Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0702111-173201 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0702111-173201
論文名稱
Title
無所不在服務趨勢下的前瞻式隱私管理實務之實證研究
Proactive Privacy Practices in the Trend of Ubiquitous Services: An Empirical Study
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
104
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2011-06-24
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2011-07-02
關鍵字
Keywords
揭露意願、整合社會契約理論、前瞻式隱私管理、前瞻式隱私實務、電子化服務、行動式服務、無所不在服務
Proactive privacy practice, Proactive privacy governance, Electronic services, Mobile services, Ubiquitous services, Disclosure willingness, Integrative social contracts theory
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5910 次,被下載 0
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5910 times, has been downloaded 0 times.
中文摘要
隱私是一備受矚目的策略性議題,常用以因應詭譎多變的競爭壓力,尤以電子化相關產業更為顯著。「無所不在服務」可視為是電子化服務及行動式服務的延伸,因其以電子化服務為基石,並可藉由行動式服務之應用蓬勃發展(Junglas & Watson 2006)。在無所不在服務環境中,顧客隨時隨地處於情境感知的網路環境裡,故可享有更高規格客製化及個人化的即時服務;而相對地,顧客也就更能感受到所引發的隱私威脅。因此,隱私問題被視為是「無所不在服務」發展的最大絆腳石。
當眾多研究探討影響顧客隱私決策相關因素如:信任、風險、隱私疑慮、隱私政策條款的呈現、隱私評估…等,本研究則著重於發展前瞻式隱私管理模式 (PPPM),以做為電子化服務業者之採取前瞻式隱私實務的參考依據,藉以提升顧客自發性資訊揭露意願。PPPM 以整合社會契約理論為基礎,涵蓋科技及非科技層面之相關元素,如:行為、法規和經濟等相關層面因素,即電子化服務業者前瞻式之隱私管理機制、業者對顧客所傳達之「無所不在服務」的認知價值及競爭策略。本研究以B2C電子化服務為研究情境,運用實證調查法驗證模式中各構念關係。
研究結果顯示三個前置因子均和資訊揭露意願有顯著關係;同時,競爭策略對業者之前瞻式隱私管理機制和揭露意願之關係亦具有顯著且正向的調節作用。此研究發現不僅可擴展資訊揭露之相關知識,更可使業者以策略式管理隱私取得隱私保護及競爭優勢之平衡,藉以確認目前隱私機制的優缺點,進而研擬更具前瞻性及卓越的隱私管理實務,以拓展其事業版圖至無所不在服務或無所不在企業。
Abstract
Privacy is a strategic issue so that much attention has been constantly devoted to information privacy in response to competitive pressure in dynamic marketplace, particularly in the trend of e-business settings. Ubiquitous services (u-services) are recognized as the logical extension of e-/m-services because they can be initiated by e- and further propagated by m-services (Junglas & Watson 2006). In u-services context, customers are always connected seamlessly in context-awareness networks so the higher degree of customized and personalized services can be timely served. Likewise, customers may also well be aware of privacy threats behind that. Consequently, privacy issues are identified as a key hindrance for booming u-services.
While a large body of studies focusing on privacy issues have examined relevant factors influence customer decision making such as customer beliefs (i.e. trust and risk), privacy concerns, the representations of privacy statement, and even the privacy calculus, this study aims to explore a theoretical proactive privacy practice model (PPPM) as a guideline for an e-services provider (ESP) initiating its privacy practices to its customers to enhance voluntary information disclosure. Drawing upon integrative social contracts theory, the proposed PPPM embraced technical and non-technical elements such as human, legal, and economic relevant perspectives, that is, e-services providers’ proactive privacy governance, and customer perceived value and competitive strategies for u-services. An empirical survey was conducted in a B2C e-services context to examine the relationships among these constructs.
The results indicate that there are significant relationships between those three antecedents and disclosure willingness respectively. Meanwhile, the moderating effect of competitive strategies significantly and positively associates with proactive privacy governance and disclosure willingness. These findings not only broaden current knowledge of the disclosure behavior but also allow ESPs to strategically manage privacy and leverage privacy protection for a competitive advantage and identify the strengths and weaknesses of their current privacy mechanisms, guiding them to develop more proactive and prominent privacy practices for extending their businesses to future u-services or u-businesses.
目次 Table of Contents
ABSTRACT IN CHINESE i
ABSTRACT ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS iv
LIST OF FIGURES vii
LIST OF TABLES viii
1. INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Background and Motivation 1
1.2 Research Questions 5
1.3 Research Objectives 7
1.4 Research Design 8
1.5 Organization of the Research 11
2. LITERATURE REVIEW AND THEORETICAL DEVELOPMENT 12
2.1 Electronic Services and Mobile Services 12
2.2 Ubiquitous Services 15
2.2 Privacy Issues 18
2.3 Integrative Social Contracts Theory 21
2.3.1 Social contract theory and marketing 21
2.3.2 Integrative social contracts theory 22
2.4 ISCT and Proactive Privacy Governance 26
2.4.1 Proactive Provision and Protection 29
2.4.2 Proactive Education 30
2.4.3 Proactive Monitoring and Feedback Seeking 31
2.5 ISCT and Perceived Value 34
2.6 ISCT, Competitive Strategies and Moderating Effects 36
3. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 40
3.1 Research Approach 40
3.2 Construct Operationalization 41
3.3 Instrument Development 43
3.4 Sampling and Survey Administration 45
3.5 Analysis Methods 46
3.5.1 Measurement Validation 47
3.5.2 Test of the Structural Model 49
4. DATA ANALYSIS AND RESULTS 51
4.1 Data Collection 51
4.2 Measurement Model Assessment 53
4.3 Structural Model Assessment 56
5. DISCUSSIONS AND CONCLUSIONS 60
5.1 Discussion of Results 60
5.2 Theoretical Implications 65
5.3 Managerial Implications 68
5.4 Limitations and Future Research 71
5.5 Conclusion 72
REFERENCES 74
APPENDIX A. SURVEY INSTRUMENT IN CHINESE 86
參考文獻 References
Abraham, C., Watson, R. T. & Bcudreau, M. C. (2008). Ubiquitous access: On the front lines of patient care and safety. Communications of the ACM, 2008, 51 (6), 95-99.
Anderson, E. & Strohm, C. Q. (2004). Consumers need education about privacy and security. Retrived on 28 May 2011 at Forrester Research, http://www.forrester. com/Research/Document/Excerpt/0,7211,34441,00.html.
Angst, C.M. & Agarwal, R. (2009). Adoption of electronic health records in the presence of privacy concerns: the elaboration likelihood model and individual persuasion. MIS Quarterly, 33 (2), 339-370.
Antón, A.I., Bertino, E., Li, N. & Yu, T. (2007). A roadmap for comprehensive online privacy policy management. Communications of the ACM, 50 (7), 109-116.
Awad, N. F. & Krishnan, M. S. (2006). The personalization privacy paradox: An empirical evaluation of information transparency and the willingness to be profiled online for personalization. MIS Quarterly, 30 (1), 13-28.
Ba, S., Stallaert, J. & Zhang J. (2010). Balancing IT with the human touch: Optimal investment in IT-based customer service. Information Systems Research, 21 (3), 423-42.
Bollen, K. & Lennox R. (1991). Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 110 (2), 305-314.

Casadesus-Masanell, R. & Ricart, J. E. (2010). From strategy to business models and onto tactics. Long Range Planning, 43 (2-3), 195-215.
Chadwick, A. (2006). Internet politics: states, citizens, and new communication technologies. Oxford University Press, New York.
Chellappa, R.K. & Saraf, N. (In press). Alliances, rivalry, and firm performance in enterprise systems software markets: A social network approach. Information Systems Research.
Chellappa, R.K. & Shivendu, S. (2007/2008). An economic model of privacy: A property rights approach to regulatory choices for online personalization. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24 (3), 193-225.
Challagalla, G., Venkatesh, R. & Kohli, A.K. (2009). Proactive postsales service: When and why does it pay off? Journal of Marketing, 73 (2), 70-87.
Chin, W.W. (1998). Issues and opinions on structural equation modeling. MIS Quarterly, 21 (1), vii-xvi.
Chin, W.W., Marcolin, B.L. & Newsted, P.R. (2003). A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic mail emotion/adoption study. Information Systems Research, 14 (2), 189-217.
Chiu, P.H., Kao, G.Y.M. & Lo, C.C. (2010). Personalized blog content recommender system for mobile phone users. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 68 (8), 496-507.
Churchill, G.A. (1979). A Paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16 (1), 64-73.
Cousins, K.C., Vrshney, U. (2009). Designing ubiquitous computing environments to support work life balance. Communications of the ACM, 52 (5), 117-123.
Culnan, M.J. (1995). Consumer awareness of name removal procedures: Implications for direct marketing. Journal of Direct Marketing, 9 (2), 10-19.
Culnan, M.J. & Bies, R.J. (2003). Consumer privacy: balancing economic and justice consideration. Journal of Social Issues, 59 (2), 323-342.
Culnan, M.J. & Carlin, T.J. (2009). Online privacy practices in higher education: making the grade? Communications of the ACM, 52 (3), 126-130.
Daouk, H., Lee, C.M.C. & Ng, D. (2006). Capital market governance: How do security laws affect market performance?, Journal of Corporate Finance, 12 (3), 560-593.
Diamantopoulos, A. & Siguaw, J.A. (2006). Formative versus reflective indicators in organizational measure development: A comparison and empirical illustration. British Journal of Management, 17 (4), 263-282.
Diamantopoulos, A. & Winklhofer, H.M. (2001). Index construction with formative indicators: An alternative to scale development. Journal of Marketing Research, 38 (2), 269-277.
Dinev, T. & Hart, P. (2006). An extended privacy calculus model for e-commerce transactions. Information Systems Research, 17 (1), 61-80.
Donaldson, T. (1982). Corporations and morality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. (Korean translation of Corporations and Morality, 1985)
Donaldson, T. (1989). The ethics of international business. New York: Oxford University Press.
Donaldson, T. & Dunfee, T.W. (1994). Toward a unified conception of business ethics: Integrative social contracts theory. Academy of Management Review, 19 (2), 252-284.
Donaldson, T., & Dunfee, T.W. (1995). Integrative social contracts theory: A communitarian conception of economic ethics. Economics and Philosophy, 11 (01), 85-112.
Dunfee, T.W., Smith, N.C. & Ross Jr., W.T. (1999). Social contracts and marketing ethics. Journal of Marketing, 63 (3), 14-32.
Fano, A. & Gershman, A. (2002). The future of business services in the age of ubiquitous computing. Communications of the ACM, 45 (12), 83-87.
Featherman, M. & Pavlou, P.A. (2003). Predicting e-services adoption: A perceived risk facets perspective. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59 (4), 451-474.
Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (1), 39-50.
Gefen, D. & Straub, D. (2005). A practical guide to factorial validity using PLS-Graph: Tutorial and annotated example. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 16, 91-109.
Gerbing, D.W., & Anderson, J.C. (1988). An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment. Journal of Marketing Research, 25 (2), 186-192.
Glover, S., & Benbasat, I. (2010-11). A comprehensive model of perceived risk of e-commerce transactions. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 15 (2), 47-78.
Gomez, J., Pinnick, T. & Soltani, A. (2009). KnowPrivacy. Retrieved on May 28, 2011 at http://www.knowprivacy.org/report/KnowPrivacy_Final_Report.pdf
Granados, N., Gupta, A. & Kauffman, R.J. (2010). Information transparency in business-to-customer markets: concepts, framework, and research agenda. Information Systems Research, 21 (2), 207-226.
Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E. & Tatham, R.L. (2005). Multivariate data analysis. 6th Edition. Prentice Hall, NJ.
Helkkula, A. & Kelleher, C. (2010). Circularity of customer service experience and customer perceived value. Journal of customer behavior, 9 (1), 37-53.
Hobbes. T. (1851/1948). Leviathan, or the matter, form and power of a commonwealth, ecclesiastical and civil. (M. Oakeshott. Ed.). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
Hui, K.L., Hock, H.T. & Lee, S.Y.T. (2007). The value of privacy assurance: an exploratory field experiment. MIS Quarterly, 31 (1), 19-33.
Jøsang, A., Ismail, R. & Boyd, C. (2007). A survey of trust and reputation systems for online service provision. Decision Support Systems, 43 (2), 618-644.
Junglas, I.A. & Watson, R.T. (2003). U-commerce: An experimental investigation of ubiquity and uniqueness. Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems, Seattle, WA, 414-426.
Junglas, I. A. & Watson, R. T. (2006). The u-constructs: four information drives. Communications of the Associations of Information Systems, 17 (1), 569-592.
Kim, E. & Lee, B. (2009). E-service quality competition through personalization under consumer privacy concerns. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 8 (4), 182-190.
Kim, C., Oh, E., Shin, N. & Chae, M. (2009). An empirical investigation of factors affecting ubiquitous computing use and u-business value. International Journal of Information Management, 29 (6), 436-448.
Kobsa, A. (2007). Privacy-enhanced personalization. Communications of the ACM, 50 (8), 24-33.
Kotler, P. (1972). A generic concept of marketing. Journal of Marketing. 36 (April), 46-54.
Kwon, O. & Choi, S. (2008). Applying associative theory to need awareness for personalized reminder system. Expert Systems With Applications, 34 (3), 1642-1650.
Lavie, T., Sela, M., Oppenheim, I., Inbar, O. & Meyer, J. (2010). User attitudes towards news content personalization. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 68 (8), 483-495.
Li, H., Sarathy, R. & Xu. H. (2011). The role of affect and cognition on online consumers' decision to disclose personal information to unfamiliar online vendors. Decision Support Systems, 51 (3), 434-445.
Liao, C., Chen, J.L., Yen, D.C. (2007). Theory of planning behavior (TPB) and customer satisfaction in the continued use of e-service: An integrated model, Computers in Human Behavior, 23 (6), 2804-2822.
Lim, S.S., Cho, H. & Rivera Sanchez, M. (2009). Online privacy, government surveillance and national ID cards. Communications of the ACM, 52 (12), 116-120.
Lindsey-Mullikin, J. & Petty, R.D. (2011). Marketing tactics discouraging price search: Deception and competition. Journal of Business Research, 64 (1), 67-73.
Locke, J. (1690/1948). The second treatise of civil government and a letter concerning toleration. (J. W. Gough. Ed.). Oxford. England: Blackwell.
McCreary, L. (2008). What was privacy? Harvard Business Review, 86 (10), 123-131.
Miyazaki, A.D. (2008). Online privacy and the disclosure of cookie use: Effects on consumer trust and anticipated patronage. American Marketing Association, 27 (1), 19-33.
Nam, C., Song, C., Lee, E. & Park, C.I. (2006). Consumers' privacy concerns and willingness to provide marketing-related personal information online. Advances in Consumer Research, 2006, 33 (1), 212-217.
OECD (1980). Organization for economic cooperation and development, guidelines on the protection of privacy and transborder flows of personal data. Retrieved on May 28, 2011 at http://www.oecd.org/document/18/0,3343,en_2649_34255_1815 186_1_1_1_1,00.html.
Piccoli, G. & Watson, R.T. (2008). Profit from customer data by identifying strategic opportunities and adopting the “born digital” approach. MIS Quarterly Executive, 2008, 7 (3), 113-122.
Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Lee, J.Y. & Podsakoff, N.P. (2003). Common method biases in behavior research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88 (5), 879-903.
Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy. techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. New York: The Free Press.
Porter, M.E. (1996). What is strategy? Harvard Business Review, 74 (6), 61-78.
Ratsimor, O., Chakraborty, D., Tolia, S., Kushraj, D., Kunjithapatham, A., Gupta, G., Joshi, A. & Finin, T. (2002). “Allia: Alliance-based service discovery for ad-hoc environments.” in ACM Mobile Commerce Workshop.
Ringle, C.M., Wende, S. & Will, A. (2005). SmartPLS. Retrieved on June 28, 2011 at http://www.smartpls.de
Rowley, J. (2006). An analysis of the e-service literature: towards a research agenda. Internet Research, 16 (3), 339-359.
Rousseau, J.J. (1762). The social contract. Retrieved on June 4, 2011 at http://www. constitution.org/jjr/socon.htm.
Roussos, G. & Moussouri, T. (2004). Consumer perceptions of privacy, security and trust in ubiquitous commerce. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 8 (6), 416-429.
Rust, R.T. & Kannan, P.K. (2003). E-service: a new paradigm for business in the electronic environment. Communications of the ACM, 46 (6), 36-42.
Ryan, M. D. (2011). Cloud computing privacy concerns on our doorstep. Communications of the ACM, 2011, 54 (1), 36-38.
Sheng, H., Nah, F.F.H. & Siau, K. (2008). An experimental study on ubiquitous commerce adoption: Impact of personalization and privacy concerns. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 9 (6), 344-376.
Shilton, K. (2009). Four billion little brothers? Privacy, mobile phones, and ubiquitous data collection. Communications of the ACM, 52 (11), 48-53.
Smith, H.J., Milberg, S. & Burke. S. (1996). Information privacy: Measuring individuals’ concerns about organizational practices. MIS Quart. 20 (2), 167-196.
Spaulding, T.J. (2010). How can virtual communities create value for business? Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 9 (1), 38-49.
Stewart, K.A., Segars, A.H. (2002). An empirical examination of the concern for information privacy instrument. Information Systems Research, 13 (1), 36-49.
Sweeney, J.C. & Soutar, G.N. (2001). Consumer perceived value: The development of a multiple item scale. Journal of Retailing, 77 (2), 203-220.
Tiwana, A. (2008). Does technological modularity substitute for control? A study of alliance performance in software outsourcing. Strategic Management Journal, 29 (7), 769-780.
Tiwana, A. 2009. Governance-knowledge fit in systems development projects. Information Systems Research, 20 (2), 180-197.
Tsai, J.Y., Egelman, S., Cranor, L. & Acquisti, A. (in press). The effect of online privacy information on purchasing behavior: An experimental study. Information Systems Research.
Turel, O., Serenko, A. & Bontis, N. (2007). User acceptance of wireless short messaging services: Deconstructing perceived value. Information & Management, 44 (1), 63-73.
Turow, J., Hennessy, M. & Bleakley, A. (2008). Consumers' understanding of privacy rules in the marketplace. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 42 (3), 411-24.
Van Slyke, C., Shim, J.T., Johnson, R. & Jiang, J. (2006). Concern for Information Privacy. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 7 (6), 415-444.
Venkatraman, N. (1989). The concept of fit in strategy research: Toward verbal and statistical correspondence. The Academy of Management Review, 14 (3), 423-444.
Waller, V. & Johnston, R. B. (2009). Making ubiquitous computing available. Communications of the ACM, 52 (10), 127-130.
Watson, R., Pitt, L.F., Berthon, P., and Zinkhan, G.M. (2002). U-commerce: expending the universe of marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30 (4), 329-343.
Woodruff, R. B. (1997). Customer value: The next source for competitive advantage. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25 (2), 139-153.
Wu, J.H. & Wang, S.C. (2005). What drives mobile commerce?: An empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 42 (5), 719-729.
Zeithaml, V.A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2-22.
Zhang, X., Prybutok, V. & Huang, A. (2006). An empirical study of factors affecting e-service satisfaction. Human Systems Management, 25 (4), 279-291.
Zimmer, J.C., Arsal, R.E., Al-Marzouq, M. & Grover, V. (2010a). Investigating online information disclosure: Effects of information relevance, trust and risk. Information & Management, 47 (2), 115-123.
Zimmer, J. C., Arsal, R., Al-Marzouq, M., Moore, D. & V. Grover (2010b). Knowing your customers: Using a reciprocal relationship to enhance voluntary information disclosure. Decision Support Systems, 48 (2), 395-406.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外均不公開 not available
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus:永不公開 not available
校外 Off-campus:永不公開 not available

您的 IP(校外) 位址是 3.209.56.116
論文開放下載的時間是 校外不公開

Your IP address is 3.209.56.116
This thesis will be available to you on Indicate off-campus access is not available.

紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code