Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0706102-164007 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0706102-164007
論文名稱
Title
知識管理系統接受度影響因素之研究
Factors Affecting The Acceptance of knowledge management Systems
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
103
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2002-07-06
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2002-07-06
關鍵字
Keywords
科技接受模式、環境因素、知識管理系統
Technology Acceptance Model(TAM), Environment factors, Knowledge management Systems
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5854 次,被下載 6222
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5854 times, has been downloaded 6222 times.
中文摘要
隨著資訊技術的提升與網際網路的快速成長,全球資訊網已成為資訊交換的新平台,WWW的出現不僅帶給網路使用者豐富的資訊來源,也提升了組織間競爭的複雜度。在十倍速的競爭環境下,使得傳統企業間資本的競爭,轉而變成知識的競爭。
企業能否有效的創造、累積、利用、管理企業知識,將企業知識轉為競爭利器已成為企業永續經營的重要關鍵,因此,已有越來越多的企業開始重視知識管理。
為了協助企業快速建置其知識管理系統,已有越來越多的軟體公司,提供知識管理工具來協助企業管理營運所需的知識。從支援的層級來看,這些工具滿足了個人、群體、與組織的知識管理需求,而從知識管理流程的角度來看,則針對知識創造、知識組織、知識分享、知識評估以及知識應用提供相當支援。
但除了提供完善的工具外,不可忽略影響系統是否成功的因素之一是使用者的使用意願與接受度,而目前缺乏針對影響知識管理系統接受因素之研究。本研究計畫透過知識管理相關文獻的分析探討,輔以現行資訊技術、知識管理平台的分析,提出影響知識管理系統接受度模式,作為實務界進行規劃與建置企業知識管理系統時之參考。
Abstract
none
目次 Table of Contents
圖目錄 III
表目錄 IV
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景 1
第二節 研究動機 3
第三節 研究目的 4
第四節 研究流程 5
第五節 論文結構 6
第二章 文獻探討 7
第一節 知識 7
第二節 知識管理 10
第三節 知識管理架構 12
第四節 知識管理重要研究議題 25
第五節 科技接受模式之探討 29
第六節 環境因素 39
第三章 研究架構與方法 41
第一節 研究架構 41
第二節 研究假說 42
第三節 研究變數與操作型定義 46
第四節 研究設計 49
第五節 統計分析方法 54
第四章 資料分析 56
第一節 問卷信效度之檢定 56
第二節 樣本背景資料分析 60
第三節 研究假說驗證 63
第四節 整體架構驗證 78
第五章 結論與建議 85
第一節 研究結論與發現 85
第二節 研究貢獻 88
第三節 研究限制 89
第四節 未來研究方向 90
參考文獻 91
附錄一 問卷 101

參考文獻 References
中文部分:
[1] Larry Downes, Chunka Mui著,邱文寶編譯,「Killer App -- 12步打造數位企業」,天下文化出版,1999年7月。

[2] Leif Edvinsson, Michael S. Malone著,林大容譯,「智慧資本:如何衡量資訊時代無形資產的價值」,臉譜出版社,1999年2月。

[3] 安寶傑,「寬頻網路群雄四起」,資訊與電腦,1999年3月,38~42頁。

[4] 朱若柔,「社會科學研究方法與資料分析」,楊智文化,初版,1996年。

[5] 何文斌 (2001) 國小行政人員網路素養對行政網路資訊系統接受度之研究-以台南市為例. 臺南師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。

[6] 吳明隆,「SPSS統計應用實務」,松崗圖書公司,2000年。

[7] 吳俊毅,周惠文(2000),「科技接受模型之實徵研究—從動機角度」,國立中央大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。

[8] 李煒杰 (2000) 應用於企業資訊系統之動態樹狀結構需求分析方法. 東海大學工業工程研究所碩士論文。

[9] 杜拉克(Peter F. Drucker)著,張玉文譯,「知識管理 Knowledge Management」,天下文化,2000年2月。

[10] 周素華 (1993) 電子通訊科技使用行為之研究-以交大學生為例. 國立交通大學土木工程研究所碩士論文。

[11] 林東清,「MIS調查研究方法探討」,資訊管理學報,第四卷,第一期,1996年。

[12] 林銓鋃 (2000) 企業知識管理之應用架構-國內知識導向組織的個案研究. 國立中山大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。

[13] 洪儒瑤 (2000) 台灣企業知識管理應用現況及其模式之研究. 國立台北大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。

[14] 張文菁 (2001) 企業特性、人力資本、產業環境以及組織績效之相關性研究. 中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。

[15] 莊妙華 (2001) 網路商店使用智慧型店員對消費者購買意願影響之研究. 國立中山大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。

[16] 陳虹煌 (2001) 經驗知識管理系統之開發與評估:以I C 封裝及測試產業為例. 國立中山大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。

[17] 陳晰,「企業典範-全錄公司」,電子化企業 經理人報告,1999年9月,53~57頁。

[18] 陳焜元 (1995) 行政管理資訊系統使用者參與效果之研究─技術接受性模式檢證. 國立政治大學公共行政研究所碩士論文。

[19] 麥孟生 (2000) 個人心理類型、自我效能及態度對電腦學習成效之影響. 國立中央大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。

[20] 曾智顯 (2001) 我國企業知識管理與組織創新之相關性研究. 國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文

[21] 森田松太郎,高梨智弘著,「知識管理的基礎與實例」,小知堂文化出版,2000年6月。

[22] 覃業明 (2001) 科技接受模型之實證研究-以國內醫療網站為例. 國立成功大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。

[23] 馮炫俊 (2000) 消費者使用電子銀行之行為研究-以ATM、電話銀行、網路銀行為例. 私立元智大學管理研究所碩士論文。

[24] 黃文俊 (2001) 網路教學環境中群組互動對學習成效之影響. 國立中山大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文

[25] 黃兆震 (2001) 網路購物意願之研究-以電腦通訊產品為例. 國立台灣科技大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。

[26] 黃俊英,「多變量分析」,華泰文化事業公司,七版,2000年1月。

[27] 黃昭銘,「啟動寬頻戰爭進入短兵相接」,資訊與電腦,1999年12月,57~61頁。

[28] 黃瑜峰 (2001) 科技框架理論於知識管理應用之探討. 國立中山大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。

[29] 勤業管理顧問公司(Arthur Andersen Business Consulting)著,劉京偉譯,「知識管理的第一本書」,商周出版,2000年6月。

[30] 楊國樞等,「社會及行為科學研究法」,東華書局,十三版,1999年。

[31] 劉信志 (2000) 知識管理參考模式之研究. 國立台北科技大學商業自動化與管理研究所碩士論文

[32] 蔡采芳 (2000) 顧問業知識管理系統架構之研究. 大業大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文

[33] 戴文坡(Thomas H. Davenport), 普賽克(Laurene Prusak)著,胡瑋珊譯,「知識管理Working Knowledge」,中國生產力中心,1999年11月。

[34] 藍紫堂 (2000) 知識管理系統建構之個案研究. 國立中山大學企業管理研究所碩士論文

英文部分:
[1] Abu S.M. Masud, Paul Metcalf, Don HOmmertzheim, “A knowledge-based Model Management System for Aircraft Survivability Analysis,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.84, 1995, pp.47-59.

[2] Adams, Dennis A, Nelson, R. Ryan, Todd, Peter A., “Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use and Usage of Information Technology: A Replication,” MIS Quarterly, Vol.16, No.2, June 1992, pp.227-247.

[3] Agarwal, R. & J. Prasad, “The Role of Innovation Characteristics and Percieved Voluntariness in the Acceptance of Information Technologies,” Decision Sciences, Vol.28, No.3, 1997, pp.557-582.

[4] Alavi, M. “Managing Organizational knowledge,” in Framing the Domains of IT Management Research: Glimpsing the Future through the Past, R.W. Zmud (ed.), Pinnaflex Educational Resources, Cincinnati, OH, 2000.

[5] Alavi, M., “KPMG Peat Marwick U.S.: One Gain Brain,” Harvard Business school (Case), July 11, 1997.

[6] Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. “KVolwledge Management Systems: Emerging Views and Practices from the Field,” Communications of the AIS, Vol.1, No.5, February 1999.

[7] Alavi, Martam & Leidner, Dororhy, “Knowledge Management Systeem: Emerging Views and Practices from the Field,” Proceedings of 32nd Hawaiian International Conference on System Science, 1999.

[8] Alistair G. Sutcliffe, “Requirements Analysis for Socio-technical System Design,” Information Systems, Vol.25, No.3, 2000, pp213-233.

[9] Arthur Andersen and the American Productivity and Quality Center, “The Knowledge Management Assessment Tool: External Benchmarking Version,” Winter 1996.

[10] Ba, S., Kalakota, R., Whiston, A.B., “Using Client-Broker-Server Architecture for Intranet Decision Support,” Decision Support Systems, Vol.19, 1997, pp.171-192.

[11] Balasubramaniam Ramesh, Amrit Tiwana, “Supporting Collaborative Process Knowledge Management in New Product Development Teams,” Decision Support Systems, Vol.27, 1999, pp.231-235.

[12] Bergeron, F., L. Raymond, S. Rivard, & M.Gara, “Determinants of EIS Use: Testing a Behavioral Model,” Decision Support Systems, Vol.14, No.2, 1995, pp.131-146.

[13] Binney, Derek, “The Knowledge Management Spectrum – Understanding the KM landscape,” Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol.5, No.1, pp.33-42.

[14] Bonora, E.A., and Revang, O., “A Strategic Framework for Analying Professional Service Firms-Developing Strategies for Sustained Performance,” Strategic Management Society Interorganizational Conference, Toronto, Canada. 1991

[15] Chau-young Ivan Lin, Cheng-seen Ho, “Generating Domain-specific methodical knowledge for Requirement Analysis Based on Methodology Ontology, ” Information Sciences, Vol.114, 1999, pp.127-164.

[16] Cole, R. E. “Introduction,” California Management Review, Vol.45, No.3, Spring 1998, pp.15-21.

[17] Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. “Working Knowledge,” Harvard Business School Press, Boston, 1998.

[18] Davenport, T. H., De Long, D. & Beers, M., “Successful Knowledge Management Projects,” Sloan Management Review, Vol.39, pp.43-57.

[19] Davis, F.D., “Perceive Usefulness, Perceived of Ease of Use, and End User Acceptance of Information Technology,” MIS Quarterly, Vol.13, No.3, 1989, pp.319-340.

[20] Davis, F.D., R.P. Bagozzi, & P.R. Warshaw, “User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models,” Management Sciencs, Vol.35, No.8, 1989, pp.982-1003.

[21] Delone, W., & E. Mclean, “Information System Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable,” Information Systems Research Vol.3, No.1, 1992, pp.60-95.

[22] DeVellis, R. F., Scale Development Theory And Applications, London: SAGE., 1991

[23] Fishbein, M. & I. Ajzen, “Attitude, Intentions and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research,” Addition-Wesly, Boston, MA. , 1975.

[24] Gilbert, Myrna & Gordey-Hayes, Martyn, “Understanding the Process of Knowledge Transfer to Achieve Successful Technological Innovation,” Technovation, Vol.16, No.6, 1996, pp.365-385.

[25] Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Balkin, D. B., & Cardy R. L., Managing Human Resources, Englewood Cliffs, N. J. :Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1995

[26] Grover, V., S. R. Jeong, & A. H. Albert, “Information Systems Effectiveness: The Construct Space and Patterns of Application,” Information & Management, Vol.31, No.4, 1996, pp.177-191.

[27] Igbaria M., “End-user Computing Effectiveness: A Structural Equation model, ” Omega, Vol.18 ,No.6 , 1990, pp.637-652.

[28] Igbaria, M., J. Iivari, & H. Maragahh, “Why Do Individuals Use Computer Technology? A Finnish Case Study,” Information & Management, Vol.29, No.5, 1995, pp.227-238.

[29] Igbaria, M., S. Parasuraman, & J. J. Baroudi, “A Motivational model of Microcomputer Usage,” Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol.13, No.1, 1996, pp.127-143.

[30] Igbaria, M., T. Guimaraes, & G. B. Davis, “Testing the Determinants of Microcomputer Usage via a Structural Equation model,” Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol.11, No.4, Spring 1995, pp.87-114.

[31] Jackson, Cynthia M., Chow, Simeon, Robert A., “Toward an Understanding of the Behavioral Intention to Use an Information System,” Decision Sciences, Vol.28, INo.2, Spring 1997, pp.357-389.

[32] Knapp, Ellen M., “Knowledge Management,” Business and Economic Review, Vol.44, I.4, pp.3-6.

[33] KPMG Management Consulting. Knowledge Management: Research Report, 1998

[34] Lai, H., and Chu, T.H., “Knowledge Management: A Review of Theoretical Framework and Industrial Cases,” Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2000.

[35] Lai, H.L., and Yang, T.C., “A system Architecture for Intelligent Browsing on the Web,” Decision Support Systems, Vol. 28, No.3, pp. 219-239, 2000.

[36] Lederer, Aldsvert L.; Maupin, Donna j., Sena, Mark P.; Zhuang, Youlong, “The Technology Acceptance Model and the World Wide Web,” Decision Support Systems, Vol.29, No.3, Octorber 2000, pp.269-282.

[37] Leonard-Barton, Dorothy, “Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol.13, special issue, 1992, pp.11-125.

[38] Liang, T. P. & Huang, J. S., “A Framework for Applying Intelligent Agents to Support Electronic Trading,” Decision Support Systems, Vol. 28, No.4, pp. 293-304, 2000.

[39] Liang, T. P. and Huang, J. S., “A Framework for Applying Intelligent Agents to Support Electronic Commerce,” Proceedings of the 31nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1998.

[40] Liang, T.P., Shaw, J.P., and Wei, C.P., “A Framework for Managing Web Information: Current Research and Future Direction,” Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1999.

[41] Lin, F.R., Tan, G.W., Shaw, M.J., “Multiagent Enterprise Modeling,” Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, Vol.9, No.1, 1999, pp.7-32

[42] Maes, P., ”Agent that Reduce Work and Information Overload., ”Communications of the ACM, Vol.37, No.7, July 1994, pp.31-40.

[43] Malhotra, Y. “Hi-Tech Hidebound Knowledge Management: Strategic Information Systems for the New World of Business,” Working Paper, BRINT Research Institute, 1999.

[44] Michael H. Zack, “Developing a Knowledge Strategy,” California Management Review, Vol.41, No.3, Spring 1999, pp125-145.

[45] Mitchell, T., Caruana, R., Gritag, d., McDermott, J., and Zabowski, D., “Experience with a Learning Personal Assistant,” Communications of the ACM, Vol.37, No.7, 1994, pp.80-91.

[46] Neter, J., Wasserman & Kutuner, L., Applied Linear Statistical Model, Homewood, IL :Irwin, 1990

[47] Nonaka, I., and Takerchi, H., “The Knowledge Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation,” New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.

[48] Nunnally, J. C., Psychometric Theory (2nd ed.), New York: McGraw Hill., 1978.

[49] O’Dell, C., & Grayson, C. J. “If Only We Knew What We Know: identification and Transfer of Internal Best Practices,” California Management Review, Vol.40, No.3, 1998, pp.154-174.

[50] Paul H.J. Hendricks, Dirk J. Vriens, “Knowledge-based systems and knowledge management: Friends or foes?” Information Management, Vol.35, 1999, pp.113-125.

[51] Pfeffer J., & Sutton R. I., “The Knowledge-Doing Gap: How Smart Companies Turn Knowledge into Action,” Harvard Business School Press, Boston, 2000.

[52] Polanyi, M. The Tacit Dimension, Routledge and Keoan Paul, London, 1967

[53] Powell, W. “Learning from Collaboration: Knowledge and Networks in the Biotechnology and Pharmaceutical Industries,” California Management Review, Vol.40, No.3, 1998, pp228-240.

[54] Scott, J.E., “Organizational knowledge and the intranet,” Decision Support Systems, Vol.23, No.1, 1998, pp.3-17.

[55] Shan L. Pan, Harry Scarbrough, “Knowledge Management in Practice: An Exploratory Case Study,” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, Vol.11, No.3, 1999, pp.359-374.

[56] Smith, D.C., Cypher, A., Spohrer, J., “KIDSIM: Programming Agents without a Programming Language,” Communications of the ACM, Vol.37, No.7, July 1994, pp.55-67.

[57] Straub, D., D. Limayem & E. Karahanna-Evaristo, “Measuring System Usage: Implications for IS Theory Testing,” Management Science, Vol.41, No.8, August 1995, pp.1328-1342.

[58] Szajna, B., “Empirical Evaluation of the Revised Technology Acceptance Model,” Management Science, Vol.42, No.1, 1996, pp.85-92.

[59] Teece, D. “Capturing Value from Knowledge Assets: The New Economy, Markets for Know-How, and Intangible Assets,” California Management Review, Vol.40, No.3, 1998, pp.55-79.

[60] Varun Grover and Thomas H. Davenport, “General Perspectives on Knowledge Management: Fostering a Research Agenda,” Journal of Management System, Vol.18, No.1, Summer 2001, pp.5-21.

[61] Venkatesh, Viswanath, “A Model of the Antecedents of Percieved Ease of Use: Development and Test,” Decision Sciences, Vol.27, No.3, Summer 1996, pp.451-481.

[62] Venkatesh, Viswanath, “Creation of Favorable User Perceptions: Exploring the Role of Intrinsic Motivation,” MIS Quarterly, Vol.23, No.2, June 1999, pp.239-260.

[63] Venkatesh, Viswanath; Davis, Fred D., “Determinants of Percieved Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model,” Information Systems Research, Vol.11, No.4, December 2000, pp.342-365.

[64] Weill, P. & M. H. Olson, “An Assessment of the Contingency Theory of Management Information Systems,” Journal of MIS, No.6, I.1, 1989, pp.59-85.

[65] Wiig, K.M., “Roles of Knowledge-based System in Support of Knowledge Management,” Knowledge Management and Its Integrative Elements, Liebowitz, J. & Wilcox, L.C. ed., CRC press, New York.

[66] Wooldridge, M., and Jennings, N.R., “Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages: A Survey,” Proceedings of ECAI-94 Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, August 1994.

[67] Yen, J., “Human Agents and Intelligent Agents: An Experiment on the Internet,” Proceedings of the 30th Hawaii International Conference on System Science, 1997, pp.242-251.

網站部分:
[1] 網際網路資訊情報中心,http://www.find.org.tw

[2] Microsoft Corp., http://www.microsoft.com/

[3] Gartner Group, http://www3.gartner.com/Init/

[4] NUA Internet Surveys, http://www.nua.ie/surveys/

[5] GUV center’s WWW user surveys, http://www.gvu.gatech.edu/user_surveys/
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內立即公開,校外一年後公開 off campus withheld
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code