Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0721124-143139 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0721124-143139
論文名稱
Title
食指大「動」:食品視覺意象對廣告效果之影響
Impact of Food Visual Imagery on Advertising Effectiveness
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
201
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2024-08-20
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2024-08-21
關鍵字
Keywords
食品視覺意象、感知美味度、一致性理論、可愛類型、情境背景
food visual imagery, perceived tastiness, consistency theory, cute type, contextual background
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 116 次,被下載 0
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 116 times, has been downloaded 0 times.
中文摘要
日常生活中充斥著各種美食圖片,在多樣食物選擇中人們常以視覺線索評估食物的美味,「視覺美味」逐漸成為品評食物的關鍵。食物圖片之視覺意象分為靜態與動態,動態意象是指在靜態中知覺到「動」,其圖片相較於靜態更為活潑生動。雖然食品廣告設計常面臨採用何種「視覺意象」的抉擇,但學界對於此概念的研究仍不足。本研究以廣告中的食品視覺意象為主軸,深入檢測其對感知美味度的影響,並釐清代言角色可愛類型(嬰兒可愛vs.古怪可愛)和情境背景(靜態背景vs.動態背景)如何干擾感知美味度與下游消費行為的生成。
本研究共執行三個實驗,結果發現:(1)食品廣告中,食品採用動態相較靜態意象的呈現方式,會提升消費者的感知美味度;(2)動態意象會透過感知美味度增加產品態度與購買意願;(3)廣告食品為牛乳(液態)相較於漢堡(固態)會強化動態意象對感知美味度的正向影響;(4)當代言角色可愛類型為古怪可愛(vs. 嬰兒可愛)時,會強化食品動態意象對感知美味度、產品態度的正向影響;(5)當可愛類型為嬰兒可愛(相較於古怪可愛)時,則是強化動態意象對購買意願的正向影響;(6)當廣告中的背景為靜態背景時,食品採用動態意象(相較於靜態意象)呈現,會提升感知美味度與產品態度,但在動態背景時,視覺意象的效果則不顯著。
本研究結果對食品廣告、視覺意象、可愛類型、情境背景等領域研究具有理論貢獻外,也為品牌商的行銷規劃提供了明確指引。此外,本研究也希望協助消費者在購物時作出理性判斷,減少因視覺線索帶來的直覺偏誤,以做出更佳的購物決策。

Abstract
In everyday life, we are surrounded by various food images, and among the various food choices available, people often rely on visual cues to assess the tastiness of food. "Visual tastiness" has gradually become a key factor in food evaluation. The visual imagery of food images can be divided into static and dynamic. Dynamic imagery refers to the perception of "movement" within the static image, making it more lively and vivid compared to static imagery. Although the design of food advertisements is often faced with the choice of what type of "visual imagery" to use, there is still a lack of research on this concept in the academic field. In this study, we examined the effect of visual imagery of food in advertisements on perceived tastiness, and explored how the cuteness types of spokescharacters (baby cuteness vs. whimsical cuteness) and contextual backgrounds (static background vs. dynamic background) moderate the formation of perceived tastiness and downstream consumer behaviors.
Three experiments were conducted in this study. The results revealed that: (1) the use of dynamic as opposed to static imagery in food advertisements increases consumers' perceived tastiness; (2) dynamic imagery increases product attitudes and purchase intentions through perceived tastiness; (3) when the advertised food is buttermilk (liquid) rather than a hamburger (solid), the positive effect of dynamic imagery on perceived tastiness is strengthened; (4) when the spokescharacter’s cuteness type is whimsical cuteness (vs. baby cuteness), the positive effects of dynamic imagery on perceived tastiness and product attitude are strengthened; (5) when the cuteness type was baby cuteness (vs. whimsical cuteness), the positive effect of dynamic imagery on purchase intention is strengthened; (6) when the background in the advertisement is static, the use of dynamic imagery (vs. static imagery) to present the advertised food increases perceived tastiness and product attitude, but when the background is dynamic, the effect of visual imagery is not significant.
The results of this study not only make theoretical contributions to the field of food advertising, visual imagery, cuteness types, and contextual background, but also provide clear guidelines for brand owners in their marketing planning. In addition, this study also aims to help consumers make rational judgments when shopping and reduce the intuitive bias caused by visual cues, so that they can make better purchase decisions.
目次 Table of Contents
論文審定書 i
誌謝 ii
摘要 iii
Abstract iv
第壹章、 緒論 1
第一節、研究背景 1
第二節、研究動機 5
第三節、研究問題 10
第四節、研究目的 10
第貳章、 文獻回顧 12
第一節、動態意象(Dynamic imagery) 12
第三節、感知美味(Perceived taste) 38
第四節、基模一致性(Schema congruity) 42
第五節、情境背景(Contextual background) 46
第參章、 研究架構與假說 50
第一節、研究架構 50
第二節、假說推論 50
第肆章、 研究方法 56
第一節、實驗概述 56
第二節、實驗情境與研究對象 56
第伍章、 實驗一 57
第一節、實驗一研究方法 57
第二節、實驗一結果分析 65
第陸章、 實驗二 78
第一節、實驗二研究方法 78
第二節、實驗二結果分析 90
第柒章、 實驗三 104
第一節、實驗三研究方法 104
第二節、實驗三結果分析 111
第捌章、 結論與建議 124
第一節、研究發現 124
第二節、研究意涵 129
第三節、研究限制與未來研究方向 136
參考文獻 139
附錄 159
附錄一:前測一-品牌名稱、廣告圖評估 159
附錄二:前測二-代言角色評估 163
附錄三:前測三-廣告及情境背景圖評估 168
附錄四:實驗一 171
附錄五:實驗二 177
附錄六:實驗三 185

參考文獻 References
李宥勳(2022)。111年餐飲業營業額及年增率雙創歷年新高。經濟部統計處。
https://www.moea.gov.tw/Mns/populace/news/News.aspx?kind=1&menu_id=40&news_id=105783
卓宏謙(2008)。可愛的正負面特質對角色設計之影響〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立台灣藝術大學視覺傳達設計學系。
周軒逸、邱育佳(2019)。吃硬不吃軟:食品口感文字描述對熱量預估之影響。 管理學報,36(1),53-82。
俞昱安(2018)。用可愛,做公益!可愛類型與公益訴求之廣告效果探討〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立中山大學行銷傳播管理研究所。
洪鈞皓(2017)。健康產品之可愛造型與產品包裝對消費者行為的影響〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立高雄科技大學國際企業所。
洪絹雅(2017)。吃的可愛?吃得健康?可愛類型、食品類型與不同促發效果對消費行為的影響〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立高雄科技大學國際企業所。
陳昱璇(2015)。可愛食物讓人更想吃嗎?消費動機與認知情感處理系統對食物造型之食用量的干擾影響〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立高雄科技大學國際企業所。
陳瀚凱、林品章(2004)。視覺動勢之視覺原則與其在視覺傳達設計上的應用探討,藝術學報,(74),81-98。
凱度消費者指數(2022)。2022年第四季台灣民生消費品市場趨勢報告。KANTAR。https://www.kantarworldpanel.com/tw/news/2022Q4-FMCG-Market-trend
黃毓澖(2015)。食物可愛造型如何影響食物種類和不同情緒下之食用量〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立高雄科技大學國際企業所。
劉思量(2001)。傳統繪畫中的空間表現。藝術評論,(12),203-239。
賴婉毓(2016)。可愛的產品包裝必勝?保健食品包裝具可愛元素與否對消費者的影響〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立中正大學行銷管理研究所。

Acebron, L. B., & Dopico, D. C. (2000). The importance of intrinsic and extrinsic cues to expected and experienced quality: An empirical application for beef. Food Quality and Preference, 11(3), 229-238.
Amar, M., Gvili, Y., & Tal, A. (2021). Moving towards healthy: Cuing food healthiness and appeal. Journal of Social Marketing, 11(1), 44-63.
Anderson , T. , Howe , C. and Tolmie , A. (1996). Interaction and mental models of physics phenomena: Evidence from dialogues between learners. In J. Oakhill & A. Garnham (Eds.), Mental models in cognitive science (pp. 247-273). Psychology Press.
Anghelcev, G., McGroarty, S., Sar, S., Moultrie, J. L., & Huang, Y. (2020). Marketing processed organic foods: The impact of promotional message framing (vice vs. virtue advertising) on perceptions of healthfulness. Journal of Food Products Marketing, 26(6), 401-424.
Arbib, M. A. (1992). Schema theory. The encyclopedia of artificial intelligence, 2, 1427-1443.
Baxter, S. M., & Ilicic, J. (2018). May the force drag your dynamic logo: The brand work-energy effect. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 35(3), 509-523.
Berry, D. S., & McArthur, L. Z. (1985). Some components and consequences of a babyface. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(2), 312-323.
Blumberg, B., Cooper, D., & Schindler, P. (2014). EBOOK: Business research methods. McGraw Hill.
Borgi, M., Cogliati-Dezza, I., Brelsford, V., Meints, K., & Cirulli, F. (2014). Baby schema in human and animal faces induces cuteness perception and gaze allocation in children. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(2), 411.
Bottomley, P. A., & Doyle, J. R. (2006). The interactive effects of colors and products on perceptions of brand logo appropriateness. Marketing Theory, 6(1), 63-83.
Boyer, L. E., Laurentz, S., McCabe, G. P., & Kranz, S. (2012). Shape of snack foods does not predict snack intake in a sample of preschoolers: A cross-over study. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 9(1), 1-7.
Brosch, T., Sander, D., & Scherer, K. R. (2007). That baby caught my eye… Attention capture by infant faces. Emotion, 7(3), 685-689.
Buckingham, G. (2014). Getting a grip on heaviness perception: A review of weight illusions and their probable causes. Experimental Brain Research, 232, 1623-1629.
Burdelski, M., & Mitsuhashi, K. (2010). “She thinks you’re kawaii”: Socializing affect, gender, and relationships in a Japanese preschool. Language in Society, 39(1), 65-93.
Cai, S., & Xu, Y. (2011). Designing not just for pleasure: effects of web site aesthetics on consumer shopping value. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 15(4), 159-188.
Callcott, M. F., & Phillips, B. J. (1996). Observations: Elves make good cookies: Creating likable spokes-character advertising. Journal of Advertising Research, 36(5), 73-73.
Capaldi, C. A., Dopko, R. L., & Zelenski, J. M. (2014). The relationship between nature connectedness and happiness: A meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 976.
Chang, C. (2013). Imagery fluency and narrative advertising effects. Journal of Advertising, 42(1), 54-68.
Chao, L. L., & Martin, A. (2000). Representation of manipulable man-made objects in the dorsal stream. Neuroimage, 12(4), 478-484.
Chen, K. J., Chuang, M. C., & Deng, Y. S. (2015). Data integration of valued-added database on the elderly national health insurance and physical examination in Taipei. Journal of Data Analysis, 10(1), 107-133.
Chi, M., Pan, M., & Huang, R. (2021). Examining the direct and interaction effects of picture color cues and textual cues related to color on accommodation-sharing platform rental purchase. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 99, 103066.
Cho, H. (2019). Brand name fluency and perceptions of water purity and taste. Food Quality and Preference, 71, 21-24.
Cho, S., Gonzales, R., & Yoon, C. (2011). Cross-cultural difference in the Preference of the cute Products: Asymetric dominance effect with product designs. Proceedings of IASDR2011, the 4th World Conference on Design Research, Delft.
Chou, H. Y., Chu, X. Y., & Chen, T. C. (2022). The healing effect of cute elements. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 56(2), 565-596.
Cian, L., Krishna, A., & Elder, R. S. (2014). This logo moves me: Dynamic imagery from static images. Journal of Marketing Research, 51(2), 184-197.
Cian, L., Krishna, A., & Elder, R. S. (2015). A sign of things to come: Behavioral change through dynamic iconography. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(6), 1426-1446.
Clark, J. M., & Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review, 3(3), 149-210.
Cutting, J. E. (2002). Representing motion in a static image: Constraints and parallels in art, science, and popular culture. Perception, 31(10), 1165-1193.
Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B., & Grewal, D. (1991). Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers’ product evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(3), 307-319.
Dondis, D. A. (1974). A primer of visual literacy. Mit Press.
Doyle, J. R., & Bottomley, P. A. (2006). Dressed for the occasion: Font-product congruity in the perception of logotype. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(2), 112-123.
Elder, R. S., & Krishna, A. (2010). The effects of advertising copy on sensory thoughts and perceived taste. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(5), 748-756.
Elder, R. S., & Krishna, A. (2012). The “visual depiction effect” in advertising: Facilitating embodied mental simulation through product orientation. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(6), 988-1003.
Epley, Nicholas, Adam Waytz, and John Cacioppo (2007), On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism, Psychological Review, 114 (4), 864-86
Faraji-Rad, A., & Lee, L. (2022). Banking Happiness. Journal of Consumer Research, 49(2), 336-358.
Fenko, A., De Vries, R., & Van Rompay, T. (2018). How strong is your coffee? The influence of visual metaphors and textual claims on consumers’ flavor perception and product evaluation. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 53.
Fenko, A., Lotterman, H., & Galetzka, M. (2016). What’s in a name? The effects of sound symbolism and package shape on consumer responses to food products. Food Quality and Preference, 51, 100-108.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley.
Fiske, S. T., & Linville, P. W. (1980). What does the schema concept buy us?. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 6(4), 543-557.
Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition. Mcgraw-Hill Book Company.
Franconeri, S. L., & Simons, D. J. (2003). Moving and looming stimuli capture attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 65(7), 999-1010.
Freyd, J. J. (1983). The mental representation of movement when static stimuli are viewed. Perception & Psychophysics, 33(6), 575-581.
Freyd, J. J., & Finke, R. A. (1984). Representational momentum. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10(1), 126-132.
Furnham, A. (1988). Lay theories: Everyday understandings of problems in the social sciences. Pergamon.
Garretson, J. A., & Niedrich, R. W. (2004). Spokes-characters: Creating character trust and positive brand attitudes. Journal of Advertising, 33(2), 25-36.
Glocker, M. L., Langleben, D. D., Ruparel, K., Loughead, J. W., Valdez, J. N., Griffin, M. D., ... & Gur, R. C. (2009). Baby schema modulates the brain reward system in nulliparous women. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(22), 9115-9119.
Gmuer, A., Siegrist, M., & Dohle, S. (2015). Does wine label processing fluency influence wine hedonics?. Food Quality and Preference, 44, 12-16.
Goering, E., Connor, U. M., Nagelhout, E., & Steinberg, R. (2011). Persuasion in fundraising letters: An interdisciplinary study. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(2), 228-246.
Golle, J., Lisibach, S., Mast, F. W., & Lobmaier, J. S. (2013). Sweet puppies and cute babies: Perceptual adaptation to babyfacedness transfers across species. PloS One, 8(3), e58248.
Greenway, R. (1995). The wilderness effect and ecopsychology. In T. Roszak, M. E. Gomes, and A. D. Kanner (Eds.), Ecopsychology: Restoring the earth, healing the Mind (pp. 122-135). Sierra Club Books.
Gvili, Y., Tal, A., Amar, M., & Wansink, B. (2017). Moving up in taste: Enhanced projected taste and freshness of moving food products. Psychology & Marketing, 34(7), 671-683.
Gvili, Y., Tal, A., Amar, M., Hallak, Y., Wansink, B., Giblin, M., & Bommelaer, C. (2015). Fresh from the tree: Implied motion improves food evaluation. Food Quality and Preference, 46, 160-165.
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Babin, B. J., & Black, W. C. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective. Pearson.
Harshman, R. A., & Paivio, A. (1987). "Paradoxical" sex differences in self-reported imagery. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie, 41(3), 287-302.
Hart, P., & Royne, M. B. (2017). Being human: How anthropomorphic presentations can enhance advertising effectiveness. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 38(2), 129-145.
Haws, K. L., Reczek, R. W., & Sample, K. L. (2017). Healthy diets make empty wallets: The healthy= expensive intuition. Journal of Consumer Research, 43(6), 992-1007.
Hayes, A. F. (2022). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression‐Based Approach. (3rd.). The Guilford Press.
Hellen, K., & Sääksjärvi, M. (2013). Development of a scale measuring childlike anthropomorphism in products. Journal of Marketing Management, 29(1-2), 141-157.
Higgins, E. T. (2006). Value from hedonic experience and engagement. Psychological Review, 113(3), 439-460.
Hirschman, E. C. (1984). Experience seeking: A subjectivist perspective of consumption. Journal of Business Research, 12(1), 115-136.
Holmberg, C., Chaplin, J. E., Hillman, T., & Berg, C. (2016). Adolescents’ presentation of food in social media: An explorative study. Appetite, 99, 121-129.
Horowitz, M. J. (1972). Image formation: clinical observations and a cognitive model. The Function and Nature of Imagery, 281-309.
Hubbard, T. L. (1995). Environmental invariants in the representation of motion: Implied dynamics and representational momentum, gravity, friction, and centripetal force. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2(3), 322-338.
Irtwange, S. V. (2006). Application of modified atmosphere packaging and related technology in postharvest handling of fresh fruits and vegetables. Agricultural Engineering International: CIGR Journal, 8, 1-13
Isen, A. M., Daubman, K. A., & Nowicki, G. P. (1987). Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(6), 1122-1131.
Jang, S. S., & Namkung, Y. (2009). Perceived quality, emotions, and behavioral intentions: Application of an extended Mehrabian–Russell model to restaurants. Journal of Business Research, 62(4), 451-460.
Jaud, D. A., & Melnyk, V. (2020). The effect of text-only versus text-and-image wine labels on liking, taste and purchase intentions. The mediating role of affective fluency. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 53, 101964.
Kaplan, S., & Talbot, J. F. (1983). Psychological benefits of a wilderness experience. In Behavior and The Natural Environment, 6, 163-203.
Keating, C. F., Randall, D. W., Kendrick, T., & Gutshall, K. A. (2003). Do babyfaced adults receive more help? The (cross-cultural) case of the lost resume. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 27, 89-109.
Kerzel, D. (2002). The locus of “memory displacement” is at least partially perceptual: Effects of velocity, expectation, friction, memory averaging, and weight. Perception & Psychophysics, 64(4), 680-692.
Ketron, S., & Spears, N. (2020). Schema-ing with color and temperature: The effects of color-temperature congruity and the role of non-temperature associations. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 54, 102021.
Kim, J. H., Hai, T., & Li, J. (2023). The impact of an auspicious name and shape on food consumption. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 55, 143-152.
Kim, M., & Lennon, S. (2008). The effects of visual and verbal information on attitudes and purchase intentions in internet shopping. Psychology & Marketing, 25(2), 146-178.
Kim, M., & Lennon, S. (2008). The effects of visual and verbal information on attitudes and purchase intentions in internet shopping. Psychology & Marketing, 25(2), 146-178.
Konuk, F. A. (2021). The moderating impact of taste award on the interplay between perceived taste, perceived quality and brand trust. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 63, 102698.
Kosslyn, S. M., Thompson, W. L., & Ganis, G. (2006). The case for mental imagery. Oxford University Press.
Kourtzi, Z., & Kanwisher, N. (2000). Activation in human MT/MST by static images with implied motion. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12(1), 48-55.
Krems, J. A., Ko, A., Moon, J. W., & Varnum, M. E. (2021). Lay beliefs about gender and sexual behavior: First evidence for a pervasive, robust (but seemingly unfounded) stereotype. Psychological Science, 32(6), 871-889.
Landwehr, J. R., Wentzel, D., & Herrmann, A. (2013). Product design for the long run: Consumer responses to typical and atypical designs at different stages of exposure. Journal of Marketing, 77(5), 92-107.
Larsen, V., Luna, D., & Peracchio, L. A. (2004). Points of view and pieces of time: A taxonomy of image attributes. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(1), 102-111.
Lavie, N., Hirst, A., De Fockert, J. W., & Viding, E. (2004). Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(3), 339.
Leborg, C. (2006). Visual grammar: A design handbook (Visual design book for designers, book on visual communication). Princeton Architectural Press.
Lee, A. Y., Keller, P. A., & Sternthal, B. (2010). Value from regulatory construal fit: The persuasive impact of fit between consumer goals and message concreteness. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(5), 735-747.
Lee, C. T., & Hsieh, S. H. (2019). Engaging consumers in mobile instant messaging: The role of cute branded emoticons. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 28(7), 849-863.
Lee, H. C., Chang, C. T., Chen, Y. H., & Huang, Y. S. (2018). The spell of cuteness in food consumption? It depends on food type and consumption motivation. Food Quality and Preference, 65, 110-117.
Lee, W., & Gretzel, U. (2012). Designing persuasive destination websites: A mental imagery processing perspective. Tourism Management, 33(5), 1270-1280.
Li, K., Bi, Y., Wang, Y., Zhang, M., Liu, Y. J., Yang, H., & Lin, F. (2019). The disentangled sub-processes involved in implied motion contributing to food freshness: The neural evidence from ERPs. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 15(3), 185-198.
Li, S., & Liu, P. (2022). Will “moving” food tastes better? Effect of dynamic food image in print advertising on food taste perception. Journal of Sensory Studies, 37(1), e12719.
Li, S., Liu, P., & Zhou, R. (2020). Diagonal or vertical? An empirical study of the impact of food brand logo orientation on consumers’ food perception and food attitude. Food Quality and Preference, 86, 103985.
Li, S., Zeng, Y., & Zhou, S. (2020). The congruence effect of food shape and name typeface on consumers’ food preferences. Food Quality and Preference, 86, 104017.
Li, Y. J., Haws, K. L., & Griskevicius, V. (2019). Parenting motivation and consumer decision-making. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(5), 1117-1137.
Lien, N. H., & Chen, Y. L. (2013). Narrative ads: The effect of argument strength and story format. Journal of Business Research, 66(4), 516-522.
Lorenz, Konrad (1943), “Die angeborenen Formen mo¨glicher Erfahrung” [The innate forms of potential experience], Zeitschrift fu¨r Tierpsychologie, 5(2), 235-409
Lv, X., Luo, J., Liang, Y., Liu, Y., & Li, C. (2022). Is cuteness irresistible? The impact of cuteness on customers’ intentions to use AI applications. Tourism Management, 90, 104472.
Macdonald, J. S., & Lavie, N. (2011). Visual perceptual load induces inattentional deafness. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73(6), 1780-1789.
Machiels, C. J., & Karnal, N. (2016). See how tasty it is? Effects of symbolic cues on product evaluation and taste. Food Quality and Preference, 52, 195-202.
Mai, R., Hoffmann, S., Schwarz, U., Niemand, T., & Seidel, J. (2014). The shifting range of optimal web site complexity. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 28(2), 101-116.
Mai, R., Symmank, C., & Seeberg-Elverfeldt, B. (2016). Light and pale colors in food packaging: When does this package cue signal superior healthiness or inferior tastiness?. Journal of Retailing, 92(4), 426-444.
Maier, E., and F. Dost. (2018a). Fluent contextual image backgrounds enhance mental imagery and evaluations of experience products. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 45, 207-20.
Maier, E., and F. Dost. (2018b). The positive effect of contextual image backgrounds on fluency and liking. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 40, 109-16.
Mandler, G. (2014). The structure of value: Accounting for taste. In Affect and cognition (pp. 3-36). Psychology Press.
Mannetti, L., Giacomantonio, M., Higgins, E. T., Pierro, A., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2010). Tailoring visual images to fit: Value creation in persuasive messages. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(2), 206-215.
Marcelino, A. S., Adam, A. S., Couronne, T., Köster, E. P., & Sieffermann, J. M. (2001). Internal and external determinants of eating initiation in humans. Appetite, 36(1), 9-14.
Mastandrea, S., & Umiltà, M. A. (2016). Futurist art: Motion and aesthetics as a function of title. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, 201.
Matthes, J., Wonneberger, A., & Schmuck, D. (2014). Consumers' green involvement and the persuasive effects of emotional versus functional ads. Journal of Business Research, 67(9), 1885-1893.
McManus, I. C., & Furnham, A. (2010). “Fun, fun, fun”: Types of fun, attitudes to fun, and their relation to personality and biographical factors. Psychology, 1(3), 159 -168.
Mead, J. A., Richerson, R., & Li, W. (2020). Dynamic right-slanted fonts increase the effectiveness of promotional retail advertising. Journal of Retailing, 96(2), 282-296.
Meyers-Levy, J., & Tybout, A. M. (1989). Schema congruity as a basis for product evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(1), 39-54.
Mitchell, D. J., Kahn, B. E., & Knasko, S. C. (1995). There's something in the air: Effects of congruent or incongruent ambient odor on consumer decision making. Journal of Consumer Research, 22(2), 229-238.
Miyazaki, A. D., Grewal, D., & Goodstein, R. C. (2005). The effect of multiple extrinsic cues on quality perceptions: A matter of consistency. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(1), 146-153.
Moeran, B., & Skov, L. (2013). Women, media and consumption in Japan. Routledge.
Monahan, L., & Romero, M. (2020). Heading the right way? The influence of motion direction in advertising on brand trust. Journal of Advertising, 49(3), 250-269.
Morris, M. W., Menon, T., & Ames, D. R. (2001). Culturally conferred conceptions of agency: A key to social perception of persons, groups, and other actors. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(2), 169-182.
Morris, P. H., Reddy, V., & Bunting, R. C. (1995). The survival of the cutest: Who's responsible for the evolution of the teddy bear?. Animal Behaviour, 50(6), 1697-1700.
Motoki, K., Saito, T., Nouchi, R., Kawashima, R., & Sugiura, M. (2018). Tastiness but not healthfulness captures automatic visual attention: Preliminary evidence from an eye-tracking study. Food Quality and Preference, 64, 148-153.
Mulier, L., Meersseman, E., Vermeir, I., & Slabbinck, H. (2021). Food on the move: The impact of implied motion in pictures on food perceptions through anticipated pleasure of consumption. Foods, 10(9), 2194.
Murman, D. L. (2015). The impact of age on cognition. Seminars in Hearing, 36, 111-121
Nenkov, G. Y., & Scott, M. L. (2014). “So cute I could eat it up”: Priming effects of cute products on indulgent consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(2), 326-341.
Nittono, H. (2016). The two-layer model of ‘kawaii’: A behavioural science framework for understanding kawaii and cuteness. East Asian Journal of Popular Culture, 2(1), 79-95.
Nittono, H., Fukushima, M., Yano, A., & Moriya, H. (2012). The power of kawaii: Viewing cute images promotes a careful behavior and narrows attentional focus. PloS One, 7(9), e46362.
Norman, D. A. (2004). Emotional design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things. Civitas Books.
Palan, K. M. (2001). Gender identity in consumer behavior research: A literature review and research agenda. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 10(2001), 1-31.
Palcu, J., Haasova, S., & Florack, A. (2019). Advertising models in the act of eating: How the depiction of different eating phases affects consumption desire and behavior. Appetite, 139, 59-66.
Papies, E. K., Stroebe, W., & Aarts, H. (2008). The allure of forbidden food: On the role of attention in self-regulation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(5), 1283-1292.
Papies, E. K., van Stekelenburg, A., Smeets, M. A. M., Zandstra, E. H., & Dijksterhuis, G. B. (2022). Situating desire: Situational cues affect desire for food through eating simulations. Appetite, 168, 105679.
Peracchio, L. A., & Meyers-Levy, J. (2005). Using stylistic properties of ad pictures to communicate with consumers. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(1), 29-40.
Perkins, A. W., & Forehand, M. R. (2012). Implicit self-referencing: The effect of nonvolitional self-association on brand and product attitude. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(1), 142-156.
Perkins, A. W., & Forehand, M. R. (2012). Implicit self-referencing: The effect of nonvolitional self-association on brand and product attitude. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(1), 142-156.
Petrova, P. K., & Cialdini, R. B. (2005). Fluency of consumption imagery and the backfire effects of imagery appeals. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(3), 442-452.
Petrova, P. K., & Cialdini, R. B. (2008). Evoking the imagination as a strategy of influence. Handbook of Consumer Psychology, 505-524.
Philipp-Muller, A., Costello, J. P., & Reczek, R. W. (2023). Get your science out of here: When does invoking science in the marketing of consumer products backfire?. Journal of Consumer Research, 49(5), 721-740.
Phillips, B., & Lee, W. N. (2005). Interactive animation: Exploring spokes-characters on the internet. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 27(1), 1-17.
Pieters, R., Wedel, M., & Batra, R. (2010). The stopping power of advertising: Measures and effects of visual complexity. Journal of Marketing, 74(5), 48-60.
Piqueras-Fiszman, B., & Spence, C. (2015). Sensory expectations based on product-extrinsic food cues: An interdisciplinary review of the empirical evidence and theoretical accounts. Food Quality and Preference, 40, 165-179.
Plante, T. G., Cage, C., Clements, S., & Stover, A. (2006). Psychological benefits of exercise paired with virtual reality: Outdoor exercise energizes whereas indoor virtual exercise relaxes. International Journal of Stress Management, 13(1), 108-117.
Plourde, L. (2014). Cat cafés, affective labor, and the healing boom in Japan. Japanese Studies, 34(2), 115-133.
Pratt, J., Radulescu, P. V., Guo, R. M., & Abrams, R. A. (2010). It’s alive! Animate motion captures visual attention. Psychological Science, 21(11), 1724-1730.
Raghunathan, R., Naylor, R. W., & Hoyer, W. D. (2006). The unhealthy= tasty intuition and its effects on taste inferences, enjoyment, and choice of food products. Journal of Marketing, 70(4), 170-184.
Reber, R., Schwarz, N., & Winkielman, P. (2004). Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver's processing experience?. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(4), 364-382.
Reber, R., Winkielman, P., & Schwarz, N. (1998). Effects of perceptual fluency on affective judgments. Psychological Science, 9(1), 45-48.
Reed, C. L., & Vinson, N. G. (1996). Conceptual effects on representational momentum. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22(4), 839-850.
Roggeveen, A. L., Grewal, D., Townsend, C., & Krishnan, R. (2015). The impact of dynamic presentation format on consumer preferences for hedonic products and services. Journal of Marketing, 79(6), 34-49.
Roininen, K., Lähteenmäki, L., & Tuorila, H. (1999). Quantification of consumer attitudes to health and hedonic characteristics of foods. Appetite, 33(1), 71-88.
Ross, L., & Nisbett, R. E. (2011). The person and the situation: Perspectives of social psychology. Pinter & Martin Publishers.
Ryan, R. M., Weinstein, N., Bernstein, J., Brown, K. W., Mistretta, L., & Gagné, M. (2010). Vitalizing effects of being outdoors and in nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(2), 159-168.
Schlosser, A. E., Rikhi, R. R., & Dagogo-Jack, S. W. (2016). The ups and downs of visual orientation: The effects of diagonal orientation on product judgment. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 26(4), 496-509.
Schnurr, B. (2019). Too cute to be healthy: How cute packaging designs affect judgments of product tastiness and healthiness. Journal of The Association for Consumer Research, 4(4), 363-375.
Scott, M. L., & Nenkov, G. Y. (2016). Using consumer responsibility reminders to reduce cuteness-induced indulgent consumption. Marketing Letters, 27, 323-336.
Sherman, G. D., Haidt, J., & Coan, J. A. (2009). Viewing cute images increases behavioral carefulness. Emotion, 9(2), 282-286.
Singh, T. K., Drake, M. A., & Cadwallader, K. R. (2003). Flavor of cheddar cheese: A chemical and sensory perspective. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 2(4), 166-189.
Song, H., Van Phan, B., & Kim, J. H. (2019). The congruity between social factors and theme of ethnic restaurant: Its impact on customer's perceived authenticity and behavioural intentions. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 40, 11-20.
Spangenberg, E. R., Sprott, D. E., Grohmann, B., & Tracy, D. L. (2006). Gender-congruent ambient scent influences on approach and avoidance behaviors in a retail store. Journal of Business Research, 59(12), 1281-1287.
Spence, C., Motoki, K., & Petit, O. (2022). Factors influencing the visual deliciousness/eye-appeal of food. Food Quality and Preference, 102, 104672.
Stayman, D. M., Alden, D. L., & Smith, K. H. (1992). Some effects of schematic processing on consumer expectations and disconfirmation judgments. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(2), 240-255.
Steinnes, K. K., Blomster, J. K., Seibt, B., Zickfeld, J. H., & Fiske, A. P. (2019). Too cute for words: Cuteness evokes the heartwarming emotion of kama muta. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 387.
Steptoe, A., Pollard, T. M., & Wardle, J. (1995). Development of a measure of the motives underlying the selection of food: The food choice questionnaire. Appetite, 25(3), 267-284.
Su, Q., & Li, F. S. (2023). How cute mascots affect relationships with tourism destinations: A moderated mediation model. Tourism Management, 99, 104782.
Sujan, M. (1985). Consumer knowledge: Effects on evaluation strategies mediating consumer judgments. Journal of Consumer Research, 12(1), 31-46.
Sussman, A. B., Paley, A., & Alter, A. L. (2021). How and why our eating decisions neglect infrequently consumed foods. Journal of Consumer Research, 48(2), 251-269.
Teixeira, T., Wedel, M., & Pieters, R. (2012). Emotion-induced engagement in internet video advertisements. Journal of Marketing Research, 49(2), 144-159.
Thomas, N., & Mulligan, J. (1995). Dynamic imagery in children’s representations of number. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 7(1), 5-25.
Van der Laan, L. N., De Ridder, D. T., Viergever, M. A., & Smeets, P. A. (2011). The first taste is always with the eyes: A meta-analysis on the neural correlates of processing visual food cues. Neuroimage, 55(1), 296-303.
Vartanian, L. R., Herman, C. P., & Wansink, B. (2008). Are we aware of the external factors that influence our food intake?. Health Psychology, 27(5), 533-538.
Vinson, N. G., & Reed, C. L. (2002). Sources of object-specific effects in representational momentum. Visual Cognition, 9(1-2), 41-65.
Wang, H., Li, H., Zhao, Y., & Xi, N. (2023). Being natural is aesthetic: The effects of “natural” labeling on lay beliefs and the purchase intention of unattractive produce. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 35(7), 1759-1773.
Wang, Q., Ma, D., Chen, H., Ye, X., & Xu, Q. (2020). Effects of background complexity on consumer visual processing: An eye-tracking study. Journal of Business Research, 111, 270-280.
Wang, T. (2014). Motivational antecedents and behavioral consequences of cuteness in marketing [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Hong Kong University of Science and Technology.
Wang, W., Keh, H. T., & Bolton, L. E. (2010). Lay theories of medicine and a healthy lifestyle. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(1), 80-97.
Wen, H., Leung, X., & Pongtornphurt, Y. (2020). Exploring the impact of background music on customers’ perceptions of ethnic restaurants: The moderating role of dining companions. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 43, 71-79.
Winkielman, P., Schwarz, N., Fazendeiro, T., & Reber, R. (2003). The hedonic marking of processing fluency: Implications for evaluative judgment. The Psychology of Evaluation: Affective Processes in Cognition and Emotion, 189-217.
Xia, H., Pan, X., Zhou, Y., & Zhang, Z. J. (2020). Creating the best first impression: Designing online product photos to increase sales. Decision Support Systems, 131, 113235.
Yamim, A. P., Mai, R., & Werle, C. O. (2020). Make it hot? How food temperature (mis) guides product judgments. Journal of Consumer Research, 47(4), 523-543.
Ye, B. H., He, J., Fong, L. H. N., Li, Z., & Yan, Y. Q. (2023). How does cuteness become the cue? Investigating the impact of cute destination spokespersons on tourist travel intention. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 27, 100758.
Yim, M. Y. C., Kim, Y. K., & Lee, J. (2021). How to easily facilitate consumers’ mental simulation through advertising: The effectiveness of self-referencing image dynamics on purchase intention. International Journal of Advertising, 40(5), 810-834.
Yoo, J., & Kim, M. (2014). The effects of online product presentation on consumer responses: A mental imagery perspective. Journal of Business Research, 67(11), 2464-2472.
Yoon, N., Park, W., & Joo, J. (2021, December). Dark Side of Cuteness: Effect of Whimsical Cuteness on New Product Adoption [Conference presentation]. In Congress of the International Association of Societies of Design Research (pp. 617-633). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.
Yu, J., Droulers, O., & Lacoste-Badie, S. (2022). Why display motion on packaging? The effect of implied motion on consumer behavior. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 64, 102840.
Zhang, N., Yu, L., Tsang, A. S., & Zhou, N. (2021). Should spokes-characters be dynamic? The interaction effects of spokes-character dynamism and brand personality on consumers’ evaluation. European Journal of Marketing, 55(5), 1516-1538.
Zhang, Y., Xiao, S. H., & Nicholson, M. (2020). The effects of dynamic product presentation and contextual backgrounds on consumer purchase intentions: Perspectives from the load theory of attention and cognitive control. Journal of Advertising, 49(5), 592-612.
Zickfeld, J. H., Schubert, T. W., Seibt, B., Blomster, J. K., Arriaga, P., Basabe, N., ... & Fiske, A. P. (2019). Kama muta: Conceptualizing and measuring the experience often labelled being moved across 19 nations and 15 languages. Emotion, 19(3), 402-424.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus:開放下載的時間 available 2026-08-21
校外 Off-campus:開放下載的時間 available 2026-08-21

您的 IP(校外) 位址是 3.128.31.106
現在時間是 2025-05-12
論文校外開放下載的時間是 2026-08-21

Your IP address is 3.128.31.106
The current date is 2025-05-12
This thesis will be available to you on 2026-08-21.

紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 2026-08-21

QR Code