資訊管理研究領域的發展至今僅有三、四十年的歷史，然而伴隨著資訊科技的快速變化，資訊技術深入企業核心與個人生活，也快速衝擊著資管學界的研究方向與成果。

過去幾十年來，資訊管理研究常藉用其他領域的理論來解決資訊管理的問題，加上近年來新資訊技術不斷的出現。因此，資訊管理研究具有多樣性之特性，研究議題隨著時間而不斷的進行變化。

資訊管理研究包含了各種學門，想要一窺資管研究發展的歷程並不容易。因此，本研究主要之目的為建立資訊管理研究之演化藍圖，對資訊管理研究進行分析。首先，本研究回顧文獻建立了資管研究議題分類架構，將資管文獻進行分類，最後透過系統的方式完整描繪資管研究之發展歷程。並依研究者研究議題的差異，進行資訊管理研究生態演化分析。

To this day, the field of the information systems (IS) research, belonging to an intact field, has evolved over thirty years. Due to the rapid development of information technology, the information systems have not only influenced enterprises and personal life but also impacted on IS research field. The development of Taiwan IS research community though lags behind that of foreign countries. During the past decade, the proportion of IS research community in Taiwan has increased tremendously and the IS research community has played an important role in local information systems and accumulation of relevant knowledge about business electronics as well. However, when the researchers want to propose their research results, they will encounter several difficulties, for instance: they do not fully understand the ecology of IS research, and it is not easy for them to keep up with the trends of future development of the IS, so they just follow the trends and cannot create them by themselves.

In order to transform local IS researches into becoming mainstream of international academic studies, we have to gain insights into IS ecology and diversity of IS studies. Many years earlier, there had been numerous studies about IS research community, but many of them focused on the classifications of IS studies. They did not have concise and accurate predictions, so we try to use rigid ecological modeling method to investigate IS research community in our research. This research will include the foundings, mortality, evolution, density dependence, key species of different IS research issues, and main internal and external environmental forces of IS research diversity as well in order to build the ecological model of IS studies. We hope to not only get hold of evolution and trends of IS studies but also enhance the qualities of IS studies and applications of information systems in Taiwan through this ecological model.

圖目錄........................................................... II
表目錄 ..........................................................III
第一章 緒論....................................................... 1
第一節 研究背景................................................. 1
第二節 研究動機................................................. 2
第三節 研究目的................................................. 3
第四節 研究流程................................................. 4
第二章 文獻探討................................................... 5
第一節 資管研究領域的形成....................................... 5
第二節 資訊管理研究趨勢調查..................................... 9
第三節 資訊管理研究議題分類.................................... 12
第四節 影響資訊管理研究生態改變的趨力.......................... 15
第三章 資料分析研究方法.......................................... 18
第一節 資料蒐集................................................ 19
第二節 分類方式................................................ 25
第三節 資料分析方法............................................ 36
第四章 結果分析.................................................. 37
第一節 文獻發表情勢............................................ 37
第二節 文獻分類結果............................................ 48
第三節 學校研究傾向............................................ 56
第四節 資管研究生態演化模式.................................... 58
第五章 結論與建議................................................ 70
第一節 研究發現................................................ 70
第二節 研究貢獻................................................ 71
第三節 研究限制................................................ 72
第四節 後續研究方向............................................ 72
參考文獻......................................................... 74
附錄一 議題編號對應表............................................ 78
附錄二 類別關鍵字................................................ 79
附錄三 研究議題趨勢圖............................................ 83
附錄四 作者所屬類別.............................................. 92
圖目錄
圖1- 1 研究流程圖 4
圖2-1影響MIS研究領域形成的主因 5
圖2-2 MIS及其構成基礎 6
圖2-3 IS AS A CONSUMER OF CONCEPTS AT THE END OF AN INTELLECTUAL FOOD CHAIN 7
圖2-4 SWANSON 分類做法 14
圖3-1分析流程 18
圖3-2編碼流程圖 22
圖3-3 資訊管理研究範圍 26
圖3-4本研究分類層級概念圖 27
圖4-1資訊管理研究範圍(同 圖3-3) 48
圖4-2 資管研究5個研究範圍時間變化 53
圖4-3資管研究10個研究範圍時間變化 54
圖4-4資管研究前五名議題變化情形 54
圖4-5階段1與階段2間之資管生態變化 64
圖4-6 階段2與階段3間之資管生態變化 66
圖4-7 階段3與階段4間之資管生態變化 68

表目錄
表2-1資管研究發展三時期特性比較 9
表2-2資管趨勢調查相關研究 12
表2-3以BARKI（1988）分類架構為基礎之研究 13
表2-4 MIS REASEARCH 分類研究 14
表2-5 資管相關各學域主要學報首次出刊年份 15
表3-1 MYLONOPOULOS AND THEOHARAKIS (2001) 進行的資管期刊排名調查 19
表3-2 GILLENSON AND STUTZ (1991)進行的資管期刊排名調查 20
表3-3 KOONG AND WEISTROFFER (1989) 進行的資管期刊排名調查 20
表3-4本研究選擇之國外期刊於研究當中的排名狀況 21
表3-5文獻編碼表 22
表3-6本研究國外各期刊之資管研究文獻數量 24
表3-7 文章作者人數統計表 24
表3-8 DAVIS (2000) 提出之分類架構 28
表3-9整合之分類架構表 29
表4-1 文章發表加權得分排名前20位作者 38
表4-2 期刊刊登篇數排名前20位作者 39
表4-3 文章發表篇數人數分配表 40
表4-4 MIS QUARTERLY作者得分排名 40
表4-5期刊JMIS 作者得分排名 41
表4-6期刊DSS 作者得分排名 41
表4-7期刊I&M 作者得分排名 41
表4-8期刊ISR 作者得分排名 42
表4-9期刊MS 作者得分排名 42
表4-10期刊CACM作者得分排名 43
表4-11期刊刊登加權得分排名前20名學校 43
表4-12亞洲各國MIS研究之得分排名 44
表4-13歐洲各國MIS研究之得分排名 45
表4-14美洲各國MIS研究之得分排名 46
表4-15大洋洲及非洲各國MIS研究之得分排名 46
表4-16世界各國MIS研究之得分排名 47
表4-17 5類別於三種樣本之出現情形表 49
表4-18 10類別於三種樣本之出現情形表 50
表4-19國外期刊排名前十五名類別列表 51
表4-20國外期刊排名前八名類別列表 52
表4-21國內期刊排名前十五名類別列表 52
表4-22 四個時期議題成長變化表 55
表4-23排名前20名學校之研究重點 57
表4-24 1980-1985 各群之人數統計表 59
表4-25 1986-1990各群之人數統計表 59
表4-26 1991-1995各群之人數統計表 60
表4-27 1996-2001 每位作者所屬群別 61

1. 梁定澎，「資訊管理研究方法總論」，資訊管理學報，第四卷第一期，June 1997。
2. 陳禹辰、皮世朋、范錚強，「我國資訊管理研究方向及方法－碩士論文之分析」，資訊管理研究，第一卷第一期，July 1996。
3. 黃俊英，多變量分析，台北市：中國經濟企業研究所，2000。
4. Alavi, M., and Carlson, P., “A Review of MIS Research and Disciplinary Development,” Journal of Management Information Systems, Spring 1992, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp.45-62.
5. Barki, H., Rivard, S., and Talbot, J., “A Keyword Classification Scheme for IS Research Literature: An Update,” MIS Quarterly, June 1993, pp209-226.
6. Barki, H., Rivard, S., and Talbot, J., “An Information Systems Keyword Classification Scheme,” MIS Quarterly, June 1988, pp299-322.
7. Barron, T.M., Chiang, R.H.L., and Storey, V.C., “A Semiotics Framework for Information Systems Classification and Development,” Decision Support Systems, Vol. 25, 1999, pp.1-17.
8. Baskerville, R. L., and Myers, M. D., “Information Systems as a Reference Discipline,” MIS Quarterly, Vol.26, Iss. 1, Mar 2002, pp.1-14.
9. Benbasat, I., “Empirical research in information systems: The practice of relevance,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 23, Iss. 1, Mar 1999, pp. 3-16.
10. Benbasat, I., and Weber R., “Research Commentary: Rethinking “Diversity” in Information Systems Research,” Information Systems Research, Vol.7, No. 4, December 1996, pp.389-399.
11. Boudreau, M.C., Gefen, D., and Straub, D.W., “Validation in Information Systems Research: A State-OF-The-ART Assessment,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 25, Iss. 1, March 2001, pp. 1-16.
12. Brancheau, J.C., Janz, B.D., and Wetherbe, J.C., “Key Issues in Information Systems Management: 1994-95 SIM Delphi Results,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 20, Iss. 2, June 1996, pp. 225-242.
13. Chan, K.C., Chen, C.R., and Steiner, T.L., “Research productivity of the finance profession in the Asia-Pacific region,” Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 2001, pp. 265-280.
14. Claver, E., Gonzalez, R., and Llopis, J., “An Analysis of Research in Information Systems,” Information & Management, Vol. 37, 2000, pp. 181-195.
15. Cooper, D.R., and Emory C.W., “Business Research Methods,” IRWIN press, 5th edition, 1995.
16. Culnan, M.J. “The Intellectual Structure of Management Information Systems, 1972-1982: A Co-citation Analysis,” Management Science, Volume 32, Number 2, February 1986, pp. 156-172.
17. Davelport, T.H., “Rigor vs. relevance revisited: Response to Benbasat and Zmud,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 23, Iss. 1, Mar 1999, pp. 19-23.
18. Davis, G., “Information Systems Conceptual Foundations: Looking Backward and Forward,” In Organizational and Social Perspectives on Information Technology, R. Baskerville, J. Stage, and J. DeGross（eds.）, Kluwer, Boston, 2000, pp. 61-82.
19. Davis, G.B., “The Knowledge and Skill Requirements for the Doctorate in MIS,” Proceedings of the First International Conference on Information Systems, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, December 8-10, 1980, pp.174-183
20. Ein-Dor, P., and Segev, E., "A Classification of Information Systems: Analysis and Interpretation," Information Systems Research, June 1993, pp.166-203
21. Farhoomand, A.F., and Drury, D.H. , “A Historiographical Examination of Information Systems,” Communications of AIS, Vol. 1, No. 19, 1999
22. Gillenson, M.L., and Stutz, J.D., “Academic Issues in MIS: Journal and Books,” Management Information Systems Quarterly, 1991, 15(4), pp. 447-452.
23. Goodman S. E., Press L.I., Ruth S.R., and Rutkowski A.M., “The Global Diffusion of the Internet: Patterns and Problems,” Communications of the ACM, Vol.37, No.8, August 1994, pp27-31.
24. Hair, J.F., and etc., “Multivariate Data Analysis”, Prentice-Hall press, 5th edition, 1998.
25. Hu, Q., Saunders, C., and Gebelt, M., “Research Report: Diffusion of Information Systems Outsourcing: A Reevaluation of Influence Sources,” Information Systems Research, Vol. 8, No. 3, September 1997.
26. Keen, P.G.W., “MIS Research: Reference Disciplines and a Cumulative Tradition,” Proceedings of the First International Conference on Information Systems, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, December 8-10, 1980, pp. 9-18
27. Koong, K.S., and Weistroffer, H.R., “Faculty Usage of Management Information Systems Journals: A Survey,” Journal of Computer Information Systems, 1989, 30(1), pp. 14.
28. Kriebel, C.H., and Moore, J.H. “Economics and Management Information Systems,” Proceedings of the First International Conference on Information Systems, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, December 8-10, 1980, pp.19-31.
29. Lee, A.S., “Rigor and relevance in MIS research: Beyond the approach of positivism alone,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 23, Iss. 1, Mar 1999, pp. 29-33.
30. Lee, Z., Gosain, S., and Im, I., “Topics of Interest in IS: evolution of themes and differences between research and practice,” Information & Management, Vol. 36, 1999, pp.233-246.
31. Lovas, B., and Ghoshal, S., “Strategy as Guided Evolution,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 21, 2000, pp.875-896.
32. Lyytinen, K., “Empirical research in information systems: On the relevance of practice in thinking of IS research,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 23, Iss. 1, Mar 1999, pp. 25-27.
33. McQuaid, M.J., Ong, T.H., Chen, H., and Nunamaker Jr., J.F., “Multidimensional scaling for group memory visualization,” Decision Support Systems, Vol. 27, 1999, pp.163-176.
34. Mylonopoulos N.A., and Theoharakis V., “Global Perceptions of IS Journals,” Communications of The ACM, Vol.44, No.9, September 2001, pp.29-33.
35. Nolan, R.L.（1979）, “Management the Crisis of Data Processing,” Harvard Business Review, March-April, pp.115-126.
36. Nord, J.H., and Nord, G.D., “MIS research: Journal Status Assessment and Analysis,” Information & Management, Vol.29, 1995, pp.29-42.
37. Robey, D., “Research Commentary: Diversity in Information Systems Research: Threat, Promise, and Responsibility,” Information Systems Research, Vol. 7, No. 4, December 1996, pp.400-408.
38. Rogers, E.M., Diffusion of Innovations, 4th ed., New York, 1995.
39. Schiffman, S.S., Reynolds, K.L., and Young, F.W., "Introduction to Multidimensional Scaling," Academic Press, 1981.
40. Swanson E.B., and Ramiller N.C., “Information Systems Research Thematics: Submissions to a New Journal, 1987-1992,” Information Systems Research, Vol. 4, No. 4, 1993, pp.299-329.
41. Swanson, E.B. “Information Systems: Necessary Foundations,” Presented at the Conference on the Intellectual Foundations for Information Professionals, Emporia State University, Emporia, Kansas, November 15-18, 1984.
42. Venkatraman, N., “Diffusion of Information Technology Outsourcing: Influence Sources and the Kodak Effect,” Information Systems Research, Vol. 3, No. 4, December 1992, pp.334-358.
43. Yang, H.L., “Key Information Management Issues in Taiwan and the US,” Information & Management, Vol. 30, 1996, pp.251-267.