近年來，台灣越來越多的新創團隊成立，學校也開始出現許多創業加速器、育成中心，不管是政府或是民間的資源越來越豐富。但是新創企業有別於穩定發展的大企業，新創企業面臨的創業風險高、消費者對於產品忠誠度低、僱主品牌尚未建立、對於人才有較低的吸引力，但是經過觀察發現，越來越多人選擇到新創企業上班，專屬於新創企業的平台也慢慢建立，希望透過研究可以了解新創企業對於人才的組織吸引為何？什麼樣的特質與新創企業的適配度較高？本研究透過訪談8位新創企業創辦人，透過質性研究的方式，而這次的研究發現在特質的部分提到自主學習的能力、勇於接受挑戰及個人態度為新創企業偏好的的特質，也認為這樣的特質較容易適應新創企業的工作模式；而組織吸引力則提到企業的願景、個人及組織的成長、組織氛圍這些因素會吸引人才想要加入新創企業。希望透過研究找出適合新創企業的人格特質，並挖掘組織吸引力為何，希望可以為之後新創企業在經營管理上可以提供人力資源管理上的參考。

In recent years, more and more startup teams have been established in Taiwan, and many startup accelerators and Innovation Incubation Center have begun to appear in schools. Whether it is government or non-governmental resources, there are more and more abundant resources. However, startups are different from the stable development of large companies. Startups face high risks of entrepreneurship, consumers have low product loyalty, employer brands have not yet been established, and have low attractiveness for talents. However, more and more people choose to go to work in startups, and the platform for recruitment of startup is slowly established. We hope that through research, we can understand what is the incentives to attracted to the talents? What kind of traits is better suited to startups? This study interviewed 8 founders of startups, through qualitative research methods to identify the personality traits suitable for startups, and attraction for talents. This study found that in the part of traits, the self-learning abilities, the courage to embrace challenges, and personal attitudes are the characteristics preferred by startups. It also considers that such traits are easier to adapt to the working style in startups; It is mentioned that the company's vision, personal and organizational growth, organizational climate and other factors will attract talents want to join startups. Hope this study can provide some advice on human resource management for startup companies in the future.

論文審定書 i
中文摘要 ii
ABSTRACT iii
List of Table vii
List of Figure viii
Chapter 1 Introduction 1
1.1 Research Background 1
1.2 Research Motivation 3
1.3 Research Procedure 5
Chapter 2 Literature Review 8
2.1 Defintion of Startup 8
2.2 Person-Organization Fit 11
2.3 Organization Attraction 14
Chapter 3 Research Method 17
3.1 Research Structure 17
3.2 Interview Process 19
3.3 Research Sample 21
Chapter 4 Results 26
4.1 Environment Analysis 26
4.1.1 Advantage of Taiwan Startup environment 28
4.1.2 Disadvantage in Taiwan Startup environment 30
4.1.3 Challenge 36
4.2 Accelerator Analysis 40
4.2.1 People connections 42
4.2.2 Entrepreneurship courses 43
4.2.3 Mentor 44
4.2.4 Partnership with other team 45
4.3 Person-Organization Analysis 47
4.3.1 Self-learning abilities 49
4.3.2 Challenges-embracing 50
4.3.3 Attitudes 51
4.4 Organization Attraction Analysis 52
4.4.1 Vision and Dream 54
4.4.2 Growth and Sence of Achievement 56
4.4.3 Organization Climate 58
Chapter 5 Discussion 60
5.1 Findings 60
5.1.1 Startup environment in Taiwan 60
5.1.2 Suitable trait in startup company 61
5.1.3 Organizational Attraction 62
5.2 Research Limition 63
5.3 Further Research Suggestion 64
Reference List 65
Chinese Reference 65
Englisg Reference 65
Appendix 70

Reference List
Chinese Reference
1. 巫立宇, 王俊如, 于卓民, & 邱志聖. (2007). 資源, 信任, 支援廠商合作意願與高科技新創企業競爭力: 以竹科廠商為例之跨期研究. 管理與系統, 14(1), 1-25.

2. 范麗娟. (1994). 深度訪談簡介. 戶外遊憩研究, 7(2), 25-35.

3. 謝凱雯、陳志坪、林聖蒨 (2008)，日本的經濟環境對創業率之影響，創業管理研究，3(3), pp103-118。

Englisg Reference
1. Argyris, C. (1957). Personality and organization; the conflict between system and the individual.

2. Boxx, W. R., Odom, R. Y., & Dunn, M. G. (1991). Organizational values and value congruency and their impact on satisfaction, commitment, and cohesion: An empirical examination within the public sector. Public Personnel Management, 20(2), 195-205.

3. Bretz, R. D., Ash, R. A., & Dreher, G. F. (1989). Do people make the place? An examination of the attraction‐selection‐attrition hypothesis. Personnel Psychology, 42(3), 561-581.

4. Bretz Jr, R. D., & Judge, T. A. (1994). The role of human resource systems in job applicant decision processes. Journal of Management, 20(3), 531-551..

5. Cable, D. M., & Judge, T. A. (1994). Pay preferences and job search decisions: A person‐organization fit perspective. Personnel psychology, 47(2), 317-348.

6. Cable, D. M., & Judge, T. A. (1996). Person–organization fit, job choice decisions, and organizational entry. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 67(3), 294-311.

7. Carroll, G. R. & Hannan, M. T. 2000. The demography of corporations and industries. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

8. Christiansen, N., Villanova, P., & Mikulay, S. (1997). Political influence compatibility: Fitting the person to the climate. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 709-730.

9. French, J. R., Caplan, R. D., & Van Harrison, R. (1982). The mechanisms of job stress and strain (Vol. 7). Chichester [Sussex]; New York: J. Wiley.

10. Harris, S. G., & Mossholder, K. W. (1996). The affective implications of perceived congruence with culture dimensions during organizational transformation. Journal of management, 22(4), 527-547.

11. Kelley, D.J., Singer, S.& Herrington, M.D. (2012). The Global Entrepreneurship monitor, 2011 Global Report, GEM 2011.

12. Kolenko, T. A., & Aldag, R. J. 1989. Congruence perceptions and managerial career/work outcomes: An exploratory analysis. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Academy of Management.

13. Kristof, A. L. (1996). Person‐organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personnel psychology, 49(1), 1-49.

14. Kristof‐Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). CONSEQUENCES OF INDIVIDUALS'FIT AT WORK: A META‐ANALYSIS OF PERSON–JOB, PERSON–ORGANIZATION, PERSON–GROUP, AND PERSON–SUPERVISOR FIT. Personnel psychology, 58(2), 281-342.

15. Lussier, R. N. (1995). A nonfinancial business success versus failure prediction mo. Journal of Small Business Management, 33(1), 8.

16. Lievens, F., Decaesteker, C., Coetsier, P., & Geirnaert, J. (2001). Organizational attractiveness for prospective applicants: A person–organisation fit perspective. Applied Psychology, 50(1), 30-51.

17. Moser, K., Tumasjan, A., & Welpe, I. M. (2015). Small, but attractive: the effect of employer branding and legitimacy on startup attractiveness. In Academy of Management Proceedings(Vol. 2015, No. 1, p. 10528). Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management.

18. O'Reilly III, C. A., Chatman, J., & Caldwell, D. F. (1991). People and organizational culture: A profile comparison approach to assessing person-organization fit. Academy of management journal, 34(3), 487-516.

19. Peter F Drucker.& Andrew Sherwood.& Newbridge Communications, inc. (1987). Innovation and entrepreneurship.

20. Rentsch, J. R., & McEwen, A. H. (2002). Comparing personality characteristics, values, and goals as antecedents of organizational attractiveness. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10(3), 225-234.

21. Saks, A. M., & Ashforth, B. E. (1997). A longitudinal investigation of the relationships between job information sources, applicant perceptions of fit, and work outcomes. Personnel psychology, 50(2), 395-426.

22. Schneider, B. (1987). The people make the place. Personnel psychology, 40(3), 437-453.

23. Taris, R., & Feij, J. (2001). Longitudinal examination of the relationship between supplies–values fit and work outcomes. Applied Psychology, 50(1), 52-80.

24. Turban, D. B., & Greening, D. W. (1997). Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Academy of management journal, 40(3), 658-672.

25. Vancouver, J. B., & Schmitt, N. W. (1991). An exploratory examination of person‐organization fit: Organizational goal congruence. Personnel psychology, 44(2), 333-352.

26. Verquer, M. L., Beehr, T. A., & Wagner, S. H. (2003). A meta-analysis of relations between person–organization fit and work attitudes. Journal of vocational behavior, 63(3), 473-489.