Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0623119-223736 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0623119-223736
論文名稱
Title
以情緒歷程模式解釋主管不當督導如何影響部屬建言:員工情緒、調節焦點的中介歷程、以及人格特質的干擾效果
An Emotional Process Model Linking Abusive Supervision and Subordinates' Voice Behaviors: The Mediating Roles of Emotions and Regulatory Focus and the Moderating Roles of Personality Traits
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
45
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2019-07-10
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2019-07-23
關鍵字
Keywords
人格特質、調節焦點、情緒、不當督導、建言行為
emotion, voice behavior, personality trait, abusive supervision, regulatory focus
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5744 次,被下載 0
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5744 times, has been downloaded 0 times.
中文摘要
過去不當督導研究,大多聚焦於不當督導對員工負面行為的影響,少有研究檢視不當督導「何時」與「為何」影響員工正面的行為。本研究以情緒歷程模型觀點,探討不當督導對員工情緒的影響,是否會透過調節焦點,使員工產生不同的行為反應,以及員工的盡責性與情緒穩定性特質所扮演的角色。本研究採經驗抽樣法針對受測者進行連續10個工作日的資料收集。
本研究共收集來自206位企業員工,共1717筆配對資料,採用多層次路徑分析進行假設檢驗。結果顯示不當督導與憤怒、害怕情緒有正向關係,與正向情緒為負相關。憤怒情緒與促進焦點的負向關係會受到盡責性干擾轉為正向,並且對促進性/預防性建言有間接效果。盡責性亦會強化正向情緒與促進焦點之間的關係。情緒穩定性則會減緩正向情緒與促進焦點之間的關係,間接影響員工促進性/預防性建言行為。最後,針對研究結果提出管理意涵與實務意涵的深入討論。
Abstract
Past researches are focused on the that abusive supervisor lead to negative subordinate outcomes. There are few literatures find the relationship between abusive supervisor and subordinate positive behavior. Base on emotional process model, I predict that abusive supervisor effect employee voice behavior via emotion, and regulatory focus moderate by regulatory focus. The study used the experience sampling design to collect the daily data for 10 days. The data was collected from collected from 206 employees, consisted of 1717 matched data. I used path analysis to test the hypotheses. Results showed that abusive supervisor negatively related to subordinate positive emotion and positively related to employee anger and fear. Employees conscientiousness will moderate the relationship of anger and promotion focus. When employees with high conscientiousness, the indirect effect of abusive supervisor on employee voice mediated by anger and promotion focus would be positive. In addition, the relationship of positive emotion and promotion focus will be buffered by subordinate emotion stability and conscientiousness. The study's implications for theory and practice are discussed.
目次 Table of Contents
目 錄

論文審定書 i
中文摘要 ii
英文摘要 iii
第一章 緒論 1
第二章 文獻探討 5
第一節 不當督導的內涵 5
第二節 主管不當督導對員工情緒的影響:情緒歷程模式的觀點 6
第三節 員工情緒對其調節焦點的影響:情緒調節技能扮演的角色 7
第四節 員工調節焦點與建言行為的關係:情緒歷程模式的觀點 10
第三章 研究方法 12
第一節 研究對象與研究程序 12
第二節 研究工具 12
第三節 資料分析方式 14
第四章 研究結果 15
第一節 描述統計 15
第二節 假設檢定 16
第三節 主管不當督導影響部屬建言的情緒歷程:檢視干擾式中介效果 19
第五章 討論與建議 21
第一節 研究發現與理論意涵 21
第二節 管理意涵 22
第二節 研究限制與未來研究建議 23
參考文獻 25
附錄 32
參考文獻 References
參考文獻
Isaacson, W.(2011)。賈伯斯傳(廖月娟、姜雪影與謝凱蒂譯)。臺北市:天下遠見出版股份有限公司。(原作2011年出版)
林守紀、周麗芳、任金剛、曾春榮 (2017)。 員工建言行為: 回顧與未來。人力資源管理學報, 17(1),頁 1-33。
紀乃文、石蕙菱、郭智涵 (2015)。 建言或諫言? 探討員工正, 負向心情與建言行為的關係: 轉換型與交易型領導的干擾效果。管理學報, 32(1),頁 43-68。
紀乃文、張火燦、黃仙麗 (2012)。 工作場域中的情感雙歧: 探討服務人員情感雙歧與其服務品質及工作滿意度之關係。人力資源管理學報, 12(1),頁 1-22。
胡昌亞、鄭瑩妮 (2014)。 不當督導研究回顧與前瞻。中華心理學刊, 56(2),頁 191-214。
梁欣光、陳彥君 (2018)。 揮之不去: 以反芻思考認知的觀點連結不當督導與部屬長期負向情感狀態。人力資源管理學報, 18(1),頁 35-56。
郭建志、蔡育菁 (2012)。 組織挫折與職場退縮: 主管不當督導與工作內外控之研究。中華心理學刊, 54(3),頁 293-313。
郭嘉博、余明助、林豪傑、王議賢 (2015)。 影響部屬知覺不當督導的原因: 心理契約違背觀點。人力資源管理學報, 15(2),頁 25-45。
彭台光、高月慈、林鉦棽 (2006)。 管理研究中的共同方法變異:問題本質、影響、測試和補救。管理學報, 23(1),頁 77-98。
賴淑女、陳淑貞、王孝文 (2014)。 主管不當督導與部屬負向情感關係之研究: 以情緒智力為干擾變數。多國籍企業管理評論, 8(S),頁 23-35。
蘇雨純(2018)。以情感事件理論探討不當督導與不當員工行為之關係:知覺相似性的調節效果。國立政治大學企業管理研究所(MBA學位學程),台北市。
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological bulletin, 103(3), 411.
Aryee, S., Sun, L.-Y., Chen, Z. X. G., & Debrah, Y. A. (2008). Abusive supervision and contextual performance: The mediating role of emotional exhaustion and the moderating role of work unit structure. Management and Organization Review, 4(3), 393-411.
Baas, M., De Dreu, C. K., & Nijstad, B. A. (2008). A meta-analysis of 25 years of mood-creativity research: Hedonic tone, activation, or regulatory focus? Psychological bulletin, 134(6), 779.
Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (2000). Select on conscientiousness and emotional stability. Handbook of principles of organizational behavior, 15, 28.
Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Judge, T. A. (2001). Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: What do we know and where do we go next? International Journal of Selection and assessment, 9(1‐2), 9-30.
Bernerth, J. B., & Aguinis, H. (2016). A critical review and best‐practice recommendations for control variable usage. Personnel Psychology, 69(1), 229-283.
Bono, J. E., Foldes, H. J., Vinson, G., & Muros, J. P. (2007). Workplace emotions: The role of supervision and leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(5), 1357.
Bowling, N. A., & Michel, J. S. (2011). Why do you treat me badly? The role of attributions regarding the cause of abuse in subordinates' responses to abusive supervision. Work & Stress, 25(4), 309-320.
Burton, J. P., Taylor, S. G., & Barber, L. K. (2014). Understanding internal, external, and relational attributions for abusive supervision. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(6), 871-891.
Chi, N.-W., Chang, H.-T., & Huang, H.-L. (2015). Can personality traits and daily positive mood buffer the harmful effects of daily negative mood on task performance and service sabotage? A self-control perspective. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 131, 1-15.
Chi, N.-W., & Ho, T.-R. (2014). Understanding when leader negative emotional expression enhances follower performance: The moderating roles of follower personality traits and perceived leader power. Human relations, 67(9), 1051-1072.
Chi, S.-C. S., & Liang, S.-G. (2013). When do subordinates' emotion-regulation strategies matter? Abusive supervision, subordinates' emotional exhaustion, and work withdrawal. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(1), 125-137.
Dupré, K. E., Inness, M., Connelly, C. E., Barling, J., & Hoption, C. (2006). Workplace aggression in teenage part-time employees. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(5), 987.
Dyne, L. V., Ang, S., & Botero, I. C. (2003). Conceptualizing employee silence and employee voice as multidimensional constructs. Journal of management studies, 40(6), 1359-1392.
Fisher, C. D. (2000). Mood and emotions while working: missing pieces of job satisfaction? Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 21(2), 185-202.
Forward, S., & Frazier, D. (1998). Emotional blackmail: When the people in your life use fear, obligation, and guilt to manipulate you: Harper Collins.
Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American psychologist, 56(3), 218.
Frijda, N. H., Kuipers, P., & ter Schure, E. (1989). Relations Among Emotion, Appraisal, and Emotional Action Readiness. Journal of personality and social psychology, 57(2), 212-228.
Fritz, C., & Sonnentag, S. (2009). Antecedents of day-level proactive behavior: A look at job stressors and positive affect during the workday. Journal of Management, 35(1), 94-111.
George, J. M. (2011). Dual tuning: A minimum condition for understanding affect in organizations? Organizational Psychology Review, 1(2), 147-164.
George, J. M., & King, E. B. (2007). Potential Pitfalls of Affect Convergence in Teams: Functions and Dysfunctions of Group Affective Tone. In E. A. Mannix, M. A. Neale, & Anderson (Eds.), Affect and Groups. Research on Managing Groups and Teams (Vol. 10, pp. 97-123). New York: Elsevier.
George, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2007). Dual tuning in a supportive context: Joint contributions of positive mood, negative mood, and supervisory behaviors to employee creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 605-622.
Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. Personality psychology in Europe, 7(1), 7-28.
Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of personality and social psychology, 85(2), 348.
Higgins, E. T. (1996). The" self digest": self-knowledge serving self-regulatory functions. Journal of personality and social psychology, 71(6), 1062.
Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American psychologist, 52(12), 1280.
Higgins, E. T., Shah, J., & Friedman, R. (1997). Emotional responses to goal attainment: strength of regulatory focus as moderator. Journal of personality and social psychology, 72(3), 515.
Hoobler, J. M., & Brass, D. J. (2006). Abusive supervision and family undermining as displaced aggression. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(5), 1125.
Hoobler, J. M., & Hu, J. (2013). A model of injustice, abusive supervision, and negative affect. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(1), 256-269.
Ilies, R., Scott, B. A., & Judge, T. A. (2006). The interactive effects of personal traits and experienced states on intraindividual patterns of citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 49(3), 561-575.
Javaras, K. N., Schaefer, S. M., Van Reekum, C. M., Lapate, R. C., Greischar, L. L., Bachhuber, D. R., . . . Davidson, R. J. (2012). Conscientiousness predicts greater recovery from negative emotion. Emotion, 12(5), 875.
Jensen-Campbell, L. A., Knack, J. M., Waldrip, A. M., & Campbell, S. D. (2007). Do Big Five personality traits associated with self-control influence the regulation of anger and aggression? Journal of Research in Personality, 41(2), 403-424.
Jensen-Campbell, L. A., Rosselli, M., Workman, K. A., Santisi, M., Rios, J. D., & Bojan, D. (2002). Agreeableness, conscientiousness, and effortful control processes. Journal of Research in Personality, 36(5), 476-489.
Kramer, R. M. (2006). The great intimidators. Harvard Business Review, 84(2), 88-96, 164.
Lazarus, R. S. (2001). Relational meaning and discrete emotions.
Lebel, R. D. (2017). Moving beyond fight and flight: A contingent model of how the emotional regulation of anger and fear sparks proactivity. Academy of Management Review, 42(2), 190-206.
Lee, S., Yun, S., & Srivastava, A. (2013). Evidence for a curvilinear relationship between abusive supervision and creativity in South Korea. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(5), 724-731.
Lerner, J. S., Li, Y., Valdesolo, P., & Kassam, K. S. (2015). Emotion and decision making. Annual review of psychology, 66, 799-823.
Liang, J., Farh, C. I., & Farh, J.-L. (2012). Psychological antecedents of promotive and prohibitive voice: A two-wave examination. Academy of Management Journal, 55(1), 71-92.
Lin, S.-H. J., & Johnson, R. E. (2015). A suggestion to improve a day keeps your depletion away: Examining promotive and prohibitive voice behaviors within a regulatory focus and ego depletion framework. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(5), 1381.
Liu, D.,Zhang, Z. &Wang, M. (2018). Mono-level and multilevel mediated moderation and moderated mediation: Theorization and test. In Chen, X. P., and Shen, W. (Eds.) Organizational andManagement Research Methods (in Chinese, 3rdedition).Beijing: Peking University Press.
Lockwood, P., Jordan, C. H., & Kunda, Z. (2002). Motivation by positive or negative role models: regulatory focus determines who will best inspire us. Journal of personality and social psychology, 83(4), 854.
Mackey, J. D., Frieder, R. E., Brees, J. R., & Martinko, M. J. (2015). Abusive supervision: A meta-analysis and empirical review. Journal of Management, 43(6), 1940-1965.
Martinko, M. J., Harvey, P., Brees, J. R., & Mackey, J. (2013). A review of abusive supervision research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(S1), S120-S137.
Matta, F. K., Erol‐Korkmaz, H. T., Johnson, R. E., & Biçaksiz, P. (2014). Significant work events and counterproductive work behavior: The role of fairness, emotions, and emotion regulation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(7), 920-944.
McCrae, R. R., & Löckenhoff, C. E. (2010). Self-regulation and the five-factor model of personality traits.
Mikula, G. (1993). On the experience of injustice. European review of social psychology, 4(1), 223-244.
Mitchell, M. S., & Ambrose, M. L. (2007). Abusive supervision and workplace deviance and the moderating effects of negative reciprocity beliefs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 1159.
Ng, W. (2011). Prior negative mood buffers some individuals from subsequent negative events: The moderating role of neuroticism. Psychology, 2(05), 445.
Oh, J. K., & Farh, C. I. (2017). An emotional process theory of how subordinates appraise, experience, and respond to abusive supervision over time. Academy of Management Review, 42(2), 207-232.
Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4), 531-544.
Preacher, K. J., Curran, P. J., & Bauer, D. J. (2006). Computational tools for probing interactions in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. Journal of educational and behavioral statistics, 31(4), 437-448.
Qin, X., DiRenzo, M. S., Xu, M., & Duan, Y. (2014). When do emotionally exhausted employees speak up? Exploring the potential curvilinear relationship between emotional exhaustion and voice. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(7), 1018-1041.
Rupp, D. E., Silke McCance, A., Spencer, S., & Sonntag, K. (2008). Customer (in) justice and emotional labor: The role of perspective taking, anger, and emotional regulation. Journal of Management, 34(5), 903-924.
Siemer, M., Mauss, I., & Gross, J. J. (2007). Same situation--different emotions: how appraisals shape our emotions. Emotion, 7(3), 592.
Smith, C. A., & Ellsworth, P. C. (1985). Patterns of cognitive appraisal in emotion. Journal of personality and social psychology, 48(4), 813.
Tepper, B. J. (2000). Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 43(2), 178-190.
Tepper, B. J. (2007). Abusive supervision in work organizations: Review, synthesis, and research agenda. Journal of Management, 33(3), 261-289.
Tepper, B. J., Carr, J. C., Breaux, D. M., Geider, S., Hu, C., & Hua, W. (2009). Abusive supervision, intentions to quit, and employees’ workplace deviance: A power/dependence analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109(2), 156-167.
Tepper, B. J., Duffy, M. K., & Breaux-Soignet, D. M. (2012). Abusive supervision as political activity: Distinguishing impulsive and strategic expressions of downward hostility. In Politics in organizations (pp. 225-246): Routledge.
Tepper, B. J., Moss, S. E., & Duffy, M. K. (2011). Predictors of abusive supervision: Supervisor perceptions of deep-level dissimilarity, relationship conflict, and subordinate performance. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 279-294.
Tepper, B. J., Simon, L., & Park, H. M. (2017). Abusive supervision. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 123-152.
Tsai, W.-C., Chen, C.-C., & Liu, H.-L. (2007). Test of a model linking employee positive moods and task performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1570.
Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological review, 92(4), 548.
Xu, E., Huang, X., Lam, C. K., & Miao, Q. (2012). Abusive supervision and work behaviors: The mediating role of LMX. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(4), 531-543.
Zellars, K. L., Perrewé, P. L., Hochwarter, W. A., & Anderson, K. S. (2006). The interactive effects of positive affect and conscientiousness on strain. Journal of occupational health psychology, 11(3), 281.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus:永不公開 not available
校外 Off-campus:永不公開 not available

您的 IP(校外) 位址是 3.230.154.90
論文開放下載的時間是 校外不公開

Your IP address is 3.230.154.90
This thesis will be available to you on Indicate off-campus access is not available.

紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 永不公開 not available

QR Code