論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available
論文名稱 Title |
角色衝突與組織公民行為:關係的中介效果與助人者性別的調節效果 Role Conflict and Organizational Citizenship Behavior:The Effect of Guanxi as Mediator and Gender of Helper as Moderator |
||
系所名稱 Department |
|||
畢業學年期 Year, semester |
語文別 Language |
||
學位類別 Degree |
頁數 Number of pages |
91 |
|
研究生 Author |
|||
指導教授 Advisor |
|||
召集委員 Convenor |
|||
口試委員 Advisory Committee |
|||
口試日期 Date of Exam |
2019-06-06 |
繳交日期 Date of Submission |
2019-07-22 |
關鍵字 Keywords |
角色衝突、組織公民行為、關係、助人者性別 guanxi, the gender of helper, role conflict, OCB |
||
統計 Statistics |
本論文已被瀏覽 5923 次,被下載 59 次 The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5923 times, has been downloaded 59 times. |
中文摘要 |
本研究目的在了解角色衝突與組織公民行為之間的影響,關係是角色衝突影 響組織公民行為的中介因素,且助人者的性別會調節此段中介關係。此研究同時 也探討組織公民行為對隔日之角色衝突和關係的影響,本研究以經驗抽樣法,於 連續 10 天收集 36 名全職印尼華人之行為作為樣本資料。研究結果顯示角色衝突 與組織公民行為之間存在正向關係。除此之外,本研究還發現組織公民行為對角 色衝突和關係之間存在正相關關係。此外,本研究結果也顯示,關係可以成為角 色衝突與組織公民行為之間的中介效果,而助人者的性別可以弱化角色衝突和關 係之間的關係。 |
Abstract |
The objective of this study is to examine the relationship between role conflict and Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB), which is mediated by guanxi and moderated at the first stage of the model by gender of helper. Also, this study tested the impact of OCB to role conflict and guanxi in the next day. This study applied the experience sampling method by using 36 full-time overseas Chinese Indonesian as samples in ten days, and this study found that role conflict was positively related to OCB. Besides that, this study found that OCB was positively related to both role conflict and guanxi. Moreover, the results indicated that guanxi could be a mediator between role conflict and OCB. Gender of helper could moderate the relationship between role conflict and guanxi |
目次 Table of Contents |
Table of Contents Thesis Validation Letter i 摘要 .........................................................................................................................................ii Abstract ...................................................................................................................................iii Table of Contents..................................................................................................................... iv List of Figures.......................................................................................................................... vi List of Tables.......................................................................................................................... vii Chapter 1 Introduction ..............................................................................................................1 1.1 Background Literature..............................................................................................1 1.2 Research Objectives ..................................................................................................4 Chapter 2 Literature Review .....................................................................................................5 2.1 Relationship between Role Conflict and OCB..........................................................5 2.2 Relationship between OCB and Role conflict ...........................................................9 2.3 Guanxi as the mediator between role conflict and OCB.........................................10 2.4 Gender as a moderator between role conflict and OCB.........................................13 Chapter 3 Research Method ....................................................................................................16 3.1 Research Framework ..............................................................................................16 3.2 Sample and Procedure.............................................................................................19 3.3 Measure ...................................................................................................................22 3.3.1 Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB)................................................22 3.3.2 Role Conflict..................................................................................................23 3.3.3 Gender...........................................................................................................24 3.3.4 Guanxi ...........................................................................................................24 3.3.5 Control Variables..........................................................................................25 3.4 Analyzing Method ...................................................................................................26 Chapter 4 Results....................................................................................................................27 4.1 Factor Analysis ........................................................................................................27 4.2 Descriptive Statistics and Correlations ...................................................................28 4.3 Hypothesis Testing...................................................................................................29 4.3.1 Linear Regression-Normal Analysis.............................................................29 4.3.2 Linear Regression-Time Lagged Analysis....................................................37 Chapter 5 Discussion ..............................................................................................................42 5.1 Theoretical Implication ...........................................................................................42 5.2 Practical Implication ...............................................................................................44 5.3 Limitation and Future Suggestions.........................................................................45 REFERENCES.......................................................................................................................47 APPENDIX 1 – Personal Information Form (English Version)................................................52 APPENDIX 2 – Personal Information Form (Bahasa Version) ................................................58 APPENDIX 3 – Daily Questionnaire (English Version) ..........................................................64 APPENDIX 4 – Daily Questionnaire (Bahasa Version) ...........................................................74 |
參考文獻 References |
Arnsten, A. F. (1998). The biology of being frazzled. Science, 280(5370), 1711-1712. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51(6), 1173. Belogolovsky, E., & Somech, A. (2010). Teachers’ organizational citizenship behavior: Examining the boundary between in-role behavior and extra-role behavior from the perspective of teachers, principals and parents. Teaching and Teacher education, 26(4), 914-923. Bergeron, D. M. (2007). The potential paradox of organizational citizenship behavior: Good citizens at what cost? Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1078-1095. doi:10.5465/amr.2007.26585791 Bolino, M. C., Hsiung, H.-H., Harvey, J., & LePine, J. A. (2015). “Well, I’m tired of tryin’!” Organizational citizenship behavior and citizenship fatigue. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(1), 56. Bolino, M. C., & Turnley, W. H. (2005). The personal costs of citizenship behavior: the relationship between individual initiative and role overload, job stress, and work-family conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(4), 740. Bowling, N. A., Khazon, S., Alarcon, G. M., Blackmore, C. E., Bragg, C. B., Hoepf, M. R., . . . Li, H. (2017). Building better measures of role ambiguity and role conflict: The validation of new role stressor scales. Work & Stress, 31(1), 1-23. Bragger, J. D., Rodriguez-Srednicki, O., Kutcher, E. J., Indovino, L., & Rosner, E. (2005). Work-family conflict, work-family culture, and organizational citizenship behavior among teachers. Journal of Business and psychology, 20(2), 303-324. Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of cross-cultural psychology, 1(3), 185-216. Brown, S. L., & Brown, R. M. (2015). Connecting prosocial behavior to improved physical health: Contributions from the neurobiology of parenting. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 55, 1-17. Cannon, W. B. (1932). The wisdom of the body. Chang, C.-H., Johnson, R. E., & Yang, L.-Q. (2007). Emotional strain and organizational citizenship behaviours: A meta-analysis and review. Work & Stress, 21(4), 312-332. Cheung, F. Y. M., Peng, K., & Wong, C.-S. (2018). Beyond exchange and prosocial motives, is altruistic helping a valid motive for organizational citizenship behavior? Chinese Management Studies, 12(1), 222-242. Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of management, 31(6), 874-900. Dunning, J. H., & Kim, C. (2007). The cultural roots of guanxi: An exploratory study. World Economy, 30(2), 329-341. Eagly, A. H. (2009). The his and hers of prosocial behavior: An examination of the social psychology of gender. American Psychologist, 64(8), 644. Eatough, E. M., Chang, C.-H., Miloslavic, S. A., & Johnson, R. E. (2011). Relationships of role stressors with organizational citizenship behavior: a meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(3), 619. Emerson, R. M. (1976). Social exchange theory. Annual review of sociology, 2(1), 335-362. Farh, J.-L., Tsui, A. S., Xin, K., & Cheng, B.-S. (1998). The influence of relational demography and guanxi: The Chinese case. Organization science, 9(4), 471-488. Foa, E. B., & Foa, U. G. (1980). Resource theory Social exchange (pp. 77-94): Springer. Greenhaus, J. H., & Beutell, N. J. (1985). Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Academy of Management Review, 10(1), 76-88. Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach: Guilford Publications. Heinrichs, M., & Domes, G. (2008). Neuropeptides and social behaviour: effects of oxytocin and vasopressin in humans. Progress in brain research, 170, 337-350. Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513. Hobfoll, S. E. (2011). Conservation of resource caravans and engaged settings. Journal of occupational and organizational psychology, 84(1), 116-122. Hong, C. H., Zhu, D.-S., & White, L. P. (2013). Colleague guanxi intensity: Scale development and validation. Journal of Management & Organization, 19(6), 756-778. Hwang, K.-k. (1987). Face and favor: The Chinese power game. American journal of Sociology, 92(4), 944-974. Jaramillo, F., Mulki, J. P., & Boles, J. S. (2011). Workplace stressors, job attitude, and job behaviors: is interpersonal conflict the missing link? Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 31(3), 339-356. Jaskyte, K. (2005). The impact of organizational socialization tactics on role ambiguity and role conflict of newly hired social workers. Administration in Social Work, 29(4), 69-87. Karam, C. M. (2011). Good organizational soldiers: conflict-related stress predicts citizenship behavior. International journal of conflict management, 22(3), 300-319. Kim, S., & Kuo, M.-H. (2015). Examining the relationships among coaching, trustworthiness, and role behaviors: A social exchange perspective. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 51(2), 152-176. Klein, N. (2017). Prosocial behavior increases perceptions of meaning in life. The Journal of positive psychology, 12(4), 354-361. Lin, L.-H., & Ho, Y.-L. (2010). Guanxi and OCB: the Chinese cases. Journal of Business Ethics, 96(2), 285-298. Liu, D., Chen, X. P., & Holley, E. (2017). Help yourself by helping others: The joint impact of group member organizational citizenship behaviors and group cohesiveness on group member objective task performance change. Personnel Psychology, 70(4), 809-842. Liu, X.-Y., & Wang, J. (2013). Abusive supervision and organizational citizenship behaviour: is supervisor–subordinate guanxi a mediator? The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(7), 1471-1489. Lovell, S. E., Kahn, A. S., Anton, J., Davidson, A., Dowling, E., Post, D., & Mason, C. (1999). Does gender affect the link between organizational citizenship behavior and performance evaluation? Sex Roles, 41(5-6), 469-478. Luo, J.-D., Cheng, M.-Y., & Zhang, T. (2016). Guanxi circle and organizational citizenship behavior: Context of a Chinese workplace. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 33(3), 649-671. Lykes, M. B. (1983). Discrimination and coping in the lives of Black women: Analyses of oral history data. Journal of Social Issues, 39(3), 79-100. Malhotra, N., & Ackfeldt, A.-L. (2016). Internal communication and prosocial service behaviors of front-line employees: Investigating mediating mechanisms. Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 4132-4139. Matud, M. P. (2004). Gender differences in stress and coping styles. Personality and individual differences, 37(7), 1401-1415. Midlarsky, E. (1991). Helping as coping. Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior : the good soldier syndrome. Lexington, Mass. :: Lexington Books. Peterson, M. F., Smith, P. B., Akande, A., Ayestaran, S., Bochner, S., Callan, V., . . . Viedge, C. (1995). Role Conflict, Ambiguity, and Overload: A 21-Nation Study. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 429-452. doi:10.5465/256687 Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of management, 26(3), 513-563. Pritchard, R. D. (1969). Equity theory: A review and critique. Organizational behavior and human performance, 4(2), 176-211. Ptacek, J. T., Smith, R. E., & Dodge, K. L. (1994). Gender differences in coping with stress: When stressor and appraisals do not differ. Personality and social psychology bulletin, 20(4), 421-430. Raposa, E. B., Laws, H. B., & Ansell, E. B. (2016). Prosocial behavior mitigates the negative effects of stress in everyday life. Clinical Psychological Science, 4(4), 691-698. Rioux, S. M., & Penner, L. A. (2001). The causes of organizational citizenship behavior: a motivational analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(6), 1306. Rizzo, J. R., House, R. J., & Lirtzman, S. I. (1970). Role conflict and ambiguity in complex organizations. Administrative science quarterly, 150-163. Rose, A. J., & Asher, S. R. (2004). Children's strategies and goals in response to help‐ giving and help‐seeking tasks within a friendship. Child Development, 75(3), 749-763. Schwartz, C., Meisenhelder, J. B., Ma, Y., & Reed, G. (2003). Altruistic social interest behaviors are associated with better mental health. Psychosomatic Medicine, 65(5), 778-785. Somech, A., & Drach-Zahavy, A. (2013). Organizational citizenship behaviour and employee's strain: Examining the buffering effects of leader support and participation in decision making. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 22(2), 138-149. Taormina, R. J., & Gao, J. H. (2010). A research model for Guanxi behavior: Antecedents, measures, and outcomes of Chinese social networking. Social Science Research, 39(6), 1195-1212. Taylor, S. E., Klein, L. C., Lewis, B. P., Gruenewald, T. L., Gurung, R. A., & Updegraff, J. A. (2000). Biobehavioral responses to stress in females: tend-and-befriend, not fight-or-flight. Psychological review, 107(3), 411. Tims, M., Bakker, A. B., & Derks, D. (2015). Job crafting and job performance: A longitudinal study. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24(6), 914-928. Tompson, H. B., & Werner, J. M. (1997). The impact of role conflict/facilitation on core and discretionary behaviors: Testing a mediated model. Journal of management, 23(4), 583-601. Tunc, T., & Kutanis, R. O. (2009). Role conflict, role ambiguity, and burnout in nurses and physicians at a university hospital in Turkey. Nursing & health sciences, 11(4), 410-416. Vaillant, G. E. (2000). Adaptive mental mechanisms: Their role in a positive psychology. American Psychologist, 55(1), 89. van der Kolk, B., & Kaufmann, W. (2018). Performance measurement, cognitive dissonance and coping strategies: exploring individual responses to NPM-inspired output control. Journal of Management Control, 1-21. Von Dawans, B., Fischbacher, U., Kirschbaum, C., Fehr, E., & Heinrichs, M. (2012). The social dimension of stress reactivity: acute stress increases prosocial behavior in humans. Psychological science, 23(6), 651-660. Weinstein, N., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). When helping helps: Autonomous motivation for prosocial behavior and its influence on well-being for the helper and recipient. Journal of personality and social psychology, 98(2), 222. Wey Smola, K., & Sutton, C. D. (2002). Generational differences: Revisiting generational work values for the new millennium. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 23(4), 363-382. Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment as Predictors of Organizational Citizenship and In-Role Behaviors. Journal of Management, 17(3), 601-617. doi:10.1177/014920639101700305 Zellars, K. L., & Tepper, B. J. (2003). Beyond social exchange: New directions for organizational citizenship behavior theory and research Research in personnel and human resources management (pp. 395-424): Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Zhai, Q., Lindorff, M., & Cooper, B. (2013). Workplace guanxi: Its dispositional antecedents and mediating role in the affectivity–job satisfaction relationship. Journal of Business Ethics, 117(3), 541-551. Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., Geiger, T. C., & Crick, N. R. (2005). Relational and physical aggression, prosocial behavior, and peer relations: Gender moderation and bidirectional associations. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 25(4), 421-452. |
電子全文 Fulltext |
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。 論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted 開放時間 Available: 校內 Campus: 已公開 available 校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available |
紙本論文 Printed copies |
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。 開放時間 available 已公開 available |
QR Code |