Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-1025119-144820 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-1025119-144820
論文名稱
Title
探討拼圖式合作學習策略對提升國小生批判性思考能力之影響
The Effects of Jigsaw Cooperative Learning to Enhance Critical Thinking Skill of Elementary 4th Grade Students
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
68
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2019-06-28
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2019-11-25
關鍵字
Keywords
合作學習、國小生、Explain Everything Collaborate、批判性思考能力、拼圖式合作學習
Cooperative learning, Elementary students, Explain Everything Collaborate, Critical thinking, Jigsaw learning
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5891 次,被下載 158
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5891 times, has been downloaded 158 times.
中文摘要
批判性思考能力(Critical thinking)與問題解決能力、創造力、溝通能力、合作能力、創新能力並列為二十一世紀不可或缺的技能。在各個領域中,批判性思考能力都是很重要的技能之一,能幫助人們進行思考,解決生活中、課業中、工作中所遇到的各種問題。而過去的研究中證明了批判性思考能力是可以經過訓練來提升的。批判性思考能力必須從小開始培養,但是文獻中大多都是針對成年人所設計的課程,鮮少有專門為國小生所設計的批判性思考能力提升課程。因此本研究的目的是為了開發出一套能夠提升國小生批判性思考能力的學習課程,並搭配IOS平台上的Explain Everything Collaborate程式,進行學習內容的建置。本研究利用故事閱讀搭配批判性思考問題回答、故事改編等學習活動,設計了三種學習策略,分別是個人學習、傳統合作學習、拼圖式合作學習,來提升國小生的批判性思考能力。本研究以準實驗法將學生隨機分配至「個人學習組」、「傳統合作學習組」與「拼圖式合作學習組」,並進行六堂課之實驗,前後兩堂課分別為前後測,中間四堂課則為批判性思考能力課程,共有79位國小四年級生完成本實驗。其研究結果顯示:(1) 經過本批判性思考能力教學課程,能有效提升批判性思考能力;(2) 傳統合作學習組與拼圖式合作學習組在提升批判性思考能力上,皆顯著優於個人學習組;(3) 傳統合作學習組與拼圖式合作學習組兩組間,在提升批判性思考能力上沒有顯著影響。本研究建議未來可以在閱讀理解環節中加入配音,加深學生的聽覺刺激,並拉長培養的時間,探討各組學生在培養批判性思考能力過程中的狀況。另外在拼圖式合作學習組中,可加入知識分享後的檢驗過程,確保每位學生都有完成所有學習活動。
Abstract
Critical thinking is combined with problem-solving, creativity, communication, cooperation, and innovation as indispensable skills for the 21st century. In all fields, critical thinking is one of the most important skills that can help people think and solve various problems encountered in life. And past research has shown that critical thinking can be improved through training. Critical thinking skills must be cultivated from an early age, but most of the literature is about courses designed for adults, and there are few critical thinking ability improvement courses specifically designed for elementary school students. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to develop a set of learning courses that can improve the critical thinking ability of elementary school students, and build the learning content with the Explain Everything Collaborate program on the IOS platform. This study uses story reading with critical thinking question answering, story adaptation, and other learning activities to design three learning strategies, namely individual learning, traditional cooperative learning, and jigsaw learning, to improve the critical thinking skill of primary school students. This study uses quasi-experimental methods to randomly assign students to the "personal learning group", "traditional cooperative learning group" and "jigsaw learning group", and conduct experiments in six lessons. The four lessons are critical thinking courses. A total of 79 fourth graders in elementary school completed this experiment. The research results show that: (1) the critical thinking skill teaching course can effectively improve the critical thinking skill; (2) the traditional cooperative learning group and the jigsaw learning group are significantly superior in improving critical thinking skill with Individual study group; (3) There is no significant effect on improving the critical thinking ability between the traditional cooperative study group and the jigsaw learning group. This study suggests that dubbing can be added to the reading comprehension in the future to deepen the students' auditory stimulation and lengthen the training time, and explore the situation of students in each group in the process of developing critical thinking skills. In addition, in the jigsaw learning group, the inspection process after knowledge sharing can be added to ensure that each student has completed all learning activities.
目次 Table of Contents
目錄
論文審定書 i
致謝 ii
摘要 iii
Abstract iv
目錄 vii
圖目錄 ix
表目錄 x
第一章、緒論 …………………………………………………………………1
第一節、 研究背景與動機 ......................................... 1
第二節、 研究目的 ............................................... 2
第三節、 研究問題 ............................................... 2
第二章、文獻探討...............................................4
第一節、 批判性思考能力 ......................................... 4
第二節、 合作學習 ............................................... 6
第三章、策略設計與系統介紹.....................................9
第一節、 策略設計 ............................................... 9
第二節、 學習活動 .............................................. 12
第三節、 故事內容 .............................................. 14
第四節、 批判性思考問題 ........................................ 15
第五節、 Explain Everything Collaborate 功能介紹 .................... 16
第四章、研究方法..............................................21
第一節、 研究假說 .............................................. 21
第二節、 研究工具 .............................................. 21
第三節、 實驗設計 .............................................. 23
第四節、 資料分析 .............................................. 28
第五章、結果與討論............................................29
第一節、 人口統計資料 .......................................... 29
第二節、 批判性思考能力分析 .................................... 30
第三節、 綜合討論 .............................................. 35
第六章、結論..................................................38
第一節、 研究發現 .............................................. 38
第二節、 研究貢獻 .............................................. 39
第三節、 研究限制 .............................................. 40
第四節、 未來研究 .............................................. 40
參考文獻. .....................................................42
附錄一、批判性思考問題........................................47
附錄二、前後測系統題目........................................50
參考文獻 References
西文部分
Aronson, E., & Goode, E. (1980). Training teachers to implement jigsaw learning: A manual for teachers. Cooperation in education, 47-81.
Bhandari, B., Mehta, B., Mavai, M., Singh, Y. R., & Singhal, A. (2017). Medical Education/Original Article Jigsaw Method: An Innovative Way of Cooperative Learning in Physiology. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol, 61(3), 315-321.
Brown, F. A. (2008). Collaborative learning in the EAP classroom: Students’ perceptions. ESP World, 17(7), 1-18.
Cottrell, S. (2017). Critical thinking skills: Effective analysis, argument and reflection. Macmillan International Higher Education.
Cozine, K. (2015). Thinking interestingly: The Use of game play to enhance learning and facilitate critical thinking within a homeland security curriculum. British Journal of Educational Studies, 63(3), 367-385. doi:10.1080/00071005.2015.1069256
Daniel, M. F., & Gagnon, M. (2011). Developmental process of dialogical critical thinking in groups of pupils aged 4 to 12 years. Creative Education, 2(05), 418-428.
Dyson, B., & Casey, A. (2016). The Jigsaw classroom–putting the pieces of Cooperative Learning together. In Cooperative Learning in Physical Education and Physical Activity (pp. 135-146). Routledge.
Ennis, R. H. (2011). The nature of critical thinking: An outline of critical thinking dispositions and abilities. In Sixth International Conference on Thinking, Cambridge, MA.

Ennis, R. H., & Weir, E. E. (1985). The Ennis-Weir critical thinking essay test: An instrument for teaching and testing. Midwest Publications
Ernst, J., & Monroe, M. (2004). The effects of environment‐based education on students’ critical thinking skills and disposition toward critical thinking. Environmental Education Research, 10(4), 507-522.
Facione, P. (1990). Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction (The Delphi Report).
Facione, P. A. (1998). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Retrieved June, 9, 2004.
Flavell, J. H. (1992). Perspectives on perspective taking. In H. Beilin, & P. Pufall (Eds.), Piaget’s Theory: Prospects and Possibilities (pp. 109–139). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Foldnes, N. (2016). The flipped classroom and cooperative learning: Evidence from a randomised experiment. Active Learning in Higher Education, 17(1), 39-49.
Garside, C. (1996). Look who's talking: A comparison of lecture and group discussion teaching strategies in developing critical thinking skills.
Gelerstein, D., del Río, R., Nussbaum, M., Chiuminatto, P., & López, X. (2016). Designing and implementing a test for measuring critical thinking in primary school. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 20, 40-49.
Gelman, S. A., & Markman, E. M. (1987). Young children’s inductions from natural kinds: The role of categories and appearances. Child Development, 8, 1532–1541.
Gillies, R. M. (2016). Cooperative learning: Review of research and practice. Australian journal of teacher education, 41(3), 3.
Grossman, S. J., & Hart, O. D. (1980). Takeover bids, the free-rider problem, and the theory of the corporation. The Bell Journal of Economics, 42-64.
Huang, X. Y., Chew, S. W., & Chen, N.-S. (2018). A Vocal Approach in Measuring Critical Thinking Skill in Elementary School Students. In 26th International Conference on Computers in Education, ICCE 2018.
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (1991). Active learning. Cooperation in the College Classroom.
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (1998). Cooperative learning returns to college what evidence is there that it works?. Change: the magazine of higher learning, 30(4), 26-35.
Kay, K., & Greenhill, V. (2011). Twenty-first century students need 21st century skills. In Bringing schools into the 21st century (pp. 41-65). Springer, Dordrecht.
Kilic, D. (2008). The effect of the Jigsaw technique on learning the concepts of the principles and methods of teaching. World applied sciences journal, 4(1), 109- 114.
Lai, E. R. (2011). Critical thinking: A Literature review. Pearson’s Research Reports, 6, 40-41.
Lee, H., Parsons, D., Kwon, G., Kim, J., Petrova, K., Jeong, E., & Ryu, H. (2016). Cooperation begins: encouraging critical thinking skills through cooperative reciprocity using a mobile learning game. Computers & Education, 97, 97- 115.
Lefrancois, G. R. (1994). Psychology for Teaching: A Bear Always, Usually, Sometimes, Rarely, Never, Always Faces the Front Will Not Commit Himself Just Now Faces the Future. Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Liao, S. N., Griswold, W. G., & Porter, L. (2018, July). Classroom experience report on jigsaw learning. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (pp. 302-307). ACM.
Lim, S., Han, C. E., Uhlhaas, P. J., & Kaiser, M. (2013). Preferential detachment during human brain development: age-and sex-specific structural connectivity in diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) data. Cerebral Cortex, 25(6), 1477-1489.
Lin, I.-H., Chew, S. W., & Chen, N.-S. (2017). A Vocal assessment approach to measure elementary school students’ critical thinking skills. In Proceedings of 2017 IEEE 17th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT2017) (pp. 419-421). Conference Publishing Services. doi:10.1109/ICALT.2017.30
May, M. A., & Doob, L. W. (1937). Competition and Cooperation:... a Report of the Sub-Committee on Competitive-Cooperative Habits, of the Committee on Personality and Culture, Based on Analyses of Research Achievement, Etc. Social Science Research Council.
Mehta, S. R., & Al-Mahrooqi, R. (2014). Can thinking be taught? Linking critical thinking and writing in an EFL context. RELC Journal, 46(1), 23-36. doi: 10.1177/0033688214555356
McPeck, J. E. (2016). Critical thinking and education. Routledge.
Mengduo, Q., & Xiaoling, J. (2010). Jigsaw Strategy as a Cooperative Learning Technique: Focusing on the Language Learners. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics (Foreign Language Teaching & Research Press), 33(4).
O’Leary, N., Barber, A., & Keane, H. (2018). Physical education undergraduate students’ perceptions of their learning using the jigsaw learning method. European Physical Education Review, 1356336X18767302.
Sagsoz, O., Karatas, O., Turel, V., Yildiz, M., & Kaya, E. (2017). Effectiveness of Jigsaw learning compared to lecture‐based learning in dental education. European Journal of Dental Education, 21(1), 28-32.

Saputra, M. D., Joyoatmojo, S., Wardani, D. K., & Sangka, K. B. (2019). Developing Critical-Thinking Skills through the Collaboration of Jigsaw Model with Problem-Based Learning Model. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 1077-1094.
Silberman, M. (1996). Active Learning: 101 Strategies To Teach Any Subject. Des Moines, IA: Prentice-Hall.
Slater, W. H., & Groff, J. A. (2017). Tutoring in Critical Thinking: Using the Stases to Scaffold High School Students’ Reading and Writing of Persuasive Text. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 33(4), 380-393.
Slavin, R. E. (1980). Cooperative learning. Review of educational research, 50(2), 315-342.
Tseng, H., Gardner, T., & Yeh, H. T. (2016). Enhancing students’ self-efficacy, elaboration, and critical thinking skills in a collaborative educator preparation program. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 17(2), 15-28.
Van Tran, D. (2012). The effects of jigsaw learning on students’ attitudes in a Vietnamese higher education classroom. International Journal of Higher Education, 1(2), 9.
Yeh, S. S. (2001). Tests worth teaching to: Constructing state-mandated tests that emphasize critical thinking. Educational Researcher, 30(9), 12-17.

 中文部分
Jan, W. (1999) 禮物 [Present](賴慈芸譯)。臺北市:格林文化出版
Lobel, A. (2001) 青蛙和蟾蜍-好朋友 [Frog and Toad Are Friends] (黨英台譯)。台北市:上誼文化公司 (原 著 1972 年出版)
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code