博碩士論文 etd-0811114-145717 詳細資訊


[回到前頁查詢結果 | 重新搜尋]

姓名 楊力行(Li-hsin Yang ) 電子郵件信箱 E-mail 資料不公開
畢業系所 政治學研究所(Political Science)
畢業學位 碩士(Master) 畢業時期 102學年第2學期
論文名稱(中) 國際關係學科的知識系譜(1870年代至1940年代)
論文名稱(英) The Genealogy of the Discipline of International Relations from 1870s to 1940s
檔案
  • etd-0811114-145717.pdf
  • 本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
    請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
    論文使用權限

    紙本論文:立即公開

    電子論文:校內校外完全公開

    論文語文/頁數 中文/142
    統計 本論文已被瀏覽 5353 次,被下載 773 次
    摘要(中) 傅柯認為現代以降的人類學或者社會科學 ,是隨著歷史事件的發生而由權力構成的並且與權力互構的,由此筆者欲探究國際關係作為一門學科是如何在歷史中由權力構成,並且又如何與權力互構。
    為此,筆者從傅柯對西方國家的治理技藝的考察中,整理出現代歷史的力線作為生成國際關係學科的構成性外在,並且以系譜學的途徑搜羅並檢視自1870年代至1940年代的國際關係文本,同時輔以以人民視角書寫的同時期的歷史,交叉檢視國際關係文本。最後,透過上述的權力、知識與歷史三者的交叉比對論證國際關係是一門誕生於現代,且受制於重農主義-自然主義-自由主義,以及種族主義的學科。
    摘要(英) Michel Foucault argues that the Anthropologies or Social Sciences in modern times are constructed by the correlative constitiution of power and knowledge through the occurrence of historical events. Following this thought, the author attempts to realize how the discipline, International Relations, has been constructed by and with power in the history of modern times.
    Therefore, the author endeavors to extract the lines of force of the modern history via the governmentality of the Western countries since mid-1800s to 20th centry as the constitutive outside of International Relations. In the meanwhile, the author collects and exams the literatures of I.R. from 1870s to 1940s with the comtemporary history and the constitutive outside. By comparing the literatures with the perspective of power, knowledge, and histories mutually, the author verifies that the discipline, International Relations, is originated from modern times, and is dominated by or embedded with Physiocracy, Naturalism or Liberalism, and even racism.
    關鍵字(中)
  • 現實主義
  • 佈署
  • 國際關係
  • 知識
  • 系譜學
  • 權力
  • 傅柯
  • 關鍵字(英)
  • realism
  • dispositif
  • knowledge
  • genealogy
  • International Relations
  • Foucault
  • power
  • 論文目次 論文審定書  i
    摘要  ii
    Abstract  iii
    目錄  iv

    前言 1
    第一章 緒論 2
     第一節 研究動機 2
     第二節 研究目的 4
     第三節 研究途徑與方法 5
      壹、系譜學研究途徑-與考古學共享的關懷 5
      貳、研究方法:詮釋解析法 13
     第四節 文獻回顧 17
     第五節 章節安排 19
    第二章 權力與歷史 21
     第一節 傅柯筆下的現代 21
      壹、自由主義的治理技藝(GOVERNMENTALITY) 23
      貳、自然與歷史-文明與野蠻 34
     第二節 盎格魯-撒克遜種族主義的歷史背景實踐 35
    第三章 知識與歷史-國際關係文本系譜 46
     第一節 1870年代至1930年代 47
      壹、1870年代 47
      貳、1880與1890年代 52
      參、1900年代至大戰(GREAT WAR) 55
      肆、大戰與1920年代-國際關係文本與歷史 66
      伍、小結 95
     第二節 1930年代與1940年代 98
    第四章 權力-知識與歷史下的國際關係文本 115
     第一節 現代佈署中的歷史-從自由主義到種族主義 115
     第二節 國際關係文本與盎格魯-撒克遜種族主義 118
    第五章 結論 126
    參考文獻 132
    參考文獻 一 、 外文文獻
    A Roman Catholic Priest. 1872. Harmony of International Relations. London:  Longmans, Green & CO.
    Ashley, Richard K., 1984. “The Poverty of Neorealism,” in Neorealism and Its Critics, ed. Keohane, Robert O., Columbia University Press, pp255-300.
    Ashley, Richard K., 1995. “The Powers of Anarchy: Theory, Sovereignty, and the Domestication of Global Life,” in International Theory: Critical Investigations, ed. James Der Derian, NYU Press, pp 94-128.
    Bryce, James, 1921, International Relations: Eight Lectures Delivered in the United States in August. New York, The Macmillan company.
    Colby, Bainbridge, 1917, “The Democratic Ideal in International Relations.” Proceedings of the Academy of Political Science in the City of New York, Volume 7: 121-123.
    Bull, Hedley, 1972, “The Theory of International Politics, 1919-1969,” in International Theory: Critical Investigations, ed. James Der Derian, NYU Press, pp181-211.
    Foucault, Michel, 1984, “Nietzsche, Genealogy, History,” in Foucault Reader, ed. Paul Rabinow, New York: Patheon Books, pp 76-100.
    Foucault, Michel, 2008, The Birth of Biopolitics, Lectrues at the College de France, 1978-79. Graham Burchell, Trans. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
    Foucault, Michel, 1980,“The Confession of the Flesh.” in Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977. Ed. Colin Gordon. New York: Random House, 194-228.
    Foucault, Michel, 2005, The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. Taylor and Francis e-Library.
    Foucault, Michel, 1984, “What is Enlightenment,” in Foucault Reader, ed. Paul Rabinow, New York: Patheon Books, pp 32-50.
    Grant, A. J. & Urquhart, Francis Fortescue et al., 1916, An introduction to the study of international relations. London, Macmillan and Co., Limited.
    Grey, Edward, 1920, “The Value of Knowledge in International Relations- An Address Given by the Right Hon. Viscount Grey of Fallodon, K.G.” London : The International Federation of University Women.
    Hargrove, E. T., 1898. World Politics. New York: R. F. Fenno & Company.
    Hart, Albert Bushnell, 1907, “American Ideals of International Relations.” The American Journal of International Law, Vol1: 624-635
    Henderson, Charles Richmond, 1908, “Social Duties: Chapter XVI. Social Duties in International Relations.” The Biblical World, Vol32: 349-359.
    Hershey, Amos S., 1911, “The History of International Relations During Antiquity and the Middle Ages.” The American Journal of International Law, Vol5: 901-933.
    Hobdent, Stephen & John M. Hobson et al. 2002. Historical Sociology of International Relations. UK: Cambridge University Press.
    Hoffmann, Stanley, 1977, “An American Social Science: International Relations,” in International Theory: Critical Investigations, ed. James Der Derian, NYU Press, pp212-241.
    Knutsen, Torbjørn Lindstrøm. 1997. A History of International Relations Theory. UK: Manchester University Press.
    Mahan, Alfred Thayer, 1912, “The Place of Force in International Relations.” The North American Review, Vol195: 28-39.
    Mathews, Shailer, 1917, “Democracy and World Politics.” Bulletin of the American Library Association, Volume 11: 95-103.
    Mearsheimer, John J., 2014, “Say Goodbye to Taiwan.” February 25. http://nationalinterest.org/article/say-goodbye-taiwan-9931, (September 8, 2014). 
    Moon, Parker Thomas, 1926, Imperialism and World Politics. United States of America: The Macmillan Company.
    Moon, Parker Thomas, 1929, Syllabus on International Relations. United States of America: The Macmillan Company.
    Mowat, Robert B., 1923, The European States System- a Study of International Relations. London: Oxford University Press.
    Nasmyth, George W., 1914, “The Universities and American International Relations.” The Journal of Race Development, Vol. 5: 98-104.
    Phelps, E. J. 1889. International Relations-Address before the Phibeta Kappa Society of Harvard University. Burlington: Free Press Association.
    Seebohm, Frederic. 1871. On International Reform. London: Longmans, Green, and CO.
    Simonds, Frank H. & Emeny, Brooks, 1939, The Great Powers in World Politics. United States of America: American Book Company.
    Smith, Steve, 1995, “The Self-Image of a Discipline: A Genealogy of International Relations Theory.” In International Relations Theory Today. Eds. Ken Booth and Steve Smith, The Pennsylvania State University Press, 1-37.
    Snow, Alpheus Henry, 1914, “The American Philosophy of Government and its Effect on International Relations.” The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 8: 191-212.
    Vucetic, Srdjan, 2011, The Anglosphere: A Genealogy of a Racialized Identity in International Relations. Standford, California: Standford University Press.
    Wilde, Oscar, 1915, The Soul of Man Under Socialism. New York:Max N. Maisel Publisher.
    Wilson, Woodrow, 1918, “The Fourteen Points.” January 8. http://web.ics.purdue.edu/~wggray/Teaching/His300/Handouts/Fourteen_Points.pdf
    (December 10, 2013).
    Zinn, Howard, 2009, A People's History of the United States. HarperCollins.
    二、中文文獻
    李俊毅,2002,《國際關係權力平衡論述的系譜研究》,台北:台灣大學政治學研究所碩士論文。
    余虹,2005,《藝術與歸家》,中國人民大學出版社。
    林淑芬,2004,〈傅柯論權力與主體〉,《人文及社會科學集刊》,16(1):117-150。
    陳欣之,2007,〈國際關係學的發展〉,載於《國際關係總論第二版》,張亞中主編,台北縣深坑鄉:揚智文化,1-35。
    楊昊,2008,《東協想像共同體的結構化系譜分析:從空中樓閣到按圖索驥?》,嘉義:國立中正大學政治學所博士論文。
    廖舜右、曹雄源,2007,〈現實主義〉,載於《國際關係總論第二版》,張亞中主編,台北縣深坑鄉:揚智文化,37-69。
    劉永謀,2009,《福柯的主體解構之旅》,南京:江蘇人民出版社。
    賴奇祿,2010,《孟德斯鳩與魁奈對於傳統中國專制政府思想之比較─一個方法論的反省》,高雄:中山大學政治學研究所博士論文。
    三、翻譯作品
    Beckett, Samuel. Waiting for Godot. Endgame. 廖玉如譯,2008,《等待果陀·終局》,臺北市:聯經。
    Carr, Edward Hallett. The Twenty Year’s Crisis (1919-1939). 秦亞青譯,2005,《20年危機(1919-1939)》,北京:世界知識出版社。
    Deleuze, G., “What is a Dispositif?” in T.J. Armstrong (ed), Michel Foucault Philosopher. 汪民安 陳永國編譯,2001,《福柯的面孔》,文化藝術出版社。
    Dreyfus, Hubert L. and Paul Rabinow. Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. 錢俊譯,2005,《傅柯:超越結構主義與詮釋學》,台北市:桂冠。
    Foucault, Michel. Il faut défendre la société: Cours au Collège de France (1975-1976). 錢瀚譯, 2010,《必須保衛社會》,上海人民出版社。
    Foucault, Michel. Naissance de la biopolitique: Cours au collège de France (1978-1979). 莫偉民 趙偉譯,2011,《生命政治的誕生》,上海人民出版社。
    Foucault, Michel. Sécurité, territoire, population: Cours au Collège de France (1977-1978). 錢瀚 陳曉徑譯,2010,《安全、領土與人口》, 上海人民出版社。
    Foucault, Michel. "Structuralism and Post-Structuralism: An Interview with Michel Foucault." 杜小真 編,2003,《福柯集》,上海遠東出版社。
    Foucault, Michel. Surveiller et punir - Naissance de la Prison. 劉北城、楊遠嬰譯,1999,《規訓與懲罰:監獄的誕生》,北京:三聯書店。 
    Morgenthau, Hans. Politics Among Nations. 徐昕 郝望 等譯,2006,《國家間政治》,北京大學出版社(第七版)。
    Morton, A. L. A People’s History of England. 謝璉造 瞿菊農 等譯,1962,《人民的英國史》,三聯書店。
    Wendt, A. Social Theory of International Politics. 秦亞青譯,2001,《國際政治的社會理論》,上海人民出版社。
    Zinn, H. A People’s History of the United States. 許先春 蒲國良 等譯,2000,《美國人民的歷史》,上海:上海人民出版社。
    口試委員
  • 曾怡仁 - 召集委員
  • 洪世謙 - 委員
  • 黃競涓 - 指導教授
  • 口試日期 2014-01-23 繳交日期 2014-09-11

    [回到前頁查詢結果 | 重新搜尋]


    如有任何問題請與論文審查小組聯繫