論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available
論文名稱 Title |
台灣放空投資人交易行為模式之實證研究 An Empirical Study on the Trading Behavior of Short-sellers in Taiwan Stock Market |
||
系所名稱 Department |
|||
畢業學年期 Year, semester |
語文別 Language |
||
學位類別 Degree |
頁數 Number of pages |
55 |
|
研究生 Author |
|||
指導教授 Advisor |
|||
召集委員 Convenor |
|||
口試委員 Advisory Committee |
|||
口試日期 Date of Exam |
2019-05-10 |
繳交日期 Date of Submission |
2019-07-29 |
關鍵字 Keywords |
融券賣出、賣空交易者、總體樂觀情緒、個股樂觀情緒、投資人情緒 Investor sentiment, Short volume, Short sellers, Individual Stock Sentiment, Overall Market Sentiment |
||
統計 Statistics |
本論文已被瀏覽 5757 次,被下載 37 次 The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5757 times, has been downloaded 37 times. |
中文摘要 |
本研究首先探討台灣賣空交易者是否可以獲利,研究結果發現台灣融券賣空者不管在原始報酬或風險調整後報酬都可獲得顯著的正報酬。與美國實證資料一致,台灣賣空交易者傾向交易大型股、高價股及動能股,透過投資組合或者Fama-MacBeth橫斷面迴歸分析,在控制其他報酬影響因子後此結論依舊穩健。其次,有別於現存文獻,本研究首次探討賣空交易者是否具有解讀市場投資人情緒的能力。研究結果從轉移機率矩陣發現高融券賣出的股票具有持續性,且上一期樂觀情緒的股票,下一期有較高機率成為高融券賣空的股票。本文進一步發現不管是從總體或者個股樂觀情緒指標,實證結果都發現賣空交易者在樂觀情緒狀態下可獲取更高報酬,台灣賣空投資人能夠有效解讀市場情緒,並且在投資人情緒過高而導致證券過度定價時進場套利。 |
Abstract |
This study first aimed to investigate whether traders in Taiwan's stock market were able to profit from short selling. We found that short sellers were able to earn significant positive returns, whether in raw returns or risk-adjusted returns. Consistent with the empirical results of U.S. studies, short sellers in Taiwan tend to trade stocks characterized by high market value, high stock price and high liquidity. With return-impacting factors controlled, the above findings still remained robust whether in portfolio analysis or Fama-MacBeth cross-sectional regression.Next, the study aimed to investigate whether short sellers were able to analyze investor sentiment. Using the transition probability matrix, the study found continuity of short selling behavior in stocks of high short volume, and stocks that exhibited optimism in the previous period had a higher probability of accumulating high short volume in the following period. Empirical results of the study further discovered that, whether using optimism indicators for the overall market or individual stocks, short selling at the state of optimism can earn higher returns; additionally, short sellers in Taiwan were effective in analyzing investor sentiment, and short sell at a time when security is overpriced. |
目次 Table of Contents |
論文審定書 i 摘要 ii Abstract iii Figure v Table vi 1. Introduction 1 2. Literature Review 8 2-1. Short sellers' trading pattern 8 2.2. Effect of investor sentiment on stock price and returns 10 3. Data and Research Methodology 13 3-1. Source of data and sampling 13 3-2. Definition of variables 14 3-3. Research model 17 4. Empirical result 24 4-1. Descriptive statistics 24 4-2. Trade preference of short sellers 26 4-3. Short volume and predictability of returns 27 4.4. Short volume and overall/individual stock optimism 35 5. Conclusions 44 6. References 46 |
參考文獻 References |
Chia-Lun Chu, 2017. Introduction to new margin trading and short selling rules. Securities & Futures Monthly, 35 (4), 5-25. Amihud, Y., 2002. Illiquidity and stock returns: cross-section and time-series effects. Journal of Financial Markets, 5 (1), 31-56. Antweiler, W., Frank, M., 2006. Do U.S. stock markets typically overreact to corporate news stories? Unpublished working paper. University of British Columbia and University of Minnesota. Brunnermeier, M., Pedersen, L., 2005. Predatory trading. The Journal of Finance, 60 (4), 1825-1863. Boehme, R., Danielsen, B. R. and Sorescu, S. M., 2006. Short-sale Constraints, Differences of Opinion, and Overvaluation. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 41 (2), 455-487. Boehmer, E., Jones, C. M., and Zhang, X., 2008. Which Shorts Are Informed? The Journal of Finance, 63 (2), 491-527. Bali, T., Cakici, N., Whitelaw, R., 2011. Maxing out: stocks as lotteries and the cross-section of expected returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 99 (2), 427–446. Bali, T., Brown, S. J., Murray, S., Tang, Y., 2017. A Lottery-Demand-Based Explanation of the Beta Anomaly. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 52 (6), 2369-2397. Choie, Kenneth S., and S. James Hwang, 1994. Profitability of short-selling and exploitability of short information. Journal of Portfolio Management, 20, 33-38. Christophe, S., Ferri, M., Angel, J., 2005. Short-selling prior to earnings announcements. The Journal of Finance, 59 (4), 1845-1875. Chan, W., 2003. Stock price reaction to news and no-news: drift and reversal after headlines. Journal of Financial Economics, 70 (2), 223-260. Chan, Y.C., Chui, A.C., 2016. Gambling in the Hong Kong stock market. International Review of Economics & Finance, 44, 204-218. Desai, Hemang, K. Ramesh, S. Ramu Thiagarajan, and Bala V. Balachandran, 2002, An investigation of the informational role of short volume in the Nasdaq market. The Journal of Finance, 57 (5),2263-2287. Daske, H., Richardson, S., Tuna, I., 2005. Do Short Sale Transactions Precede Bad News Events? Working Paper, University of Pennsylvania. Diether, K., Lee, K., Werner, I., 2008. Short-sale strategies and return predictability. Review of Financial Studies, 22 (2), 575-607. Dutt, T., & Humphery-Jenner, M., 2013. Stock return volatility, operating performance and stock returns: International evidence on drivers of the ‘low volatility’ anomaly. Journal of Banking and Finance, 37 (3), 999-1017. Engelberg, J., 2008. Costly information processing: evidence from earnings announcements. Unpublished working paper. University of North Carolina. Engelberg J. E., Reed A. V., Ringgenberg M. C., 2012. How are shorts informed? short sellers, news, and information processing. Journal of Financial Economics, 105 (2), 260-278. Engelberg J. E., Reed A. V., Ringgenberg M. C., 2018. Short-selling risk. The Journal of Finance, 73 (2), 755-786. Fama, E. F., and MacBeth, J.D., 1973. Risk, return, and equilibrium: Empirical tests. Journal of Political Economy, 81 (3), 607-636. Francis, J., Jennifer, Venkatachalam, M., Zhang, Y., 2005. Do short sellers convey information about changes in fundamentals or risk? Working paper, Duke University. Fong, W. M., Toh, B., 2014. Investor sentiment and the MAX effect. Journal of Banking & Finance, 46, 190-201. Goldstein, I., Guembel, A., 2008. Manipulation and the Allocational Role of Prices, Review of Economic Studies, 75 (1), 133-164. Hou, K.W., Moskowitz, T., 2005. Market frictions, price delay, and the cross-section of expected returns. Review of Financial Studies, 18 (3), 981-1020. Hirose, T. H., Kato, H. K., Bremer, M., 2009. Can margin traders predict future stock returns in Japan? Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 17, 41-57. Hung, W., Yang, J. J., 2018. The MAX effect: Lottery stocks with price limits and limits to arbitrage. Journal of Financial Markets, 41, 77-91. Hodgson, A., Lim, W. D., Mi, L., 2018. Insider sales vs. short selling: Negative information trading in Australia. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 48, 72-83. Jegadeesh, N., 1990. Evidence of Predictable Behavior of Security Returns. The Journal of Finance, 45 (3),881-898. Jegadeesh, N., Titman, S., 1993. Returns to Buying Winners and Selling Losers: Implications for Stock Market Efficiency. The Journal of Finance, 48 (1),65-91. Kelley, E. K., Tetlock, P.C., 2016. Retail short selling and stock prices. The Review of Financial Studies, 30 (3), 801-834. Lehmann, B. N., 1990. Fads, Martingales, and Market Efficiency. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 105 (1), 1-28. Liu, J., Stambaugh, R. F., Yuan, Y., 2018. Absolving beta of volatility’s effects. Journal of Financial Economics, 128 (1), 1-15. Purnanandam, A., Seyhun, N., 2018. Do short-sellers trade on private information or false information? Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 53 (3), 997-1023. Seneca, J. J., 1967. Short volume: Bearish or Bullish? Journal of Finance, 22 (1),67-70. Saffi, Pedro, and Kari Sigurdsson, 2011. Price efficiency and short selling. Review of Financial Studies, 24 (3), 821-852. Stambaugh, R. F., Yu, J., Yuan, Y., 2015. Arbitrage asymmetry and the idiosyncratic volatility puzzle, The Journal of Finance, 70 (5), 1903-1948. Tetlock, P., Saar-Tsechansky, M., Macskassy, S., 2008. More than words: quantifying language to measure firms’ fundamentals. The Journal of Finance, 63 (3), 1437-1467. Tetlock, P., 2011. All the news that’s fit to reprint: do investors react to stale information? Review of Financial Studies, 24 (5), 1481-1512. Vega, C., 2006. Stock price reaction to public and private information, Journal of Financial Economics, 82 (1), 103-133. |
電子全文 Fulltext |
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。 論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted 開放時間 Available: 校內 Campus: 已公開 available 校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available |
紙本論文 Printed copies |
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。 開放時間 available 已公開 available |
QR Code |