論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available
論文名稱 Title |
預先持股策略之個案研究 Do you really need a Toehold? A Case Study |
||
系所名稱 Department |
|||
畢業學年期 Year, semester |
語文別 Language |
||
學位類別 Degree |
頁數 Number of pages |
66 |
|
研究生 Author |
|||
指導教授 Advisor |
|||
召集委員 Convenor |
|||
口試委員 Advisory Committee |
|||
口試日期 Date of Exam |
2018-06-15 |
繳交日期 Date of Submission |
2018-06-22 |
關鍵字 Keywords |
建立溝通橋樑、個案研究、企業併購、收購、預先持股策略 Case Study, Mergers and Acquisitions, Building a communication bridge, Toehold Strategy, Takeover |
||
統計 Statistics |
本論文已被瀏覽 5768 次,被下載 64 次 The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5768 times, has been downloaded 64 times. |
中文摘要 |
由於預先持股策略( Toehold Strategy )有著財務與資訊上的優勢特性,可進而提升併購成功機率,故此策略常用於企業併購之中。惟近年此策略之使用率下降,故本研究以個案研究與半結構式訪談之方式,探討此策略於實務運用時,應給予之特別注意有何。有別於過往文獻,本研究發現「建立溝通橋樑」亦為企業採用預先持股策略的動機之一;此外,我們提出了在「取得優勢資訊」、「降低收購成本」及「建立溝通橋樑」三種不同策略使用動機之下,企業可參照之基本使用準則,協助其在收購過程中能對此策略有更為全面之掌握。 |
Abstract |
We use case study method with the semi-structure interview method to study Toehold, a strategy with numerous benefits and it can increase the probability of completing a successful M&A deal. Different from the literature, we found that “Building a communication bridge” could also be the reasons that acquirers conducting the Toehold strategy. We further propose three basic guidelines to the companies which are willing to adapt the Toehold strategy to help them better understand the comprehensive consideration while engaging in M&A deals. |
目次 Table of Contents |
Contents I. Introduction 1 1-1. Research background 1 1-2. Research motivation 3 1-3. Research purpose 5 II. Literature review 6 2-1. Benefits of using Toehold strategy 6 2-2. Concerns of using Toehold strategy 11 2-3. Others related field 12 2-4. A Completed Toehold Case 14 III. Research Design and Methodology 15 3-1. Case study method 15 3-2. Research design 16 3-3. Methodology 19 IV. Results 21 4-1. Research execution 21 4-2. Details of the deal 24 4-3. Questions replied and discussion 27 4-4. Basic guidelines for Toehold strategy 35 V. Conclusion 39 5-1. Conclusions 39 5-2. Suggestions 40 References 42 Appendices 44 Appendix A - Invitation letters and interview guides 44 Appendix B – Financial Statement 46 Appendix C - Transcript of the interview 48 Appendix C - Follow-up email 58 Figure Index Figure 1 10-year global deal volume & value trend 1 Figure 2 the using rate of Toehold strategy 4 Figure 3 case selection in sample period 22 Figure 4 the transaction structure of deal 25 Table Index Table 1 the details of interview 23 |
參考文獻 References |
Bates, T.W., Lemmon, M.L., 2003. Breaking up is hard to do? An analysis of termination fee provisions and merger outcomes. Journal of Financial Economics 69, 469-504 Bengtsson, L., Larsson, R., 2012. Researching Mergers & Acquisitions with the Case Study Method: Idiographic Understanding of Longitudinal Integration Processes. Bessler, W., Schneck, C., 2015. Excess premium offers and bidder success in European takeovers. Eurasian Economic Review 5, 23-62 Betton, S., Eckbo, B.E., 2000. Toeholds, bid jumps, and expected payoffs in takeovers. The Review of Financial Studies 13, 841-882 Betton, S., Eckbo, B.E., Thorburn, K.S., 2009. Merger negotiations and the toehold puzzle. Journal of Financial Economics 91, 158-178 Betton, S., Thorburn, K.S., Eckbo, B.E., 2005. The toehold puzzle. Bris, A., 1998. When do bidders purchase a toehold? Theory and tests. Bris, A., 2002. Toeholds, takeover premium, and the probability of being acquired. Journal of Corporate Finance 8, 227-253 Brooks, C., Chen, Z., Zeng, Y., 2018. Institutional cross-ownership and corporate strategy: The case of mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Corporate Finance 48, 187-216 Bulow, J., Huang, M., Klemperer, P., 1999. Toeholds and takeovers. Journal of Political Economy 107, 427-454 Cai, Y., Sevilir, M., 2012. Board connections and M&A transactions. Journal of Financial Economics 103, 327-349 Capen, E.C., Clapp, R.V., Campbell, W.M., 1971. Competitive bidding in high-risk situations. Journal of petroleum technology 23, 641-653 Chowdhry, B., Jegadeesh, N., 1994. Pre-tender offer share acquisition strategy in takeovers. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 29, 117-129 Flanagan, D.J., D'Mello, J.P., O'Shaughnessy, K., 1998. Completing the deal: Determinants of successful tender offers. Journal of Applied Business Research 14, 21 Ghauri, P., 2004. Designing and conducting case studies in international business research. Handbook of qualitative research methods for international business, 109-124 Goldman, E., Qian, J., 2005. Optimal toeholds in takeover contests. Journal of Financial Economics 77, 321-346 Grossman, S.J., Hart, O.D., 1980. Takeover bids, the free-rider problem, and the theory of the corporation. The Bell Journal of Economics, 42-64 Higgins, M.J., Rodriguez, D., 2006. The outsourcing of R&D through acquisitions in the pharmaceutical industry. Journal of financial economics 80, 351-383 Hirshleifer, D., Titman, S., 1990. Share tendering strategies and the success of hostile takeover bids. Journal of Political Economy 98, 295-324 Jennings, R.H., Mazzeo, M.A., 1993. Competing bids, target management resistance, and the structure of takeover bids. The Review of Financial Studies 6, 883-909 Kyle, A.S., Vila, J.-L., 1991. Noise trading and takeovers. The RAND Journal of Economics, 54-71 Officer, M.S., 2003. Termination fees in mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Financial economics 69, 431-467 Porta, R.L., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., Vishny, R.W., 1998. Law and finance. Journal of political economy 106, 1113-1155 Povel, P., Sertsios, G., 2014. Getting to know each other: The role of toeholds in acquisitions. Journal of Corporate Finance 26, 201-224 Ravid, S.A., Spiegel, M., 1999. Toehold strategies, takeover laws and rival bidders. Journal of Banking & Finance 23, 1219-1242 Schneck, C., Bessler, W., Zimmermann, J., 2014. Bidder Contests in International Mergers and Acquisitions: The Impact of Toeholds, Preemptive Bidding, and Termination Fees. Schwert, G.W., 1996. Markup pricing in mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Financial economics 41, 153-192 Shleifer, A., Vishny, R.W., 1986. Large shareholders and corporate control. Journal of political economy 94, 461-488 Singh, R., 1998. Takeover bidding with toeholds: The case of the owner's curse. The Review of Financial Studies 11, 679-704 Strickland, D., Martin, D.R., Cotter, J.F., 2010. Toeholds as an M&A strategy? Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance 21, 57-61 Thaler, R.H., 1988. Anomalies: The winner's curse. Journal of Economic Perspectives 2, 191-202 Walkling, R.A., 1985. Predicting tender offer success: A logistic analysis. Journal of financial and Quantitative Analysis 20, 461-478 Yin, R.K., 1984. Case study research: design and methods. Sage Publications. KPMG Report(2018). M&A Predictor: 2018 Annual Report + 2018 Q1 Update. Retrieved May. 13, 2018, from https://home.kpmg.com/xx/en/home/insights/2018/04/m-and-a-predictor-2018-annual-report.html |
電子全文 Fulltext |
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。 論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define 開放時間 Available: 校內 Campus: 已公開 available 校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available |
紙本論文 Printed copies |
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。 開放時間 available 已公開 available |
QR Code |