||Since Taiwan government has implemented “Program for the Development of the Cultural and Creative Industries” in 2002, many local governments have encouraged investors to reuse public cultural heritage as well as to operate creative industries, they emphasized the economic benefit coming from cultural creative industry rather than the preservation and sustainability of cultural heritage, which destroy the value of cultural heritage and result in the less of publicity and improper management of culture conservation.|
Hence, this research emphasizes the importance of preservation and conservation of cultural heritage from three perspectives. 1. Distinguishing the conservation and adaptive-reuse of cultural heritage from the content of cultural industries, and 2. analyzing the advantage and disadvantage of adaptive-reusing cultural heritage transformed into cultural industries policy in Taiwan, furthermore, 3. analyzing the “Draft Revision of the Cultural Heritage Preservation Law” and giving advice on grading and classifying cultural heritage in order to construct the model of transformation from adaptive reusing cultural heritage into creative industries.
In conclusion, the transformation from adaptive reusing cultural heritage into creative industries is not a wrong policy, but it is not the only way to preserve cultural heritage value. Recognizing the concept of conservation which presents publicity and region characters take precedence over adaptive-reuse as well as constructing the system of grading and classifying cultural heritage will ensure that the cultural heritage reveals cultural value, art value and history value.