隨著亞洲及中國市場的興起，對於華人組織情境下的領導研究日益獲得關注。
家長式領導是華人組織中最主要的領導風格，這是一種在關係主義氛圍下表現出
嚴明紀律的威權與長輩般提攜照顧關懷的領導方式。
過往許多實證研究都發現家長式領導中的仁慈領導能對部屬有正向效果，這
與西方相關領導理論有相似的結果。然而隨著時間與研究的推進，仁慈領導已不
被再視為一個單一構面，深受儒家思想薰陶與華人文化中關係與人情等規範，仁
慈領導逐漸發展成為雙元構面，也就是領導者對部屬的照顧已不單單是工作內的
關照，而是拓展到個人生活的照顧。雖然這樣的方向已被確立，但針對生活照顧
如何展現、且如何影響部屬的邏輯卻尚未有相關研究解釋，仁慈領導中的生活照
顧被視為與西方相關理論最具差異性的地方，生活照顧行為也存在於華人文化的
各種情境中，對此構面值得多加深入探討。
以此為由，本研究基於先前學者建立之領導者生活照顧的理論模式發展出領
導者生活照顧量表，將生活照顧再區分為主動關懷與主動援助之兩行為面向進行
施測，檢驗因素結構之間的相關概念。

In the light of the booming market in Asia and China, much attention had been drawn
to the unique leader’s style in the Chinese organization context. Paternalistic leadership
(PL) is the dominant leading style practiced in Chinese-culture organizations. Under
relationalism, PL leaders demonstrate both highly-disciplined authority and parentallike
consideration and help to subordinates.
Past empirical studies have investigated the Benevolent Leadership (BL) and found that
BL has positive effect on followers. These findings are analogical to similar Western
leadership researches. However, through the furthering of time and research, BL now
is seen as dual dimensions, instead of single. Due to Confucianism and the norms of
Quanxi(relation) and Renquing(Favor) in Chinese culture, the consideration and help
demonstrated from BL have gone beyond work domain to subordinates’ life domain.
Although a new direction has shed light on BL, nevertheless, an in-depth investigation
on how life domain consideration is demonstrated is still waiting to be conducted.
Previous researches have shown the life domain consideration is the most
distinguishing factor from Western leadership theories. The generalization of life
domain consideration in Chinese culture also made the construct itself worthy of a
further study.
In the view of above reasons, this research aims to develop a new life domain
consideration scale based on the leader life domain consideration theoretical model.
The present study again divided life domain consideration into two constructs, initiative
consideration and initiative help, to test the validation of the scale and determine the
similarity between different factors.

論文審定書 i
致謝 ii
摘要 iii
英文摘要 iv
目錄 v
第一章 緒論 1
第二章 文獻回顧
第一節 領導者生活照顧的研究脈絡 3
第二節 仁慈領導 5
第三節 個別體恤 6
第四節 不當督導 8
第五節 部屬任務績效 8
第六節 部屬組織公民行為 9
第三章 研究方法
第一節 研究樣本與受試對象 11
第二節 研究程序 16
第三節 研究工具 17
第四章 研究結果
第一節 探索性因素分析 22
第二節 驗證性因素分析 24
第三節 相關構面驗證 25
第四節 效標關聯驗證 26
第五章 結論與建議
第一節 研究結論與管理意涵 28
第二節 研究限制與未來研究建議 30
參考文獻
一. 中文文獻 32
二. 英文文獻 33
附錄一. 樣本一問卷 36
附錄二. 樣本二問卷 39

鄭伯壎 (1995a)。〈家長權威與領導行為之關係：一個台灣民營企業主持人的
個案研究〉。《中央研究院民族學研究所集刊》（台北），79，119-173。
鄭伯壎、林姿葶、周麗芳 (2014)。家長式領導：問題與解答。本土心理學研
究，P147 – 177。
樊景立 & 鄭伯壎 (2000)。家長式領導: 再一次思考. 本土心理學研究, (13),
219-226。
黃光國 (1988)。《中國人的權力遊戲》。台北：巨流。
徐茂洲 (2015)。共同方法變異之統計應用分析. 運動管理, (27), 48-67。
鄭美琪 (2017)。發展式領導:量表編制與效度驗證。
陳虹諭 (2018)。教練對運動員的生活照顧行為展現與其效應:理論模式的建
構。
Avolio, B. J., & Bass, B. M. (1995). Individual consideration viewed at multiple levels
of analysis: A multi-level framework for examining the diffusion of transformational
leadership. The leadership quarterly, 6(2), 199-218.
Blau, P. (1964a). Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: Wiley
Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include
elements of contextual performance. In N. Schmitt & W. C. Borman (Eds.), Personnel
selection in organizations (pp. 71-98). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Cheng, B. S., Chou, L. F., & Wu, T. Y., Huang, M. P., & Farh, J. L. (2004). Paternalistic
leadership and subordinate responses: Establishing a leadership model in Chinese
organizations. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 7, 90.
Chen, X. P., Eberly, M. B., Chiang, T. J., Farh, J. L., & Cheng, B. S. (2014). Affective
trust in Chinese leaders: Linking paternalistic leadership to employee
performance. Journal of management, 40(3), 796-819.
Farh, J. L., & Cheng, B. S. (2000). A cultural analysis of paternalistic leadership in
Chinese organizations. In J. T. Li, A. S. Tsui, & E. Weldon (Eds.), Management and
organizations in the Chinese context (pp. 84–127). London: Macmillan.
Farh, J. L., Cheng, B. S., Chou, L. F., & Chu, X. R (2006). Authority and benevolence:
Employées' responses to paternalistic leadership in China. In A. S. Tsui, Y. Bian, & L.
Cheng (Eds.), China's domestic private firms: Multidisciplinary perspectives on
management and performance (pp. 230-260). Ne
Hammond, M., Clapp-Smith, R., & Palanski, M. (2017). Beyond (just) the workplace:
A theory of leader development across multiple domains. Academy of Management
Review, 42(3), 481-498.
Hosseini, A., Vakshavarz, A., Faraz, F., and Arabi, A. , (2012) Investigating the
relationship between the quality of work life and the behavior of the city and its effects
on the quality of gas in Fars province, two-monthly research journal of Daneshvar,
behavior and progress, 18, 50, 345 -358.
Hwang, K. K. (1987). Face and favor: The Chinese power game. American journal of
Sociology, 92(4), 944-974.
Jackman, M. R. 1994. The velvet glove: Paternalism and conflict in gender, class, and
race relations. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Keashly, L. (1998). Emotional abuse in the workplace: Conceptual and empirical issues.
Journal of Emotional Abuse, 1, 85–117.
Lin, T. T., Cheng, B. S., Wang, A. C., Chou, L. F., & Huang, M. P. (2010). Trust in
leader and perceived organizational support as the mediators of the relationship
between benevolent leadership and subordinate outcomes. Paper presented at the
International Association for Chinese Management Research (IACMR) Annual
Conference, Shanghai, China.
Pellegrini, E. K., & Scandura, T. A. (2008). Paternalistic leadership: A review and
agenda for future research. Journal of Management, 34(3), 566–593.
Shamsuddin, E., Alamdari, A., Porhemmat, M., & Nejati, M. (2018).
INVESTIGATING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ORGANIZATIONAL
CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR AND ORGANIZATIONAL HEALTH OF THE STAFF
OF YASUJ UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES. Journal of Fundamental and
Applied Sciences, 10(1), 495-503.
Smith, C.A., Organ, D.W., & Near, J.P. (1983). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its
nature and antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 655-663.
Tepper, B. J. (2000). Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of management
journal, 43(2), 178-190.
Wang, A. C., Chiang, J. T. J., Chou, W. J., & Cheng, B. S. (2017). One definition,
different manifestations: Investigating ethical leadership in the Chinese context. Asia
Pacific Journal of Management, 34(3), 505-535.
Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational
commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal
of management, 17(3), 601-617.
Yang, L. S. (1957). The concept of pao as a basis for social relations in China.
In J. K. Fairbank (Ed), Chinese thought and institutions. Chicago, IL:
University of Chicago Press.