Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0720119-123715 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0720119-123715
論文名稱
Title
探討消費者情緒體驗對於智慧商店再使用意圖之影響
Exploring the Influence of Consumer Emotional Experience on Intention to Continue Using Smart-Stores
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
59
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2019-06-12
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2019-08-20
關鍵字
Keywords
情緒反應、使用者經驗、智慧商店
User Experience, Smart Store, Emotion Reaction
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5894 次,被下載 1365
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5894 times, has been downloaded 1365 times.
中文摘要
提供我們幾乎一切日常所需的實體店面正在進化,在支持技術的逐漸成熟之下,智慧商店這個概念開始被廣泛的討論甚至直接的應用;智慧商店的本意在於減少店員的負擔,並且提供更多機會來實現其它服務。台灣的智慧商店最早應用的便是便利商店,因其特性與智慧商店的優點非常合適,本研究以統一企業智慧門市X-Store作為範例,透過使用者經驗元素模型(Components of User Experience ,CUE)試圖探討,使用者在智慧商店的體驗中產生了哪些主觀認知;本研究根據CUE模型將其主觀認知分為工具性品質的感知(Perception of Instrumental Qualities)、非工具性品質的感知(Perception of Non-Instrumental Qualities)以及情緒體驗(Emotion Experience),透過問卷調查法回收了303份問卷,並採用SPSS版本24以及SmartPLS 3.0版本兩套軟體作統計分析。本研究的目的在於探究,使用者產出的主觀回饋中,哪些會影響其再次選擇智慧商店;由於過去的文獻大多忽視情緒體驗作為影響使用者決策的重要性,因此在本研究更會延伸探討,在使用者的體驗中,情緒會被何者影響,而這個情緒的反應是否會反饋至其對於智慧商店的評價,進而影響使用者的意圖。本研究希望透過這些研究分析,能讓企業、決策者在深思後,決定實行智慧商店的轉變時,能夠有一個過去曾實際實行的依據,透過使用者實際的資料回饋分析得出最佳方案;亦即本研究的幾個重點與討論,如工具性品質感知與非工具性品質感知何者較為重要,或是對使用者來說哪個元素是其最為看重的,是什麼影響情緒反應較多;根據這些綜合分析討論,探討如今X-Store的發展與瓶頸作為未來的前車之鑑。
Abstract
The brick-and-mortar storethat provides us with every day’s needs is now evo-lving. With the development of the supported technologys, the concept of smart store has been widely discussed and even applied directly. The purpose of smart store is to reduce the burden on those poor clerks. And perhaps provide more opportunity to im-plement other services.Convenience storesare the first ones to applied the concept of smart store, for its characteristicsfit the advantages of smart storethe most. The Xstore from Uni-President Chain Store Corporationhas beenusedas a sample in this study. With the Com-ponent ofUser’sExperience (CUE), we try to explore what subjective cognition the experience of smart storehas bring to users.This study divides the subjective cognition into (1)Perception of Instrumental Qualities(2)Perception of Non-Instrumental Qualities and(3)Emotion Experienceacc-rding to the CUE model.303 valid sampleswere collected through questionnaires, and SPSS version 24 and SmartPLS version 3.0were used for analysis.Since most of the past literature ignores the importance of emotional experience as a factor in influencing user’s decisions, this study will be extendedwith it. The pur-pose of this study is to explore which factorwill affect user’s choice, whether they are willing to choose the smart store next time or not. And also, if the factors will influence emotion, which in turn affects their continuance intention.With this study,we hope to support enterprises if they are willing to implementsmart store. With these actual data and analysis, enterprises will get to know what is actually important for users, and what might cause a failure.
目次 Table of Contents
論文審定書……………………………………………………………………………i
摘要……………………………………………………………………………………ii
Abstract………………………………………………………………………………iii
圖次…………………………………………………………………………………….vi
表次…………………………………………………………………………………vii
第一章緒論.........................................................................................1
第一節研究背景............................................................................1
第二節研究動機............................................................................2
第三節研究問題與目的...................................................................3
第四節研究流程............................................................................3
第二章文獻探討.................................................................................5
第一節使用者經驗元素模型............................................................5
一、情緒體驗.........................................................................7
二、再使用意圖......................................................................9
三、非工具性品質..................................................................10
第二節智慧商店...........................................................................11
第三章研究方法.................................................................................12
第一節研究模型.........................................................................12
第二節研究假說.........................................................................13
第三節操作型定義......................................................................15
第四節研究設計.........................................................................16
一、研究對象.....................................................................16
二、問卷設計........................................................................16
三、資料收集及使用工具.........................................................19
第四章資料分析.................................................................................20
第一節樣本基本資料分析............................................................20
第二節衡量模型........................................................................21
一、信度分析......................................................................22
二、收斂效度......................................................................23
三、區別效度......................................................................24
四、共線性分析...................................................................25
五、共同方法偏誤................................................................26
第三節結構模型及假說驗證..........................................................30
第五章結論與建議.............................................................................34
第一節研究結果與討論...............................................................34
一、工具性品質感知與非工具性品質感知對情緒體驗皆有正向影響.......34
二、情緒體驗的中介效果.........................................................35
三、智慧商店的情境下使用者如何構成再使用意圖........................35
第二節理論與實務意涵...............................................................36
一、理論面...........................................................................36
二、實務面...........................................................................36
第三節研究限制與未來研究方向...................................................37
文獻參考...........................................................................................39
附錄.................................................................................................45
參考文獻 References
 Ainslie, G. (1986). Choice and Consequences: Perspectives of an Errant Economist. American Journal of Sociology, 91(6), 1467–1469.
 Alexandre N.Tucha, Sandra P.RothaKasper, Hornbækb, KlausOpwisa, Javier A.Bargas-Avilaa.(2012) Is beautiful really usable? Toward understanding the relation between usability, aesthetics, and affect in HCI. Computers in Human Behavior Volume 28, Issue 5, Pages 1596-1607.
 Andreas Sonderegger, Juergen Sauer.(2010). The influence of design aesthetics in usability testing: Effects on user performanceand perceived usability. Applied Ergonomics 41 : 403-410.
 Brief, A. P., & Weiss, H. M. (2002). Organizational Behavior: Affect in the Workplace. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 279–307.
 Briggs, R. O., Reinig, B. A., & de Vreede, G.-J. (2012). The Yield Shift Theory of Satisfaction and Its Application to the IS/IT Domain (pp. 185–217). Springer New York.
 Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern methods for business research, 295(2), 295-336.
 Chin, W. W. (1998a). Commentary: Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS quarterly, 22(1), 7-16.
 Crampton, Suzanne M.,Wagner III, John A. Percept-percept inflation in microorganizational research: An investigation of prevalence and effect. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol 79(1), 67-76
 Cronin, J. J. J., Brady, M. K., & Hult, G. T. M. (2000). Assessing the Effects of Quality, Value, and Customer Satisfaction on Consumer Behavioral Intentions in Service Environments. Journal of Retailing, 60 76(2), 193–218.
 Daniela Andrei, Alina Fleştea, Adriana Guran, Mircea Miclea.(2015). Understanding Interactive Technology in Organizational Settings. Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology, Third Edition, Page 9.
 Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003.
 Ding, Y., & Chai, K. H. (2015). Emotions and continued usage of mobile applications. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 115(5), 833–852.
 Elaine Sherman, Anil Mathur, Ruth Belk Smith.(1997). Store Environment and Consumer Purchase Behavior: Mediating Role of Consumer Emotions. Psychology and Marketing 14(4):361 – 378
 Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 39-50.
 GianfrancoWalsh, EdwardShiu, Louise M.Hassan, NinaMichaelidou, Sharon E.Beatty.(2011) Emotions, store-environmental cues, store-choice criteria, and marketing outcomes. Journal of Business Research, Volume 64, Issue 7, Pages 737-744
 Gratch, J., & Marsella, S. (2004). A domain-independent framework for modeling emotion. Cognitive Systems Research, 5(4), 269–306.
 Guinea, A. O. de, & Markus, M. L. (2009). Why break the habit of a lifetime? Rethinking the roles of intention, habit, and emotion in continuing information technology use. MIS Quarterly, 33(3), 433– 444.
 Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (1998). Multivariate data analysis.
 Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing theory and Practice, 19(2), 139-152.
 Henseler, J., Hubona, G., & Ray, P. A. (2016). Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: updated guidelines. Industrial management & data systems, 116(1), 2-20.
 Holbrook, M. B., Chestnut, R. W., Oliva, T. A., & Greenleaf, E. A. (1984). Play as a Consumption Experience: The Roles of Emotions, Performance, and Personality in the Enjoyment of Games. Journal of Consumer Research, 11(2), 728–739.
 Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance
 JF Hair, CM Ringle, M Sarstedt (2013). Editorial - Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling: Rigorous Applications, Better Results and Higher Acceptance. Long Range Planning, Volume 46, Issues 1-2, pp. 1-12
 KENNETH A. BOLLEN(1989). A New Incremental Fit Index for General Structural Equation Models. Sociological Methods & Research
 Kim, H. W., Chan, H. C., & Chan, Y. P. (2007). A balanced thinking–feelings model of information systems continuance. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65(6), 511–525.
 Klein, J. G., Smith, N. C., & John, A. (2004). Why we boycott: Consumer motivations for boycott participation. Journal of marketing research, 68(3), 92-109.
 Lacher, K. T. (1989). Hedonic consumption: Music as a product. Advances in Consumer Research, 16, 367–373.
 Lacher, K. T., & Mizerski, R. (1994). An Exploratory Study of the Responses and Relationships Involved in the Evaluation of, and in the Intention to Purchase New Rock Music. Source Journal of Consumer Research, 21135243(2), 366–380.

 Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Cognition and motivation in emotion. The American Psychologist, 46(4), 352–67.
 Li, D., Chau, P. Y., & Lou, H. (2005). Understanding Individual Adoption of Instant Messaging: An Empirical Investigation *. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 6(4), 102–129.
 MARTIN CHRISTOF KINDSMÜLLER, SASCHA MAHLKE. (2007). User Experience – Recent approaches to intuitive use and hedonic aspects in human-technology interaction. MMI-Interaktiv, Nr. 13.
 Martin Schrepp, Andreas Hinderks, Jörg Thomaschewski.(2017). Construction of a Benchmark for the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ). International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 4, Nº4
 Moshagen, M. & Thielsch, M. T. (2010). Facets of visual aesthetics.International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 68(10),689-709.
 Nico H. Frijda. (1987). THE EMOTIONS (STUDIES IN EMOTION AND SOCIAL INTERACTION). Cambridge University Press.
 Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric methods., 464-465.
 Price, L. L., Arnould, E. J., & Tierney, P. (1995). Going to Extremes: Managing Service Encounters and Assessing Provider Performance. Journal of Marketing, 59(2), 83.
 Richard S. Lazarus, & Susan Folkman. (1984). Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. Springer Publishing Company.
 S Kim, G Park, Y Lee, S Choi - Journal of Business Research, (2016). Customer emotions and their triggers in luxury retail: Understanding the effects of customer emotions before and after entering a luxury shop. Journal of Business Research Volume 69, Issue 12, Pages 5809-5818
 Salah Uddin Ahmed, Abdullah Al Mahmud, Kristin Bergaust (2009). Aesthetics in Human-Computer Interaction: Views and Reviews. Human-Computer Interaction. New Trends pp 559-568.
 Sascha Mahlke , Iris Lemke , Manfred Thüring (2007). The Diversity of Non-instrumental Qualities in Human-Technology Interaction. MMI Interaktiv
 Sascha Mahlke. (2007). Aesthetic and Symbolic Qualities as Antecedents of Overall Judgements of Interactive Products. People and Computers XX — Engage
scales, 15-127.
 Scherer, K. R. (1984). On the nature and function of emotion: A component process approach. In Approaches to emotion (pp. 293 – 317).
 Seidah, A., & Bouffard, T. (2007). BEING PROUD OF ONESELF AS A PERSON OR BEING PROUD OF ONE’S PHYSICAL APEARANCE: WHAT MATTERS FOR FEELING WELL IN ADOLESCENCE? Social Behavior and Personality, 35(2), 255–268.
 Smock, A. D., Ellison, N. B., Lampe, C., & Wohn, D. Y. (2011). Facebook as a toolkit: A uses and gratification approach to unbundling feature use. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(6), 2322– 2329.
 Streiner, D. L., & Norman, G. R. (1995). Devising the items. Health measurement
structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 1-55.
 Swanson, G. E. (1978). Travels Trough Inner Space: Family Structure and Openness to Absorbing Experiences. American Journal of Sociology, 83(4), 890–919.


 Thong, J. Y. L., Hong, S.-J., & Tam, K. Y. (2006). The effects of postadoption beliefs on the expectation-confirmation model for information technology continuance. International Journal of HumanComputer Studies, 64(9), 799–810.
 Thüring, M., & Mahlke, S. (2007). Usability, aesthetics and emotions in human–technology interaction. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 42(1013), 253–264.
 Titz, K., Andrus, D., & Miller, J. (2012). Hedonistic Differences Between Mechanical Game Players And Table Game Players: An Exploratory Investigation On The Road To A Comprehensive Theory For Gambling. UNLV Gaming Research & Review Journal, 6(1), 23–32.
 Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204.
 Wang, J., & Wang, X. (2012). Structural equation modeling: Applications using Mplus: John Wiley & Sons.
 Wu, J., & Holsapple, C. (2014). Imaginal and emotional experiences in pleasure-oriented IT usage: A hedonic consumption perspective. Information & Management, 51(1), 80–92.
 Yang, I., & Bahli, B. (2015). Interplay of cognition and emotion in IS usage: Emotion as mediator between cognition and IS usage. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 28(3), 363–376.
 Yoo, Y. (2010). COMPUTING IN EVERYDAY LIFE: A CALL FOR RESEARCH ON EXPERIENTIAL COMPUTING. MIS Quarterly, 34(2), 213–231.
 葉冠玟(2018)7-11 花半年做「無人商店」X-store 的反思. 經理人https://www.managertoday.com.tw/articles/view/56420

 葉冠玟(2019)無人店喊卡!一次失敗策略,給零售業的啟示. 經理人https://www.managertoday.com.tw/topic/view/58/post/28800
 何佩珊(2018)X-STORE 2號店啟用,7-11朝一店雙區型態測試. 數位時代. https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/49933/seven-eleven-launch-xstore-number-two
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code