生活照顧是華人領導者獨特且有效的領導作風，在華人管理領域也是常見的領導行為，然目前相關的研究數量寥若晨星，更遑論西方管理領域通常迴避對私人生活的探究。本研究認為生活照顧不但反應華人傳統文化下濃厚的家庭色彩且能夠表示領導者與部屬間關係的深化，發展取向等同主管對部屬的栽培意願，說明生活照顧之所以產生作用的道理，當部屬被主管當作自己人時，也會因為獲得較多支持、照顧及對環境的安全感，而依循需求法則來與主管互動，更加鮮明地描繪本土的華人領導現象。
　　為深入討論，本研究取得共147對的部屬與主管對偶問卷樣本，試圖了解部屬對主管生活照顧、發展取向的知覺，與主管對部屬績效表現看法之間有什麼樣的關聯，利用結構方程模型分析方法，從整體模式的結果證實下列幾點：（1）生活照顧是部屬界定雙方關係的重要來源、（2）發展取向決定雙方關係情感性成分的高低，以及（3）生活照顧、發展取向影響部屬的角色內與角色外行為。

Life consideration is a leadership that is unique and effective in Chinese leaders. It is a prevalent leadership behavior in Chinese context, though quantity of the research is limited and further discussion from the west perspective is difficult as they preserve the privacy of individual’s life. I suppose that life consideration is capable of symbolizing Chinese familism and representing relationship between leaders and subordinates has being deeper. The effect of life consideration is derived from leaders’ willingness to cultivate their subordinates. When subordinates notice that they are seen as insiders (zijiren) by the leaders, they gain support from the leaders and respond with hard work and make an effort beyond duty.
For more information, this research collected a sampling of 147 employees and their supervisors. Intending to realize relevance among subordinates’ perception of supervisors’ life consideration and development orientation, and performance review by supervisors, so the research conducted structural equation modeling (SEM) to tested: (1) for subordinates, life consideration is a significant variable to define relations with leaders. (2) development orientation affects the level of affection in relations between leaders and subordinates. (3) leaders’ life consideration and development orientation affect subordinates’ in-role behaviors and extra-role behaviors.

論文審定書+i
致謝+ii
摘要+iii
Abstract+iv
圖次與表次+vi
第一章 緒論+1
第二章 文獻探討+2
第一節 領導者生活照顧+2
第二節 領導者發展取向+3
第三節 研究假設發展+4
第三章 研究方法+7
第一節 研究樣本+7
第二節 研究工具+8
第三節 研究程序+12
第四節 資料分析+13
第四章 研究結果+15
第一節 描述性統計與各變項之相關分析+15
第二節 從生活照顧到部屬績效的結構方程模型分析+16
第三節 驗證性因素分析+17
第五章 討論與建議+19
第一節 結果討論+19
第二節 管理實務意涵+21
第三節 研究限制與未來研究建議+22
參考文獻+23
附錄一 部屬問卷（第一次施測）+28
附錄二 主管問卷（第二次施測）+31
附錄三 部屬問卷（第二次施測）+34

林姿葶, & 鄭伯壎. (2012). 華人領導者的噓寒問暖與提攜教育: 仁慈領導之雙構
面模式. 本土心理學研究, (37), 253-302.

周麗芳, 鄭伯壎, 陳靜慧, 任金剛, & 許金田. (2005). 華人高階管理者網絡中的
特殊連帶與人際情感: 深層心理契合與正式工作關係的效果. 本土心理學研究, (23), 201-257.

徐瑋伶, 鄭伯壎, & 黃敏萍. (2002). 華人企業領導人的員工歸類與管理行為. 本
土心理學研究, (18), 51-94.

陳虹諭. (2018). 教練對運動員的生活照顧行為展現與其效應：理論模式的建構.

黃光國. (1988). 人情與面子: 中國人的權力遊戲, 台北: 巨流圖書公司.

黃光國. (1995). 儒家價值觀的現代轉化: 理論分析與實徵研究. 本土心理學研究,
(3), 276-338.

黃韋綱. (2018). 領導者生活照顧：量表編製與效度驗證.

鄭伯壎. (1995). 家長權威與領導行為之關係：一個台灣民營企業主持人的個
案研究. 中央研究院民族學研究所集刊, 台北, (79), 119-173.

蔡松純, 鄭伯壎, 周麗芳, 姜定宇, & 鄭弘岳. (2009). 領導者上下關係認定與部
屬利社會行爲: 權力距離之調節效果. 中華心理學刊, 51(1), 121-138.

Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.

Brewer, M. B., & Gardner, W. (1996). Who is this“we”?: Levels of collective
identity and selfrepresentations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 83-93.

Chen, X. P., & Chen, C. C. (2004). On the intricacies of the Chinese guanxi: A
process model of guanxi development. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 21(3), 305-324.

Cheng, B. S., Chou, L. F., Huang, M. P., & Wu, T. Y., Farh, J. L. (2004). Paternalistic
leadership and subordinate reverence: Establishing a leadership model in Chinese organizations. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 7, 89-117.

Cheng, B. S., Huang, M. P., & Chou, L. F. (2002). Paternalistic leadership and its
effectiveness: Evidence from Chinese organizational teams. Journal of Psychology in Chinese Societies, 3, 85-112.

Cheung, F. Y., Wu, W. P., Chan, K. K., & Wong, M. L. (2009). Supervisor–
subordinate guanxi and employee work outcomes: The mediating role of job satisfaction. Journal of Business Ethics, 88, 77-89.

Child, J. (2009). Context, comparison, and methodology in Chinese management
research. Management and Organization Review, 5, 57-73.

Chuang, A., Hsu, R. S., Wang, A. C., & Judge, T. A. (2015). Does West “fit” with
East? In search of a Chinese model of person–environment fit. Academy of Management Journal, 58(2), 480-510.

Farh, J. L. (樊景立), & Cheng, B. S. (鄭伯壎) (2000). A cultural analysis of
paternalistic leadership in Chinese organizations. In J. T. Li, A. S. Tsui, & E. Weldon (Eds.), Management and organizations in the Chinese context. London: Macmillan.

Farh, J. L. (樊景立), Tsui, A. S. (徐淑英), Xin, K., & Cheng, B. S. (鄭伯壎) (1998).
The influence of relational demography and guanxi, The Chinese case. Organization Science, 9(4), 471-487.

Farh, J. L. (樊景立), Zhong, C. B., & Organ, D. W. (2004). Organizational citizenship
behavior in the People’s Republic of China. Organization Science, 15(2), 241-253.

Farh, J. L., Dobbins, G. H., & Cheng, B. S. (1991). Culture relativity in action: A
comparison of self-ratings made by Chinese and U.S. worker. Personnel Psychology, 44, 129-147.

Flynn, F. J. (2005). Identity orientations and forms of social exchange in
organizations. Academy of Management Review, 30, 737-750.
Ho, D. Y. (1995). Selfhood and identity in Confucianism, Taoism, Buddhism, and
Hinduism: contrasts with the West. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 25(2), 115-139.

Huntington, S. P. (1997). The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order.
New York: Simon & Schuster.

Hwang, K. K., & Chang, J. (2009). Self-cultivation: Culturally sensitive
psychotherapies in Confucian societies. The Counseling Psychologist, 37(7), 1010-1032.

Janssen, O., & Van Yperen, N. W. (2004). Employees’ goal orientations, the quality
of leader-member exchange, and the outcomes of job performance and job satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 368-384.

Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L., (1978). The social psychology of organizations (2nd ed.).
New York: Wiley.

Konovsky, M. A., & Pugh, S. D. (1994). Citizenship behavior and social exchange.
Academy of management journal, 37(3), 656-669.

Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., & Stilwell, D. (1993). A longitudinal study on the early
development of leader-member exchanges, Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 662-674.

Lin, T. T., Cheng, B. S. (鄭伯壎), Wang, A. C., Chou, L. F. (周麗芳), & Huang, M.
P. (黃敏萍) (2010). Trust in leader and perceived organizational support as the mediators of the relationship between benevolent leadership and subordinate outcomes. Paper presented at the International Association for Chinese Management Research (IACMR) Annual Conference, Shanghai, China.

Park, S. H., & Luo, Y. (2001). Guanxi and Organizational Dynamics: Organizational
Networking in Chinese Firms. Strategic Management Journal, 22(5), 455-477.

Podsakoff, E M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H., & Fetter, R. (1990).
Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers' trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behavior. Leadership Quarterly, 1, 107- 142.
Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2007). Organizational behavior (12th ed.).
Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Tsui, A. S. (徐淑英), Farh, J. L. (樊景立), & Xin, K. R. (2000). Guanxi in the
Chinese Context. In J. T. Li, A. S. Tsui, & E. Weldon (Eds.), Management and organizations in the Chinese context. London: Macmillan.

Tsui, A. S., & O’Reilly, C. A., III (1989). Beyond simple demographic effects: The
importance of relational demography in superior-subordinate dyads. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 402-423.

Wallis, N. C., Yammarino, F. J., & Feyerherm, A. (2011). Individualized leadership:
A qualitative study of senior executive leaders. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(1), 182-206.

Wang, A. C. (2017). Developmental leadership: How Chinese leaders integrate
control and care to cultivate subordinates. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 2017, No. 1, p. 11731). Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management.

Wang, A. C., & Cheng, B. S. (鄭伯壎) (2010). When does benevolent leadership lead
to creativity? The moderating role of creative role identity and job autonomy. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(1), 106-121.

Wat, D., & Shaffer, M. A. (2005). Equity and relationship quality influences on
organizational citizenship behaviors: The mediating role of trust in the supervisor and empowerment. Personnel review, 34(4), 406-422.

Wei, S. Y. (2018). Leaders’ development orientation: Scale development and
validation.

Wei-ming, T. (2012). A Confucian Perspective on Human Rights. In Confucianism,
Chinese History And Society (pp. 1-22).

Williams, S., Pitre, R., & Zainuba, M. (2002). Justice and organizational citizenship
behavior intentions: Fair rewards versus fair treatment. The journal of social psychology, 142(1), 33-44.

Yang, C. F., & Chiu, S. Y. 1987. The dilemma facing Chinese subjects in answering
questionnaires: Reflecting on the over-reliance on Western rating scales in research. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 29: 59-78.

Yang, L. S. (1957). The concept of pao as a basis for social relations in China. In J. K.
Fairbank (Ed), Chinese thought and institutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.