Title page for etd-0809111-171137


[Back to Results | New Search]

URN etd-0809111-171137
Author Shih-Chang Juan
Author's Email Address No Public.
Statistics This thesis had been viewed 5352 times. Download 373 times.
Department Political Science
Year 2010
Semester 2
Degree Master
Type of Document
Language zh-TW.Big5 Chinese
Title A Research on the Legal System of public servants due to conflicts of interest
Date of Defense 2010-07-07
Page Count 275
Keyword
  • administrative supervision
  • Act on Recusal of Public Servants Due to Conflicts of Interest
  • government ethics
  • Control Yuan
  • public servants
  • Abstract Abstract
    To build the clean government has become a new trend of the political reforms all over the world, and an important symbol of high national competitiveness. In order to establish people’s trust to the government and ensure public servants done their duty justice, Act on Recusal of Public Servants Due to Conflicts of Interest (ARPSCI) is enacted to protect the value of democracy and the foundation of ethics and also implement the accountability.
     With the social changes and the evolution of democracy, ARPSCI has been implemented during the past decade since July 12, 2000, and there are a lot of issues waiting for solutions. This paper studies on ARPSCI by five major principles of administrative law, and collects data from newspapers and literatures. It reveals the policy-making background of ARPSCI through prospects of society, economy, politics, and legislation. Furthermore, the author compares Taiwan’s legislation with the other countries’ conflict of interest systems, and reviews ARPSCI by the three principles of rule by law, the seven principles of due process; identifies the purpose and value of ARPSCI by the viewpoints of the local self-governing and the individual’s participation.
     As mentioned above, this paper clarifies the orientation and value of ARPSCI; then discusses about the design of administrative organizations, staff, and budget to support ARPSCI. It also researches whether ARPSCI was designed properly for good performance under the review of nine kinds of administrative authority. Moreover, it discusses whether ARPSCI’s remedy procedure is proper, and advice to improve self-control function of the act. 
    In short, after analyzing completely, it finds that ARPSCI has lots of institutional problems in the dimensions of basic principle, administrative organization, restriction of administrative power, administrative remedy, and administrative supervision. Therefore, in order to meet people's expectations and construct a fair conflict of interest system, the author proposes personal suggestions.
    Advisory Committee
  • Yi-Ren Dzeng - chair
  • Liang-Jung Lin - co-chair
  • Shuai-liang Deng - advisor
  • Files
  • etd-0809111-171137.pdf
  • Indicate in-campus at 5 year and off-campus access at 5 year.
    Date of Submission 2011-08-09

    [Back to Results | New Search]


    Browse | Search All Available ETDs

    If you have more questions or technical problems, please contact eThesys