Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-1117118-205547 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-1117118-205547
論文名稱
Title
中老年人對病人自主權利法之知識、態度、行為分析
Knowledge, attitude and behavior among middle-aged and old people toward Patient Autonomy Act
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
85
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2018-07-17
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2018-12-17
關鍵字
Keywords
病人自主權利法、預立醫療決定、預立醫療諮商、中老年人、知識態度行為模型
advance care planning, Knowledge-attitude-behavior Model, middle-aged and old people, Patient Autonomy Act, advance directive
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5670 次,被下載 0
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5670 times, has been downloaded 0 times.
中文摘要
目標:台灣截至2018年4月,65歲以上的老年人口數已占總人口比率14.10%。隨著人體器官逐年衰老,高齡者可能需要藉由呼吸器、鼻胃管甚至葉克膜來維持身體的機能,因此臨終前之健保醫療費用也甚高。台灣於2016年公布「病人自主權利法」,並將於2019年實施,以提高其簽署預立醫療決定之比例。本研究調查台灣中老年人對病人自主權利法之知識、態度與行為間之相關與其影響因子。

方法: 採橫斷式調查研究設計,自填式結構問卷設計以KAB(knowledge, attitudes and behaviors)模式為基礎,研究對象為40歲以上社區活動中心、公園與網路之民眾。統計方法包含Pearson correlation、One-way ANOVA、T-test與Multiple Regression。

結果:共完成有效問卷446份(回收率93.5%)。研究顯示中老年者對病人自主權利法之知識、態度、行為之間有顯著正相關。人口學變項中,每月可支配之金額對知識有相關。年齡、每月可支配之金額、教育、婚姻狀態與態度有相關。深入探討後發現,信仰佛教、家中有父母/子女/配偶者知識分數顯著較低,且月可支配金額5001~10000組也顯著低於50001以上之組別。喪偶組在態度分數上較未婚組別低。

結論: 建議對於特定信仰、收入與家中組成成員之族群,依其特性訂定宣導策略,增加其對資訊之了解,進而提升對此法條之態度,提高其簽署預立醫療決定之比例。達到人人皆能善用預立醫療決定、提升病人自主權、減少無效醫療之花費並促進台灣醫療永續發展。
Abstract
Objectives: As of April 2018, old people aged 65 and over have accounted for 14.1% of Taiwan population. Health expenditures for old people who require ventilators, nasogastric tubes, or extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) during end of life care could be high. The Taiwanese government published Patient Autonomy Act (PAA) in 2016, and is going to implement the Act in 2019 to increase the sign up rate of advance care planning. The present research investigates knowledge, attitude and behavior among middle-aged and old people toward PAA.
Methods: The present study adopts a cross-sectional survey design and uses questionnaire as a survey instrument. The knowledge, attitudes and behaviors (KAB) model is applied in designing the questionnaire. The survey sample includes people aged 40 and over from community centers, parks and the internet. The statistical methods used include t-tests, ANOVA, and multiple linear regressions.
Results: A total number of 466 questionnaires are included in this analysis, which is equivalent to 93.5% of the questionnaires collected. The results show that among middle-aged and old people, the knowledge, attitude and behavior toward PAA are positively correlated. Among various demographic factors, both age and marital status are correlated with attitude; disposable income(DI) is correlated with knowledge and attitude, and education is correlated with attitude and behavior. A further investigation shows that people who are Buddhists, have disposable monthly income between 5,001 and 10,000 NTD, or live with parents/children/spouse have lower scores for knowledge. The widowed have lower scores for attitude. The scores for attitude are significantly different for people with different monthly disposal income and education levels. People with different education levels also have significantly different scores for behavior.
Conclusion: On the basis of results from the current study, we suggest that government tailors promotion strategies for PAA to individual groups which have different demographic backgrounds. This may increase people’s understanding of and improve their attitude toward PAA, and finally increase the sign up rate of advance care planning.
目次 Table of Contents
論文審定書 i
致謝 ii
摘要 iii
ABSTRACT iv
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究問題 3
第三節 目的與預期貢獻 3
第二章 文獻探討 5
第一節 病人自主權利法 5
第二節 知識、態度、行為模型 6
第三節 國外對預立醫療決定與諮商的知識、態度、行為之相關文獻 8
第四節 國內對預立醫療決定與諮商的知識、態度、行為之相關文獻 10
第五節 影響預立醫療決定與諮商之相關因素 11
第三章 研究方法 13
第一節 研究假設 14
第二節 問卷設計與資料收集 14
第三節 問卷的信效度 18
第四章 研究分析與結果 23
第一節 描述性統計分析 23
第二節 中老年人對病人自主權利法之知識、態度、行為間的關係 29
第三節 影響知識、態度、行為之人口學因素 29
第四節 影響知識、態度、行為之因素-迴歸分析 33
第五節 驗證假設之結果 38
第五章 討論 39
第六章 結論與建議 42
第一節 研究結論 42
第二節 研究限制與未來研究建議 42
第三節 政策建議 43
參考文獻 45
附錄一、 名詞定義 49
附錄二、 病人自主權利法 50
附錄三、 專家效度名單 56
附錄四、 專家效度檢核表 57
附錄五、 試題分析與項目分析 62
附錄六、 因素分析 66
附錄七、 正式問卷 70
參考文獻 References
1. 內政部統計處(2018,5 月 1 日)。107年4月最新統計指標。資料引自https://www.moi.gov.tw/stat/chart.aspx
2. 衛生福利部統計處(2018)。105年死因統計年報,台北市:衛生福利部統計處。
3. 病人自主權利法(民國 105 年 01 月 06 日)
4. 劉嘉年、楊銘欽、楊志良(民90)。台灣成年民眾於死亡前三個月健保醫療費用支出之影響因素分析。台灣公共衛生雜誌,20(6),451-462。
5. 李欣慈、鄭淑貞、黃川芳、吳郁梅、胡文郁(民104)。華人儒、釋、道文化觀點探討台灣護理之家老年住民簽署自身預立醫療指示文件的現況與困境。安寧療護雜誌,20(2),154-165。
6. 林艷君、胡文郁(民105)。社區高齡者預立醫療自主計畫之介入與推展。護理雜誌,63(4),13-18。
7. 李欣慈、陳慶餘、胡文郁(民101)。華人孝道與家庭主義文化脈絡下談長照機構住民執行預立醫療照護計畫與老人自主權。安寧療護雜誌,17(2),187-199。
8. 林慧美(民98)。住院病人對醫療預立指示知識, 態度與行為意向之研究。臺灣大學護理學研究所學位論文,1-114。
9. 楊嘉玲、陳慶餘、胡文郁(民97)。醫療預立指示。安寧療護雜誌,13(1),30-41。
10. 蘇玲華、黃美玲、林亞陵、吳春桂、林芳如、林宏茂、黃勝堅(民97)。護理人員對生命末期照護知識與態度-以中部某區域教學醫院為例。安寧療護雜誌,13(4),431-446。
11. 林綉君、李佳苓、張家銘(民105)。探討中部某醫學中心加護病房老年病人及家屬對預立醫療指示的認知情形。台灣老年醫學暨老年學雜誌,11(1),50-65。
12. 林綉君(民104)。探討中老年病人及家屬對預立醫療指示的認知與決策情形-以中部某醫學中心加護病房為例。成功大學老年學研究所學位論文,1-163。
13. 吳明隆(民96)。SPSS 操作與應用:問卷統計分析實務(第二版)。台北市:五南圖書。
14. Alano, G. J., Pekmezaris, R., Tai, J. Y., Hussain, M. J., Jeune, J., Louis, B., . . . Wolf-Klein, G. P. (2010). Factors influencing older adults to complete advance directives. Palliat Support Care, 8(3), 267-275.
15. Arora, N. K., & McHorney, C. A. (2000). Patient Preferences for Medical Decision Making: Who Really Wants to Participate? Medical Care, 38(3), 335-341.
16. Carr, D. (2012a). Racial and ethnic differences in advance care planning: Identifying subgroup patterns and obstacles. Journal of Aging and Health, 24(6), 923-947.
17. Carr, D. (2012b). The social stratification of older adults’ preparations for end-of-life health care. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 53(3), 297-312.
18. Detering, K. M., Hancock, A. D., Reade, M. C., & Silvester, W. (2010). The impact of advance care planning on end of life care in elderly patients: randomised controlled trial. BMJ, 340, c1345.
19. Frahm, K. A., Brown, L. M., & Hyer, K. (2012). Racial disparities in end-of-life planning and services for deceased nursing home residents. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 13(9), 819-e7
20. Portanova, J., Ailshire, J., Perez, C., Rahman, A., & Enguidanos, S. (2017). Ethnic differences in advance directive completion and care preferences: What has changed in a decade?. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 65(6), 1352-1357.
21. Rao, J. K., Anderson, L. A., Lin, F. C., & Laux, J. P. (2014). Completion of advance directives among US consumers. American journal of preventive medicine, 46(1), 65-70.
22. Schicktanz, S., Raz, A., & Shalev, C. (2010). The cultural context of end-of-life ethics: A comparison of Germany and Israel. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 19(3), 381-394.
23. Schwartz, N. E. (1975). Nutritional knowledge, attitudes, and practices of high school graduates. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 66(1), 28-31.
24. Shin, D. W., Lee, J. E., Cho, B., Yoo, S. H., Kim, S., & Yoo, J. H. (2016). End‐of‐life communication in K orean older adults: With focus on advance care planning and advance directives. Geriatrics & gerontology international, 16(4), 407-415.
25. Teno, J. M., Gruneir, A., Schwartz, Z., Nanda, A., & Wetle, T. (2007). Association between advance directives and quality of end‐of‐life care: A national study. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 55(2), 189-194.
26. Gamble, E. R., McDonald, P. J., & Lichstein, P. R. (1991). Knowledge, attitudes, and behavior of elderly persons regarding living wills. Archives of Internal Medicine, 151(2), 277-280.
27. Holley, J. L., Nespor, S., & Rault, R. (1993). Chronic in-center hemodialysis patients' attitudes, knowledge, and behavior towards advance directives. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 3(7), 4.
28. Douglas, R., & Brown, H. N. (2002). Patients' Attitudes Toward Advance Directives. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 34(1), 61-65.
29. Htut, Y., Shahrul, K., & Poi, P. J. H. (2007). The Views of Older Malaysians on Advanced Directive and Advanced Care Planning: A Qualitative Study. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health, 19(3), 58-66.
30. Jang, Y., Park, N. S., Chiriboga, D. A., Radhakrishnan, K., & Kim, M. T. (2017). The knowing–doing gap in advance directives in Asian Americans: the role of education and acculturation. American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®, 34(9), 874-879.
31. Kavalieratos, D., Ernecoff, N. C., Keim-Malpass, J., & Degenholtz, H. B. (2015). Knowledge, attitudes, and preferences of healthy young adults regarding advance care planning: a focus group study of university students in Pittsburgh, USA. BMC Public Health, 15, 197.
32. Ko, E., & Berkman, C. S. (2012). Advance directives among Korean American older adults: Knowledge, attitudes, and behavior. Journal of gerontological social work, 55(6), 484-502.
33. Matzo, M., Hijjazi, K., & Outwater, M. (2008). Older Oklahomans’ knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors related to advance directives. Journal of gerontological nursing, 34(2), 21-26.
34. Porensky, E. K., & Carpenter, B. D. (2008). Knowledge and Perceptions in Advance Care Planning. Journal of Aging and Health, 20(1), 89-106.
35. Zhou, G., Stoltzfus, J. C., Houldin, A. D., Parks, S. M., & Swan, B. A. (2010). Knowledge, attitudes, and practice behaviors of oncology advanced practice nurses regarding advanced care planning for patients with cancer. Oncology Nursing Forum, 37(6), 11.
36. World Medical Association (2006), WMA Declaration of Venice on Terminal Illness, http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/i2/index.html (last visited: 2017/4/20).
37. World Medical Association (2013), WMA Statement on Advance Directives (“Living Wills”), http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/w14/index.html (last visited: 2017/4/20).
38. World Medical Association (2011), WMA Declaration on End-of-Life Medical Care, http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/e18/index.html (last visited: 2017/4/20).
39. The National Archives (2005), Mental Capacity Act 2005, legislation.gov.uk, http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2005/9/part/1/crossheading/advance-decisions-to-refuse-treatment (last visited: 2017/4/20).
40. Dictionary, O. E. (2008). Oxford english dictionary. Retrieved May, 30, 2008.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code