軟體能力成熟度模式整合自 2003 年由卡內基美隆大學軟體工程學院發表後，許多軟體業者開始導入以增進軟體品質保證與國際化的機會。系統分析與設計階段是軟體開發中相當重要的兩個階段，此兩階段的產出主要由結構化或物件導向兩方法論產出表示。本研究之方法論提出一方針供比較兩方法論之產出對嵌入式系統之塑模。本研究架構以設計科學明確地表達，並完成一實際嵌入式系統案例進行可用性測試，藉此展示本研究方法論之可行性。本研究結果加強我們對於兩方法論其優勢與劣勢之認知。

Since the Software Engineering Institute published the Capability Maturity
Method Integration (CMMI) in 2003, many software firms have implemented it to
enhance its software quality assurance and international collaboration. Analysis and
design phases are two important phases for the software development. The artifacts of
these two phases mainly represented using the structured technique or the
object-oriented technique. This study proposed a methodology which provides
guidelines to compare the artifacts of these two techniques for an embedded system. The research methodology is articulated using the design science research methodology. A usability valuation with a real-world embedded system case is performed to demonstrate its applicability. The results provide evidences to enhance our understanding about the strength and weakness of these two nalysis and design techniques.

第一章 緒論.................................................................................................................. 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 ..................................................................................................... 1
第二節 研究目的與範圍 ..................................................................................................... 3
第二章 文獻探討.......................................................................................................... 4
第一節 結構化技術 ............................................................................................................. 4
第二節 物件導向系統分析與設計 ................................................................................... 11
第三節 CMMI .................................................................................................................... 22
第四節 認知適配理論 ....................................................................................................... 31
第三章 研究方法........................................................................................................ 33
第一節 設計科學研究法 ................................................................................................... 33
第二節 研究流程 ............................................................................................................... 34
第四章 設計與發展.................................................................................................... 38
第一節 需求分析 ............................................................................................................... 38
第二節 系統分析 ............................................................................................................... 40
第三節 總結 ....................................................................................................................... 45
第五章 展示................................................................................................................ 47
第一節 個案公司介紹 ....................................................................................................... 47
第二節 需求分析階段 ....................................................................................................... 48
第三節 系統分析設計階段 ............................................................................................... 62
第四節 結構化方法論與物件導向方法論於 CMMI ....................................................... 73
第五節 評估 ....................................................................................................................... 79
第六章 結論................................................................................................................ 82

第一節 研究成果 ............................................................................................................... 82
第二節 研究貢獻 ............................................................................................................... 82
第三節 研究限制與未來研究方向 ................................................................................... 83
參考文獻...................................................................................................................... 84
附錄 A. 可用性測試問卷 ........................................................................................... 87
附錄 B. 系統需求規格書 ........................................................................................... 92
附錄 C. 系統初步設計規格書 ................................................................................. 101

中文參考文獻

中華民國軟體協會與經濟部工業局. (2010). "CMMI 提升資訊軟體品質(CMMI)
計畫." 2010, from http://www.cmmi-taiwan.org.tw/content/index.aspx.

吳仁和，物件導向系統分析與設計：結合 MDA 與 UML，三版，台北：智勝，
2010 年 3 月

吳仁和、林信惠，系統分析與設計：理論與實務應用，五版， 台北：智勝，2010
年 3 月

許文政，「嵌入式系統之結構化塑模方法論」， 國立中山大學資訊管理學系碩士
論文，2010 年

蔡淑茵 ，「嵌入式系統之 PIM 塑模方法論之研究」，國立中山大學資訊管理學系
碩士論文，2010 年

英文參考文獻

Baker, E. R. (2001). "Which Way, SQA?" IEEE SOFTWARE 18(1): 16-18.

Boehm-Davis, D. A. and Ross, L. S. (1992). "Program design methodologies and the
software development process." International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 36(1):
1-19.

Booch, G., Rumbaugh, J. and Jacobson, I. (1999). The unified modeling language
user guide, Addison Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc. Redwood City, CA, USA.

Chrissis, M. B., Konrad, M. and Shrum, S. (2003). CMMI Guidlines for Process
Integration and Product Improvement, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc.

85

Boston, MA, USA.

DeLone, W. H. and McLean, E. R. (1992). "Information systems success: the quest
for the dependent variable." Information systems research 3(1): 60-95.

Dijkstra, E. W. (1968). "Letters to the editor: go to statement considered harmful."
Commun. ACM 11(3): 147-148.

Fichman, R. G. and Kemerer, C. F. (1992). "Object-oriented and conventional
analysis and design methodologies." COMPUTER: 22-39.

Fries, T. P. (2006). A framework for transforming structured analysis and design
artifacts to UML, ACM.

Group, S. (2009). "CHAOS Summary 2009." from
http://www1.standishgroup.com/newsroom/chaos_2009.php.

Jacobson, I., Booch, G. and Rumbaugh, J. (1999). The unified software development
process, Addison-Wesley.

Karahanna, E., Straub, D. W. and Chervany, N. L. (1999). "Information Technology
Adoption across Time: A Cross-Sectional Comparison of Pre-Adoption and
Post-Adoption Beliefs." MIS Quarterly 40(23): 2.

Lewis, T. G. and Oman, P. W. (1990). "Guest Editors' Introduction: The Challenge of
Software Development." IEEE Softw. 7(6): 9-10, 12.

March, S. T. and Storey, V. C. (2008). "Design Science in the Information Systems
Discipline: an Introduction to the Special Issue on Design Science Research." MIS
Quarterly 32(4): 725-730.

OMG. (2008). "Unified Modeling Language, Infrastructure." V2.1.2. from
http://www.omg.org/spec/UML/2.1.2/Infrastructure/PDF,2007.

Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A. and Chatterjee, S. (2007). "A design
science research methodology for information systems research." Journal of
Management Information Systems 24(3): 45-77.

Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations, Free Pr.

Sinha, A. P. and Vessey, I. (1992). "Cognitive fit: an empirical study of recursion and
iteration." IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 18(5): 368-379.

Software Engineering Institute, C. M. (1993). "CMMI." from
http://www.sei.cmu.edu/index.cfm.

Vessey, I. (1991). "Cognitive fit: A theory-based analysis of the graphs versus tables
literature." Decision Sciences 22(2): 219-240.

Vessey, I. and Conger, S. (1993). "Learning to specify information requirements: the
relationship between application and methodology." Journal of Management
Information Systems 10(2): 201.

Wieringa, R. (1998). "A survey of structured and object-oriented software
specification methods and techniques." ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 30(4):
459-527.

Wixom, B. H. and Todd, P. A. (2005). "A Theoretical Integration of User Satisfaction
and Technology Acceptance." Info. Sys. Research 16(1): 85-102.

Yourdon, E. (1988). Managing the system life cycle, Prentice-Hall.

Yourdon, E. (1989). Modern structured analysis, Yourdon Press Upper Saddle River,
NJ, USA.