論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available
論文名稱 Title |
國際人才競爭:以目的地選擇模型看僑外生留台就業之拉推因素 Global Talent War: An Evaluation of Taiwan’s Push And Pull Factors Affecting Retention of International Students Post-Graduation - Using “Choice of Destination Model” |
||
系所名稱 Department |
|||
畢業學年期 Year, semester |
語文別 Language |
||
學位類別 Degree |
頁數 Number of pages |
68 |
|
研究生 Author |
|||
指導教授 Advisor |
|||
召集委員 Convenor |
|||
口試委員 Advisory Committee |
|||
口試日期 Date of Exam |
2019-03-25 |
繳交日期 Date of Submission |
2019-03-28 |
關鍵字 Keywords |
畢業留台率、目的地選擇模型、人才、拉推因素、人才赤字 Choice of Destination Model, human capital, push and pull factors, post-graduation retention, talent deficit |
||
統計 Statistics |
本論文已被瀏覽 5805 次,被下載 63 次 The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5805 times, has been downloaded 63 times. |
中文摘要 |
人才是國家永續發展的關鍵。各國爭奪高知識份子和高階人才的競賽也更加競爭 與白熱化。為招攬外國人才,台灣政府編列了豐厚的預算設立人才培育計畫和獎 學金吸引各國優秀學子來台。台灣的僑外生人數在過去的十年成長了四倍,然而, 畢業後留在台灣工作的外籍學位生,卻低於四成。因此,在砸下重金和如此多資 源招攬外籍學生的同時,如何讓這些人才學成之後留在台灣更為迫切與重要! 這份研究以目的地選擇模型評量高階僑外生們在決定是否留台就業所考量的拉推 因素。探討台灣是否為一有吸引力、值得留下來發展的國家,並探究台灣該如何 留住這些優秀人才。 研究結果發現,高階人才低薪化、有限的發展空間和語言隔閡是台灣留才的最大 阻力,而台灣良好的生活品質、安全友善的環境和人民則是吸引這些優秀僑外生 繼續留在台灣的最大原因;對於來自高收入地區的僑外生來說,由於薪資上巨大 的差異,留在台灣工作顯得較無吸引力;而對於來自收入水平和台灣相當或是較 低地區的僑外生來說,畢業後留在台灣工作的意願則相對高出許多。 |
Abstract |
Talent is the key to economic transformation and growth. However, Taiwan has been suffering from serious brain drain. With the aim to expand the talent pool, the Taiwanese government budget billions of NTD each year on providing quality educations and giving financial support to attract outstanding international students. However, even international enrollment in Taiwan has increased significantly, the retention rate of these international students post-graduation remains low. This study evaluates Taiwan’s attractiveness as a work destination using Choice of Destination Model. What are the key push and pull factors affecting the retention of the international students post-graduation? How can Taiwan correct the negative push factors and reinforce the positive pull factors to become more talent-friendly and attractive? This study reveals that the biggest push factors that discourage international students to stay are low wages and limited career opportunities; the strongest pull factors are the relaxed lifestyle, safe society, and high quality of life in Taiwan. Students from higher income countries usually see Taiwan as an unattractive work destination due to significant income differences. Students from similar or lower-income countries see Taiwan as an attractive work destination, but they point out the existence of discrimination and racism. |
目次 Table of Contents |
論文審定書 i 致謝 ii 摘要 iii Abstract iv Table of Content v List of Figures vi List of Tables vi I. Introduction 1 1.1 Research Background 1 1.2 Research Motivation 5 1.3 Research Questions 7 1.4 Research Process 8 II. Literature Review 10 2.1 Key Elements in the Ecosystem 10 2.2 Push And Pull Factors 20 2.3 Choice of Destination Model: Decision-Making Calculus Framework for Highly Skilled Individuals 21 2.3-1 Decision Making Drivers 22 2.3-2 Decision Making Facilitators 23 2.3-3 Total Immigration Package 23 2.4 Propositions Development 24 2.5 Research Framework Adjustments 25 2.5-1 Deletions 25 2.5-2 Regrouping 26 III. Methodology 27 3.1 Research Framework 27 3.2 Research Design and Instrument for Data Collection 28 3.3 Interview Questions Development 29 3.4 Selection of Samples 32 IV. Findings 35 4.1 Opportunities 35 4.2 Total Immigration Package 40 4.3 Social Environment 42 4.4 Summary of Findings 46 V. Discussions 53 5.1 Contributions 53 5.2 Limitations 54 5.3 Recommendations for Further Research 55 VI. Recommendations and Conclusions 56 VII. Reference List 59 |
參考文獻 References |
Alicia Nguyen. (2018, November 7). Taiwan to become a bilingual country by 2030: NDC proposal. Taiwan News. Retrieved from https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/en/news/3570021 Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications, Incorporated. Dan Rodriguez. (2018, January 23). Leverage Your Company Culture To Attract And Retain Beyond Salary. Forbes Human Resources Council. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbeshumanresourcescouncil/2018/01/23/leverage-your-company-cultureto-attract-and-retain-beyond-salary/#290176861a27 DeAeth, D. (2019, February 05). Foreign students in Taiwan 10% of total university and college students in 2018. Taiwan News. Retrieved from https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/en/news/3631340 Directorate General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (Taiwan). (2017). 2017 Central Government Budget Overview. Retrieved from https://eng.dgbas.gov.tw/public/Attachment/7217104714ZX60WRZE.pdf Edward Jones. (2018, May 15).Survey: 88 percent of Taiwanese would consider working overseas. Taipei Times. Retrieved February from http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/lang/archives/2018/05/15/2003693069 EZ Work Taiwan. (2018). Apply by New Scoring Criteria for Foreign and Overseas Chinese Students to Work in Taiwan. Retrieved March 2, 2019, from https://ezworktaiwan.wda.gov.tw/en/cp.aspx?n=8E87472D9CB255FF&s=BCA6B6757A58F5B3 Florida, R. (2005), The Flight of the Creative Class: The New Global Competition for Talent, Collins, New York, NY. Hicks, J. (1963). The theory of wages. Springer. IMD Competitiveness Center. (2018). World talent ranking 2018. Retrieved December 24, 2018, from https://www.imd.org/globalassets/wcc/docs/release-2018/talent-2018/talent_ranking_2018.pdf IMD Competitiveness Center (2017). IMD World Competitiveness Yearbook 2017. Retrieved from http://www.otp.go.th/uploads/tiny_uploads/PDF/2560- 08/IMDReport/IMDWorldCompetitivenessYearbook2017/IMD_World_Competitiveness_Yearbook_201 7.pdf InterNations. (2018). Expat Insider 2018: Quality of Life Index. Retrieved January 12, 2019, from https://www.internations.org/expat-insider/2018/quality-of-life-index-39586 Kerr, S. P., Kerr, W., Ozden, C., & Parsons, C. (2016). Global talent flows. The World Bank. Khatri, P., Guapta, S., Gulati, K., & Chauhan, S. (2010) Talent management in HR. Journal of Management and Strategy, 1(1), 39. Lanvin, B., & Evans, P. (2013). The Global Talent Competitiveness Index 2013. INSEAD Business School, Adecco Group and Human Capital Leadership Institute. Lanvin, B., & Evans, P. (2016). The Global Talent Competitiveness Index 2016. INSEAD Business School, Adecco Group and Human Capital Leadership Institute. Lee, E. (1966). A Theory of Migration. Demography, 3(1), 47. doi: 10.2307/2060063 60 LinkedIn. About LinkedIn. Retrieved January 10, 2019, from https://about.linkedin.com/ McNamara, C. (1999). General guidelines for conducting interviews. Ministry of Education (Singapore). More Information on Service Obligation - Tuition Grant. Retrieved January 15, 2019, from https://tgonline.moe.gov.sg/tgis/normal/studentViewServiceObligationSubsidyInfo.action Ministry of Education (Taiwan). (2019, February 11). Non-citizen Students in Universities, Colleges and Junior Colleges. Retrieved from https://english.moe.gov.tw/cp-26-18880-df66b-1.html Moretti, E. (2012). The new geography of jobs. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. National Development Council (Taiwan). (2018). Act for the Recruitment and Employment of Foreign Professionals. Retrieved February 18, 2019, from https://www.ndc.gov.tw/en/Content_List.aspx?n=153CD4D68F158AC8 Oxford Economics. (2012). Global Talent 2021 [Ebook]. Retrieved from https://www.oxfordeconomics.com/my-oxford/projects/128942 Papademetriou, D. G., Somerville, W., & Tanaka, H. (2008). Talent in the 21st century economy. Migration Policy Institute. Papademetriou, D. G., & Sumption, M. (2013). Attracting and Selecting from the global talent pool– policy challenges. Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute. Serban, A., & Andanut, M. (2014). Talent Competitiveness and Competitiveness through Talent. Procedia Economics and Finance, 16, 506-511. World Economic Forum (2010). Stimulating Economies through Fostering Talent Mobility Reports. Retrieved February 17, 2019, from http://reports.weforum.org/stimulating-economies-through-fostering-talent-mobility-info/ World Economic Forum. (2011) Global Talent Risk – Seven Responses. Retrieved from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/PS_WEF_GlobalTalentRisk_Report_2011.pdf 中文參考文獻: 石凱仁 (2018)。以相對薪資探討台灣對中國、香港及馬來西亞白領人力的吸引力—羅伊模型(Roy model)之應用。淡江大學亞洲研究所,新北市 行政院主計總處 (2018)。行政院主計總處 - 106 年國人赴海外工作人數統計結果。檢自: https://www.dgbas.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=43612&ctNode=5624 江睿智 (2019 年 3 月 7 日)。陳良基:台灣低薪留不住人。經濟日報. 檢自: https://money.udn.com/money/story/5612/3684393 教育部 (2017)。新南向人才培育推動計畫-- 新南向人才培育計畫。檢自: http://www.edunsbp.tw/album/news/59edef0095b87.pdf 國發會全球資訊網 (2018)。國家發展委員會-8.留臺工作僑外生人數。檢自: https://www.ndc.gov.tw/Content_List.aspx?n=039607ED1B9EF460 61 詹雯惠 (2015)。新加坡與台灣引進外國專業人才之政策的比較研究 。 東海大學政治學系所,台 中市 經濟日報 (2018)。人才大出走 72 萬人海外討生活 。經濟日報。檢自: https://money.udn.com/money/story/8853/3083441 經濟部中小企業處(2018)。2018 年中小企業白皮書 。檢自: https://book.moeasmea.gov.tw/book/doc_detail.jsp?pub_SerialNo=2018A01333&click=2018A01 333# 蘇尹岑 (2015 年 11 月 20 日)。人才外流 專業交流?! -上班族前進海外工作意願調查。1111 產經 新聞。檢自: http://www.1111.com.tw/news/surveyns_con.asp?ano=85404 |
電子全文 Fulltext |
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。 論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted 開放時間 Available: 校內 Campus: 已公開 available 校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available |
紙本論文 Printed copies |
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。 開放時間 available 已公開 available |
QR Code |