Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0802119-122848 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0802119-122848
論文名稱
Title
「同一願景、同一認同、同一共同體」:東協認同的形塑與實踐
“One Vision, One Identity, One Community”: The Evolution and Realization of ASEAN Identity
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
205
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2019-07-23
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2019-09-02
關鍵字
Keywords
東協認同、東協、建構主義、區域整合、區域認同
constructivism, ASEAN identity, regional identity, collective identity, ASEAN
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5872 次,被下載 64
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5872 times, has been downloaded 64 times.
中文摘要
東南亞國家協會(簡稱東協)成立於 1967 年,至今已逾 50 年,從一開始 不被外界看好,到現今成為東南亞整合的主要推動區域組織,已朝向一體化邁 進,「東協認同」在此歷程當中具有相當重要性。本文以建構主義為研究理論, 透過梳理東協自成立至今的脈絡,分析東協整合進程中,「東協認同」是如何從 做為一個概念被提出,再通過國際和區域環境、內外互動來形塑,如冷戰和後 冷戰的國際情勢變化、東亞金融危機等,並進一步實踐。東協從各自優先考慮 自身國家利益,到作為一個整體後,在國際場域集體行動、承認成員國命運休 戚與共,這些都意味著東協亦逐步實踐「東協認同」相關理念,如東協憲章的 通過與實施、東協共同體的建成,都是東協整合過程的重要里程碑。「東協認 同」的強化在後來的官方會議、文件中不斷被提及,可見「東協意識」到「東 協認同」在區域整合中的重要性。
Abstract
The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) established in 1967. Nowadays this regional organization becomes the main player to promote regional integration. However, in this region with diverse ethnic, languages and cultures ASEAN faces many challenges to form a regional identity. This research is based on Constructivism to analysis the evolution of ASEAN identity and how ASEAN do to realize the idea of collective identity. The are many sources formed the ASEAN identity. The change of international society and the interactions between ASEAN members and other countries or international organizations also impact the idea and identities of ASEAN and how do they act with others. The ASEAN Charter and the achievement of ASEAN community are the milestone of the process to realize the ASEAN identity. It shows ASEAN aware the ASEAN identity is and will be important for ASEAN integration.
目次 Table of Contents
論文審定書 i
中文摘要 ii
英文摘要 iii
目錄 iv
圖次 vi
表次 vii
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機與目的 1
第二節 文獻回顧 3
第三節 研究途徑與方法 17
第四節 研究範圍與限制 19
第五節 論文章節安排 20
第二章 建構主義理論及對東協研究之適用 22
第一節 建構主義理論來源探討 22
第二節 建構主義主要論述 29
第三節 建構主義與國際組織 43
第四節 東協研究之適用 48
第三章 東協認同的形塑 56
第一節 東協認同的源起 56
第二節 東協認同形塑的變遷 60
第三節 小結 95
第四章 東協認同的實踐 102
第一節 東協憲章的制定與生效 102
第二節 東協共同體的成立 112
第三節 東協與區域外的互動形塑東協認同 134
第四節 小結 156
第五章 結論 161
第一節 研究發現 161
第二節 研究建議 169
參考書目 171
附錄 190
參考文獻 References
一、 中文部分
(一)專書
Alexander Wendt原著,秦亞青譯,2014,《國際政治的社會理論》,上海:上海人民出版社。
Nichael R. J. Vatikiotis原著,林若雩譯,1996,《東南亞政治與發展》,台北:韋伯出版社。
江啟臣,2011,《國際組織與全球治理概論》(二版),台北:五南。
宋鎮照,1996,《東協國家之政經發展》,台北:五南。
───,2014,《新世紀之台灣-中國-東協的新三角政經發展:區域經濟整合戰略思維——台灣連結新西進與新南向發展的蟹行策略應用》,台北:五南。
宋鎮照、蔡相偉,2016,《大國戰略:安倍晉三和歐巴馬政府的東南亞區域發展競合》,台南:成大出版社。
林宗達,2013,《國際關係理論:社會學派與受實證主義學派的相關理論》,新北:晶典文化。
林若雩,2016,《東協共同體的建構與成立:「4C安全文化」之理論與實踐》,台北:三民書局。
倪世雄,2003,《當代國際關係理論》,台北:五南。
葉至誠、葉立誠,2002,《研究方法與論文寫作》(二版),台北:商鼎文化。
顧長永,2005,《東南亞政治學》,台北:巨流。

(二)專書篇章
王勤,〈2007-2008年東協經濟的分析與預測〉,載於《東南亞地區形勢概覽第一輯》,《東南亞研究》編輯部主編,北京:世界知識出版社,37-45。
耿曙,2007,〈分析層次與國際體系〉,載於《國際關係總論》,張亞中主編,新北:揚智文化,145-192。
袁易,2011,〈社會建構論:Onuf、Kratochwil和Wendt的建構主義世界〉,載於《國際關係理論》,包宗和主編,台北:五南,359-385。
郝培芝、羅至美,2007,〈國際整合與區域主義〉,載於《國際關係總論》,張亞中主編,新北:揚智文化,380-413。
曹雲華,2015,〈東南亞地區形勢:2008年〉,載於《東南亞地區形勢概覽(第一輯)》,《東南亞研究》編輯部主編,北京:世界知識出版社,17-36。
梁銘華,2008,〈從區域主義論「中國東協自由貿易區」—從中國視角出發〉,載於《從變遷中的東南亞整合—過程、挑戰與發展》,宋鎮照、陳欣之主編,台北:五南書局:211-251。
莫大華,2011,〈國際關係後現代建構主義理論的知識論立場〉,載於《國際關係理論》,包宗和主編,台北:五南,205-233。
陳欣之,2007,〈新自由制度主義、社會建構主義及英國學派〉,載於《國際關係總論》,張亞中主編,新北:揚智文化,74-116。

(三)期刊論文
王子昌,2003a,〈國外東盟研究:方法與觀點〉,《東南亞研究》,1: 27-32。
───,2003b,〈東盟的文化特徵意識——東盟意識與東盟的發展(I)〉,《東南亞研究》3: 17-22。
───,2003c,〈東盟的地理整體與利益整體意識—─東盟意識與東盟的發展(II)〉《東南亞研究》,5: 4-8。
───,2003d,〈東盟意識面臨的挑戰〉,《東南亞研究》,6: 34-38。
-──,2004,〈文化認同與東盟合作〉,《東南亞研究》,5: 27-31。
王文岳,2013,〈東亞區域主義再建構:韓國參與東亞區域整合之進程與效應〉,《亞太研究論壇》,59: 49-86。
任琳、程然然,2015,〈歐盟東南亞政策論析〉,《歐洲研究》,3: 27-42。
江敏華,2009,〈美國與東南亞關係進展之研析〉,《戰略安全研析》,51: 39-44。
何燿光,2015,〈後冷戰時期東南亞戰略操作的多重困局:中國vs東協〉,《國家發展研究》,14(2): 23-98。
吳玲君,2000,〈東協國家APEC政策的政經因素〉,《問題與研究》,39(3): 39-55。
───,2005,〈中國與東亞區域貿易合作:區域主義與霸權之間的關係〉,《問題與研究》,44(5): 1-27。
───,2007,〈東協國家與東亞經濟合作: 從「東協加三」到「東亞高峰會」〉,《問題與研究》,46: 117-138。
───,2015,〈東協推動區域經濟合作的動力與條件〉,《東協瞭望》,11: 8-11。
吳祖田,1998,〈東南亞國家協會組織之發展與回顧〉,《問題與研究》,37(8): 35-48。
吳德美、曾聖文,2005〈中國大陸經濟崛起對東協經濟發展影響〉,《問題與研究》,44(3): 57-91。
吳褔成, 2005 , 〈東亞高峰會與 APEC的競合關係〉,《亞太經濟合作評論》,13: 57-63。
宋興州、林佩霓,2009,〈東南亞國協與區域安全〉,《全球政治評論》,25: 1-52。
宋鎮照,1996,〈台海兩岸與東南亞國家之關係與策略〉,《問題與研究》,35(5): 15-28。
李佩珊、楊昊,2007,〈建構《東協憲章》:是作繭自縛?還是老調重彈?〉,《政治學報》,43: 123-173。
李知宇,1999,〈東盟面臨的危機與挑戰〉,《東南亞研究》,5: 40-46。
李政憲,2008,〈東協推動信心建立措施的困境與作法:從國際關係三大理論分析〉,《全球政治評論》,22: 127-166。
李隆生,2006,〈以東協為軸心的東亞經濟整合:從區域主義到全球化〉,《亞太研究論壇》,33: 101-124。
沈鑫,2011,〈外交共同體:東盟外交文化的行程與實踐——評《東盟外交共同體:主體及表現》,6: 91-96。
金榮勇,2003,〈國際社會對於緬甸朝野對峙的困境與前景〉,《問題與研究》,42(3): 103-119。
───,2007,〈緬甸軍人政府的未來發展——加入東協後之展望〉,《問題與研究》,36(3): 81-90。
施曉恩、張毓欣,2008,〈東協-日本總括性經濟合作協定之發展與評析〉,《經貿法訊》,77: 4-8。
孫國祥,2012,〈論東協對南海爭端的共識與立場〉,《問題與研究》,53(2): 31-66。
郝培芝,2004,〈亞歐會議形成的結構動力與意義:從新區域主義的觀點分析〉,《問題與研究》,43(1): 125-144。
張心怡,2010,〈「東協+3」v.s. 「跨太平洋策略性經濟夥伴協定+N」:亞太經濟整合的擴大及其效應〉,《國際關係學報》,29: 131-168。
張惠玲,2000,〈亞洲金融危機對中共區域霸權目標之影響〉,《問題與研究》,39(2): 51-65。
莫大華,1996,〈後冷戰時期東協的軍備競賽與區域安全〉,《問題與研究》,35(3): 51-64。
───,1999,〈論國際關係理論中的建構主義〉,《問題與研究》,38(9): 93-109。
───,2007,〈探索國際關係理論的建橋計畫:理性主義與建構主義的理論總和〉,《政治科學論叢》,31: 175-216。
───,2007,〈緬甸軍政府之對外關係〉,《問題與研究》,36(10): 69-84。
郭俊麟,2008,〈東南亞區域整合經驗——「東協模式」的實踐與檢討〉,《台灣國際研究季刊》,4(1): 99-126。
陳仲沂,2010,〈冷戰結束後歐盟、東協與中國三邊關係之研究〉,《歐洲國際評論》,6: 25-57。
───,2011,〈從區域主義觀點論冷戰結束後歐盟與東協發展歷程之異同〉,《台灣國際研究季刊》,7(1): 171-194。
陳欣之,1996,〈東協諸國對「中國威脅論」的看法與回應〉,《問題與研究》,35 (11): 15-33。
陳勁,2000,〈緬甸在東協的角色及影響〉,《問題與研究》,39(9): 13-34。
陳寧,1998,〈大東盟的形成及今後面臨的問題〉,《東南亞研究》,3: 22-24。
黃奎博,2005,〈「東協加三」與區域合作:東北亞與東南亞的連結〉,《國際關係學報》20: 93-124。
楊永明,1999,〈東協區域論壇:亞太安全之政府間多邊對話機制〉,《政治科學論叢》,11: 145-180。
楊永明、唐欣偉,1999,〈信心建立措施與亞太安全〉,《問題與研究》,38(6): 1-22。
楊昊,2005,〈「安全治理」的理論與實踐:以東南亞國協安全治理模式的建構與演化為例〉,《台灣政治學刊》,9(2): 153-231。
───,2008,〈新憲章規範下的東協區域主義:回顧與展望〉,《台灣東南亞學刊》,5(1): 145-177。
───,2010,〈從東協連接到東亞連結:台灣的角色與期待〉,《東協瞭望》,2: 52-57。
楊保筠,2007,〈東盟與歐盟關係 30 年評析〉,《東南亞研究》,6: 63-70。
楊曉靜,2008,〈冷戰後中國和東盟的關係〉,《牡丹江教育學院學報》,4: 26-27。
葉蕙君、林岑妤,2016,〈東協經濟共同體(專題):發展與回顧(上)〉,《東協瞭望》,12: 17-21。
葛紅亮,2014,〈東協對南海政策的建構主義解析〉,《全球政治評論》,47: 107-120。
廖文義,2006,〈國際關係理論中的建構主義學派〉,《通識研究集刊》,9: 247-270。
廖舜右,2010,〈東協加三的發展與研析〉,《台灣經濟研究月刊》,33(4): 21-28。
───,2011,〈亞太主義與東亞主義對治下的東協加八〉,《政治學報》,51: 29-51。
劉興華,2006,〈東亞共同體:構想與進程〉,《東南亞研究》,1: 92-96。
蔡東杰、洪銘德,2009,〈美中兩國在東南亞地區的軟權力構築與競爭〉,《遠景基金會季刊》,10(1): 45-88。
蔡政修,2008,〈國際關係英國學派之理論評介:兼論其與建構主義和建制理論的異同〉,《亞太研究通訊》,6: 153-184。
蔡增家,1998,〈冷戰後中共對東協的外交政策〉,《中國大陸研究》,41(9): 71-87。
───,2005,〈日本與東協關係的轉變〉,《問題與研究》,44(2): 103-129。
───,2006,〈亞歐會議經濟議程的建構與發展從國際建制的角度分析〉,《問題與研究》,45(4): 63-90。
蔡學儀,2003,〈亞洲經貿區域化與台灣因應之道〉,《問題與研究》,42(2): 23-53。
鄭先武,2004,〈東盟「安全共同體」:從理論到實踐〉,《東南亞研究》,1:26-32。
蕭全政,2001,〈東亞「區域主義」的發展與台灣的角色〉,《政治科學論叢》,14:201-222。
賴怡忠,2009,〈歐巴馬時代的美國——亞太關係展望〉,《台灣國際研究季刊》,5(1):43-78。
戴萬平,2011,〈泰國對中國外交政策的演變:建構主義的觀點分析〉,《台灣東南亞學刊》,8(1):65-100。
藍玉春,2009,〈從建構主義探討形塑中的歐洲認同〉,《全球政治評論》,25:81-116。

(四)研討會論文
楊昊,2005,〈新區域主義與安全治理:東協安全擴溢網絡在亞太地區的實踐與挑戰〉,2005年臺灣的東南亞區域研究年會, 4月28、29日。南投:國立暨南國際大學。

(五)其他
中華人民共和國外交部,〈中國-東盟的睦鄰互信夥伴關係〉,
https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_chn//ziliao_611306/wjs_611318/2159_611322/t8988.shtml ,檢索時間:2019/1/13。
中國人大網,1992,《中華人民共和國領海及毗連區》,http://www.npc.gov.cn/wxzl/wxzl/2000-12/05/content_4562.htm ,檢閱時間:2019/6/30。
中華民國經濟部國際貿易局,2015,〈東協經濟共同體成立背景、目的及進展〉,https://www.trade.gov.tw/App_Ashx/File.ashx?FilePath=../Files/PageFile/6522c6a2-e6da-42c0-9dee-1209f43c1a08.pdf ,檢索時間:2018/6/15。
中華民國經濟部國際貿易局,2019,〈「區域全面經濟夥伴協定(RCEP)」簡介〉,https://www.trade.gov.tw/Files/PageFile/555772/1080326_RCEP簡介.pdf ,檢索時間:2019/4/29。
徐遵慈,2016,〈東協經濟共同體:現狀、挑戰與前景〉,https://web.wtocenter.org.tw/Page.aspx?nid=126&pid=274640 ,檢索時間:2018/6/15。
蔡佩芬,2019,〈日本、東協下月簽新EPA〉,《經濟日報》,https://money.udn.com/money/story/5599/3664827 ,檢索日期:2019/5/10。
楊仁賢,2011,〈東帝汶想進東協 新加坡為何反對?〉,http://onmeditation-read.blogspot.com/2011/06/blog-post_16.html,檢索時間:2019/7/15。

二、 英文部分
(一)官方文件
ADMM. 2006. Joint Press Release of the Inaugural ASEAN Defence Ministers’ Meeting Kuala Lumpur. https://admm.asean.org/dmdocuments/1.%20Joint%20Press%20Release%20of%20the%20Inaugural%20ASEAN%20Defence%20Ministers.pdf (May 25, 2018).
ASCC. 2013. Mid-Term Review of the ASEAN Socio- Cultural Community Blueprint 2009-2015. https://asean.org/storage/2017/09/2.-Feb-2014-Mid-Term-Review-of-the-ASCC-Blueprint-2009-2015-Executive-Summary.pdf (July 1, 2019).
ASEAN Ministerial Meeting. 2004. Joint Communique of the 37th ASEAN Ministerial Meeting. https://asean.org/joint-communique-of-the-37th-asean-ministerial-meeting-jakarta/ (March 30, 2018).
ASEAN. 2012. “Overview of ASEAN-European Union Dialogue Relations.” https://asean.org/?static_post=overview-of-asean-eu-dialogue-relations , (June 27, 2019).
ASEAN Secretariat News. 2017.“ASEAN, Germany formalize Development Partnership.” https://asean.org/asean-germany-formalise-development-partnership/ (December 22, 2018).
ASEAN. 1967. the ASEAN Declaration. https://asean.org/the-asean-declaration-bangkok-declaration-bangkok-8-august-1967/ (March 30, 2019).
ASEAN. 1976. Declaration of ASEAN Concord. https://asean.org/?static_post=declaration-of-asean-concord-indonesia-24-february-1976 (March 31, 2019).
ASEAN. 1976. Treaty of Amity and Cooperation in Southeast Asia. https://asean.org/treaty-amity-cooperation-southeast-asia-indonesia-24-february-1976/ (January 14, 2019).
ASEAN. 1977. ASEAN Preferential Trading Arrangement. https://cil.nus.edu.sg/wp-content/uploads/formidable/18/1977-Agreement-on-ASEAN-Preferential-Trading-Arrangements.pdf (May 10, 2018).
ASEAN. 1987. Manila Declaration. https://asean.org/?static_post=manila-declaration-philippines-15-december-1987 (October 2, 2018).
ASEAN. 1996. Press Statement The First Informal ASEAN Heads of Government Meeting. https://asean.org/?static_post=press-statement-the-first-informal-asean-heads-of-government-meeting-jakarta-30-november-1996 (April 16, 2018).
ASEAN. 1997. ASEAN Vision 2020. https://asean.org/?static_post=asean-vision-2020 (September 26, 2018).
ASEAN. 1997. Press Statement of the 2nd ASEAN Informal Meeting of Heads of State/Government of the Member States of ASEAN. https://asean.org/?static_post=press-statement-of-the-2nd-asean-informal-meeting-of-heads-of-stategovernment-of-the-member-states-of-asean-kuala-lumpur-malaysia-15-december-1997 (April 16, 2018).
ASEAN. 1998. Ha Noi Declaration of 1998. https://asean.org/?static_post=ha-noi-declaration-of-1998-16-december-1998 (June 25, 2018).
ASEAN. 2003. Declaration of ASEAN Concord II. https://asean.org/?static_post=declaration-of-asean-concord-ii-bali-concord-ii (June 25, 2018).
ASEAN. 2004. Vientiane Action Programme.
https://www.asean.org/uploads/archive/VAP-10th%20ASEAN%20Summit.pdf (May 22, 2018).
ASEAN. 2005. “One Vision, One Identity, One Community.” Chairman’s Statement of the 11th ASEAN Summit. https://asean.org/?static_post=chairman-s-statement-of-the-11th-asean-summit-one-vision-one-identity-one-community (July 2, 2019).
ASEAN. 2007. “One ASEAN at the Heart of Dynamic Asia.” Chairman’s Statement of the 13th ASEAN Summit. https://asean.org/?static_post=chairman-s-statement-of-the-13th-asean-summit-one-asean-at-the-heart-of-dynamic-asia-singapore-20-november-2007 (September 25, 2018).
ASEAN. 2007. ASEAN Charter. https://asean.org/storage/images/archive/publications/ASEAN-Charter.pdf (April 15, 2018).
ASEAN. 2007. Cebu Declaration on the Acceleration of the Establishment of an ASEAN Community by 2015. https://asean.org/?static_post=cebu-declaration-on-the-acceleration-of-the-establishment-of-an-asean-community-by-2015 (May 28, 2018).。
ASEAN. 2007. ASEAN Economic Community Blueprint. https://asean.org/wp-content/uploads/archive/5187-10.pdf (June 25, 2018).
ASEAN. 2007. Singapore Declaration on the ASEAN Charter. https://asean.org/?static_post=singapore-declaration-on-the-asean-charter-singapore-20-november-2007 (May 30, 2018).
ASEAN. 2007.“Media Release – ASEAN Leaders Sign ASEAN Charter Singapore.” https://asean.org/?static_post=media-release-asean-leaders-sign-asean-charter-singapore-20-november-2007 (December 15, 2018).
ASEAN. 2009. ASEAN Political-Security Community Blueprint. https://asean.org/wp-content/uploads/archive/5187-18.pdf (August 21, 2018).
ASEAN. 2009. ASEAN Socio- Cultural Community Blueprint. https://cil.nus.edu.sg/wp-content/uploads/formidable/18/2009-ASEAN-Socio-Cultural-Community-Blueprint.pdf (Novermber 10, 2018).
ASEAN. 2009. Cha-am Hua Hin Declaration on the Roadmap for the ASEAN Community(2009-2015). https://asean.org/?static_post=cha-am-hua-hin-declaration-on-the-roadmap-for-the-asean-community-2009-2015 (June 1, 2018).
ASEAN. 2010. Master Plan of ASEAN Connectivity. https://www.asean.org/storage/images/ASEAN_RTK_2014/4_Master_Plan_on_ASEAN_Connectivity.pdf (June 25, 2018).
ASEAN. 2015. Kuala Lumpur Declaration on ASEAN 2025: Forging Ahead Together. https://www.asean.org/wp-content/uploads/images/2015/November/KL-Declaration/KL%20Declaration%20on%20ASEAN%202025%20Forging%20Ahead%20Together.pdf (June 15, 2018).
ASEAN. 2015. Kuala Lumpur Declaration on the Establishment of the ASEAN Community. https://www.asean.org/wp-content/uploads/images/2015/November/KL-Declaration/KL%20Declaration%20on%20Establishment%20of%20ASEAN%20Community%202015.pdf (June 8, 2018).
ASEAN. 2016. ASEAN Socio-Cultural Community Blueprint 2025. https://asean.org/storage/2016/01/ASCC-Blueprint-2025.pdf (January 30, 2019).
ASEAN+ 3. 2004. Chairman’s Statement of the 8th ASEAN+ 3 Summit. https://asean.org/?static_post=chairman-s-statement-of-the-8th-asean-3-summit-vientiane-29-november-2004 (July 24, 2018).
ASEAN and Japan. 2003. Tokyo Declaration for the Dynamic and Enduring Japan-ASEAN Partnership in the New Millennium. https://asean.org/?static_post=external-relations-japan-tokyo-declaration-for-the-dynamic-and-enduring-asean-japan-partnership-in-the-new-millenium-tokyo-12-december-2003 (June 25, 2019).
ASEAN-Japan Summit. 2007. Joint Statement on the Conclusion of the Negotiations for the ASEAN-Japan Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement. https://asean.org/?static_post=external-relations-japan-joint-statement-on-the-conclusion-of-the-negotiations-for-the-asean-japan-comprehensive-economic-partnership-agreement-singapore-21-november-2007 (June 26, 2019).
East Asia Summit. 2005. Kuala Lumpur Declaration on the East Asia Summit. https://asean.org/?static_post=kuala-lumpur-declaration-on-the-east-asia-summit-kuala-lumpur-14-december-2005 (July 4, 2019).
EPG. 2006. Report of the Eminent Persons Group on the ASEAN Charter. https://www.asean.org/storage/images/archive/19247.pdf (February 15, 2019).
Goh, Chok Tong. 2002. “Deepening Regional Integration and Co-operation.” https://asean.org/?static_post=keynote-address-by-singapore-prime-minister-goh-chok-tong-at-the-wef-east-asia-economic-summit-2002-on-tuesday-8-october-2002-kuala-lumpur-malaysia (May 22, 2019).
Jayakumar, Shunmugam. 1998. “Stick to Basics,” https://asean.org/?static_post=opening-statement-by-professor-s-jayakumar-minister-for-foreign-affairs-and-minister-for-law-of-the-republic-of-singapore-at-the-31st-asean-ministerial-meeting-24-july-1998-manila-stick-to-basics (September 25, 2018).
Razak, Najib. 21th Nov. 2015. “Opening Address by Yab Dato’ Sri Mohd Najib Tun Abdul Razak Prime Minister of Malaysia.” https://www.asean.org/wp-content/uploads/images/2015/November/27th-summit/Opening%20ceremony%2020%2011%2015%202.pdf (October 5, 2018).
Shinawatra, Thaksin. 2002. “Asia Cooperation Dialogue- the New Asian Realism.”
https://asean.org/?static_post=asia-cooperation-dialogue-the-new-asian-realism-keynote-address-by-his-excellency-thaksin-shinawatra-prime-minister-of-thailand-at-the-east-asia-economic-summit-2002-kuala-lumpur-6-october-2002 (May 22, 2019).

(二)專書
Acharya, Amitav. 2001. Constructing a Security Community in Southeast Asia: ASEAN and the Problem of Regional Order. London: Routledge.
Allison, Laura. 2015. The EU, ASEAN and Interregionalism: Regionalism support and norm diffusion between the EU and ASEAN. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Antolik, Michael. 1990. ASEAN and the Diplomacy of Accommodation. New York: M. E. Sharp, Inc.
Baviera, Aileen, and Larry Mararmis, et al.. 2017. “Building ASEAN Community: Political- Security and Socio-cultural Reflections.” ASEAN@50. 4. http://www.eria.org/ASEAN_at_50_Vol_4_Full_Report.pdf .
Boli, John, and Thomas George M., et al.. 1998. Constructing World Culture: International Nongovernmental Organizations Since 1875. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Basu Das, Sanchita, and Jayant Menon, eds. 2013. The ASEAN Economic Community: a work in progress. Singapore: ISEAS Publishing.
Finnemore, Martha. 1996a. National Interests in International Society. New York: Cornell University Press.
Goldstein, Joshua S., and Jon C. Pevehouse. 2008. International Relations. New York: Longman.
Jackson, Robert, and Georg Sørensen. 2007. Introduction to International Relations: Theories and Approach. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
Jones, David Martin, and M.L.R. Smith. 2006. ASEAN and East Asian International Relations: Regional Delusion. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Keohane, Robert O.. 1986. Neorealism and Its Critics. New York: Columbia University Press.
Narine, Shaun. 2002. Explaining ASEAN: Regionalism in Southeast Asia. Boulder, Colo. :Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Prakash, Aseem, and Jeffrey A. Hart, et al.. 1999. Globalization and Governance. London and New York: Routledge.
Severino, Rodolfo. 2006. Southeast Asia in Search of an ASEAN Community: Insights from the former ASEAN Secretary General. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asia Studies.
Steans, Jill, and Lloyd Pettiford. 2005. Introduction to International Relations: Perspectives and Themes. New York: Pearson Educations Ltd.
Waltz, Kenneth N. 1979. Theory of International Politics. London: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
Wendt ,Alexander. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.

(三)專書篇章
Acharya, Amitav. 2004. “What is a Community?” In Towards Realizing an ASEAN Community: A Brief Report on the ASEAN Community Roundtable, eds. Denis Hew et al. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 27-35.
Adler, Emanuel. 2002. “Constructivism and International Relations.” In Handbook of International Relations, eds. Walter Carlsnaes, Thomas Risse and Beth A. Simmons. London: SAGE, 95-118.
Bertens, Hans. 1997. “The Debate on Postmodernism.” In International Postmodernism Theory and Literary Practice, eds. Hans Bertens and Douwe Fokkema. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 3-14.
Copeland, Dale C.. 2006.“The Constructivist Challenge to Structural Realism.” In Constructivism and International Relations: Alexander Wendt and his critics, eds. Stefano Guzzini and Anna Leander. London and New York: Routledge, 1-20.
Evans, Paul M. 1996. “Economic and Security Dimension of the Emerging Order in Asia Pacific.” In Southeast Asia in the New World Order: The Political Economy of a Dynamic Region, eds. David Wurfel and Cruce Burton. Houndmills: Macmillan Press, Ltd.
Hurd, Ian. 2008. “Constructivism.” In The Oxford Handbooks of International Relations, eds. Christian Reus-Smit and Duncan Snidal. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 298-316.
Katzenstein, Peter. 1996. “Introduction: Alternative Perspectives on National Security.” In The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics, ed. Peter Katzenstein. Columbia University Press, 1-32.
Lee, Seungjoo, and Chung-in Moon. 2009. “South Korea’s Regional Economic Cooperation Policy: The Evolution of an Adaptive Strategy.” In Northeast Asia: Ripe for Integration? eds. Vinod K. Aggarwal, Min Gyo Koo, Seungjoo Lee and Chung-in Moon. New York: Springer-Verlag, 37-61.
Onuf, Nicholas Greenwood. 2001b. “The Politics of Constructivism.” In Constructing International Relations, eds. Karin M. Fierke and Knud Erik Jørgensen. New York: M.E. Sharpe, 236-254.
Palmer, Norman D.. 1992. “SEATO, ASA, Maphilindo and ASPAC.” In The ASEAN Reader, eds. K. S. Sandhu et al.. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
Ringmer, Erik. 1997. “Alexander Wendt: A Social Scientist Struggling with History.” In The Future of International Relations: Masters in the Making, eds. Iver Neumann and Ole Wæver. London, New York: Routledge, 290-311.
Steans, Jill, and Lloyd Pettiford. 2005. “Critical Theory,” In Introduction to International Relations: Perspectives and Themes, eds. Jill Steans, Lloyd Pettiford, Thomas Diez and Imad El-Anis. New York: Pearson Educations Ltd., 103-128.
Sterling-Folker, Jennifer. 2013. “Constructivism.” In Making Sense of International Relations Theory, ed. Jennifer Sterling-Folker. Boulder: Lynne Rienner, 127-135.

(四)期刊論文
Acharya, Amitav. 1997. “Idea, Identity, and Institution-Building: From the ASEAN Way to the Asia-Pacific Way.” Pacific Review 10(3): 319-346.
───. 2017. “The Evolution and Limitations of ASEAN.” ASEAN@50 4: 25-38.
Ba, Alice, and Matthew J. Hoffman. 2003. “Making and Remaking the World for IR 101: A Resource for Teaching Social Constructivism in Introductory Classes.” International Studies Perspectives 49(1): 15-33.
Bae, Ki-Hyun. 2015. “Neither Left-out nor Publish-over: Anxious ASEAN and its 4C Practices.” The Pacific Review 28(5): 703-729.
Barnett, Michael N., and Martha Finnemore. 1999. “The politics, power, and pathologies of international organizations.” International Organization 53: 699-732.
Bowls, Paul. 1997. “ASEAN, AFTA and the New Regionalism.” Pacific Affairs 70(2): 219-233.
Buszynski, Leszek. 1992. “Southeast Asia in the Post-cold War Era.” Asian Survey 32(9): 830-847.
Buzan, Barry. 2001. “The English School: An Underexploited Resource in IR.” Review of International Studies 27(3): 471-488.
Copeland, Dale C.. 2000. “The Constructivist Challenge to Structural Realism: A Review Essay.” International Security 25(2): 187-212.
Finnemore, Martha, and Kathryn Sikkink. 2001. “Taking Stock: The Constructivist Research Program in International Relations and Comparative Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science 4: 391-416.
Finnemore, Martha. 1993. “International organizations as teachers of norms: the United Nations educational, scientific, and cultural organization and science policy.” International Organization 47:565–597 .
───. 1996b. “Norms, culture, and world politics: insights from sociology’s institutionalism.” International Organization 50:325–347.
Jones, Michael E.. 2004. “Forging an ASEAN Identity: The Challenge to Construct a Shared Destiny.” Contemporary Southeast Asia 26(1): 140-154.
Koslowski, Rey, and Friedrich Kratochwil. 1994. “Understanding Change in International Politics: The Soviet Empire Demise and International System.” International Organization 48(2):215-247.
Rüland, Jürgen. 2000. “ASEAN and the Asian Crisis: Theoretical Implications and Practical Consequences for Southeast Asian Regionalism.” Pacific Review 13(3): 421-451.
Suganami, Hidemi. 2001. “Alexander Wendt and the English School.” Journal of International Relations and Development 4(4):406-411.
Wendt, Alexander. 1992. “Anarchy is What States Make of It: the Social Construction of Power Politics.” International Organization 46(2):391-425.
───. 1994. “Collective Identity Formation and the International State.” The American Political Science Review 88(22): 384-396.
───. 1995. “Constructing International Politics.” International Security 20(1):71-81.
Wiener, Antje. 2003. “Constructivism: The Limits of Bridging Gaps.” Journal of International Relations and Development. 6(3): 252-275.
Wu, Chien-Huei. 2013.“The Evolution of EU-ASEAN Relations: Legal Framework and Policy Change.” National Taiwan University Law Review. 8(2):329-372.
Yamakage, Susumu. 2017. “Evolving ASEAN and Changing Roles of the TAC”, http://www.eria.org/ASEAN_at_50_4A.3_Yamakage_final.pdf

(五)研討會論文
Acharya, Amitav and Allan Layug. 2012. “Collective Identity Formation in Asian Regionalism: ASEAN Identity and the Construction of the Asia-Pacific Regional Order”, Paper presented at the World Congress of International Political Science Association(IPSA), Madrid, Spain, 8-12 July.
Milner, Anthony. 2000. “ASEAN+3, ‘Asia’ Consciousness and Asian Values,” PROSEA Research Paper No. 39. Taipei: Program for Southeast Asian Area Studies, Academia Sinica.

(六)其他
ASEAN Socio-Cultural Community. https://asean.org/asean-socio-cultural/ (July 1, 2019).
Spiie, Marguerite A. 2015. “Indonesia Against Notion to Form ASEAN Union.” https://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2015/11/18/indonesia-against-notion-form-asean-union.html (March 22, 2019).
Wuryandari, Ganewati. 2011. “East Timor’s Membership in ASEAN: Prospects and Challenges.” http://www.aseancenter.org.tw/upload/files/OUTLOOK_003_02.pdf (July 2, 2019).
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code