||In Chinese enterprises, authoritarian leadership is in charge of a common leadership. It has been pointed out that the leadership of the competent authority will destroy affective commitment, and psychological well-being of employees. However, if divided the connotation of authoritarian leadership into Juan-Chiuan leadership and Shang-Yan leadership, for affective commitment, and psychological well-being of his subordinates is it still the same negative effect? In addition, under the psychological adjustment of capital, yet strict authoritarian leadership and whether leadership will continue to subordinate the emotional commitment and psychological well-being has the same impact? Therefore, this study to investigate the effect of the angle of subordinates leader style subordinates, and further assume that psychological capital has a regulatory role.|
This study adopted a questionnaire survey method for full-time workers in the survey in Taiwan, and finally get 386 valid questionnaires, the results showed that: 1. The competent autocratic leadership behavior have a significant negative impact on subordinates affective commitment, but the subordinates psychological well-being of no significant impact; 2. Shang-Yan competent leadership behavior have a significant positive impact on the psychological well-being and affective commitment of subordinates ; three psychological capital in the autocratic leadership and leadership is still strict, for emotion. commitment and a sense of the impact of psychological well-being can not be a regulatory role. For the findings, this study also suggest that the management implications and discuss in detail in the text.