Title page for etd-1031111-020007


[Back to Results | New Search]

URN etd-1031111-020007
Author Yan-shun Lai
Author's Email Address No Public.
Statistics This thesis had been viewed 5628 times. Download 671 times.
Department Information Management
Year 2011
Semester 1
Degree Master
Type of Document
Language zh-TW.Big5 Chinese
Title Effectiveness comparison between Concolic and Random Testing
Date of Defense 2011-07-27
Page Count 67
Keyword
  • Symbolic Execution
  • path constraints
  • Automatic Testing
  • Concolic Testing
  • Random Testing
  • Abstract The development of software today, the company has their own test system usually. Because there has a few bugs in the every software. And it will make the damage of company’s property or security of information. We can find the bugs in the software by the test systems. But the few bugs will appear repeatedly even if you have been fixed it. In this time, it will be effective if we use the automatic test systems. They can solve the waste of time and cost.
    Appearance of the automatic test system has been solved the defect of the test method in the past. In this paper will mention two kind of automatic test systems, one of them is concolic testing, and another is random testing. In the 2009, there had the few of evidence to discuss that the concolic testing was more effective than the random testing, but there wasn’t have the enough demonstration. So I hope to prove that the effectiveness comparison between concolic and random testing by this paper.
    Advisory Committee
  • Yuh-Jiuan Tsay - chair
  • W.-P. Lee - co-chair
  • Bing-chiang Jeng - advisor
  • Files
  • etd-1031111-020007.pdf
  • Indicate in-campus at 5 year and off-campus access at 5 year.
    Date of Submission 2011-10-31

    [Back to Results | New Search]


    Browse | Search All Available ETDs

    If you have more questions or technical problems, please contact eThesys