本論文探究大衛•哈維(David Harvey, 1935 – present)《新帝國主義》(New Imperialism)一書的空間與地理學意涵，論證其與過去帝國主義的不同，以及對於當代馬克思主義全球化研究之意義。
以往的馬克思主義帝國主義理論，繼承了時間優先的歷史決定論，表現出重視時間與歷史，忽視空間與地理的現象。這些帝國主義理論無不以歷史決定論看待國際結構的不平衡，意即仍然是時間造成了核心與邊陲的差異，帝國主義在本質上是歷史性的。對歷史性與時間維度的側重，是哈維之前馬克思主義帝國主義理論的共同特徵。哈維的新帝國主義之所以「新」，就是在於是一種空間化的帝國主義理論，將地理學的視野帶入帝國主義的討論，這是對應於當代資本主義全球化的空間生產，自然是意義非凡，與眾不同而自成一家之言。
在方法學上，哈維的馬克思主義地理學途徑、空間辯證法與歷史－地理唯物主義，構成其空間化理論的框架。馬克思主義地理學代表著一種激進與革命的觀點，兼具批判性與啟示性的視角，對於空間中所隱含的社會關係與政治權力給予獨特的關注和理解。空間辯證法繼承自馬克思與列斐伏爾(Henri Lefevre, 1901 – 1991)，以空間實踐、空間再現與再現空間為經，絕對空間、相對空間與關係空間為緯，交叉構成一種多重辯證的空間認識論。歷史－地理唯物主義則是哈維對歷史唯物主義的時代升級，將地理學與空間因素放進歷史的過程中同時加以審視。
新帝國主義動力來自於領土邏輯與資本邏輯，以確保對領域內控制與對外擴張，藉以實現全球範圍嚴格的層級、總體的一致性，以及社會內部的區隔與分割。對新帝國主義進行政策指導與背書的是當代的新自由主義思想，透過金融化與私有化，實現金融集團、特權階級與統治精英的利益最大化，造成並持續深化了世界範圍的不公平與不正義。掠奪性積累是新帝國主義的積累方式，使得資本主義入侵到任何可以想像到之領域，例如人體、山川、宇宙等等，造就倫理、文化、資源與生態的嚴重危機。新帝國主義造成不平衡地理發展，亦即高度繁榮的帝國中心區與其附庸國，相對於不對稱交換下被剝削的邊陲地區，在空間上形成巨大的落差。
本論文之貢獻在於：論證《新帝國主義》的「新」是在於空間意涵，哈維因應全球化時代的生產方式變遷，不僅對馬克思主義進行空間性的升級，更提供了帝國主義研究一種空間化的框架。

This work deals with the spatial and geographical factors in David Harvey’s New Imperialism, identifies the difference between traditional imperialism and Harvey’s theory, and proves the academic meaning of New Imperialism in the Marxist globalization research.
The Imperialism in nineteenth century is generally regarded as a theory inherited from the idea of priority on history, emphasizing the viewpoints from the time and history, instead of the geography and space. Such a traditional kind of imperialism is fundamentally based on the priority on history in nature. On the other hand, the New Imperialism proposed by David Harvey (1935 – present) is a sort of spatial theory. The perspective of geography was innovatively brought into the New Imperialism by Harvey.
The Marxist’s geography theory, the spatial dialectics and the historical- geographical materialism are the three core methodologies of the space theory in the New Imperialism by Harvey. First, the Marxist’s geography theory reflects not only the radical and revolutionary spirit, but also the social relations and political power. Second, the spatial dialectics is inherited from Henri Lefevre (1901 – 1991). On the theoretical basis of Lefevre, Harvey added the absolute space, the relative space and the relational space in his theory to create a multiple-dialectical epistemology of space. Third, the historical-geographical materialism is derived from the traditional historical materialism by Harvey from which the geography and spatial factors were added.
The dynamics of New Imperialism come from the territory/capital logic of power. In addition, the new imperialism is further guided by the Neoliberalism, which provides political guidelines and endorsement so as to maximize the benefits to financial groups, the aristocratic class and the ruling elites through financialization and privatization. As a result, the Neoliberalism can make an unfair and unjustified condition worldwide. On the other hand, the “accumulation by dispossession” is the solution of over accumulation of capital in the new imperialism era, allowing a total invasion on all the domains such as our human body, the rivers and the mountains of our mother nature, the air, and even the universe. This comprehensively creates serious crises on the ethics, culture, resources and ecology. Moreover, the New Imperialism may also result in an uneven geographical development, i.e., a huge difference between the highly developed empires vs. the deprived under-developed region.
The major achievement derived form this work are: The significant”new” of New imperialism is rooted in spatial conception. Alone with the changes of mode of production in globalization era, Harvey not only updates traditional Marxism theoretically with space, but also provides the imperial research innovatively a spatial framework.

第一章、 緒論…………………………………………..........1
第一節、 問題意識與研究目的………………………..……1
第二節、 文獻回顧…………………………...………...……8
第三節、 研究策略、研究途徑與名詞界定…………..…..14
第四節、 章節安排…………………………………..……..21

第二章、 新帝國主義理論的背景………………………....27
第一節、 馬克思原典的帝國主義與空間概念……………27
第二節、 古典帝國主義理論…………………………..…..35
第三節、 社會科學研究的空間轉向…………………..…..41
第四節、 美國霸權與新帝國主義理論的提出……………51

第三章、 新帝國主義理論的方法學………………………57
第一節、 馬克思主義地理學…………………………..…..57
第二節、 空間辯證法…………………………………..…..67
第三節、 歷史－地理唯物主義………………………..…..79

第四章、 新帝國主義理論的主要內容………………..…..87
第一節、 領土邏輯與資本邏輯………………………..…..87
第二節、 新自由主義霸權與掠奪性積累……………....…98
第三節、 不平衡地理發展………..………………………111
第四節、 替代性方案……………………………...……..120

第五章、 結論………………………………………….…131

參考文獻 ………………………………………….………..…147

中文文獻：

厄里。2003。＜關於時間與空間的社會學＞。載於《社會理論指南》，特納主編、李康 譯。上海：上海人民出版社。504-535。
布哈林 著，蒯兆德 譯。1983。《世界經濟和帝國主義》。北京：中國社會科學出版社。
布魯厄 著，仇啟華 等譯。1984。《馬克思主義的帝國主義理論》。北京：求實出版社。
弗雷德里克• 傑姆遜 著，胡亞敏 等譯。2000。《文化轉向》。北京：中國社會科學出版社。
弗雷德里克• 傑姆遜 著，唐小兵 譯。1997。《後現代主義與文化理論》。北京: 北京大學出版社。
田毅鵬、張金榮。2010。＜馬克思社會空間理論及其當代價值＞http://www.reviewing.cn/idal/2010/1029/article_883.html. (accessed Feb/12/2011)。
列寧。1995。＜唯物主義和經驗批判主義＞。《列寧選集》，第2卷，北京：人民出版社。35-150。
列寧。2001。《帝國主義是資本主義的最高階段》。第3版。北京：人民出版社。
考斯基 著，史集 譯。1964。《帝國主義》。北京：三聯書店。
希法亭 著，福民 等譯。1992。《金融資本》。北京：商務印書館。
阿蘭德 著，蔡英文 譯。1982。《帝國主義》。臺北：聯經。
保羅• 諾克斯、史蒂文• 平奇 著，柴彥威、張景秋 等譯。2005。《城市社會地理學導論》。北京：商務印書館。
紀登斯 著，李康、李猛 譯。1998。《社會的構成：結構化理論大綱》。北京：三聯書店。
胡大平。2004。〈從歷史唯物主義到歷史地理唯物主義〉。《南京大學學報》。(四)。12-15。
胡大平。2007。〈社會批判理論之空間轉向與歷史唯物主義的空間化〉，《江海學刊》。( 2)：31-36。
馬克思、恩格斯。1980。《馬克思恩格斯全集》。第46卷(下)。北京：人民出版社。
馬克思、恩格斯。1995a。。《馬克思恩格斯選集》。第1卷。北京：人民出版社。
馬克思、恩格斯。1995b。《馬克思恩格斯選集》。第2卷 ，北京：人民出版社
馬克思。2004。《資本論》。第1卷(上)。北京：人民出版社。
張亞中、苗繼德。2007。〈國際政治經濟學理論〉。載於《國際關係總論》。張亞中 主編。第二版。臺北：揚智。483-520。
劉德斌、孫興傑。2011。〈霸權與帝國：兩種不同的組織形態與邏輯〉。《吉林大學社會科學學報》。(2)。78-83
魏海燕。2012。〈哈維新帝國主義論域中的空間〉。《蘇州大學學報(哲學社會科學版) 》。2012年第1期。http://www.xzbu.com/4/view-1557309.htm (Accessed Dec./11/2012)
羅莎•盧森堡 著，彭塵舜、吳紀先 譯。1959。《資本積累論》。北京：三聯書店。




英文文獻：
Arrighi, Giovanni. 1994. The Long Twentieth Century. New York: verso.
Arrighi, Giovanni. 2005. “Hegemony Unraveling (I ) (II)." New Left Review 32、33( March/April、 May/June): 23-80, 83-116.
Arrighi, Giovanni. Interviewed by David Harvey. 2009. ” The Winding Paths of Capital.” New Left Review. 56(March-April). http://www.newleftreview.org/?view=2771 (accessed Oct/2/2010)
Ashman, Sam & Alex Callinicos.2006. ” Capital Accumulation and the State System: Assessing David Harvey’s The New Imperialism.” Historical Materialism, 14(4): 107-130.
Barnes, Trevor. 2006. “Between deduction and dialectics: David Harvey on knowledge.” in Noel Castree & Derek Gregory (eds.). David Harvey : A Critical Reader . Oxford: Blackwell: 26- 46.
Bashir, Abu-Manneh. 2004. “The Illusions of Empire.“Monthly review. 56(2). http://monthlyreview.org/2004/06/01/the-illusions-of-empire. (Accessed Jan./20/2013)
Brenner, Neil & Stuart Elden. 2009. Henri Lefebvre, State, Space, World: Selected Essays. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Brenner, Robert. 2006. ”What is, and what is not, Imperialism.” Historical Materialism. 14 (4): 79- 105.
Castree, Noel. 1999.” Envisioning Capitalism: Geography and the Renewal of Marxian Political Economy.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. 24(2): 137-158.
Castree, Noel. 2006. ” David Harvey’s Symptomatic Silence.” Historical Materialism. 14(4):35-57.
Castree, Noel. 2007. “David Harvey: Marxism, Capitalism and the Geographical Imagination.” New Political Economy. 12(1). http://www.excellentfuture.ca/sites/default/files/David%20Harvey%20Marxism,%20Capitalism%20and%20the%20Geographical%20Imagination.pdf. (accessed April/25/2011)
Cooper, Robert. 2000. The Postmodern State and the World Order. London: Demos.
Cooper, Robert. 2010. “Why We still Need Empires”. The Observer. April/7/2002. http://www. observer.co.uk/worldview/story/0,11581,680117,00.html (accessed April/24/2010).
Cox, Judy. 2004.” Imperialism: just a phase we're going through?” International Socialism Journal.(spring). http://www.isj.org.uk/index.php4?id=46&issue=102 (Accessed Feb/12/2011)
Cox, Robert. 1987. Production, Power and World Order. New York: Columbia University Press.
Crang, Mike & Nigel Thrift. 2000. Thinking Space. London: Routledge.
Doel, Marcus. 2006. “Dialectical materialism: stranger than friction.” in Noel Castree & Derek Gregory ( eds.). David Harvey : A Critical Reader. Oxford: Blackwell.55-79.
Dunn, Bill. 2007. “Accumulation by Dispossession or Accumulation of Capital? The Case of China.” Journal of Australian Political Economy.60 (December): 12-21 http://lutahamutuk.org/yahoo_site_admin1/assets/docs/Accumulation_by_Disposession_or_Accumulation_of_Capital_China_case_study.7245801.pdf. (accessed April/24/2012)
Elden, Stuart. 2004. Understanding Henri Lefebrve. London and New York: Continuum.
Frank, Andre Gunder. 1996. “The Underdevelopment of Development”. In Andre Gunder Frank, Sing C. Chew, Robert Allen Denemark. (eds.). The Underdevelopment of development, London: Sage.17-55.
Ferguson, Niall. 2004. Colossus: The Price of America's Empire. New York: Penguin
Fine, Ben. 2006.” Debating the ‘New’ Imperialism.” Historical Materialism, 14(4):133-156
Foucault, Michel. 1980. Power/ Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings :1972-1977. Brighton: Harvester Press.
Fuchs, Christian. 2009. “A Contribution to Critical Globalization Studies.” European Journal of Communication ,24 (1): 69-87.
Fuchs, Christian.2010a. “Critical Globalization Studies: An Empirical and Theoretical Analysis of the New Imperialism.” Science & Society. 74(2):215-247.
Fuchs, Christian.2010b. “Critical Globalization Studies and the New Imperialism.” Critical Sociology. 36(6):839-867
Gilpin, Robert. 1987. The Political Economy of International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Gregory, Derek. 1994. Geographical Imaginations. Oxford: Blackwell.
Gregory, Derek. 2006. ”Introduction: Troubling Geographies.” in Noel Castree & Derek Gregory ( eds.). David Harvey : A Critical Reader. Oxford: Blackwell.1-25.
Halliday, Fred. 2002. ”The Pertinence of Imperialism.” In Mark Rupert & Hazel Smith (eds.).Historical Materialism and Globalization. New York: Routledge. 75-89.
Hansen, Anders Lund.2006. Spaces Wars and the New Urban Imperialism. Lund : Department of Social and Economic Geography.
Hardt, Michael & Antonio Negri. 2000. Empire. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Harvey, David. 1973. Social Justice and the City. London: Sage.
Harvey, David. 1982. The Limits to Capital, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Harvey, David. 1984. ”On the history and present condition of geography: an historical materialist manifesto.” The Professional Geographer, 36(1): 1-11.
Harvey, David. 1985. “The Geopolitics of Capitalism.” In Derek Gregory and John Urry (eds.) Social Relations and Spatial Structures. New York: St. Martin's Press.128-163.
Harvey, David. 1990a. The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change. Cambridge: Blackwell.
Harvey, David. 1990b. 王志弘 譯. “Between space and time: reflections on the geographical imagination.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 80(3): 418-434. http://www.bp.ntu.edu.tw/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/03%20Harvey-%E6%99%82%E7%A9%BA%E4%B9%8B%E9%96%93.pdf. (Accessed Feb/12/2011)
Harvey, David. 1996. Justice, Nature and the Geography of Difference. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Harvey, David. 2000a. Space of Hope. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Harvey, David. (interview with Perry Anderson).2000b. “Reinventing Geograghy.” New Left Review. 4(July-August):75-97.
Harvey, David. 2003a. The New Imperialism. New York: Oxford University Press.
Harvey, David. 2003b. Paris, Capital of Modernity. London: Routledge.
Harvey, David. 2005. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. NewYork: Oxford University Press.
Harvey, David. 2006a. Spaces of Global Capitalism: Towards a Theory of Uneven Geographical development. New York: Verso.
Harvey, David. 2006b. ” Space As a Keyword.” in Noel Castree & Derek Gregory ( eds.) ,David Harvey : A Critical Reader. Oxford: Blackwell.270-294.
Harvey, David. 2006c , “Comment on Commentaries.”, Historical Materialism, 14(4):157-166.
Harvey, David. 2007. ”In What Ways Is 'The New Imperialism' Really New?” Historical Materialism. 15(2): 57–70
Harvey, David. 2008. ”The Dialetics of space- time.” In Bertell Ollman & Tony Smith (eds.). Dialectics for the New Century. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 98-117.
Harvey, David. 2012. Rebel Cities: From the Right to the City to the Urban Revolution. New York: Verso.
Higgs, Robert. 1987. Crisis and Leviathan: Critical Episodes in the Growth of American Government. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hobson. J. A. 1975. Imperialism: A Study. New York: Gordon Press.
Huntington, Samuel P.1968. Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Ikenberry, John. 2002 "America's Imperial Ambition." Foreign Affairs. 5(Sep./Oct.):55-73.
Iversen, Gudmund R. 1991. Contextual Analysis. Philadelphia: Swarthmore College.
Jessop, Bob. 2006. ” Spatial Fixes, Temporal Fixes and Spatio- Temporal Fixes.” in Noel Castree & Derek Gregory (eds.). David Harvey : A Critical Reader. Oxford: Blackwell.142-162.
Johnston, Ron & James D. Sidaway. 2004. Geography& Geographers: Anglo- American Human Geography since 1945. New York: Routledge.
Laclau, Ernesto & Chantal Mouffe. 2001. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. 2nd Edition. London: Verso.
Lefebvre, Henri. 1971. Everyday Life in the Modern World. New York and London: Harper & Row.
Lefebvre, Henri. 1976. The Survival of Capitalism. London: Allison & Busby.
Lefebvre, Henri. 1991. The Production of Space. Cambridge: Blackwell.
Lefebvre, Henri. 2003. Key Writings. Stuart Elden etc. eds. New York: Continuum.
Marcuse, Herbert. 1991. One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society. 2 edition. London: Routledge.
Nitzan, Jonathan & Shimshon Bichler. 2004. ” New Imperialism or New Capitalism?” Montreal and Jerusalem. (December). http://bnarchives.yorku.ca/124/01/041214NB_NewImperialismNewCapitalism(Ver2).pdf. (Accessed Feb/10/2011)
Ollman, Bertell. 2003. Dance of the Dialectic: Steps in Marx's Method. Champlain, Illinois: University of Illinois Press
Panitch, Leo & Colin Leys. 2003. The New Imperial Challenge. London: Merlin Press.
Panitch, Leo & Sam Gindin. 2003. Global Capitalism and American Empire. London: The Merlin Press.
Parsons, Talcott. 1964. The Social System .New York: Free Press.
Peet, Richard. 1998. Modern Geographical Thought. Blackwell: Oxford.
Quaini, Massimo. 1982. Geography and Marxism. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Ricks, Thomas E. 2001. “U. S. Urged to Embrace an 'Imperialist' Role, Worldwide Dominance Ignites a Debate.” Washington Post. August/22/2001. http://dimension.ucsd.edu/CEIMSA-IN-EXILE/ateliers2/a15/art15-19.html (accessed April/24/2010)
Robinson, William, I. 2002, “Global Capitalism and Nation-State Centric Thinking: What We Dont See When We Do See Nation-States: Response to Critics.” Science & Society. 65(4):500-508.
Robinson, William I. & Jerry Harris. 2000.” Towards a Global Ruling Class? Globalization and the Transnational Capitalist Class” Science and Society .64 (1):11 – 54.
Rostow, Walt W. 1960. The Stages of Economic Growth: A Non-communist Manifesto. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Rotberg, Robert I. 2002. “The New Nature of Nation-State Failure” The Washington Quarterly, 25(3), Summer：85-96.
Schmidt, Alfred. 1971. The concept of nature in Marx. London: New Left Books.
Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1974. Imperialism and Social Classes. Reprint of 1951 edition. New York: Augustus M Kelley.
Sheppard, Eric. 2006. “David Harvey and Dialectical Space- time.” in Noel Castree & Derek Gregory ( eds.). David Harvey : A Critical Reader. Oxford: Blackwell.
Smith, Neil. 2001. “Marxism and Geography in the Anglophone World.“ Geographische Revue, 3(2). 5-21. http://opus.kobv.de/ubp/volltexte/2008/2435/pdf/gr2_01_Ess01.pdf. (accessed Feb./5/2012)
Smith, Neil. 2008. Uneven Development: Nature, Capital, and the Production of Space. 3rd edition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Smith, Roy C & Ingo Walter. 2003. Global Banking. 2nd Edition . UK: Oxford University Press.
Soja, Edward W. 1989. Postmodern Geographies: The Reassert on of Space in Critical Social Theory. London: Verso Press.
Soja, Edward W. 1996. Thirdspace:Journeys to Los Angeles and Other Real - and- Imagined Places. L.A.: Blackwell
Soja, Edward W. 2000. Postmetropolis: Critical Studies of Cities and Regions. Oxford: Blackwell.
Strange, Susan.1996. The Retreat of the State : the Diffusion of Power in the World Economy. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
Sutcliffe, Bob. 2006. ” Imperialism Old and New: A Comment on David Harvey’s The New Imperialism and Ellen Meiksins Wood’s Empire of Capital.” Historical Materialism, 14(4): 107-130.
Sutcliffe, Bob. 2002. “How Many Capitalisms?” in Mark Rupert & Hazel Smith(eds.). Historical Materialism and Globalization. London: Routledge.
Swyngedouw, Erik. 2002. ” The Marxian Alternative: Historical-Geographical Materialism and the Political Economy of Capitalism.” In Eric Sheppard & Trevor J. Barnes (eds.). A Companion to Economic Geography. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. 41-59
Thomas, Martin & Arthur Bough. 2002. “Ultra-imperialism: a debate.” Workers' Liberty (31). http://www.workersliberty.org/node/1037. (Accessed Jan./20/2013)
Wade, Robert. 1990. “Industrial Policy in East Asia: Does it Lead or Follow the Market?”in Gary Gereffi & Donald Wyman(eds.). Manufacturing Miracles: Path of Industrialization in Latin American and East Asia. New Jersey: Princeton Press, 231-266.
Wood, Ellen. 2006. “Logics of Power: A Conversation with David Harvey.” Historical Materialism, 14(4): 9-34.
Wright, Melissa. 2006. “Differences that Matter.” in Noel Castree & Derek Gregory ( eds.). David Harvey : A Critical Reader. Oxford: Blackwell. 80-101.
Zukin, Sharon. 2006. “David Harvey on Cities.” in Noel Castree & Derek Gregory ( eds.). David Harvey : A Critical Reader. Oxford: Blackwell. 102-120