||By using narrative inquiry and which’s concern, the researcher takes” hope sharer” (which accepted management education) as the study case , trying to answer the question of “managerialism and organization of business student association”. And found that, the daily life of hope sharer was influenced by the value of managerialism in the aspects of “daily meeting discussion”, “organizationally structural division of work ” and “the characteristic of student association”.|
The process of daily meeting discussion of hope sharer becomes lengthy and formal, because of the reason that team members put too much emphasis on conference proceedings; “the organizationally structural division of work” was supposed to assist the operation of hope sharer, but transforming hope sharer’s working team into multiple independent individuals instead, and which can’t support one another. Nevertheless, “the characteristic of student association ”of hope sharer takes favor of the feeling of belonging and coherence, which collapsed due to the thought of division of work and emphasizing procedure, but it was which makes students feeling lonely and separates each of them. The organization system which was built to serve the members of hope sharer, deprives human’s happiness and the joy of work. Human was thus enforced to be Hannah Arendt so-called “physical labor (which was the slave of the world)” instead of ”action”. It is the condition that not only the organization system overrides human, but also the emergence and characters that managerialism appears in the world.
The research tends to discussion and reflex how managerialism influences people’s daily life, and reflexes the meaning of management by using the story of the case study.