Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0719119-202146 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0719119-202146
論文名稱
Title
民眾與醫護人員對於醫病共享決策之知識態度行為研究
Knowledge Attitude Behavior Study on Shared Decision Making for Patients and Medical Staff
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
124
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2019-07-29
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2019-08-19
關鍵字
Keywords
醫病共享決策、知識態度行為模型、一般民眾、醫護人員
Shared decision making (SDM), Knowledge Attitude behavior model (KAB model), Patients and Medical staff
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5720 次,被下載 0
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5720 times, has been downloaded 0 times.
中文摘要
由於疾病類型已從前期的急性醫療逐漸轉變成慢性疾病,因此醫病關係可能已經由短期照護轉變成一種長期照護之關係,在醫療環境的改變以及長期醫病資訊不對等的情況下,醫療共享決策在近日被認為是醫療中較理想的治療決策模式之一。本研究計畫以知識態度行為模型為主,探討民眾以及探討醫護人員對於醫病共享決策的接受度與其知識、態度與行為,並探討醫護人員執行該政策上之看法或障礙等。
本研究以南台灣一般民眾與醫療院所之醫療人員作為研究對象,採用紙本及網路問卷方式施測,一般民眾問卷以網路方式發放後共回收500份問卷,且樣本皆為有效問卷;醫護人員問卷以紙本及網路方式發放問卷,共回收422份問卷,共計400份有效問卷,本研究以SPSS 24.0版與R語言3.5.2版之統計軟體進行資料處理與分析,其分析包含描述性統計、皮爾森相關分析、獨立樣本T檢定、單因子變異數分析、卡方檢定與迴歸分析進行資料處理,所得一般民眾結果如下:(一)民眾對於醫病共享決策之知識、態度、行為之間有顯著正相關;(二)對於是否聽過及接受過醫病共享決策正向影響民眾對於醫病共享決策之知識態度行為;以及(三)民眾之教育程度正向影響民眾對於醫病共享決策之知識態度行為。醫護人員結果如下:(一)醫護人員對於醫病共享決策之知識、態度、行為之間有顯著正相關;(二)是否擔任主管職務、就職醫院一年內是否即將或已通過醫院評鑑、是否曾經製作決策輔助工具以及是否曾經使用決策輔助工具正向影響醫護人員對於醫病共享決策之知識態度行為;(三)醫護人員在實行醫病共享決策時最常遭遇之困難依序為:缺乏執行時間、知識不足、製作決策輔助工具困難與缺乏決策輔助工具等因素;以及(四)71%的醫護人員表示願意將醫病共享決策納入臨床實踐,並認為醫病共享決策可以為病患提供最好的健康照護、帶來良好的醫療結果與符合患者和社會的期望。
Abstract
Disease category has moved gradually from acute to chronic. The relationship between doctors and patients may have been changed from short-term care to long-term. Due to medical encounter changes and information asymmetry, the shared decision-making model has been considered as one of the most suitable ones. This study adopts the model of Knowledge Attitude Behavior (KAB) as its framework to explore how each construct in this model impacts Shared decision making (SDM), and it reveals the factors that affect behavior intention and actual use behavior via the use of moderators.
This study targets the general public and medical staff in south Taiwan as its object and utilizes an online or paper questionnaire to survey the opinions. For general public, a total of 500 questionnaires were completed and received, among all have been recognized as valid. For medical staff, a total of 422 questionnaires were completed and received, among which 400 have been recognized as valid. Furthermore, descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation analysis, independent sample T test, one way ANOVA analysis, Chi-square test and linear regression analysis were leveraged for data processing by SPSS version 24.0 and R Language version 3.5.2. Finally, the results of general public include as follows: 1) The knowledge, attitude and behavior toward SDM are positively correlated. 2) Regarding whether or not general public heard or accepted SDM are positively correlated with their knowledge, attitude and behavior. 3) Education level of general public are positively correlated with their knowledge, attitude and behavior of SDM. The results of health care providers include as follows: 1) the knowledge, attitude and behavior toward SDM are positively correlated. 2) Whether the health care provider is a supervisor or not, whether they will soon or have already passed hospital accreditation within one year of employment in hospital, and whether they have made PDAs, also, whether they have used PDAs to positively influence the knowledge and attitudes of health care providers on SDM. 3) The most often meet barriers reported were lack of time, lack of knowledge, difficulty of developing patient decision aids, and lack of patient decision aids. 4) 71% respondents who were willing to practice SDM opined that SDM can provide the best health care for patients, can maintain and improve individual clinical expertise, and can meet patient and social expectations.
目次 Table of Contents
論文審定書 i
摘要 ii
Abstract iii
目錄 v
圖次 vii
表次 viii
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究問題 3
第三節 研究目的 4
第四節 研究流程 5
第二章 文獻探討 6
第一節 醫病共享決策之定義與實行步驟、工具 6
第二節 醫病共享決策與醫病關係之關聯性 14
第三節 臺灣與各國實施醫病共享決策之現況 17
第四節 知識態度行為模型 21
第五節 小結 28
第三章 研究方法 30
第一節 研究架構與假設 30
第二節 問卷設計與資料蒐集方法 31
第三節 研究變項與操作型定義 32
第四節 資料處理與統計分析方法 40
第五節 專家效度與問卷前測結果分析 42
第六節 正式問卷信效度分析 44
第四章 研究結果 51
第一節 資料發放與蒐集 51
第二節 描述性統計分析 52
第三節 推論性統計分析 67
第四節 研究架構與假設檢驗 85
第五章 討論與建議 88
第一節 討論 88
第二節 建議 93
第三節 研究限制 94
第四節 研究貢獻 95
第五節 結論 96
參考文獻 97
附錄一 102
附錄二:決策輔助工具研發報告 103
附錄三:民眾問卷 107
附錄四:醫護人員問卷 110
附錄五:人體研究計畫同意函 114
參考文獻 References
王英偉(2016)。醫病共享決策-決策輔助工具與臨床運用。醫療品質雜誌,10(4),15-24頁。
吳碧娟、張靜怡、莊舒閔、李于嘉、游育苓、廖熏香(2017)。醫病共享決策簡介與推行現況。醫療品質雜誌,11(4),4-10頁。
吳明隆(2013)。SPSS統計應用學習實務:問卷分析與應用統計(第三版)。新北市:易習。
高益凱(2008)。急診醫師對實證醫學認知及應用之差異性分析(未出版碩士論文)。國立中山大學,高雄市。
許維邦、張瑞月、呂美君、周明智、蕭培靜(2015)。共同決策於臨床醫學之應用(Shared Decision Making in Clinical Practice)。澄清醫護管理雜誌,11(2),24-29頁。
臺灣衛生福利部醫病共享決策平台。取自:https://sdm.patientsafety.mohw.gov.tw/。2018年12月05日。
臺灣病人安全通報系統年度報告(2014)。取自: http://www.patientsafety.mohw.gov.tw/Content/Downloads/List01.aspx?&SiteID=1&MenuID=621273303702500244&xSSize=10&PageID=2&SSize=10。2019年01月30日。
財團法人醫院評鑑暨醫療品質策進會廖薰香副執行長醫病共享決策觀念回顧與迷思釐清(2017年04月)。取自:http://attend.jct.org.tw/upload/event_news/201704122026511.pdf。2019年01月02日。
財團法人醫院評鑑暨醫療品質策進會廖薰香副執行長2017醫病共享決策國內推行現況與整體回顧(2017年11月)。取自:https://sdm.patientsafety.mohw.gov.tw/Files/PublicContent/19/01_%E5%BB%96%E7%86%8F%E9%A6%99%E5%89%AF%E5%9F%B7%E8%A1%8C%E9%95%B7_%E9%86%AB%E7%97%85%E5%85%B1%E4%BA%AB%E6%B1%BA%E7%AD%96%E6%95%B4%E9%AB%94%E5%9B%9E%E9%A1%A7.pdf。2019年02月01日。
晨晰統計部落格新站。取自:https://dasanlin888.pixnet.net/blog/post/462836243-%E7%B5%90%E6%A7%8B%E6%96%B9%E7%A8%8Bsem%E6%A8%A1%E5%BC%8F%E9%85%8D%E9%81%A9%E5%BA%A6%E6%8C%87%E6%A8%99(model-fit)%E4%B9%8B%E4%BB%8B%E7%B4%B9%EF%BC%883。2019年01月08日。
美國RCW 41.05.033 “Shared Decision-Making Demonstration Project”法案。取自:https://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=41.05.033。2019年01月19日。
美國H.R. 3590 ”Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act ”法案。取自:https://www.congress.gov/bill/111th-congress/house-bill/3590?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%5B%22Patient+Protection+and+Affordable+Care+Act%22%5D%7D。2019年01月19日。
Using decision support materials。取自:http://personcentredcare.health.org.uk/person-centred-care/shared-decision-making/implementing-shared-decision-making/using-decision#typesdsm。2019年03月05日。
Baranowski, T., Cullen, K. W., Nicklas, T., Thompson, D., & Baranowski, J. (2003). Are current health behavioral change models helpful in guiding prevention of weight gain efforts? Obesity research, 11(S10), 23S-43S.
Barry, M. J., & Edgman-Levitan, S. (2012). Shared Decision Making — The Pinnacle of Patient-Centered Care. New England Journal of Medicine, 366(9), 780-781. doi:10.1056/NEJMp1109283
Benesty, J., Chen, J., Huang, Y., & Cohen, I. (2009). Pearson correlation coefficient. In Noise reduction in speech processing (pp. 1-4): Springer.
Bone, R. C. (1995). Effective patient-physician communication. Otolaryngology--Head and Neck Surgery, 112(5), P124-P124.
Charles, C., Gafni, A., & Whelan, T. (1997). Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean?(or it takes at least two to tango). Social science & medicine, 44(5), 681-692.
Eddy, D. M. (1990). Anatomy of a decision. Jama, 263(3), 441-443.
Elwyn, G., Frosch, D., Thomson, R., Joseph-Williams, N., Lloyd, A., Kinnersley, P., . . . Rollnick, S. (2012). Shared decision making: a model for clinical practice. Journal of general internal medicine, 27(10), 1361-1367.
Elwyn, G., Laitner, S., Coulter, A., Walker, E., Watson, P., & Thomson, R. (2010). Implementing shared decision making in the NHS. Bmj, 341, c5146.
Emanuel, E. J., & Emanuel, L. L. (1992). Four models of the physician-patient relationship. Jama, 267(16), 2221-2226.
Freeman, R., & Ismail, A. (2009). Assessing Patients’ Health Behaviours. In Detection, Assessment, Diagnosis and Monitoring of Caries (Vol. 21, pp. 113-127): Karger Publishers.
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Babin, B. J., & Black, W. C. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (Vol. 7). In: Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis 6th Edition. Pearson Prentice Hall. New Jersey. humans: Critique and reformulation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 87, 49-74.
Hinkle, D. E., Wiersma, W., & Jurs, S. G. (1988). Applied statistics for the behavioral sciences.
Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31-36.
Légaré, F., Ratté, S., Gravel, K., & Graham, I. D. (2008). Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: update of a systematic review of health professionals’ perceptions. Patient education and counseling, 73(3), 526-535.
Légaré, F., & Witteman, H. O. (2013). Shared decision making: examining key elements and barriers to adoption into routine clinical practice. Health affairs, 32(2), 276-284.
Landmark, A. M. D., Ofstad, E. H., & Svennevig, J. (2017). Eliciting patient preferences in shared decision-making (SDM): Comparing conversation analysis and SDM measurements. Patient education and counseling, 100(11), 2081-2087.
Liao, H.-H., Liang, H.-W., Chen, H.-C., Chang, C.-I., Wang, P.-C., & Shih, C.-L. (2017). Shared decision making in Taiwan. Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen, 123, 95-98.
Mishler, E. G. (1984). The discourse of medicine: Dialectics of medical interviews (Vol. 3): Greenwood Publishing Group.
Nunnally, J. C., Bernstein, I. H., & Berge, J. M. t. (1967). Psychometric theory (Vol. 226): McGraw-hill New York.
Nutbeam, D. (2008). The evolving concept of health literacy. Social science & medicine, 67(12), 2072-2078.
O'Connor, A. M., Tugwell, P., Wells, G. A., Elmslie, T., Jolly, E., Hollingworth, G., . . . Drake, E. (1998). A decision aid for women considering hormone therapy after menopause: decision support framework and evaluation. Patient education and counseling, 33(3), 267-279.
O’connor, A. M., Stacey, D., & Légaré, F. (2008). Coaching to support patients in making decisions. In: British Medical Journal Publishing Group.
Parker, R. M., Williams, M. V., Weiss, B. D., Baker, D. W., Davis, T. C., Doak, C. C., . . . Nurss, J. (1999). Health literacy-report of the council on scientific affairs. Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association, 281(6), 552-557.
Parsons, T. (1951). 1951 The Social System. New York: Free Press.
Rollnick, S., Kinnersley, P., & Stott, N. (1993). Methods of helping patients with behaviour change. Bmj, 307(6897), 188-190.
Ryan, M. (1992). The economic theory of agency in health care: lessons from non-economists for economists: Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen.
Sørensen, K., Van den Broucke, S., Fullam, J., Doyle, G., Pelikan, J., Slonska, Z., & Brand, H. (2012). Health literacy and public health: a systematic review and integration of definitions and models. BMC public health, 12(1), 80.
Scholl, I., Kriston, L., Dirmaier, J., Buchholz, A., & Härter, M. (2012). Development and psychometric properties of the Shared Decision Making Questionnaire–physician version (SDM-Q-Doc). Patient education and counseling, 88(2), 284-290.
Schwartz, N. E. (1973). The Relationship of Nutrition Education to Subsequent Nutrition Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Ohio High School Graduates. Ohio State University,
Semler, C. N. (2001). Health Behaviour Change. A Guide for Practitioners S. Rollnick, P. Mason, & C. Butler. London: Churchill Livingstone-Harcourt Brace and Company Ltd, 1999. pp. 225.£ 15.95 (paperback). Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 29(1), 119-124.
Turner, T., Cull, W. L., Bayldon, B., Klass, P., Sanders, L. M., Frintner, M. P., . . . Dreyer, B. (2009). Pediatricians and health literacy: descriptive results from a national survey. Pediatrics, 124(Supplement 3), S299-S305.
Weng, Y.-H., Kuo, K. N., Yang, C.-Y., Liao, H.-H., Chen, C., Lo, H.-L., . . . Chiu, Y.-W. (2013). Effectiveness of national evidence-based medicine competition in Taiwan. BMC medical education, 13(1), 66.
Williams, M. V., Davis, T., Parker, R. M., & Weiss, B. D. (2002). The role of health literacy in patient-physician communication. FAMILY MEDICINE-KANSAS CITY-, 34(5), 383-389.
Xu, W., Sun, G., Lin, Z., Chen, M., Yang, B., Chen, H., & Cao, K. (2010). Knowledge, attitude, and behavior in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing radiofrequency catheter ablation. Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology, 28(3), 199-207.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus:開放下載的時間 available 2024-08-19
校外 Off-campus:開放下載的時間 available 2024-08-19

您的 IP(校外) 位址是 18.117.111.1
現在時間是 2024-04-29
論文校外開放下載的時間是 2024-08-19

Your IP address is 18.117.111.1
The current date is 2024-04-29
This thesis will be available to you on 2024-08-19.

紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 2024-08-19

QR Code