Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0710118-155250 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0710118-155250
論文名稱
Title
探討運用蘇格拉底式提示策略促進國小四年級學生批判性思考能力
The Effects of Using Socratic Hint to Enhance Critical Thinking Skill of Elementary 4th Grade Students
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
98
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2018-07-16
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2018-08-10
關鍵字
Keywords
批判性思考、蘇格拉底式提示、口說回答、國小學生
Verbal answer, Elementary students, Socratic questioning/hint, Critical thinking
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5904 次,被下載 231
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5904 times, has been downloaded 231 times.
中文摘要
批判性思考能力(Critical thinking)與問題解決能力、創造力、溝通能力、合作能力、創新能力並列為二十一世紀不可或缺的技能。為了在現在這個社會取得成功,現代的人必須要學習並掌握批判性思考能力。文獻指出批判性思考能力可以被提升及改善。過去已經有很多研究開始探討提升批判性思考能力的方法,而這些研究都是針對中學生與大學生居多,但批判性思考能力應該從小開始培養。因此,本研究的目的是致力於發展一套能提升國小學生批判性思考能力系統。本研究模擬傳統教導批判性思考能力的方式,透過短篇影片搭配設計的影片問題及提供蘇格拉底式提示來提升國小學生批判性思考能力。除了提供蘇格拉底式提示輔助學生的思考過程,本研究也探討要求學生回答蘇格拉底式提示對提升國小學生批判性思考能力有何影響。本研究以準實驗法將學生隨機分配至「無蘇格拉底式提示組」、「有蘇格拉底式提示組」與「回答蘇格拉底式提示組」,並進行四堂課之實驗,共有128位國小四年級學童完成本研究。其研究結果顯示:(1)使用蘇格拉底式提示能有效提升批判性思考;(2)有無回答蘇格拉底式提示對提升批判性思考能力並沒有影響。本研究建議未來可以加入系統回饋,系統根據學生所回答的內容做進一步的提問及引導學生更深層的思考,並且拉長培養時間,探討各組學生在培養批判性思考能力過程中的狀況。
Abstract
Critical thinking is one of the most important skill in 21 century, along with other skills such as problem solving, creativity, collaboration, communication and innovation. Nowadays, in order to have good performance in any field or career path, one is required to be good at using their critical thinking skill to solve every problem he/she faces, understand which option is better and and most optimum. Past research had shown that critical thinking skill can be enhanced and cultivated along with numerous studies exploring different methods to improve one’s critical thinking skill. These studies were mostly focused on junior and senior high school students, college students and adults. However, past research had also shown that critical thinking skill should be cultivated starting from an early age. Therefore, the objective of this study is to develope a system to enhance the critical thinking ability of elementary school students. This study mirrored the traditional way of enhancing critical thinking skills by providing students with short films, asking them critical thinking questions regarding events in the film. Prior to answering the designed critical thinking questions, Socratic hints were provided to guide their thinking and help them to think much deeper about the critical thinking questions. The results show that there was significant different between two groups, who was provided with Socratic hints and who were not provided with. Yet, there was no significant different between two groups where both were provided with Socratic hints, with one group who was required to answer Socratic hints and another not required to answer. The suggestion for future research is according to the answer from student, the system should give them some feedback, such like a following question to lead them think much deeper.
目次 Table of Contents
論文提要 ii
致謝 iii
摘要 iv
Abstract v
目錄 vi
圖目錄 viii
表目錄 x
第一章、 緒論 1
第一節、 研究背景與動機 1
第二節、 研究目的 2
第三節、 研究問題 2
第二章、 文獻探討 3
第一節、 批判性思考 3
第二節、 蘇格拉底式提示/問題 8
第三節、 影片問題與蘇格拉底式提示差別 10
第三章、 系統與策略設計 11
第一節、 內容設計 11
第二節、 蘇格拉底式提示之設計 14
第三節、 系統設計與流程 16
第四章、 研究方法 24
第一節、 研究假說 24
第二節、 研究工具 24
第三節、 實驗設計 34
第四節、 資料分析 39
第五章、 結果與討論 40
第一節、 人口統計資訊 40
第二節、 批判性思考能力分析 41
第三節、 綜合討論 46
第六章、 結論 52
第一節、 研究發現 52
第二節、 研究貢獻 53
第三節、 研究限制 54
第四節、 未來研究 55
參考文獻 56
附錄一、四堂課之影片問題、蘇格拉底式提示 61
附錄二、前後測 65
附錄三、前後測編碼表 69
附錄四、預試問卷 85
參考文獻 References
中文部分
廖羽晨(民98)。批判思考教學法的歷史課程設計。歷史教育,15,97-118。
西文部分
Aloqaili, A. S. (2012). The relationship between reading comprehension and critical thinking: A theoretical study. Journal of King Saud University-Languages and Translation, 24(1), 35-41.
Association of American Colleges & Universities. (2005). Liberal education outcomes: A preliminary report on student achievement in college. Washington, DC: AAC&U.
Australian Council for Educational Research. (2002). Graduate skills assessment: Stage one validity study. Australia: Department of Education, Science and Training.
Brickhouse, T. C., & Smith, N. D. (2000). The philosophy of Socrates. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Copeland, M. (2010). Socratic circles: Fostering critical and creative thinking in middle and high school. Portland, MN: Stenhouse.
Cozine, K. (2015). Thinking interestingly: The Use of game play to enhance learning and facilitate critical thinking within a homeland security curriculum. British Journal of Educational Studies, 63(3), 367-385. doi:10.1080/00071005.2015.1069256
Dwyer, C. P., Hogan, M. J., & Stewart, I. (2014). An integrated critical thinking framework for the 21st century. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 12, 43-52.
Elder, L., & Paul, R. (1998). The Role of Socratic questioning in thinking, teaching, and learning. The Clearing House, 71(5), 297-301.
Ennis, R. H. (1989). Critical thinking and subject specificity: Clarification and needed research. Educational researcher, 18(3), 4-10.
Ennis, R. H. (1993). Critical thinking assessment. Theory into Practice, 32, 179–86.
Ennis, R. H. (1996). Critical thinking dispositions: Their nature and assessability. Informal Logic, 18(2), 165-182.
Facione, P. A. (2009). Critical thinking: what it is and why it counts. Retrieved from http://www.insightassessment.com/9articles WW.html
Facione, P. (1990). Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction (The Delphi Report). Millbrae, CA: The California Academic Press.
Flavell, J. H. (1992). Perspectives on perspective taking. In H. Beilin, & P. Pufall (Eds.), Piaget’s Theory: Prospects and Possibilities (pp. 109–139). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Gelerstein, D., del Río, R., Nussbaum, M., Chiuminatto, P., & López, X. (2016). Designing and implementing a test for measuring critical thinking in primary school. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 20, 40-49.
Gelman, S. A., & Markman, E. M. (1987). Young children’s inductions from natural kinds: The role of categories and appearances. Child Development, 8, 1532–1541.
Halpern, D. F. (1998). Teaching critical thinking for transfer across domains: dispositions, skills, structure training, and metacognitive monitoring. American psychologist, 53(4), 449-455.
Halpern, D.(2003). Thought and knowledge: an introduction to critical thinking (4th ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Helsdingen, A. S., Van Gog, T., & van Merriënboer, J. J. (2011). The effects of practice schedule on learning a complex judgment task. Learning and Instruction, 21(1), 126-136.
Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2014). Using blended learning: Evidence-based practices. Singapore: Springer.
Huang, X.-Y., Chew, S. W., & Chen, N.-S. (in print). A Vocal Approach in Measuring Critical Thinking Skill in Elementary School Students. International Conference on Computers in Education (ICCE).
Jones, J. M., & Safrit, R. D. (1994). Developing critical thinking skills in adult learners through innovative distance learning. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED373159).
Ken K., & Greenhill V.(2011). Twenty-first century students need 21st century skills. In Bringing schools into the 21st century (pp. 41-65). Netherlands: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-0268-4_3
King, A. (1994). Guiding knowledge construction in the classroom: Effects of teaching children how to question and how to explain. American Educational Research Journal, 31(2), 338–368.
Lai, E. R. (2011). Critical thinking: A Literature review. Pearson’s Research Reports, 6, 40-41.
Lee, H., Parsons, D., Kwon, G., Kim, J., Petrova, K., Jeong, E., & Ryu, H. (2016). Cooperation begins: Encouraging critical thinking skills through cooperative reciprocity using a mobile learning game. Computers & Education, 97, 97-115.
Lee, M., Kim, H., & Kim, M. (2014). The effects of Socratic questioning on critical thinking in web-based collaborative learning. Education as Change, 18(2), 285-302.
Lin, I. H., Chew, S. W., & Chen, N. S. (2017). A Vocal assessment approach to measure elementary school students’ critical thinking skills. In Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), 2017 IEEE 17th International Conference on (pp. 419-421). doi:10.1109/ICALT.2017.30
Maiorana, V. P. (1990–1991). The road from rote to critical thinking. Community Review, 11(1–2), 53–63.
Meredith, K. S., & Steele, J. L. (2011). Classrooms of wonder and wisdom: Reading, writing, and critical thinking for the 21st century. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Nippold, M. A., Frantz-Kaspar, M. W., Cramond, P. M., Kirk, C., Hayward-Mayhew, C., & MacKinnon, M. (2015). Critical thinking about Fables: Examining language production and comprehension in adolescents. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 58(2), 325-335.
Norris, S. P., & Ennis, R. H. (1989). Evaluating Critical Thinking. Pacific Palisades, CA: Critical Thinking Press and Software.
O’Hare, L., & McGuinness, C. (2009). Measuring critical thinking, intelligence, and academic performance in psychology undergraduates. The Irish Journal of Psychology, 30(3-4), 123-131.
Paul, R. W. (1993). Critical thinking: What every person needs to survive in a rapidly changing world. CA: Foundation for Critical Thinking, Sonoma Valley University.
Paul, R. W. (1984). Critical thinking – Fundamental to education for a free society. Educational Leadership, 42(1), 4–14.
Paul, R. W. (1995). Critical thinking: How to prepare students for a rapidly changing world. Foundation for Critical Thinking. Santa Rosa, CA: EMC.
Pithers, R. T., & Soden, R. (2000). Critical thinking in education: A review. Educational research, 42(3), 237-249.
Scriven, M., & Paul, R. W. (1987). Critical thinking as defined by the National Council for Excellence in Critical Thinking. Retrieved from http://www.criticalthinking.org/pages/defining-critical-thinking/766 (accessed 11 January 2013).
Sim, J., & Wright, C. C. (2005). The Kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements. Physical Therapy, 85(3), 257-268.
Swaggerty, E. A. (2015). Selecting engaging texts for upper elementary students who avoid reading or find reading difficult. In D. A. Wooten, L. A. Liang, & B. E. Cullinan (Eds.), Children’s Literature in the Reading Program: Engaging Young Readers in the 21st Century (pp. 150-166). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Tsui, L. (2002). Fostering critical thinking through effective pedagogy: Evidence from four institutional case studies. The Journal of Higher Education, 73(6), 740-763.
Van Den Brink-Budgen, R. (2000). Critical thinking for students learn the skills of critical assessment and effective argument. Begbroke, ‎England: How To Books.
Van Gelder, T. (2001). How to improve critical thinking using educational technology. In Meeting at the crossroads: Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (pp. 539-548). Melbourne, Australia: ASCILITE.
Yang, Y. T. C., & Wu, W. C. I. (2012). Digital storytelling for enhancing student academic achievement, critical thinking, and learning motivation: A year-long experimental study. Computers & Education, 59(2), 339-352.
Yang, Y.-T. C., Newby, T. J., & Bill, R. L. (2005). Using Socratic questioning to promote critical thinking skills through asynchronous discussion forums in distance learning environments. The American Journal of Distance Education, 19(3), 163-181.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code