本研究旨在探討二十一世紀國際氣候治理的轉變與現狀，從理論與實踐層次上提供國際氣候治理議題一個全面性的觀察脈絡。
嗣經本文分析與研究後有如下的發現：首先在理論層次上，建制複合作為一套涵括諸多要素建制的系統，「修正結構主義學派」傾向於從權力與國家利益的角度分析此系統產生的背景因素與原因，並主張強權國家透過鬆散的建制與分散的法律秩序，負擔較高的制度交易成本，增加其在單一國際建制中遭受限制的活動空間，換取更多國家風險管理與實質議價能力。其次，在實踐層次上，即使美國霸權衰弱，氣候建制複合的誕生象徵美國仍試圖領導國際氣候治理的發展，透過多邊氣候合作以獲取氣候治理的絕對利得，惟，當前國際氣候治理乃是一套以UNFCCC為中心而發展的氣候建制複合，其與UNFCCC相互補充，使國際氣候治理更完善。最後，在比較層次上，國際建制理論與建制複合理論皆屬新自由制度主義下的次級架構，此外，國際氣候建制以及氣候建制複合享有共同的規範，兩者關於減排管制方式、特性與優點等相異之處實為彼此互補。

The whole theme about this thesis mainly focuses on the discussion of the transition of modern international climate governance (ICG) and its current status, and provides a comprehensive context to examine the issue of ICG.
Summarized below are findings from research studies that have especially contributed to the understanding of ICG. First, regime complex as a system composed of at least three elemental regimes, the modified structural tends to analyze the background of the system and explore why it appears, from perspectives of power and state interest, and contends that strong powers would afford higher transaction cost via loose-coupling institutions rather than a single and complete regime to gain more ability of state risk management and negotiating power. Secondly, the climate regime complex emerges as a symbol of the United States’ desire to lead the process of ICG for its absolute gains via multiple climate cooperation, even if the descending power of the United States. The current status of ICG is mainly focused on the development of climate regime complex, however, which is targeted on, complementary to the UNFCCC and making the ICG more complete. Finally, the regime theory and regime complex theory are both the secondary structures to the neo-liberal institutionalism paradigm; furthermore, they share the same norms and are complementing to each other in terms of their emission regulations, features and benefits.

目錄
第一章 緒論……….…………………………………...…………………………...…1
第一節 研究動機與目的…………………………………………………...1
第二節 文獻回顧………………………………………………………...…4
第三節 研究途徑與研究方法…………………………………………….17
第四節 研究範圍與限制………………………………………………….22
第五節 章節安排……………………………………...…………………..24
第二章 從國際建制理論到建制複合理論………………....…………………….25
第一節 國際建制理論………………...……………………………………26
第二節 建制複合理論………………………...……………………………36
第三節 國際建制理論與建制複合理論之比較…………………...………43
第四節 小結………………………...………………………………………47
第三章 國際氣候變遷治理：1992年~2015年……………….………………….49
第一節 環境議題與國際關係……………………………...………………49
第二節 氣候變遷與國際建制……………………………………………...55
第三節 國際氣候治理現狀…………………………………...……………72
第四節 小結………………………………………………………...………79
第四章 國際氣候建制複合之評析……...………..……….………………………82
第一節 國際氣候建制複合之合作形式…………………………….......…82
第二節 國際氣候建制與國際氣候建制複合之比較………...……………91
第三節 建制複合對國際氣候治理的影響…………………...……………98
第四節 小結…………………………………………...…………………..104
第五章 結論…………………….…………………..………………………………106
參考文獻…………………..…………………..……………………………………..110

中文
期刊：
王啟明，2012，〈氣候變遷與國際關係理論〉，《全球政治評論》，37：61-88。
李河清，2004，〈知識社群與全球氣候談判〉，《問題與研究》，43(6)：73-102。
李河清、譚偉恩，2012，〈氣候變遷與人權: 以農業和糧食安全為起點的思考〉，《台
灣人權學刊》，1(2)：59-75。
李玫憲、洪銘德，2011，〈當前歐盟氣候治理策略的發展與挑戰－從氣候難民問題
分析〉，《政治學報》，52：1-28。
李堅明，2016，〈COP21《巴黎協定》之觀察與啟示〉，《能源月刊》，一月號：23-27。
許晃雄，2001，〈淺談氣候變遷的科學〉，《科學發展月刊》，29(12)：867-878。
葉俊榮，2015，〈氣候變遷的歷史排放量比例責任〉，《月旦法學雜誌》，239：5-17。
黃郁棻，2007，〈全球潔淨能源科技發展的推手－亞太清潔發展與氣候夥伴計畫
(AP6)〉，《科技發展政策報導》，2：59-63。
楊惟任，2015，〈主權國家於全球氣候治理的角色分析〉，《全球政治評論》，49：
83-106。
書籍：
丘宏達，2008，《現代國際法》，臺北市：三民。
朱雲漢，2011，〈邁向二十一世紀的國際政治經濟學：超越與突破〉，載於《國際
關係理論》，包宗和主編，台北：五南。頁：451-476。
倪世雄，2010，《當代國際關係理論》，台北：五南。
宋學文，2011，〈新自由制度主義之過去、現在與未來〉，載於《國際關係理論》，
包宗和主編，台北：五南。頁：139-172。
徐斯勤，2011，〈新自由主義與新自由制度主義〉，載於《國際關係理論》，
包宗和主編，台北：五南。頁：111-138。
陳欣之，2007，〈新自由制度主義、社會建構主義及英國學派〉，載於《國際關係
總論》，張亞中主編，第二版，台北：揚智。頁：73-116。
黃競涓，2007，〈國際關係理論中的後實證主義學派〉，載於《國際關係總論》，
張亞中主編，第二版，台北：揚智。頁：117-144。
學位論文：
周若敏，2015，〈IPCC 之研究：以知識社群為分析途徑 (2007-2014) 〉，淡江大
學國際事務與戰略研究所碩士班學位論文。
陳文葳，2015，〈政府間氣候變遷小組的建構、組織與功能演變：以跨國法制歷程
觀點分析〉，臺灣大學科際整合法律學研究所碩士學位論文。
張尹菀，2012，〈中國參與全球環境治理機制之研究： 以京都議定書為例〉，中興
大學國際政治研究所碩士學位論文。
張瑋儒，2009，〈歐盟的氣候治理：以排放交易決策為例〉，臺灣大學政治學研究
所碩士學位論文。
蔣欣如，2004，〈環境安全與國際建制-氣候安全建制之探討〉，政大外交所碩士學
位論文。
網路資源：
中華人民共和國科學技術部，
http://www.most.gov.cn/shfzs/sfdtxx/200711/t20071123_57405.htm，檢索日期：2016年6月26日。
行政院環保署，
http://ccs.gov2.tw/ccsintro/什麼是ccs，檢索日期：2016年6月26日。
李堅明，2014，〈台灣推動碳交易制度機會、挑戰與可行策略〉，
http://www.tri.org.tw/trinews/doc/1030530_1-1.pdf，檢索日期：2016年6月26日。
黃介正，2002，〈布希主義之內涵初探〉，
http://old.npf.org.tw/PUBLICATION/NS/091/NS-C-091-274.htm，檢索日期：2016年6月3日。
潘潔，〈《巴黎協定》既是里程碑也是試金石〉，端傳媒，2015年12月20日，
https://theinitium.com/article/20151220-opinion-kittypoon-cop21/，檢索日期：2016年4月6日。
譚偉恩、洪銘德，2014，〈治理暖化的新途徑：裂解模式〉，2014年12月13日，
http://csil.org.tw/home/category/觀念平台/，中華民國國際法學會觀念平台。檢索日期：2016年4月6日。
環境資訊中心，2014，〈2015巴黎氣候大會 你需要了解的事〉，
http://e-info.org.tw/node/103803，檢索日期：2016年5月23日。

英文
期刊：
Abbott, Kenneth. 2012. "The transnational regime complex for climate change."
Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 30(4): 571-590.
Alter, Karen and Meunier, Sophie. 2009. “The Politics of International Regime
Complexity.” Perspectives on Politics, 7(1): 13-24.
Bäckstrand, Karin. 2008. "Accountability of networked climate governance: The rise
of transnational climate partnerships." Global Environmental Politics 8(3): 74-102.
Barrett, Scott and Toman, Michael. 2010. "Contrasting Future Paths for an Evolving
Global Climate Regime." Global Policy 1(1): 64-74.
Bernstein, Steven, et al. 2010. "A tale of two Copenhagens: carbon markets and
climate governance." Millennium-Journal of International Studies 39(1): 161-173.
Biermann, Frank. 2010. "Beyond the intergovernmental regime: recent trends in global
carbon governance." Environmental Sustainability 2(4): 284-288.
Bluemel, Erik B.. 2007. “Unraveling the Global Warming Regime Complex:
Competitive Entropy in the Regulation of the Global Public Good.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 155(6): 1981-2049.
Cole, Daniel. 2011. "From global to polycentric climate governance." Climate law
2(3): 395-413.
———. 2015. "Advantages of a polycentric approach to climate change policy."
Nature Climate Change 5(2): 114-118.
Drezner, Daniel. 2009. “The Power and Peril of International Regime Complexity.”
Perspectives on Politics 7(1): 65-70.
Falkner, Robert, et al. 2010. "International Climate Policy after Copenhagen: Towards
a ‘Building Blocks’ Approach." Global Policy 1(3): 252-262.
Hardin, Garrett. 1968. “The tragedy of the commons.” Science 162(3859): 1243-1248.
Hare, William, Stockwell, Clare, Flachsland, Christian and Oberthur, Sebastian. 2010.
“The architecture of the global climate regime: a top-down perspective.” Climate Policy 10(6): 600-614.
Jervis, Robert. 1982. "Security regimes." International organization 36(2): 357-378.
Keohane, Robert O.. 1989. “International Institutions: Two Approaches.” International
Studies Quarterly 32(4): 379-396.
———. 2015. “The Global Politics of Climate Change: Challenge for Political
Science.” Political Science & Politics 48: 19-26.
Keohane, Robert O. and Victor David G.. 2011. "The regime complex for climate
change." Perspectives on Politics 9(01): 7-23.
Krasner, Stephen. 1982. "Structural causes and regime consequences: regimes as
intervening variables." International organization 36(02): 185-205.
Moncel, Remi and Asselt, Harro van. 2012. "All hands on deck! Mobilizing climate
change action beyond the UNFCCC." Review of European Community & International Environmental Law 21(3): 163-176.
Orsini, Amandine, Morin, Jean-Frédéric, Young, Oran. 2013. "Regime Complexes: A
Buzz, a Boom, or a Boost for Global Governance?" Global Governance 19: 27-39.
Pattberg, Philipp and Stripple, Johannes. 2008. "Beyond the public and private divide:
remapping transnational climate governance in the 21st century." International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 8(4): 367-388
Puchala, Donald J. and Hopskin, Raymond F.. 1982. "International regimes: lessons
from inductive analysis." International organization 36(02): 245-275.
Rabe, Barry. 2007. "Beyond Kyoto: Climate change policy in multilevel governance
systems." Governance 20(3): 423-444.
Raustiala, Kal and Victor, David G.. 2004. “The Regime Complex for Plant Genetic
Resources.” International Organization, 58(2): 277-309.
Ruggie, John G.. 1975. “International responses to technology: concepts and trends.”
International organization 29(03): 557-583.
Sandalow, David and Bowles, Ian A.. 2001. "Fundamentals of Treaty-Making on
Climate Change." Science 292(5523): 1839-1840.
Strange, Susan. 1982. "Cave! hic dragones: a critique of regime analysis."
International organization 36(02): 479-496.
Thompson, Alexander. 2010. “Rational design in motion: Uncertainty and flexibility in
the global climate regime.” European Journal of International Relations 16(2): 269-296.
Urpelainen, Johannes. 2012. "A model of dynamic climate governance: dream big, win
small." International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics
13(2): 107-125.
Weischer, Lutz, Morgan, Jennifer and Patel, Milap. 2012. “Climate clubs: Can small
groups of countries make a big difference in addressing climate change?” Review of European Community & International Environmental Law 21(3): 177-192.
Young, Oran R.. 1982. "Regime dynamics: the rise and fall of international regimes."
International organization 36(02): 277-297.
———. 1989. "The politics of international regime formation: managing natural
resources and the environment." International organization 43(03): 349-375.
Zaelke, Durwood, Andersen, Stephen and Borgford-Parnell, Nathan. 2012.
“Strengthening Ambition for Climate Mitigation: The Role of the Montreal Protocol in Reducing Short-lived Climate Pollutants.” Review of European Community & International Environmental Law, 21(3): 231-242.
書籍：
Bodansky, Daniel. 1994. “Prologue to the Climate Change Convention,” In Irving M.
Mintzer and J. A. Leonard eds., Negotiating Climate Change: The Inside Story of the Rio Convention, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Carson, Rachel. 2002. Silent Spring. Anniversary edition. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Dougherty, James E. and Pfaltzgraff ,Robert L., Jr. 1997. Contending Theories of
International Relations. 4th ed. Longman.
Haggard, Stephan and Simmons, Beth A.. 1987. "Theories of international regimes."
International organization 41(03): 491-517.
IPCC. 2001. “Summary for Policymakers and Technical Summary of the Working
Group II Report,” Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Geneva.
———. 2007. Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. An Assessment of
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 30.
IPCC Working Group I. 1990. “Climate Change: The IPCC Scientific Assessment.”
IPCC First Assessment Report (FAR). Cambridge University Press.
Keohane, Robert O.. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World
Political Economy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
———. 1989. International Institutions and State Power: Essays in
International Relations Theories. Boulder: Westview.
———. 1993. "The analysis of international regimes: Towards a European-American
research programme." Regime theory and international relations, Oxford.
Keohane, Robert O. and Nye, Joseph S.. 1977. Power and Interdependence. Boston:
Little, Brown.
Krasner, Stephen D. (ed.). 1983. International Regimes, Cornell University Press.
16 Years of Scientific Assessment in Support of the Climate Convention. 2004.
Geneva: IPCC Secretariat.
Repetto, Robert. 2008. “Introduction” in Punctuated equilibrium and the dynamics of
US environmental policy, ed. New Heaven and London: Yale University Press.
Victor, David. 2011. Global warming gridlock: creating more effective strategies for
protecting the planet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
官方文件：
Declaration of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, 1972, U.N.
Doc. A/Conf.48/14/Rev. 1; 11 ILM 1416.
Economic and Social Council official records, 45th session, 8 July-2 August 1968,
E/4561, Resolutions 1346 (XLV).
Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, 1992, UN Doc.
A/CONF.151/26(vol. I)/31 ILM 874.
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, May 9, 1992, 1771
U.N.T.S. 107.
UNFCCC/CP/1996/2.
UNFCCC. 1997. FCCC/CP/1997/7/Add.1.
UNGA Resolution No. A/RES/43/196.
網路資源：
Frankel, Jeffery. 2007. “Formulas for Quantitative Emission Targets.” John F. Kennedy
School of Government or of Harvard University (KSG) Working Paper No. RWP07-011. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.217.9026&rep=rep1&type=pdf (accessed at April 2, 2016).
IPCC, http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/publications_and_data_reports.shtml,
(accessed at June 26, 2016).
JCM, https://www.jcm.go.jp/about, (accessed at June 26, 2016).
MEF, http://www.majoreconomiesforum.org/, (accessed at June 25, 2016).
Merle David Kellerhals Jr. 2010. “U.S.-India Nuclear Pact Will Create Jobs, Clean
Energy.” http://iipdigital.ait.org.tw/st/english/article/2010/03/20100330121934dmslahrellek0.7133905.html#axzz4DgXZDLOK, (accessed June 25, 2016)
UNFCCC, http://unfccc.int/ghg_data/items/9354.php, (accessed at June 13, 2016).
The White House,
https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2016/03/31/us-china-joint-presidential-statement-climate-change, (accessed at June 4, 2016).
新聞雜誌：
“Clear thinking needed”. The Economist, 28 November 2015.