博碩士論文 etd-0119114-222336 詳細資訊


[回到前頁查詢結果 | 重新搜尋]

姓名 柯汎禧(Fen-shi Ker) 電子郵件信箱 srxcomtx@gmail.com
畢業系所 政治學研究所(Political Science)
畢業學位 碩士(Master) 畢業時期 104學年第2學期
論文名稱(中) 霍布斯式的社會學:滕尼斯觀點下的輿論共同體
論文名稱(英) Hobbesian Sociology: A Perspective from Ferdinand Tönnies on Public Opinion and Community
檔案
  • etd-0119114-222336.pdf
  • 本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
    請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
    論文使用權限

    紙本論文:立即公開

    電子論文:使用者自訂權限:校內立即公開、校外 5 年後公開

    論文語文/頁數 中文/219
    統計 本論文已被瀏覽 5352 次,被下載 34 次
    摘要(中) 本文之目的在於藉由1、滕尼斯對現代社會的勾勒2、多數社會學理論所忽略的霍布斯式個體,重建霍布斯-滕尼斯體系,所構成出的社會存有論與其可能具有的經驗形式。值此,本論文分為四個部分,在第二章中,筆者試圖證明涂爾幹-帕森斯的理論體系,其基礎建立在黑格爾式的社會存有論之上,而這個存有論的特徵,正是兩者提出「霍布斯的社會秩序問題」,以及反對霍布斯的真正理由。在第三章中,筆者要重建滕尼斯對於社會結社的論述,並由此指出,滕尼斯的社會結社-選擇意志,建立在一個以霍布斯式個體存有為前提的基礎上。這項前提,開啟了第四章的兩個問題,亦即,如何從霍布斯體系的角度回答:「社會結社下的交換關係如何可能?」、「社會結社下的共同體如何可能?」,順此,在第四章中,本文試圖證明,以霍布斯的個體慾望為基礎的現代人,能夠適切地開展出利己的交換關係、與利他的群體。在第五章中,我們要藉由第四章的思想史根據,重新以剝離了古代共同體的個體激情,理解滕尼斯的公共輿論、以及公共輿論所開啟的現代共同體。藉由各章的論述與重建,本文將呈現,在思想與社會存有論的層次上,霍布斯-滕尼斯典範,勾勒出了流動且液態的現代共同體;在社會結構的層次上,霍布斯-滕尼斯典範的意義,則在於若我們從社會關係(social relationship)的視角來看待社會結構,那麼,社會學研究就有必要重視個人層級的激情與慾望。
    摘要(英) According to outline concept of Ferdinand Tönnies’s gesellschaft and the
    Hobbesian individual ignored by most common sociological theories, this thesis
    tries to reconstruct the social ontology and the empirical matter of Hobbes- Tönnies’s system For this purpose, this thesis have four parts. In chapter two, I try to justify the theoretical systems of Durkheim-Parsons are established by social ontology of Hegelian. This is a reason why “the problem of social order in Hobbes” and “the anti-Hobbes tendency” appear in the writings of Durkheim-Parsons. In chapter three, I try to reconstruct the concept of gesellschaft and point out Tönnies’s gesellschaft which is based on the Hobbesian individual. Simultaneously, there are arised two problem of chapter four. In other words, how could we response two problem with perspective of Hobbes’ system,
    “ how could exchange relationship is possible in gesellschaft?” “ How could
    the community is possible in gesellschaft?” In chapter five, I try to reconstruct Tönnies’s ”the publc opinion” and the public opinion of modern community with evidence from history of thought which connected to individual passion estranged from ancient community. On these gourds, this thesis will present the paradigm of Hobbes-Tönnies’s system could build the community with liquid form in the perspective of social ontology and the paradigm of Hobbes-Tönnies’system also justify sociology must pay attention to individual passion in the perspective of social structure.
    關鍵字(中)
  • 個體激情
  • 公共輿論
  • 社會範疇
  • 社會秩序
  • 自利
  • 現代共同體
  • 關鍵字(英)
  • modern community
  • social category
  • social order
  • individual passion
  • public opinion
  • self-interest
  • 論文目次 目錄
    第一章 緒論 - 1 -
    第一節: 前言與問題意識: - 1 -
    第二節: 問題意識與其開展: - 2 -
    第三節: 研究架構: - 7 -
    第四節: 章節安排: - 8 -
    第五節: 初步文獻回顧: - 10 -
    第二章: 黑格爾式的社會存有論-涂爾幹與帕森斯的霍布斯秩序問題 - 18 -
    第一節: 霍布斯與社會學: - 18 -
    第二節: 帕森斯的霍布斯問題: - 19 -
    第三節: 簡論社會秩序如何可能及其前提: - 19 -
    第四節: 再論社會如何可能-規範秩序、實際秩序及其延伸: - 23 -
    小結: - 30 -
    第五節: 涂爾幹與霍布斯的秩序問題: - 32 -
    第六節: 涂爾幹與「社會變遷如何可能」: - 36 -
    第七節: 「社會變遷如何可能」與《社會分工論》: - 40 -
    第八節: 從實然到應然(from is to ought)-可欲求性與有效性: - 43 -
    第一項:道德的有效性 - 44 -
    第二項:道德的可欲性 - 45 -
    從實然到應然(from is to ought)的社會事實: - 47 -
    第九節: 從應然到實然(from ought to is) - 50 -
    第一項:對社會變遷的反駁 - 57 -
    第二項:對「從實然證成應然」的反駁 - 58 -
    第十節: 與社會和解-涂爾幹與帕森斯的社會本體: - 59 -
    第十一節: 第二章結論: - 62 -
    第三章 個人慾望下社會結社-滕尼斯的霍布斯式社會 - 65 -
    第一節: 為什麼社會學界不重視滕尼斯?: - 65 -
    第二節: 共同體與社會結社的基礎: - 68 -
    第三節: 社會結社(gesellschaft)下的交換關係(exchange relationship): - 71 -
    第四節: 社會結社-交換關係如何可能? - 73 -
    第五節: 滕尼斯的社會結社與霍布斯的利維坦: - 86 -
    第六節: 關係結構-社會結社的結構意涵 - 86 -
    第七節: 當下的辯證-社會結社的社會存有論意涵: - 93 -
    第八節: 霍布斯的兩個社會學命題: - 96 -
    第四章 自然狀態的社會學意義-恐懼與同情;交換與群體 - 101 -
    第一節: 前言:滕尼斯詮釋下的霍布斯-交換關係與群體: - 101 -
    第二節: 哲學與歷史-霍布斯的自然狀態: - 103 -
    第三節: 雙重的斷裂-自然狀態下的激情(passion) - 113 -
    第四節: 從激情到自利-Hirschman觀點與政治修辭: - 121 -
    第五節: 從激情到自利(self-interest) 政治性與經濟人: - 123 -
    第六節: 被拒斥的政治性-自然狀態與激情的群體: - 125 -
    第七節: 恐懼之後-自利與經濟人 - 143 -
    第八節: 第四章結論:霍布斯論同情-簡論思想史及當代意義 - 152 -
    第五章 個體激情、公共輿論與滕尼斯的現代共同體 - 162 -
    第一節: 前言: - 162 -
    第二節: 理性與激情-重新界定公共輿論的基礎 - 164 -
    第三節: 固態的輿論、液態的宗教: - 171 -
    第四節: 社會結社下的共同體如何可能?激情與公共輿論;社會關係與浮現: - 180 -
    第五節: 第五章結論-公共輿論的思想史、理論意義: - 187 -
    第六章-結論 - 188 -
    第一節: 本文重點回顧: - 188 -
    第二節: 社會學的結論: - 189 -
    第三節: 政治與社會思想上的結論: - 191 -
    第四節: 倫理學上的結論: - 192 -
    第五節:綜合性的結論 - 193 -
    參考書目 - 197 -
    參考文獻 參考書目
    中文部分(按筆畫排列):
    王振寰、瞿海源,2003《社會學與台灣社會》第三版,台北:巨流。
    孔恩(Thomas S.Kuhn),2004,《科學革命的結構》,傅大為等人譯。台北:遠流。
    卡斯滕斯(Uwe Carstens),2010,《滕尼斯傳︰佛里斯蘭人與世界公民》,林遠榮  
      譯。北京:北京大學。
    牟斯(Marcel Mauss),1989,《禮物:舊社會中交換的形式與功能》,汪珍宜、何翠
      萍譯。台北:允晨。
    安德森(Benedict Andrson),2012,《想像的共同體-民族主義的起源與散布》,吳叡人譯。台北:時報出版。
    李猛,2012,〈社會的構成-自然法與現代社會理論的基礎〉,《中國社會科學》,
    10,1-14。
    亞當斯密(Adam Smith),2000,謝宗林,李華夏譯,《國富論》台北:先覺。
    町村敬志、西澤晃彥著;〈由住家延伸的社會〉收於《都市的社會學》,蘇碩斌譯 
      台北:群學。
    林端,2011,〈自殺論導讀〉,收於涂爾幹《自殺論》,馮韻文譯。台北:五南。
    吳政諭,2012,〈亞當斯密道德哲學研究. 〉,國立中山大學政治學系碩士學位論
      文
    吳豐維,2016,《正義的激情》台北: Airiti。
    周家瑜,2014,〈霍布斯論自然法與政治義務〉,《政治與社會哲學評論》,50:
      59-100。
    梁裕康,2013,〈哲學家兼修辭家?論修辭學在霍布斯政治理論中的功能〉,《政治與社會哲學評論》,45:175-216。
    韋伯(Max Weber),2013,〈社會學與經濟學的諸科學之「價值中立」的意義〉, 收 
      於《韋伯方法論文集》,張旺山譯。台北:聯經。
    柄谷行人,2013,《世界史的結構》,林暉鈞譯。台北:心靈工坊。
    班雅明(Walter Benjamin),2012,《啟迪:本雅明文選(修訂版)》,張旭東、王斑
      譯。
    烏韋‧卡斯滕斯(Uwe Carstens),2010,《滕尼斯傳》,林榮遠譯。北京:北京大
      學。
    馬克思(Karl Marx), 2004,〈第一篇:商品和貨幣〉,《資本論第一卷》,中共中 
      央馬克思恩格斯列寧斯大林著作編譯局譯。北京:人民出版社。
    張巍卓,2014,〈《共同體與社會》和 滕尼斯的社會學--以著述史爲線索的思想 
      考證〉,《社會學理論學報》,17(2):271-385。
    陳正國,2012,〈陌生人的歷史意義——亞當史密斯論商業社會的倫理基礎〉,《中 
      央研究院歷史語研究所集刊》83(4):779-835。
    葉啟政,2013,〈霍布斯的嗜欲說〉,收於《深邃思想的歷史跳躍》,吳家恆主編, 
      台北:遠流,頁11-66。
    曾國祥,2004,〈社會科學的經驗主義危機:幾項初步的哲學評論〉, 《政治學報》,
      38:175-218。
    曾國祥,2011,〈歷史意識與道德意識:柯靈烏的歷史道德理念〉,《新史學》,22(2):101-154。
    萬毓澤,2013,〈共同體的社會化與社會的共同體化:翻轉Tönnies的命題〉,收 
      於《2013社會學理論經典論壇紀要》:219-224。
    盧有恆,2006,〈涂爾幹論康德-對定言令式的社會學詮釋〉,國立清華大學社會
    學研究所碩士學位論文。
    英文部分(按字母排列):
    Adler ,Paul S..2015.Community and Innovation: From Tönnies to Marx. Organization
      Studies.36(4):445-471
    Arnold ,A.K ..2007. Tönnies' Concept of Public Opinion and Its Utility for the 
      Academic Field. The Public: Journal of the European Institute for
      Communication and Culture14(2) :7-30
    Alexander ,J. 1988 ‘Parsons’ “Structure” in American Sociology’, Sociological Theory 6(1): 96-102
    Ashcraft ,Richard.1978.Ideology and Class in Hobbes' Political Theory .Political
    Theory 6 (1): 27-62
    Ball ,Terence.1985. “Hobbes' Linguistic Turn.” Polity 17(4): 739-760.
    Bauman, Zygmunt.2001. Modernity and the Holocaust . New York::Cornell University Press.
    Bertman,Martin A. 1999..” Sociology and Hobbes” Hobbes Studies 12 (1):90-102.
    Bobbio ,Norberto.1993. Daniela Gobetti Tran .Thomas Hobbes and the natural law
      tradition. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
    Bottici ,Chiara.2014.Imaginal Politics: Images Beyond Imagination and the
      Imaginary. New York: Columbia University Press.
    Bond ,Niall.2013. “Ferdinand Tönnies’ appraisal of Karl Marx: Debts and distance” 
      Journal of Classical Sociology13: 136-162.
    ------------------ 2013.Understanding Ferdinand Tonnies’s Community and Society.
      Berlin:Münster.
    Bryant ,Christopher G. A..1985.Positivism in Social Theory and research. London:
    Cahnman ,W.J.1971 Tonnies and Durkheim: an exchange of reviews. "In Ferdinand Tonnies: a new evaluation. . Netherlands:Brill Academic Publishers.
    -----------------.1995Weber and Toenies: Comparative sociology in historical
    perspective. Netherlands:Brill Academic Publishers.
    Collingwood ,R.G.1994.The idea of history . Oxford :Oxford University Press.
    Cotterrell ,Roger..2006. Law, Culture and Society: Legal Ideas in the Mirror of Social
    Theory. Aldershot, England: Ashgate Publish.
    Chernilo,Daniel.2014.The natural law foundations of modern social theory .London:
      Cambridge University Press .
    Deflem ,Mathieu.1999.Ferdinand Tönnies on crimed society: an unexplored 
      contribution to criminological sociology” History of the Human Sciences 12(3):
      87-116.
    Durkheim ,Emile.1974.Sociology and Philosophy. . Trans by D.F.Pocock New
      York:Free Press.
    -------------------.1982.The Rules of Sociological Method Edited with an Introduction
      by Steven Lukes... New York: The Free Press .
    -------------------.1984. The Division of Labour in Society. Trans by W. D. Halls 
      London: Macmillan
    -------------------.1986. Durkheim on Politics and the State. Trans.by Anthony Giddens  
      New.York: Stanford University Press
    -------------------.1995.The Elementary Forms of Religious Life: Introduction. Trans by Karen E.Field New York:Free Press.
    -------------------.2002. Moral Education. Trans by Everett K Wolson New York:
      Dover Press.
    Elliott ,Anthony and Turner ,Bryan S..2012.On society.Uk: Polity press.
    Filippov ,Alexander F. 2013 “The other 'Hobbes' people': An alternative reading of 
      Hobbes” Journal of Classical Sociology 13(1): 113-135
    Foucault,Michel.trans by David Macey .2003.Lectures at the College de France,
      1975-76: Society Must Be Defended. New York: Picador
    Foisneau ,Luc.2004. ” Leviathan's Theory of Justice” in Leviathan after 350 Years 
      Clarendon:.Oxford.
    Gangas ,Spiros.2007.Social Ethics and Logic Rethinking Durkheim through Hegel. Journal of Classical Sociology.7(3): 315-338
    Gane ,Mike.1992.The Radical sociology of Durkheim and Mauss New York :
      Routledge.
    Gert ,Bernard.1967.Hobbes and Psychological Egoism . Journal of the History of
      Ideas.28(4)
    Giddens , Anthony 1972.”Four Myths in the History of Social Thought’ Economy and Society.1(4): 357-385
    Gouldner ,Alvin Ward.1970.The Coming Crisis of Western Sociology.: New York : 
      Basic Books.
    Hanson,Donald W.1991.” Thomas Hobbes on Discourse in Politics”. Polity.24(4):
      199-226.
    Hanson,Donald W.1991.” Thomas Hobbes on Discourse in Politics”. Polity.24(4):
      199-226
    Hegel ,G.W.F.1952. Hegel’s Philosophy of Right Trans by S W Dyde.London:
    Clarendon Press.
    Hegel ,G.W.F.1952. Hegel’s Philosophy of Right Trans by S W Dyde.London:
    Clarendon Press.
    Hechter ,Michael and Christine Horne.2009.Theory of social order, 3ed. New York:  
      Stanford press
    Hobbes ,Thomas.1928.The Elements of Law: Natural and Politic . Cambridge .London: Cambridge
    -------------------.1985.Levathan. Edited with and introduction by C.B Macpherson
    London: Penguin.
    -------------------.1996.Levathan. Edited with Richard Tuck. London: Cambridge
    -------------------.1998. On the Citizen, Edited with Richard Tuck London: Cambridge
    Howard ,Perry H.1991.”Tönnies and Habermas: The Telos of Community, Public  
      Opinion and the Public Sphere” in Hundert Jahre ed.Gemeinschaft und
    Gesellschaft
    Hume ,David .2008.A Treatise of Human Nature . NuVision Publications
    Kant , Immanuel.1985 Prolegomena to any future metaphysics. Trans by Paul Carus London: Hackett .
    Krause ,Sharon R.2010.Civil Passions:Moral Sentiment and Democratic Deliberation. Princeton University Press.
    Kraynak ,Robert P.1983.”Hobbes’s on barbarism and civilization.” The Journal of Politics,45(1): 86-109
    Krieken ,Robert Van. 2002. “The paradox of the two sociologies Hobbes Latour and  
      the Constitution of modern social theory: Jour nal of Sociology 38(3): 255-273
    Krom ,Michael P.2011.” The Limits of Reason in Hobbes's Commonwealth” New   
      York: Bloomsbury Academic.
    Liebersohn, Harry.1988. Fate and utopia in German sociology, 1870-1923. Mass. :
      MIT Press.
    Lopez ,Jose and Scott ,John.2000.Social structure. USA: open university press
    Lopata ,Benjamin .1973. ” Property Theory in Hobbes”. Political Theory 1:(2): 
      203-218.
    MacIntyre,Alasdair.2002.A short history of ethics .London:Routledge.   
    Masterman,Margaret.1965.”The nature of a Paradigm” in Criticism and the Growth of   
      Knowledge London: Cambridge.
    Meier ,Heinrich.2006. Carl Schmitt and Leo Strauss: The Hidden Dialogue . J. Harvey Lomax Trans. Chicago :university Of Chicago Press.
    Mitzman ,Arthur.1973. Sociology and Estrangement: Three Sociologists of Imperial
      Germany .New York:Knopf.
    --------------------1987.Three sociologists on imperial germany sociology and estrangement. London: Transaction Publishers.
    Milbank,John. 2006.Theology and Social Theory. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    Miller ,W.Watts.1996.Durkhem, morals and modernity:.London: Routledge
    Nielsen ,Donald A.1998. Three Faces of God: Society, Religion, and the Categories of
      Totality in the Philosophy of Emile Durkheim. New York: State University of
      New York Press.
    Nielsen ,Hviid.1986.The State, the Market and the Individual. Politics, Economy and the Idea of Man .The Works Acta Sociologica.29:(4):283-302
    Oakeshott,Michael.1975.”Dr. Leo Strauss on Hobbes” in Hobbes on civil association.   
      Indianapolis : Liberty Fund .
    Parsons ,Talcott 1957 .The structure of social action : a study in social theory and special reference to a group of recent European writers. New York : Free Press.
    ------------------1969. “The concept of society: the components and their interrelations” in Polity and social Structure. New York :Free Press
    ------------------.1971.A note on gemeinschaft and gesellschaft in Ferdinand Tonnies: a new evaluation. Werner Jacob Cahnman ed. Netherlands: Brill Academic Publishers,
    -----------------.1971. Some afterthoughts on gemeinschaft and gesellschaft. In Ferdinand Tonnies: a new evaluation.Werner Jacob Cahnman ed. Netherlands:Brill Academic Publishers.
    -----------------.1975.””The present status of “Structural-Functional” theory of sociology “”in The idea of social structure. L.A Coser,.ed. USA: Macmillan
    Patapan ,Haig.2008.“Love and the Leviathan: Thomas Hobbes's Critique of Platonic Eros”.. PoliticalTheory 36 (6): 803-826
    Palmer,P.A.1938. Ferdinand Tonnies's Theory of Public Opinion. The Public Opinion 
      Quarterly 2(4): 584-595
    Philip Selznick.1961. “Sociology and Natural Law” Natural Law Forum: 84-108
    Ringer, Fritz K.1969. The decline of the German mandarins : the German academic
    community, 1890-1933. Mass : Harvard University Press.
    Rapheael ,D.D..1976.Problems of political philosophy .London: Macmillan Education.
    ----------------.1977. Political thinkers-Hobbes. London:Routledge
    Russell ,Paul .1985 Hume’s Treatises and Hobbes’ the elements of law, Journal of
      History of Ideas 46(1): 51-63
    Runeberg ,A.1971.On the (Un)Translatability of Some of Ferdinand Tönnies'
    Principal Sociological Ideas.”. Acta Sociologica.14:(4): 227-235.
    Rose ,Gillian.2001.Hegel contra sociology. London: Continuum International.
    Sawyer ,R. Keith.2005.Social Emergence Societies As Complex Systems London:  
      Cambridge .
    Schochet ,Gordon J.1967.Thomas Hobbes on the Family and the State of Nature.” Political Science Quarterly” 82: (3). 427-445.
    Schmitt,Carl. 1996 The Concept of the Political. George Schwab. Trans. Chicago: the
      University of Chicago.
    Schuhmann ,Karl.2000. “Hobbes’s concept of history”. In Hobbes and history. 
      London: Routledge
    Smith ,Adam.2004.The Theory of Moral Sentiments . The online library :Glasgow ed.
    Strauss ,Leo.1996. “The Political Philosophy of Hobbes: Its Basis and Its Genesis”
      Chicago: University of Chicago.
    Strong ,Tracy B.2012. Politics without vision. Chicago: the University of Chicago
    Skinner ,Quentin.2008. Hobbes and Republican Liberty. London: Cambridge.
    Toteff, C Adair 1995. Ferdinand Tonnies: Utopian Visionary” Sociological 
      Theory,13(4): 58-65
    Taylor,A.E.1938.” The Ethical Doctrine of Hobbes” Philosophy 13:(52): 406-424
    Taylor ,Charles.1985. Human agency and language. New York : Cambridge
      Macmillam.
    Thornhill ,Chris.2013.“Natural law, state formation and the foundations of social
      theory”.Journal of Classical Sociology.13(2) :197–221.
    Thornton ,Helen.2005. State of Nature or Eden? “Thomas Hobbes and His Contemporaries on the Natural Condition of Human Beings”New York: University of 
      Rochester
    Tricaud ,Francois.1988.”Hobbe’s conception of the state of nature from 1640 to 1651” in Perspectives on Thomas Hobbes. New York: Oxford.
    Tönnies,Ferdinand. 1971. Thomas Hobbes : Leben und Lehre. Friedrich Frommann
    ----------------------. 1971 “Social norm: Law” In Ferdinand Tönnies on sociology:pure ,applied ,and empirical ,. Werner Cahnman, and Rudolf Heberle. eds Chicago: Chicago press.
    ----------------------.1971.” Hobbes and the zoon politikon.” Tönnies.1971 In Ferdinand Tönnies on sociology:pure ,applied ,and empirical ,
    ---------------------. 1971.“A prelude to sociology” in Ferdinand Toennies on 
      sociology: pure, applied and empirical. Trans by Cahnman.
    ----------------------.1971.“Social values: ethical social value.” in Ferdinand Toennies on sociology: pure, applied and empirical. . Trans by Cahnman.
    ----------------------.1971.“Social entities or configurations..” in Ferdinand Toennies on sociology: pure, applied and empirical. Trans by Cahnman.
    ----------------------.2000. Ferdinand Tönnies on public opinion .Gray T. Marx. Trans.
    USA: Rowman & Littlefield.
    ---------------------.2001. Community and Civil Society Jose Harris, and Margaret 
      Hollis ,Trans. New York : Cambridge University Press.
    Turner ,Stephen P.2005.Sociologist and morals. New York :Routledge.
    Walby ,Sylvia.2007. Complexity Theory, Systems Theory, and Multiple Intersecting Social Inequalities. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 37(4): 449-470
    Watkins ,J. W. N .1955 “Philosophy and Politics in Hobbes”. The Philosophical Quarterly 5(19): 125-146
    Warrender, Howard.1987.”Hobbes and Macro ethic” in Hobbes’s science of natural
    justice.USA:MTP.
    Weber,Max.2001. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism London:  
      Routledge Classics
    Weil ,Frederick D.1986.“The Stranger, Prudence, and Trust in Hobbes's Theory” Theory and Society 15: (5): 759-788
    Wickham ,Gary.2014.” Hobbes’s Commitment to Society as a Product of Sovereignty: A basis for a Hobbesian sociology” Journal of Classical Sociology 14(2): 139-155.
    White ,Hayden.2010.The fiction of narrative: essays on History and theory 1957-2007. Maryland: Hopkins university.
    Whitt ,Matt S.2013 “Hegel, Identity Politics and the Problem of Slavery,” Political
      Theory 41: 87-104.
    Wood ,Ellen Meiksins.2001.”A social history of western political thought from
      renaissance to enlightenment” London:Verso.
    Wolin ,Sheldon S.2004.Politics and Vision Continuity and Innovation in Western Political Thought New Jersey: Princeton University.
    Wrong ,Dennis H.1961.The Oversocialized Conception of Man in Modern Sociology
      American Sociological Review, 26:(2) : 183-193.
    Zagorin ,Perez.2009. Hobbes and the Law of Nature. New Jersey: Princeton
      University Press
    口試委員
  • 洪世謙 - 召集委員
  • 蔡博方 - 委員
  • 曾國祥 - 指導教授
  • 萬毓澤 - 指導教授
  • 口試日期 2016-07-27 繳交日期 2016-09-01

    [回到前頁查詢結果 | 重新搜尋]


    如有任何問題請與論文審查小組聯繫