對手合作性則有正向關係;(2)環境動態性在高階經營團隊性別多樣性與競爭積極性或對手合作性的關係上,均有正向調節效果。
本研究首次將性別議題導入高階經營團隊與動態競爭的研究中,藉此強化了兩個策略管理理論的連結。檢視競爭對手合作性也實證回應了動態競爭理論近期強調之關係基礎(relation-based)的競爭。本研究最後也討論了實務意涵與未來研究方向。
Abstract
People have begun to pay attention to the characteristics and advantages of different genders due to the rising awareness of gender equality. Studies related to gender/female issues thus have been bourgeoning. This article employ the upper echelons and competitive dynamics theories to explore effects of the gender diversity in top management teams (TMTs) on competitive aggressiveness and rival cooperation. The moderating roles of environmental dynamism are also examined.
Survey method was applied to collect TMT information from 474 executives in 172 IPO firms in Taiwan. The statistics of inter-rater reliability, confirmatory factor analysis, and regression analysis were applied to analyze the data. Research results show that: (1) TMT gender diversity is negatively related to competition aggressiveness while positively related to rival cooperation; (2) environmental dynamism positively moderates the relationship between TMT gender diversity and competitive aggressiveness, as well as that between TMT gender diversity and rival cooperation.
The study represents a first effort to connect the upper-echelons research with competitive dynamics perspective from the lens of gender, which is conducive for the integration of the two promising theories. An exploring of rival cooperation also responds to recent developments in the field of competitive dynamics, which underlines more exploration of relation-based competition. Implications for business practices and directions for future studies are discussed as well.
目次 Table of Contents
論文審定書 i
誌謝 ii
中文摘要 iii
Abstract iv
目錄 v
圖次 vii
表次 viii
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機 1
第二節 研究目的 3
第二章 文獻探討 4
第一節 理論背景 4
第二節 變數介紹 7
第三節 假說推導 11
第三章 研究方法 15
第一節 研究架構 15
第二節 研究樣本 16
第三節 研究假說彙整 20
第四節 研究變數之操作性定義與衡量工具 21
第五節 統計分析方法 25
第四章 實證結果分析 27
第一節 原始資料整合正當性檢驗 27
第二節 模型檢測 28
第三節 相關分析 29
第四節 層級迴歸分析 31
第五章 結論與建議 39
第一節 研究分析結果 39
第二節 研究意涵 41
第三節 研究限制 43
第四節 未來研究建議 44
參考文獻 45
參考文獻 References
Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1996). Co-opetition: Crown Business.
Carpenter, M. A., Geletkanycz, M. A., & Sanders, W. G. (2004). Upper echelons research revisited: Antecedents, elements, and consequences of top management team composition. Journal of Management, 30(6), 749-778. doi:10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.001
Chen, M. J. (2002). Transcending Paradox: The Chinese “Middle Way” Perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19, 179–199. doi:1016235517735
Chen, M. J., Lin, H.-C., & Michel, J. G. (2010). Navigating in a hypercompetitive environment: the roles of action aggressiveness and TMT integration. Strategic Management Journal, 31(13), 1410-1430. doi:10.1002/smj.891
Chen, M. J., & MacMillan, I. C. (1992). Nonresponse and Delayed Response to Competitive Moves: The Roles of Competitor Dependence and Action Irreversibility. The Academy of MAnagement Journal, 35(3), 539-570. doi:10.2307/256486
Chen, M. J., & Miller, D. (1994). Competitive Attack, Retaliation and Performance: An Expectancy-Valence Framework. Strategic Management Journal, 15(2), 85-102.
Chen, M. J. (1996). Competitor analysis and interfirm rivalry: Toward a theoretical integration. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 100-134.
Chen, M. J., & Hambrick, D. C. (1995). SPEED, STEALTH, AND SELECTIVE ATTACK - HOW SMALL FIRMS DIFFER FROM LARGE FIRMS IN COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 453-482. doi:10.2307/256688
Chen, M. J., & Miller, D. (1994). COMPETITIVE ATTACK, RETALIATION AND PERFORMANCE - AN EXPECTANCY-VALENCE FRAMEWORK. Strategic Management Journal, 15(2), 85-102. doi:10.1002/smj.4250150202
Chen, M. J., & Miller, D. (2015). RECONCEPTUALIZING COMPETITIVE DYNAMICS: A MULTIDIMENSIONAL FRAMEWORK. Strategic Management Journal, 36(5), 758-775. doi:10.1002/smj.2245
Colbert, A. E., Barrick, M. R., & Bradley, B. H. (2014). Personality And Leadership Composition in Top Management Teams: Implications For Organizational Effectiveness. Personnel Psychology, 67(2), 351-387. doi:10.1111/peps.12036
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. In (2 ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Eribaum.
Cox, T. (2001). Creating the Multicultural Organization: A Strategy for Capturing the Power of Diversity: Jossey Bass.
Croson, R., & Gneezy, U. (2009). Gender Differences in Preferences. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(2), 448-474. doi:10.1257/jel.47.2.448
CyerT, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A Behavioral Theory of the Firm: Prentice Hall.
D. Thompson, J., & J. McEwen, W. (1958). Organizational Goals and Environment: Goal-Setting as an Interaction Process (Vol. 23).
D’Aveni, R. (1994). Hypercompetition : Managing the Dynamics Of Strategic Maneuvering: The Free Press, NY.
Daft, R. L., Sormunen, J., & Parks, D. (1988). Chief Executive Scanning, Environmental Characteristics, and Company Performance: An Empirical Study. Strategic Management Journal, 9(2), 123-139.
Dagnino, G. B., & Padula, G. (2002). Coopetition Strategy: A New Kind of Interfirm Dynamics for Value Creation.
Daily, C. M., Certo, S. T., & Dalton, D. R. (1999). A Decade of Corporate Women: Some Progress in the Boardroom, None in the Executive Suite. Strategic Management Journal, 20(1), 93-99.
Dezso, C. L., & Ross, D. G. (2012). Does female representation in top management improve firm performance? A panel data investigation. Strategic Management Journal, 33(9), 1072-1089. doi:10.1002/smj.1955
Ferrier, W. J., Smith, K. G., & Grimm, C. M. (1999). The role of competitive action in market share erosion and industry dethronement: A study of industry leaders and challengers. Academy of Management Journal, 42(4), 372-388. doi:10.2307/257009
George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference, 11.0 Update Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Glick, W. H. (1985). Conceptualizing and Measuring Organizational and Psychological Climate: Pitfalls in Multilevel Research. The Academy of Management Review, 10(3), 601-616. doi:10.2307/258140
Gneezy, U., Niederle, M., & Rustichini, A. (2003). Performance in Competitive Environments: Gender Differences. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(3), 1049-1074.
Gupta, A. K., & Govindarajan, V. (2002). Cultivating a global mindset. Academy of Management Executive, 16(1), 116-126. doi:10.5465/ame.2002.6640211
Hambrick, D. C., Cho, T. S., & Chen, M.-J. (1996). <The Influence of Top Management Team Heterogeneity on Firms' Competitive Moves.pdf>. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 659-684.
Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). UPPER ECHELONS - THE ORGANIZATION AS A REFLECTION OF ITS TOP MANAGERS. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193-206. doi:10.2307/258434
Helfat, C. E., Harris, D., & Wolfson, P. J. (2006). The Pipeline to the Top: Women and Men in the Top Executive Ranks of U.S. Corporations. Academy of Management Perspectives(20), 42-64.
Helfat, C. E., & Martin, J. A. (2014). Dynamic Managerial Capabilities. Journal of Management, 41(5), 1281-1312. doi:10.1177/0149206314561301
Herring, C. (2009). Does Diversity Pay?: Race, Gender, and the Business Case for Diversity. American Sociological Review, 74(2), 208-224.
Hillman, A. J., Shropshire, C., & Cannella, A. A. (2007). Organizational Predictors of Women on Corporate Boards. The Academy of MAnagement Journal, 50(4), 941-952. doi:10.2307/20159898
Hughes-Morgan, M., Kolev, K., & McNamara, G. (2018). A meta-analytic review of competitive aggressiveness research. Journal of Business Research, 85, 73-82. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.10.053
Jacobson, R. (1992). The "Austrian" School of Strategy. The Academy of Management Review, 17(4), 782-807. doi:10.2307/258808
Kaleka, A., & Morgan, N. A. (2017). Which Competitive Advantage(s)? Competitive Advantage–Market Performance Relationships in International Markets. Journal of International Marketing, 25(4), 25-49. doi:10.1509/jim.16.0058
Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1966). The social psychology of organizations. New York: Wiley.
Katz, R. (1982). THE EFFECTS OF GROUP LONGEVITY ON PROJECT COMMUNICATION AND PERFORMANCE. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27(1), 81-104. doi:10.2307/2392547
Kirzner, I. M. (1973). COMPETITION AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP: University of Chicago Press.
Kohn, A. (1999). Punished by Rewards: Houghton Mifflin.
Kraus, S., Meier, F., Niemand, T., Bouncken, R. B., & Ritala, P. (2017). In search for the ideal coopetition partner: an experimental study. Review of Managerial Science. doi:10.1007/s11846-017-0237-0
Lawrence, P. R., & Lorsch, J. W. (1967). Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration: Harvard Business School Press.
Luo, Y. (2007). A coopetition perspective of global competition. Journal of World Business, 42(2), 129-144. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2006.08.007
McHugh, M. L. (2012). Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica, 22(3), 276-282.
Miller, D. (1990). The Icarus Paradox: How Exceptional Companies Bring About Their Own Downfall: HarperBusiness.
Miller, D., & Friesen, P. H. (1983). <Strategy Making and Environment The Third Link.pdf>. Strategic Management Journal, 4, 221-235.
Miller, C., H. Glick, W., & Huber, G. (1993). The Impact of Upper-echelon Diversity on Organizational Performance.
Mollerstrom, J., & Wrohlich, K. (2017). women shy away from competing. DIW Economic Bulletin.
Morris, M. H., Kocak, A., & Ozer, A. (2007). Coopetition as a Small Business Strategy: Implications for Performance. Journal of Small Business Strategy, 18, 35-56.
Negandhi, A. R., & Reimann, B. C. (1972). A Contingency Theory of Organization Re-Examined in the Context of a Developing Country. The Academy of MAnagement Journal, 15(2), 137-146. doi:10.2307/254904
Niederle, M., & Vesterlund, L. (2007). Do Women Shy Away from Competition? Do Men Compete Too Much? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(3), 1067-1101.
Nielsen, B. B., & Nielsen, S. (2011). The role of top management team international orientation in international strategic decision-making: The choice of foreign entry mode. Journal of World Business, 46(2), 185-193. doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2010.05.003
Roig‐Tierno, N., Kraus, S., & Cruz, S. (2017). The relation between coopetition and innovation/entrepreneurship. Review of Managerial Science, 12(2), 379-383. doi:10.1007/s11846-017-0266-8
Tsui, A. S., Egan, T. D., & Oreilly, C. A. (1992). BEING DIFFERENT - RELATIONAL DEMOGRAPHY AND ORGANIZATIONAL ATTACHMENT. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(4), 549-579. doi:10.2307/2393472
Wagner, W. G., Pfeffer, J., & Oreilly, C. A. (1984). ORGANIZATIONAL DEMOGRAPHY AND TURNOVER IN TOP-MANAGEMENT GROUPS. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(1), 74-92. doi:10.2307/2393081
Weick, K. E. (1969). The social psychology of organizing: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.
Westphal, J. D., & Milton, L. P. (2000). How experience and network ties affect the influence of demographic minorities on corporate boards. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(2), 366-398. doi:10.2307/2667075
Wiersema, M. F., & Bantel, K. A. (1992). TOP MANAGEMENT TEAM DEMOGRAPHY AND CORPORATE STRATEGIC CHANGE. Academy of Management Journal, 35(1), 91-121. doi:10.2307/256474
Wright, P. M., & Boswell, W. R. (2002). Desegregating HRM: A review and synthesis of micro and macro human resource management research. Journal of Management, 28(3), 247-276. doi:10.1016/s0149-2063(02)00128-9
Young, G., Smith, K. G., & Grimm, C. M. (1996). 'Austrian' and industrial organization perspectives on firm-level competitive activity and performance. Organization Science, 7(3), 243-254. doi:10.1287/orsc.7.3.243
吳文郡. (2016). 高階經營團隊風險傾向與組織績效的關係:檢視競爭互動的角色. (碩士), 國立中山大學, 高雄市.
吳明隆. (2009). 結構方程模式 AMOS的操作與應用: 五南圖書出版股份有限公司.
陳明哲. (2012). 行動與回應:競爭優勢的基礎. 哈佛商業評論.
陳明哲. (2013). 動態競爭觀點下的合作分析. 哈佛商業評論.
陳品豪. (2016). 高階經營團隊自我效能與競爭積極性對組織績效之影響:以信任為干擾因素. (碩士), 國立成功大學, 台南市.
Porter, M. E. (1999). 競爭優勢(上) (李明軒、邱如美, Trans.): 遠見天下文化出版股份有限公司.
Robbins, S. P., & Coulter, M. (2009). 管理學 (羅雅萱, 吳美惠, & 李祺菁, Trans.): Pearson Education.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus:開放下載的時間 available 2024-01-15
校外 Off-campus:開放下載的時間 available 2024-01-15

您的 IP(校外) 位址是 18.206.12.157
現在時間是 2023-12-08
論文校外開放下載的時間是 2024-01-15

Your IP address is 18.206.12.157
The current date is 2023-12-08
This thesis will be available to you on 2024-01-15.

紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 2024-01-15

QR Code