Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0704120-090117 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0704120-090117
論文名稱
Title
探討餐飲衛生分級評核與食品中毒相關性
Discussing The Correlation Between Food Hygiene Rating Scheme And Foodborne Disease
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
80
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2020-07-28
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2020-08-04
關鍵字
Keywords
食品中毒、食品良好衛生規範準則(GHP)、食品安全、食物、食源性疾病、餐飲衛生管理分級評核
Good Hygiene Practice (GHP), Food, Food poisoning, foodborne illness / foodborne disease, food safety, Food Hygiene Rating Scheme
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5706 次,被下載 0
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5706 times, has been downloaded 0 times.
中文摘要
本研究討論利用餐飲衛生管理分級評核制度,對於參與餐飲業業者,與發生食品中毒相關性,能有效提供民眾消費用餐指標。
選擇2019年1月至2019年12月高雄市地區餐飲業並參與餐飲衛生管理分級評核,依管理業別分類,以食品良好衛生規範準則(GHP)為基礎評核,結果分為優、良及不合格,過程配合衛生局(所)評核、例行性抽驗、參與衛生講座及運用食品藥物管理署(TFDA)之產品通路管理資訊系統(PMDS)大數據資料庫等作為評價指標,統計發生食品中毒案件之業者,進行對比分析相關性。
自收集2019年1月至12月有發生食品中毒且無參加餐飲衛生管理分級評核大於有參加 (92% vs 8%;P<0.00);通過或參與認證評核且無食品中毒大於有食品中毒(81% vs 7%;P<0.00) ;有食品中毒中連鎖加盟店大於無連鎖加盟店(70% vs 30%;P<0.00);有食品中毒且資本額500萬元至1000萬元以下大於無資本額、500萬元以下及超過1000萬元以上;高雄市地區中食品中毒高一組高於高二組、北岡組、南岡組、大寮組及旗山組;無食品中毒技術士證比例高於有食品中毒(56.65% vs 6.07%;P<0.00);無食品中毒廚師證比例高於有食品中毒(38.65% vs 5.72%;P<0.00)。
高雄市餐飲衛生管理分級制度評核對於食品中毒有一定高度相關性,因此在法規及食品良好衛生規範準則(GHP)基礎下,持續辦理該評核制度,促使實務及學理上平衡,而達成可以有效提供民眾在選擇消費用餐前的參考指標。
Abstract
Background:This study explored the correlation of implementing a food hygiene rating scheme and the occurrence of foodborne outbreaks in dining service providers. This facilitates providing an effective indicator for consumers to select restaurants.
Methods:Data were collected from dining service providers in Kaohsiung City who did and did not participate in the food hygiene rating scheme conducted by the local government between January 2019 and December 2019. The participating service providers were assessed on the basis of Good Hygiene Practices and categorized according their management types. The assessment outcomes of this scheme were either outstanding, qualified, or unqualified. During the assessment process, the service providers were subject to evaluation by the local health bureau and routine random inspections, in addition to participating in hygiene seminars. Data in the Product Management Distribution System of the Taiwan Food and Drug Administration were also used as indicators to assess the service providers. Statistics of service providers experiencing foodborne outbreaks were collected to perform correlation analysis.
Results:The results revealed that between January 2019 and December 2019, the proportion of service providers who did not participate in the food hygiene rating scheme and experienced foodborne outbreaks was greater than that of service providers who participated in the scheme and experienced foodborne outbreaks (92% vs 8%; P<0.00). The proportion of service providers who participated or passed the scheme and did not experience foodborne outbreaks was greater than that of service providers who participated or passed the scheme but experienced foodborne outbreaks (81% vs 7%; P<0.00). The proportion of franchise service providers who experienced foodborne outbreaks was greater than that of nonfranchise service providers who experienced foodborne outbreaks (70% vs 30%; P<0.00). The proportion of service providers with a registered capital between NT$5 million and NT$10 million who experienced foodborne outbreaks was greater than that of service providers without a registered capital or a registered capital of <NT$5 million and >NT$10 million. In terms of geographic regions, the proportion of service providers who experienced foodborne outbreaks in the Kaohsiung 1 group was greater than that in the Kaohsiung 2, Gangshan North ,Gangshan South, Daliao, and Cishan groups. The proportion of service providers with a technician certificate who did not experience foodborne outbreaks was greater than that of service providers with a technician certificate who experienced foodborne outbreaks (56.65% vs 6.07%: P<0.00). The proportion of service providers with a chef certificate who did not experience foodborne outbreaks was greater than that of service providers with a chef certificate who experienced foodborne outbreaks (38.65% vs 5.72%; P<0.00).
Conclusion:A high correlation was observed between the food hygiene rating scheme of Kaohsiung City and the occurrence of foodborne outbreaks. Therefore, the government should continue to implement this scheme in accordance with relevant regulations and Good Hygiene Practices. By ensuring the balance between practice and theory, the government can provide an effective indicator for the public to select adequate restaurants.
目次 Table of Contents
論文審定書 i
摘要 ii
Abstract iii
目錄 v
圖目錄 vii
表目錄 viii
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 4
第二章 文獻探討 5
第一節 何謂食品安全 5
第二節 食安危機帶來的影響 10
第三節 餐飲衛生管理分級制度的施行 20
第三章 研究方法 32
第一節 研究設計與架構 32
第二節 研究樣本與資料來源 33
第三節 研究分析工具與方法 37
第四章 研究分析與結果 40
第一節 研究樣本特質 40
第二節 研究樣本之迴歸及檢定模式分析 45
第五章 討論 49
第六章 結論與建議 53
第一節 結論 53
第二節 研究限制 55
第三節 研究建議 56
第四節 研究貢獻 57
參考文獻 58
附錄一 64
附錄二 65
參考文獻 References
參考文獻
FSN食品安全新聞(2015)。世衛組織發布食源性疾病的第一個全球估計。2020年6月02日取自 https://www.foodsafetynews.com/2015/12/who-releases-first-global-
estimates-of-foodborne-disease/#.VmlDzuN95bV
全國法規資料庫(2019)。食品安全衛生管理法。2020年5月10日取自https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawHistory.aspx?pcode=L0040001
周正剛、洪雅齡(2020)‧台灣連鎖店年鑑‧台北市:臺灣連鎖暨加盟協會。
食力Foodnex(2016)。美國每年每6人就有1人曾食物中毒。2020年5月1日取自foodnext.net/news/newsnation/paper/4739531954
高雄市政府衛生局(2013)。102年優良餐飲業者分級暨食品業者衛生自主管理標章認證計畫。2020年6月8日取自https://slidesplayer.com/slide/11399144/
高雄市政府衛生局(2020)。食品衛生科。2020年3月8日取自https://khd.kcg.gov.tw/upload/news/0_109年餐飲衛生管理分級評核-報名公告.pdf
高雄市政府衛生局(2020)。食安地圖。2020年6月8日取自https://foodmap.kchb.gov.tw/
高雄市政府青年局(2020)。青年補給站。2020年6月16日取自https://youth.kcg.gov.tw/
黃育珺、林蘭砡(2019)‧107年食品中毒‧台北市:衛生福利部食品藥物管理署
經濟部統計處(2020)。批發、零售及餐飲業營業額統計。2020年4月20日取自https://www.moea.gov.tw/Mns/dos/home/Home.aspx
衛生福利部食品藥物管理署(2020)。歷年食品中毒資料(數據資料可能因未來修正而更新)。2020年7月16日取自https://www.fda.gov.tw/TC/siteContent.aspx?sid=323
衛生福利部食品藥物管理署(2020)。藥物食品安全週報。2020年6月29日取自
https://www.fda.gov.tw/Tc/PublishOtherEpaperContent.aspx?ID=1115&chk=9bb0ff35-f584-4c77-8c28-0d78903eac64&tID=1732
Bintsis, T. (2017). Foodborne pathogens. American Institute of Mathematical Sciences Microbiology, 3(3), 529-563. doi:10.3934/microbiol.2017.3.529
Bosch, A., Gkogka, E., Le Guyader, F. S., Loisy-Hamon, F., Lee, A., van Lieshout, L., . . . Phister, T. (2018). Foodborne viruses: Detection, risk assessment, and control
options in food processing. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 285, 110-128. doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2018.06.001
Checkit. (2016). Nearly 20,000 restaurants risk losing 61% of customers due to poor food hygiene Retrieved May 15, 2020, From https://www.checkit.net/
CNN business (2018). Yelp will roll out restaurant hygiene scores in the U.S. CNN business. Retrieved April 24, 2018. From
https://money.cnn.com/2018/07/24/technology/yelp-restaurant-hygiene-score/index.html. Accessed 4 June 2019.
Dewey-Mattia, D., Manikonda, K., Hall, A. J., Wise, M. E., & Crowe, S. J. (2018). Surveillance for Foodborne Disease Outbreaks - United States, 2009-2015. Morbidity
and Mortality Weekly Report Surveill Summ, 67(10), 1-11. doi:10.15585/mmwr.ss6710a1
Fleetwood, J. (2019). Scores on doors: restaurant hygiene ratings and public health policy. Journal of Public Health Policy, 40. doi:10.1057/s41271-019-00183-4
Fleetwood, J., Rahman, S., Holland, D., Millson, D., Thomson, L., & Poppy, G. (2019). As clean as they look? Food hygiene inspection scores, microbiological
contamination, and foodborne illness. Food Control, 96, 76-86. doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2018.08.034
Food Standards Agency. (2019). Food Hygiene Rating Scheme Retrieved April 20, 2020, From https://www.food.gov.uk/
Food Standards Scotland. (2020). Food Safety Retrieved June 02, 2020, From https://www.foodstandards.gov.scot/
Ho, D. E., Ashwood, Z. C., & Handan-Nader, C. (2017). The False Promise of Simple Information Disclosure : New Evidence on Restaurant Hygiene GradingB
Hardstaff, J. L., Clough, H. E., Lutje, V., McIntyre, K. M., Harris, J. P., Garner, P., & O'Brien, S. J. (2018). Foodborne and Food-Handler Norovirus Outbreaks: A Systematic
Review. Foodborne Pathogens and Disease, 15(10), 589-597. doi:10.1089/fpd.2018.2452
Jones, S. L., Parry, S. M., O'Brien, S. J., & Palmer, S. R. (2008). Operational practices associated with foodborne disease outbreaks in the catering industry in England
and Wales. Journal of Food Protection, 71(8), 1659-1665. doi:10.4315/0362-028x-71.8.1659
Jones, A. K., Cross, P., Burton, M., Millman, C., O’Brien, S. J., & Rigby, D. (2017). Estimating the prevalence of food risk increasing behaviours in UK kitchens. Public
Library of Science ONE, 12(6), 1-17. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0175816
Kibret, M., & Abera, B. (2012). The sanitary conditions of food service establishments and food safety knowledge and practices of food handlers in bahir dar town.
Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences, 22(1), 27-35.
Mejia, J., Mankad, S., & Gopal, A. (2018). A for Effort? Using the Crowd to Identify Moral Hazard in NYC Restaurant Hygiene Inspections. Social Science Research
Network Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3204249
Odeyemi, O. A. (2016). Public health implications of microbial food safety and foodborne diseases in developing countries. Food and Nutrition Research, 60(1),
29819. doi:10.3402/fnr.v60.29819
Scallan, E., Hoekstra, R. M., Angulo, F. J., Tauxe, R. V., Widdowson, M. A., Roy, S. L., . . . Griffin, P. M. (2011). Foodborne illness acquired in the United States--major
pathogens. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 17(1), 7-15. doi:10.3201/eid1701.p11101
Schirone, M., Visciano, P., Tofalo, R., & Suzzi, G. (2017). Histamine Food Poisoning. Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology, 241, 217-235.
doi:10.1007/164_2016_54
Switaj, T. L., Winter, K. J., & Christensen, S. R. (2015). Diagnosis and Management of Foodborne Illness. American Family Physician, 92(5), 358-365.
TORONTO. (2020). About DineSafe Retrieved April 13 , 2020, From https://www.who.int/activities/promoting-safe-food-handling
Wong, M. R., McKelvey, W., Ito, K., Schiff, C., Jacobson, J. B., & Kass, D. (2015). Impact of a letter-grade program on restaurant sanitary conditions and diner behavior
in New York City. American Journal of Public Health, 105(3), e81-87. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2014.302404
World Health Organization. (2015). Foodborne diseases Retrieved April 28,
2020, From https://www.who.int/health-topics/foodborne-diseases#tab=tab_1
World Health Organization. (2019). romoting safe food handlin Retrieved April 28,
2020, From https://www.who.int/activities/promoting-safe-food-handling
Wu, G., Yuan, Q., Wang, L., Zhao, J., Chu, Z., Zhuang, M., . . . Du, Z. (2018). Epidemiology of foodborne disease outbreaks from 2011 to 2016 in Shandong Province,
China. Medicine, 97, e13142. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000013142
한국식품안전관리인증원. (2020). 음식점위생등급 . 위생등급 평가표의 이해. Retrieved May 20, 2020, From https://www.haccp.or.kr/site/haccp/sub.do?key=2407
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus:開放下載的時間 available 2025-08-04

您的 IP(校外) 位址是 3.133.109.30
現在時間是 2024-04-29
論文校外開放下載的時間是 2025-08-04

Your IP address is 3.133.109.30
The current date is 2024-04-29
This thesis will be available to you on 2025-08-04.

紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code