論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available
論文名稱 Title |
誠實型與欺瞞型印象管理策略:不同面試競爭性與面試模式下之使用行為差異 Honest and Deceptive Impression Management Strategies: Employment Interview Competition and Form Differences in Its Use |
||
系所名稱 Department |
|||
畢業學年期 Year, semester |
語文別 Language |
||
學位類別 Degree |
頁數 Number of pages |
61 |
|
研究生 Author |
|||
指導教授 Advisor |
|||
召集委員 Convenor |
|||
口試委員 Advisory Committee |
|||
口試日期 Date of Exam |
2020-01-10 |
繳交日期 Date of Submission |
2020-02-10 |
關鍵字 Keywords |
團體面試、個別面試、社會比較理論、誠實與欺瞞、印象管理 Honest and Deceptive, Impression Management, Group Interview, Individual Interview, Social Comparison Theory |
||
統計 Statistics |
本論文已被瀏覽 5906 次,被下載 47 次 The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5906 times, has been downloaded 47 times. |
中文摘要 |
有鑑於過往團體面試的研究相對缺乏,本研究主要探討應徵者於不同面試競爭情境下的印象管理行為。依據社會比較理論的觀點,個體會在人際互動過程中,與目標對象相互比較以建立自我評價。本研究基於前述觀點,認為團體面試過程會讓應徵者經歷社會比較,並改變其印象管理的策略以呈現更佳的自我。由於印象管理是應徵者在工作面試中的常見行為,為了協助實務管理者提高面試有效性之方法,本研究的首要目的是比較應徵者在個別面試與團體面試的印象管理行為是否會有差異,並納入團體面試情境的競爭性差異,以比較個體是否會不同競爭情境下採取不同的印象管理策略。本研究針對誠實型與欺瞞型共七個向度之印象管理策略,以情境故事法的方式操弄面試的差異,包含:個別面試及團體面試 (競爭性高與低),透過線上問卷方式共收集252位受試者之自陳式資料。研究結果顯示,相較於個別面試情境,應徵者在團體面試中會採取較高的誠實型自我提升策略,儘管其他印象管理在不同競爭情境下皆無顯著差異,但可發現團體面試中的印象管理策略平均均高於個別面試情境。 |
Abstract |
Given the lack of past researches on group interviews, this study mainly explores the impression management behavior of candidates in different interview competition situations. According to the point of view of Social Comparison Theory, individuals will compare with target objects in the process of interpersonal interaction to establish self-evaluation. This study is based on the foregoing point of view and believes that the group interview process will allow candidates to experience social comparisons and change their impression management strategies to present a better self. Since impression management is a typical behavior of candidates in job interviews, to assist practioners improving the effectiveness of interviews, the primary purpose of this study is to compare whether the impression management behavior of candidates in individual interviews and group interviews will be different. The competitive differences of group interview situations are included to compare whether individuals will adopt different impression management strategies in different competitive situations. This study focuses on the seven-dimensional impression management strategy on honesty and deception. It uses situational scenarios to manipulate the perceived competition differences in interviews, including individual interviews and group interviews (high and low competition). A total of 252 subjects are collected using online questionnaires. Findings show that compared with individual interview situations, candidates will adopt a higher honest self-enhancement strategy in group interviews. Although the impression management behaviors do not significantly differentiate under various competition situations, the results show that the mean values of impression management strategies are higher than individual interview situation. |
目次 Table of Contents |
Thesis/Dissertation Validation Letter ...........................................i Abstract (Chinese) ........................................................................ ii Abstract (English) ......................................................................... iii Chapter 1 Introduction................................................................... 1 Chapter 2 Literature Review........................................................... 6 Section 1 Social Comparison Theory.............................................6 Section 2 Social Comparison Direction………………….……….…….…….. 7 Section 3 Status Influenced by Social Comparison………………..……9 Section 4 Comparison in Group Job Interview……………………….……10 Section 5 Impression Management……………………………………..….…..11 Chapter 3 Method…………............................................................... 17 Chapter 4 Results ......................................................................... 24 Chapter 5 Discussion and Suggestion......................................... 35 Section 1 Discussion......................................................................35 Section 2 Conclusion……………………………………….…….................…….. 37 Section 3 Limitations and Suggestions….……….........……………………38 Reference........................................................................................42 Appendix......................................................................................... 48 |
參考文獻 References |
Barrick, M. R., Shaffer, J. A., & DeGrassi, S. W. (2009). What You See May Not Be What You Get: Relationships Among Self-Presentation Tactics and Ratings of Interview and Job Performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(6), 1394–1411. doi: 10.1037/a0016532 Bourdage, Joshua & Roulin, Nicolas & Levashina, Julia. (2017). Impression Management and Faking in Job Interviews: An Editorial and New Directions. Frontiers in Psychology. 8. 1294. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01294. Bourdage, J. S., Roulin, N., & Tarraf, R. (2018). “I (might be) Just That Good”: Honest and Deceptive Impression Management in Employment Interviews. Personnel Psychology. doi: 10.1111/peps.12285 Buunk, A. P., & Gibbons, F. X. (2007). Social Comparison: The End of a Theory and the Emergence of a Field. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 102(1), 3–21. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.09.007 Bye, H. H., & Sandal, G. M. (2015). Applicant Personality and Procedural Justice Perceptions of Group Selection Interviews. Journal of Business and Psychology, 31(4), 569–582. doi: 10.1007/s10869-015-9430-9 Byrnes, D. A., Kiger, G., & Shechtman, Z. (2003). Evaluating the Use of Group Interviews to Select Students into Teacher-Education Programs. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(2), 163–172. doi: 10.1177/0022487102250310 Clearly Cultural, Hofstede’s Cultural Dimension Index. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://clearlycultural.com/geert-hofstede-cultural-dimensions/ Collins, R. L. (1996). For Better or Worse: The Impact of Upward Social Comparison on Self-evaluations. Psychological Bulletin, 119(1), 51–69. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.119.1.51 Cramer, E. M., Song, H., & Drent, A. M. (2016). Social Comparison on Facebook: Motivation, Affective Consequences, Self-esteem, and Facebook Fatigue. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 739–746. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.049 Crittenden, K. S., & Bae, H. (1994). Self-effacement and Social Responsibility: Attribution as Impression Management in Asian Cultures. American Behavioral Scientist, 37(5), 653–671. doi: 10.1177/0002764294037005006 DePaulo, B. M. (1992). Nonverbal Behavior and Self-presentation. Psychological Bulletin, 111(2), 203–243. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.111.2.203 DePaulo, B. M., Lindsay, J. J., Malone, B. E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., & Cooper, H. (2003). Cues to Deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129(1), 74–118. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.1.74 Ellis, A. P. J., West, B. J., Ryan, A. M., & DeShon, R. P. (2002). The Use of Impression Management Tactics in Structured Interviews: A Function of Question Type? Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(6), 1200–1208. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1200 Erving Goffman. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, NJ: Doubleday. Fell, C. B., König, C. J., & Kammerhoff, J. (2016). Cross-cultural Differences in the Attitude toward Applicants’ Faking in Job Interviews. Journal of Business and Psychology, 31(1), 65–85. doi: 10.1007/s10869-015-9407-8 Festinger, L. (1954). A Theory of Social Comparison Processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140. doi: 10.1177/001872675400700202 Friend, R. M., & Gilbert, J. (1973). Threat and Fear of Negative Evaluation as Determinants of Locus of Social Comparison. Journal of Personality, 41(2), 328–340. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1973.tb00097.x Gifford, Robert & Ng, Cheuk & Wilkinson, Margaret. (1985). Nonverbal Cues in the Employment Interview. Links Between Applicant Qualities and Interviewer Judgments. Journal of Applied Psychology. 70. 729-736. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.70.4.729. Gilmore, D. C., & Ferris, G. R. (1989). The Effects of Applicant Impression Management Tactics on Interviewer Judgments. Journal of Management, 15(4), 557–564. doi: 10.1177/014920638901500405 Hakmiller, K. L. (1966). Threat as a Determinant of Downward Comparison. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1, 32–39. doi: 10.1016/0022-1031(66)90063-1 Ho, J. L., Powell, D. M., Barclay, P., & Gill, H. (2019). The Influence of Competition on Motivation to Fake in Employment Interviews. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 18(2), 95–105. doi: 10.1027/1866-5888/a000222 Hoffman, P. J., Festinger, L., & Lawrence, D. H. (1954). Tendencies toward Group Comparability in Competitive Bargaining. Human Relations, 7, 141–159. doi: 10.1177/001872675400700203 Howard, J. L., & Ferris, G. R. (1996). The Employment Interview Context: Social and Situational Influences on Interviewer Decisions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26(2), 112–136. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1996.tb01841.x Leary, M. R., & Kowalski, R. M. (1990). Impression Management: A Literature Review and Two-factor Model. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 34–47. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.107.1.34. Levashina, J., & Campion, M. A. (2007). Measuring Faking in the Employment Interview: Development and Validation of an Interview Faking Behavior Scale. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1638–1656. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1638 Morse, S., & Gergen, K. J. (1970). Social Comparison, Self-consistency, and the Concept of Self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16(1), 148–156. doi: 10.1037/h0029862 Mussweiler, T., Gabriel, S., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2000). Shifting Social Identities as a Strategy for Detecting Threatening Social Comparisons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 398–409. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.79.3.398 Peeters, M. A. G., Van Tuijl, H. F. J. M., Rutte, C. G., & Reymen, I. M. M. J. (2006). Personality and Team Performance: A Meta-Analysis. European Journal of Personality, 20(5), 377–396. doi: 10.1002/per.588 Pleban, R., & Tesser, A. (1981). The Effects of Relevance and Quality of Another's Performance on Interpersonal Closeness. Social Psychology Quarterly, 44(3), 278–285. doi: 10.2307/3033841 Prasmara, Aldo & Wijaya, Nikodemus. (2017). Relations Between Big Five Personalities, Motivation to Fake, and Applicant Faking Behavior. Journal Manajemen dan Kewirausahaan. 19. doi: 10.9744/jmk.19.2.85-90. Riggio, R. E., & Throckmorton, B. (1988). The Relative Effects of Verbal and Nonverbal Behavior, Appearance, and Social Skills on Evaluations Made in Hiring Interviews. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18(4, Pt 2), 331–348. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1988.tb00020.x Rosenfeld, P. (1997). Impression Management, Fairness, and the Employment Interview. Journal of Business Ethics, 16, 801-808. doi: 1023/A:1017972627516 Roulin, N., Bangerter, A., & Levashina, J. (2014). Interviewers' Perceptions of Impression Management in Employment Interviews. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 29(2), 141–163. doi: 10.1108/JMP-10-2012-0295 Roulin, Nicolas & Schneider, Leann & Powell, Deborah. (2015). Cues to Deception in the Employment Interview. International Journal of Selection and Assessment. 23. 182-190. doi: 10.1111/ijsa.12106. Stevens, C. K., & Kristof, A. L. (1995). Making the Right Impression: A Field Study of Applicant Impression Management During Job Interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(5), 587–606. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.80.5.587 Tesser, A., & Campbell, J. L. (1982). Self-evaluation Maintenance and the Perception of Friends and Strangers. Journal of Personality, 50(3), 261–279. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1982.tb00750.x Thornton, B., & Moore, S. (1993). Physical Attractiveness Contrast Effect: Implications for Self-Esteem and Evaluations of the Social Self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19(4), 474–480. doi: 10.1177/0146167293194012 Thornton, D. A., & Arrowood, A. J. (1966). Self-evaluation, Self-enhancement, and the Locus of Social Comparison. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1, 40–48. doi: 10.1016/0022-1031(66)90064-3 Tran, T., & Blackman, M. C. (2006). The Dynamics and Validity of the Group Selection Interview. The Journal of Social Psychology, 146(2), 183–201. doi: 10.3200/socp.146.2.183-201 Uziel, L. (2013). Impression Management (“Lie”) Scales Are Associated with Interpersonally Oriented Self-Control, Not Other-Deception. Journal of Personality, 82(3), 200–212. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12045 Weiss, B., & Feldman, R. S. (2006). Looking Good and Lying to Do It: Deception as an Impression Management Strategy in Job Interviews. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(4), 1070–1086. doi: 10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00055.x Wills, T. A. (1981). Downward Comparison Principles in Social Psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 90(2), 245–271. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.90.2.245 Wilson, S. R., & Benner, L. A. (1971). The Effects of Self-esteem and Situation upon Comparison Choices During Ability Evaluation. Sociometry, 34(3), 381–397. doi: 10.2307/2786205 Wood, J. V. (1989). Theory and Research Concerning Social Comparisons of Personal Attributes. Psychological Bulletin, 106(2), 231–248. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.106.2.231 Wood, J. V. (1996). What is Social Comparison and How Should We Study It? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(5), 520–537. doi: 10.1177/0146167296225009 |
電子全文 Fulltext |
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。 論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted 開放時間 Available: 校內 Campus: 已公開 available 校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available |
紙本論文 Printed copies |
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。 開放時間 available 已公開 available |
QR Code |