論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available
論文名稱 Title |
企業文化與實踐之研究 Research on Corporate Culture Penetration and Practice |
||
系所名稱 Department |
|||
畢業學年期 Year, semester |
語文別 Language |
||
學位類別 Degree |
頁數 Number of pages |
82 |
|
研究生 Author |
|||
指導教授 Advisor |
|||
召集委員 Convenor |
|||
口試委員 Advisory Committee |
|||
口試日期 Date of Exam |
2018-06-20 |
繳交日期 Date of Submission |
2018-06-26 |
關鍵字 Keywords |
自有品牌、個案研究、企業的文化建設、企業願景、磨床機械業 Corporate culture construction, Vision, Grinding machine industry, Own brand, Case study |
||
統計 Statistics |
本論文已被瀏覽 5869 次,被下載 228 次 The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5869 times, has been downloaded 228 times. |
中文摘要 |
KENT創立於1966年,成立至今已滿52年,為磨床機械業的龍頭,自有品牌KENT精密磨床位居全球銷量第一。總公司位於新北市三重區、工廠位於雲林縣鬥六市,大陸工廠設於浙江省杭州市,於中國大陸主要城市設有營銷服務中心,亦於日本、美國、越南設立分公司負責當地營銷。並於歐洲、美洲、東北亞及東南亞等地區之主要國家,皆有合作多年之經銷商及代理商負責當地之銷售與市場開發。 本研究採取個案研究方式,闡述個案公司如何經由企業的文化建設來提升市場競爭力、產品獲利、經營效率和效能;取得持續生存的核心競爭力,並且與內外在經營環境協調共生。於此同時,持續保有企業創設的初衷(核心價值)-「技術、創新、可靠」,全員朝共同的企業願景「讓KENT成為精密工具機械的代名詞」邁進。 |
Abstract |
KENT Group (hereinafter referred to as "KENT") established in 1966 in Taiwan. It has been engaged in Machinery business for 52 years and has been the leader in the grinding machinery industry. Its own brand KENT precision grinding machines ranks at the top in global sales. The head office is located in Sanchong District, New Taipei City, and its factory is located in Douliu City, Yunlin County. Kent China main manufacturing plant is located in Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, and has set their marketing service centers in several big cities in Mainland China. It also establishes branch companies in Japan, USA, and Vietnam for maintaining their overseas sales and marketing activities. Kent also long worked with some sales dealers and agents in major countries in Europe, USA, Northeast Asia and Southeast Asia for many years to help explore local markets and responsible for local market campaigns. This study adopts the case study approach to illustrate how a company can enhance its competitiveness, product profitability, operating efficiency and effectiveness through the company's cultural construction. That is to say, to achieve its sustainable core competency, while co-exist with the internal and external operating environments robustly. People work in KENT always keep its core value - "Technology, Innovation, Reliability" in mind, and keep moving toward the company’s vision - "Make KENT the synonym of the best precise machinery." |
目次 Table of Contents |
VERIFICATION LLETTER i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ii CHINESE ABSTRACT iii ENGLISH ABSTRACT iv CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW AND RESEARCH BACKGROUND 8 2.1 LITERATURE REVIEW 8 2.2 RESEARCH BACKGROUND 15 2.2.1 Definition of Machinery Industry 15 2.2.2 Characteristics of Taiwan’s Machinery Industry 16 2.3 THE IMPORTANCE OF TAIWAN’S MACHINERY INDUSTRY 20 2.4 THE DEVELOPMENT STAGES OF THE MACHINERY INDUSTRY 20 2.5 THE DEVELOPMENT TREND OF THE MACHINERY INDUSTRY 28 2.5.1 The competitiveness of the machinery industry 29 2.5.2 The impact of the Internet 30 2.5.3 The influence of participation in regional economic integration 31 CHAPTER 3 RESEARCH METHOD 32 3.1 EMPLOYEE QUESTIONNAIRE 32 3.1.1 Department function / job description review and rotation willingness questionnaire 32 3.1.2 Denison Organizational Culture Model Internal Questionnaire 32 3.2 QUESTIONNAIRE SAMPLES COLLECTION 37 3.2.1 Results 38 CHAPTER 4 CASE STUDY 42 4.1 ESTABLISHMEENT – OEM MOLD MANUFACTURER 45 4.2 GROWTH AND INTERNATIONALIZATION – OWN BRAND AND FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT 47 4.3 EXPANSION AND DIVERSIFICATION: FOREIGN EXPANSION, MERGER AND MULTICULTURAL INCLUSION AND INTEGRATION 50 4.4 CORPORATE CULTURE TRANSFORMATION PERIOD - "INTRODUCE NEW CULTURAL CONCEPTS IN OLD ENTERPRISE" 53 4.4.1 Implementation example – Based on the results derived from the survey results of the "Study on Corporate Culture Implementation in Management" questionnaire 55 4.4.2 Improve head office employees’ recognition of corporate culture concepts and management systems 56 4.4.3 The degree of recognition of non-management is lower than that of management, and it is generally believed that the company is not sensitive enough to the external market changes and react to the changes 58 4.4.4 the number of employees with 6-10 years tenure are much less, who also have the lowest identity to company’s cultural concepts. 60 4.5 CONCLUSION 61 4.6 RESEARCH LIMITATION 62 REFERENCE 62 APPENDIX 65 |
參考文獻 References |
Al Y S. Chen, Roby B. Sawyers, and Paul E Williams (1997), Reinforcing Ethical Decision Making Through Corporate Culture. Anne S. Tsui, Zhi-Xue Zhang, Hui Wang, Katherine R. Xin, and Joshua B. Wu (2006), Unpacking the relationship between CEO leadership behavior and organizational culture Carrie Dusterhoff , J. Barton Cunningham, and James N. MacGregor (2014), The Effects of Performance Rating, Leader–Member Exchange, Perceived Utility, and Organizational Justice on Performance Appraisal Satisfaction: Applying a Moral Judgment Perspective. Christopher Williams and Sander van Triest (2009), The impact of corporate and national cultures on decentralization in multinational corporations. Daniel Denison, Colleen Lief, and John L. Ward (2004), Culture in Family-Owned Enterprises: Recognizing and Leveraging Unique Strengths. David A. Ralston, David H. Holt, Robert H. Terpstra, and Yu Kai-Cheng (2008), The Impact of National Culture and Economic Ideology on Managerial Work Values: A Study of the United States, Russia, Japan, and China Edgar H. Schein (1990), Organizational Culture. Edgar H. Schein (1996), Culture: The Missing Concept in Organization Studies. Jay B. Barney (1996), Organizational Culture: Can It Be a Source of Sustained Competitive Advantage? Jenniier A. Howard-Grenviiie, and Andiew J. Hoffman (2003), The importance of cultural framing to the success of social initiatives in business. K Bijlsma-Frankema (2001), On managing cultural integration and cultural change processes in mergers and acquisitions. Laszlo Tihanyi, David A Griffith, and Craig J Russell (2005), The effect of cultural distance on entry mode choice, international diversification, and MNE performance: a meta-analysis. Michael Birshan, Marja Engel, and Olivier Sibony (2013), Avoiding the quicksand: Ten techniques for more agile corporate resource allocation. Mrs.E.Deepa, Dr.R.Palaniswamy, and Dr.S.Kuppusamy (2014), Effect of Performance Appraisal System in Organizational Commitment, Job Satisfaction and Productivity. Nai-Wen Chi, Chih-Yun Wu, and Carol Yeh-Yun Lin (2008), Does training facilitate SME’s performance? Richard L. Daft (2007), Organization Theory and Design, 9th edition, Thomson Learning, Inc. Stephen Hall and Conor Kehoe (2013), How quickly should a new CEO shift corporate resources?, McKinsey Qarterly. Yaotian Pan, Julie A. Rowney, and Mark F. Peterson (2011), The Structure of Chinese Cultural Traditions: An Empirical Study of Business Employees in China. Zhen Xiong Chen, Anne S. Tsui, and Jiing-Lih Farh (2002), Loyalty to supervisor vs. organizational commitment: Relationships to employee performance in China. 丁金輝 (2001),以公司重整再生機制重建企業價值之研究,國立交通大學高階主管管理學程碩士論文。 何志峰、楊慎淇 (2011),「國際企業 管理與策略」,新加坡商聖智學習亞洲私人有限公司台灣分公司。 李哲瑋 (2006),資源配置觀點之企業價值分析,輔仁大學金融研究所碩士論文。 邱健偉 (2006),以經濟附加價值及市場附加價值決定企業高階經理人薪酬和員工薪酬之實證研究,國立成功大學會計學碩士論文。 胡慈容 (1993),企業購併之長期績效評估,東海大學管理研究所碩士論文。 范生平 (2002),企業價值評估與創造策略之研究–以百略公司為例,國立政治大學經營管理研究所碩士論文。 徐伊嫻 (2009),從OEM/ODM到OBM的轉型之研究–動態能力的觀點,國立政治大學科技管理研究所碩士論文。 康淑君 (2006),產業品牌資產與企業價值績效指標之關聯性研究,國立臺北大學會計系碩士論文。 陳俊廷 (2007),台灣企業品牌價值與股價報酬關係之實證研究,國立交通大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。 陳振祥 (1997),ODM策略之理論架構與實證,國立台灣大學商學研究所博士論文。 黃柏儒 (2011),跨國購併績效實證研究:以台灣上市公司為例,國立臺灣大學管理學院國際企業學研究所碩士論文。 薛明玲、遊明德等資誠作者群 (2011),「企業購併策略與最佳實務」,資誠教育基金會。 |
電子全文 Fulltext |
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。 論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted 開放時間 Available: 校內 Campus: 已公開 available 校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available |
紙本論文 Printed copies |
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。 開放時間 available 已公開 available |
QR Code |