領土主權長期以來被視為給定、不變的國際關係預設前提。本文採用歷史分析法，探究中世紀領地與主權間的關係，發現當時的權威空間不以線性國界劃分，而是以人際效忠關係和各種相異的統治功能，作為劃分標準。這也使得一個空間上得有相互重疊的權威共存著，和現代疆域領土上的主權絕對不可侵犯，是迥然相異的概念；同時，中世紀權威的展現是透過人際的維持，對於領地是抱著持有而非擁有的態度，與現代主權國家將領土作為權力附載體、權威具象化的工具，並不相同。隨著全球化發展，權威有了空間層域化的發展，包含向下的全球城市與向上的歐盟。權威空間再度有了拼貼、並存的可能，象徵著新中世紀主義的到來。儘管歷史是不可能回頭的線性發展，中世紀曾有的以人際定義土地的社會關係，恐怕難以再現，但不同功能的權威空間確實是可預見的。本文最終目的在於跳脫長期以來領土圈套的制約，提供一個權威與空間重組的思辨可能。

Territorial Sovereignty has been treated as a presupposition without the perspective of history in the study of international relations. This paper aims at tracing back the relationship between authority and space in the Middle Ages, finding it was defined by feudatory’s fealty and alliance rather than by boundaries. Therefore, authority space in the Middle Ages could overlap and coexist above one land. On the contrary, modern national boundary excludes other authorities from its territory; territory serves as a container to reify power in the modern time. Besides, this paper shows that processes of re-scaling of authority space, which include sub-national spatial scales of global cities and supra-national spatial scales of the European Union, constitute the current round of globalization. This development of overlapping authority spaces could be conceived as a sign of arrival of Neo-Medievalism.

論文審定書
誌謝…………………………………………………………………………….… …i
中文摘要………………………………………………………….……. …….. ……iii
英文摘要………………………………………..……………………………………iv
目錄……………………………………………………………………. . …………..v
圖次……………………………………………………………………............ ……vii
第 一 章 緒論…………………………………………………1
第一節 研究動機……………………………………………………….……. 1
第二節 文獻回顧 ..……………………………………………………….. 2
第三節 研究目的…………………………………………………. ………..18
第四節 研究方法、限制與章節安排………………………………………19
第 二 章 領土主權的理論與特性…..……………………21
第一節 領土主權的定義與特性…………………………………………….21
第一項、 領土主權的定義……………………………………………21
第二項、 領土主權的特性……………………………………………22
第二節 領土主權衍生的矛盾……………………………………………….27
第一項、 產生的衝突最劇烈難解…………………………………….27
第二項、 民主根源於不民主………………………………………… 29
第三項、 領土圈套…………………………………………………… 31
第三節 不以疆界領土作為權力實踐的統治型態…………………….……34
第 三 章 中世紀以「人」為統治前提……………………………………….41
第一節 中世紀的政治社會-以「人」為權力空間劃分標準………………41
第一項、 領主與封臣的關係………………………………………….41
第二項、 領主與領地社群的關係…………………………………….50
第二節 軍事權威空間的轉變………………………………………………56
第三節 宗教面向-以節點統治全面地理空間……………………………...60
第 四 章 全球化下的領土主權……………………………………………….…65
第一節 層域化政治………………………………………………………...65
第二節 全球地方化與都市空間層域化…………………………………...71
第三節 歐盟的空間層域化-後西伐利亞時代……………………………..78
第 五 章 結論……………………………………………………………………..87

參考文獻………………………………………………………......95

中文文獻

李永展，2003，「全球化與時空重構」，《建築與規劃學報》，4(1):55-72。
李怡諄，2004，「傳統國家主權概念之批判-Zygmunt Bauman之自由及現代性觀
點」，國立中山大學政治學研究所碩士在職專班碩士論文。
沈正彥，2000，「兩岸主權問題研究」，國立中山大學大陸研究所碩士論文。
林岱瑋，2004，「主權重構-以北愛『星期五協議』為例」，國立台灣大學政治學
研究所碩士論文。
俞寬賜，2002，《國際法新論》，臺北縣 新店市:啟英文化。
陳秀鳳，2009，「卡佩王朝建立時期封建領主之形成」，《臺灣師大歷史學報》，
No.42:327-366
陳牧民，2008a，「當代國際安全理論中的主權意涵」，《全球政治評論》，
No.22:107-126。
-----，2008b，「美國為何承認柯索沃獨立」，《台灣國際研究季刊》，4(3):19-33。
張麟徵，2002，《近代國際關係史》，台北:揚智文化。
彭士晃譯，塩野七生原著，2001，《海都物語》，台北:三民書局。
黃旻華，2004，「主權國家的啟元、演變與未來發展:時空因素的重要性」，《政治
學報》，No.38:1-57
楊日青、李培元、林文彬、劉兆隆譯，Andrew Heywood原著，2002，《政治學
新論》，台北:韋伯文化。
蔡東杰，2003，「現實主義」，收錄於張亞中編，《國際關係總論》，62-77，台北:
揚智。
簡博秀、周志龍，2006，「空間再層域化和國家:改革開放後的中國空間發展略」，《人文及社會科學集刊》，18(1):77-118。
藍逸之、李建平，2007，「失能的空間治理及其時空再層級化障礙-評析亞太地緣
政經中的北臺都市區域與國家」，《中山人文及社會科學期刊》，15(1):71-119。





英文文獻
Agnew, John, 2005, “Sovereignty Regimes: Territoriality and State Authority in
Contemporary World Politics” Annals of the Association of American Geographers,
95(2):437-461
------2009. Globalization and Sovereignty. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield
Publisher.
Agnew, John and Stuart Corbridge. 1995. Mastering Space: Hegemony. Territory and
International political economy. New York: Routledge
Albert, Mathias. 2001. “Territoriality and Modernization.” Presented at the 2001
Workshop “The Cluster of Water, Energy and the Human Environment: Towards
an Extra Territorial Concept for the Middle East”, organized by the Jordan Institute
of Diplomacy in cooperation with the Saskawa Peace Foundation, Jordan.
Anderson, James, 1996. “The Shifting Stage of Politics: New Medieval and
Postmodern Territorialities?” Environment and Planning D: Society and Spare 14:
133-153
Anderson, James and Liam O’Dowd. 1999. “Borders, Border Regions and
Territoriality: Contradictory Meanings, Changing Significance” Regional Studies,
33(7):593-604
Anderson, Perry, 1974, Passages From Antiquity to Feudalism. 中文譯名《從古代到
封建主義的過渡》，郭方，劉健譯，2001，上海:人民。
-------, 1996, Lineages of the Absolutist State. 中文譯名《絕對主義國家的系譜》，
劉北成，龔曉莊譯，2001，台北:桂冠。
Ansell, Christopher K. 2004. “Restructuring Authority and Territoriality” in Ansell
and Palma, eds. Restructuring Territoriality: Europe and the United States
Compared. New York: Cambridge University Press, 3-18
Antonsich, Marco. 2009. “On Territory, the Nation-State and the Crisis of the
Hyphen” Progress in Human Geography, 33(6):789-806
Appadurai, Arjun, 1996, “Sovereignty Without Territoriality: Notes for a
Postnational Geography” in The geography of Identity, ed. Patricia Yaeger. Ann
Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 40-57
Arnold, Benjamin, 2003, Princes and Territories in Medieval Germany, New York:
Cambridge University Press
Ashley, Richard, 1988, “The Powers of Anarchy: Theory, Sovereignty, and the
Domestication of Global Life” in International Theory: Critical Investigations,
Ed. James Der Derian, Washington Square: New York University Press, Part II,
94-128
Barkin, J. Samuel and Bruce Cronin, 1994, “The State and the Nation: Changing
Norms and the Rules of Sovereignty in International Relations” International
Organization, 48(1):107-130
Bartolini, Stefano. 2004. “Old and New Peripheries in the Process if European
Territorial Integration” In Restructuring Territoriality: Europe and United States
Compared, eds. Christopher K. Ansell and Giuseppe Di Palma. NY: Cambridge
University Press, 19-44
Berend, Nora. 1999. “Medievalists and the Notion of the Frontier” in The Medieval
History Journal 2(1):55-72
Bialasiewicz, Luiza, Stuart Elden and Joe Painter. 2005. “The Constitution of EU
Territory” Comparative European Politics, 3:333-363
Biersteker, Thomas J. and Cynthia Weber, 1996, “The Social Construction of State
Sovereignty” in Biersteker and Weber (eds.), State Sovereignty as Social Construct,
(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 1-21
Bisson, Thomas N., 1995, “Medieval Lordship” Speculum 70(4):743-759
Bloch, Marc, 1989, Feudal Society. 中文譯名《封建社會》，談谷錚譯，1995，台
北:桂冠
Brenner, Neil, 1999a. “Beyond State-Centrism? Space, Territoriality, and
Geographical Scale in Globalization Studies” Theory and Society, 28(1): 39-78
-----1999b. “Globalization as Reterritorialisation : The Re-scaling of Urban
Governance in the European Union” in Urban Studies, 36(3):431-451
-----2004, “Urban Governance and the Production of New State Spaces in
Western Europe, 1960-2000” in Review of International Political Economy, 11(3):
447-488. 中文譯名「都市管治和西歐新國家空間的生產，1960-2000」，收錄於《地理學報》，No.60:153-185。
Brunner, Otto. 1992.Land and Lordship: Structures of Governance in
Medieval Austria. Howard Kaminsky and James Van Horn Melton, Trans.
Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Bull, Hedley, 2003, The Anarchy Society: A study of Order In World Politics. 張小明
譯，《無政府社會:世界政治秩序研究》，北京:世界知識
Buzan, Barry, 1993. “From International System to International Society: Structural
Realism and Regime Theory Meet the English School,” International Organization
47(3):327-352
Chittolini, Giorgio. 1991. “The Italian City-State and Its Territory” in City States in
Classical Antiquity and Medieval Italy, eds. Anthony Molho, Kurt Raaflaub and
Julia Emlen. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 589-602
Elden, Stuart. 2005. “Missing the Point: Globalization, Deterritorialization and the
Space of the World” in Transactions of the Institute of British Geography, New
Series, 30(1): 8-19
Eudaily, Sean Patrick and Smith Steve. 2008. ‘Seeing through States. Sovereign
Geopolitics?-Uncovering the “Sovereignty Paradox” Geopolitics, 13:309-334
Fisher, Markus. 1992. “Feudal Europe, 800-1300: Communal Discourse and
Conflictual Practices” International Organization. 46(2):427-466
Forsberg, Tuomas. 1996. “Beyond Sovereignty, Within Territoriality. Mapping the
Space of Late-Modern (Geo) Politics” Cooperation and Conflict, 31(4): 355-386
------ 2003. “The Ground Without Foundation? Territory as a Social Construct”
Geopolitics, 8(2):7-24
Friedrichs, Jorg. 2001. “The Meaning of New Medievalism” European Journal of
International Relations, 7(4):475-502
-----. 2006. “When Push Comes to Shove: the Territorial Monopoly of Force and the
Travail of Neomedieval Europe” in State territoriality and European
Integration. eds. Michael Burgess and Hans Vollaard. London: Routledge.
228-251
Gayton, Jeffrey T. 1996. “From Personalism to Territoriality: State Authority and
Foreign Policy in Medieval and Modern Europe.” Presented at the 1996
International Studies Association Conference, San Diego, CA.
-----.1997, “From Here to Extraterritoriality: The United States Within
and Beyond Borders” http://minds.wisconsin.edu/handle/1793/18289

Grubb, James S., 1991. “Diplomacy in the Italian City-State” in City States in
Classical Antiquity and Medieval Italy, eds. Anthony Molho, Kurt Raaflaub and
Julia Emlen. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press,
Ham, Peter van. 2006. “Europe, war and territory” in State territoriality and European
Integration. eds. Michael Burgess and Hans Vollaard. London: Routledge.
252-273
Harding, Alan, 1997, “Urban Regimes In A Europe Of The Cities?” European Urban
and Regional Studies 4(4):291-314
Hardt, Michael and Antonio Negri, 2000, Foreword to Empire. Harvard University
Press.
Harvey, David C. 2000. “Continuity, authority and the place of heritage in the
Medieval world” Journal of Historical Geography. 26 (1):47-59
Held, David, McGrew, Anthony, Goldblatt, David and Perraton, Jonathan. 2001.
Global Transformations: Politics, Economics and Culture. 中文譯名《全球化大轉
變》，沈宗瑞，高少凡，許湘濤，陳淑鈴譯，2001，台北:韋伯
Hintze, Otto. 1975. “The Nature of Feudalism.” in Lordship and Community in
Medieval Europe, ed. Fredric L. New York: Cheyette, Robert E.Krieger publishing
Company, 22-31
Hirst, Paul and Grahame Thompson, 1995, “Globalization and the Future of the
Nation State”, 中文譯名「民族國家的未來」，龍虎譯，收錄於余可平編，《國
將不國?》，江西人民，190-236
Jackson, Robert H., “Quasi-States, Dual Regime, and Neoclassical Theory:
International Jurisprudence and the Third World,” International
Organization,41(4):519-549
Jones, Rhys. 1998. “Mann and Men in a Medieval State: the Geographies of Power in
the Middle Ages” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers,
24(1):65-78
Jonsson, Christer, Sven Tagil and Gunnar Tornqvist. 2000. Organizing European
Space, London: Thousand Oaks.
Kotkin, Joel. 2010. “The City: A Global History”, 中文譯名「全球城市史」，王旭
譯，2010，北京:社會科學文獻出版社
Krasner, Stephen D., 1988, “Sovereignty: An Institutional Perspective” Comparative
Political Studies, 21(1):66-94
------,1993, “Westphalia and All That” in Keohane and Goldstein (eds.), Ideas and
Foreign Policy Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change,中文譯名「威斯特伐利
亞及諸如此類」，劉東國、于軍譯，收錄於《觀念與外交政策:信念、制度與政
治變遷》，北京:北京大學，224-253
-------, 2001, “Problematic Sovereignty” in Krasner (ed.), Problematic Sovereignty:
Contested Rules and Political Possibilities, 1-23,
Kratochwil, Friedrich. 1986. “Of Systems, Boundaries, and Territoriality: An Inquiry
into the Formation of the State System.” World Politics, 39(1):27-52
Lapple, Dieter, 2009, 「多中心城市體系與城市等級:德國大都市區域體系的經驗
教訓」，收錄於任遠、陳向明、Dieter Lapple主編，《全球城市-區域的時代》，
290-310，上海:復旦大學。
Lechner, Silviya. 2007. “Sovereignty and Territoriality: An Essay in Medieval
Political Theory” Presented at the 2007 6 SGIR Pan-European Conference on
International Relations, Turin.
Littoz-Monnet, Annabelle. 2002. “Dynamic Multi-Level Governance- Bringing the
Study of Multi-Level Interactions into the Theorising of European Integration”
European Integration online Paper(EIoP) Vol.14, Article 01,
http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2010-001a.htm
Murphy, Alexander B., 1996, “The Sovereignty State as Political-territorial Ideal” in
Biersteker and Weber (eds.), State Sovereignty as Social Construct,
(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 1-21.
-----,2002. “National Claims to Territory in the Modern State System:
Geographical Considerations” Geopolitics, 7(2):193-214
Passi, Anssi. 2007. “Territory” in A Companion to Political Geography, eds. John
Agnew, Katharyne Mitchell and Gerard Toal. Malden, MA, USA: Blackwell
Publishing Ltd, ch8
Philpott, Daniel, 1995, “Sovereignty: An Introduction and Brief History” Journal of
International Affairs, 48(2):353-368
Popescu, Gabriel. 2008. “The Conflicting Logics of Cross-border
Reterritorialization: Geopolitics of Euroregions in Eastern Europe” Political
Geography 27:418-438
Postan, Michael Moïssey and Habakkuk, H. J. eds. 1989. The Cambridge economic
history of Europe. Cambridge : Cambridge. 中文譯名《劍橋歐洲經濟史》，王
春法主譯，2002，北京:經濟科學。
Resch, Robert Paul. 1992. Althusser and the Renewal of Marxist Social Theory.
Berkeley: University of California Press.
http://ark.cdlib.org/ark:/13030/ft3n39n8x3/
Rode, Philipp, 2009, 「倫敦與柏林的戰略計畫」，收錄於任遠、陳向明、Dieter
Lapple主編，《全球城市-區域的時代》，290-310，上海:復旦大學。
Ruggie, John, 1983, “Continuity and Transformation In the World Polity: Toward a
Neorealist Synthesis” in Keohane (ed.), Neorealism and Its Critics, 131-157, New
York : Columbia University Press.
------, 1993, “Territoriality and Beyond: Problematizing Modernity in International
Relations,” International Organization,47(1):139-174
Sack, Robert. 1986. Human Territoriality: Its Theory and History. New York:
Cambridge
Sassen, Saskia, 1999, A New Cross-Border Filed for Public and Private Actors:
National States and Global Cities. 中文譯名「公共與私人行動者的新跨界場域:
國族國家與全球城市」，葉蔭聰、劉益誠、鄭鈺玲譯，《城市與設計學報》，
No.13/14:21-40
Sheehan, James J. 2006. “Presidential Address: The Problem of Sovereignty in
European History” American Historical Review, 111(1):1-15
Shoemaker, Pamela J.,James William Tankard, Jr., and Dominic L. Lasorsa, 2004.
How to Build Social Science Theories. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage. Chapter 3.
Spruyt, Hendrik. 1994. “Institutional Selection in International Relations: State
Anarchy as order” International Organization. 48(4): 527-557
Steinberg, Philip E. 2009. “Sovereignty, Territory, and the Mapping of Mobility: A
View from the Outside” Annals of the Association of American Geographers.
99(3):467-495
Strayer , Joseph. 1973. On the Medieval Origin of the Modern State. Princeton, N.J.
-----, 1975,
Taylor, Peter J. 1999. “Modern States” in Modernities- A Geohistorical Interpretation,
Minneapolis : University of Minnesota Press, 62-79
---- 2003. “The States as Container: Territoriality in the Modern World-System” in
State/Space: A Reader, eds. Neil Brenner, Bob Jessop, Martin Jones and Gordon
Macleod. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub, 101-113
Teschke, Benno. 1998. “Geopolitical Relations in the European Middle Ages: History
and Theory” International Organization, 52(2): 325-358
Thompson, James Westfall. 1918. “Church and State in Medieval Germany. I” The
American Journal of Theology, 22(1):72-100
Thomson, Janice E., 1995, “State Sovereignty in International Relations: Brining the
Gap between Theory and Empirical Research” International Studies Quarterly,
39(2):213-233
Tilly, Charles, 1985. “War Making and State Making as Organized Crime” in Evans,
Rueschemeyer and Skocpol(eds.), Brining the State Back In, (New York :
Cambridge University Press), 169-191
Volckart, Oliver, 2002, “No Utopia: Government without Territorial Monopoly in
Medieval Central Europe” Journal of Institution and Theoretical Economics,
158:325-343
Vollaard, Hans. 2009. “The Logic of Political Territoriality” Geopolitics, 14:687-706
Waltz, Kenneth N., 1999, “Globalization and Governance” Political Science and
Politics, 32(4):693-700
Zielonka, Jan. 2001. “How New Enlarged Borders will Reshape the European Union”
Journal of Common Market Studies, 39(3):507-536.



網路資料

李明，2000，「權力平衡、集體安全和世界政府」，http://www3.nccu.edu.tw/~minglee/b.ppt#256,1,權力平衡、集體安全和世界政府
http://big5.xinhuanet.com/gate/big5/news.xinhuanet.com/world/2011-07/29/c_121738738.htm 上網日期:2011年8月7日
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ptolemy's_world_map 上網日期: 2011年10月4日
http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E7%A5%9E%E8%81%96%E7%BE%85%E9%A6%AC%E5%B8%9D%E5%9C%8B 上網日期: 2011年4月11日
http://www.ccim.org/cgi-user/bible/ob?version=hb5&book=mat&chapter=6 上網日期: 2011年4月20日
http://law.hku.hk/clsourcebook/human%20rights/40001.htm 上網日期:2011年4月16日
Amendments to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty Establishing the
European Community, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2007:306:0010:0041:EN:PDF，上網日期:2011年9月15日
The Lisbon Treaty and the European Constitution: A side-by-side Comparison- http://www.openeurope.org.uk/research/comparative.pdf，上網日期:2011年9月15日
http://ec.europa.eu/world/enp/pdf/com03_104_en.pdf，上網日期:2011年9月15日
http://www.reuters.com/article/2009/11/20/us-eu-president-idUSTRE5AJ2UT20091120，上網日期:2011年9月17日
http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2010/new/jan/2/today-int2.htm，上網日期:2011年9月17日
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copenhagen_criteria，上網日期:2011年9月17日