博碩士論文 etd-0622114-205929 詳細資訊


[回到前頁查詢結果 | 重新搜尋]

姓名 田志雄(Chih-Hsiung Tien) 電子郵件信箱 E-mail 資料不公開
畢業系所 企業管理學系研究所(Business Management)
畢業學位 碩士(Master) 畢業時期 102學年第2學期
論文名稱(中) 企業合作信任要素之研究
論文名稱(英) The research in elements of enterprise collaboration trust.
檔案
  • etd-0622114-205929.pdf
  • 本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
    請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
    論文使用權限

    紙本論文:立即公開

    電子論文:使用者自訂權限:校內 1 年後、校外 1 年後公開

    論文語文/頁數 中文/82
    統計 本論文已被瀏覽 5563 次,被下載 919 次
    摘要(中) 企業為快速獲得創新成果,並節省其投入成本,降低無效創新之風險,於業界最普遍的選擇方式為企業聯盟合作,透過開放式創新的精神及合作模式,將企業的資源共享,形成互補性資產,進而提昇企業創新能力。
    企業聯盟合作最重要的關鍵成功因素,乃為聯盟的信任基礎,在互相信任的環境中,才能進行最有效且順暢的溝通,建立共識並形成共同的價值觀,以產生綜效。然而,所謂信任乃一模糊的概念,為一無法量化的情感指標,但企業營運的準則及策略佈局,無法單靠情感,便決定形成聯盟的合作模式,仍得經過市場資訊的整合,以獲得具體的評估結果,成為決策的基礎。
    本研究透過深度訪談企業的重要幹部、專案決策及企業經營者,探討企業進行聯盟合作的過程,評估各項要素分析以構成信任的基礎來源。經歸納所得的結論呈現,欲形成企業聯盟,需評估夥伴企業的各項能力,其能力可區分為「外顯實力」及「隱性能力」,其概念是由知識性質具有「內隱性」與「外顯性」兩大類的觀念衍伸而來,形成企業合作的信任基礎來源。而且此信任基礎會因不同的合作時期,透過不同型態的能力條件支持信任的存在與發展。另外亦發現,外顯實力與隱性能力具有因果關係,會相互影響及回饋,而其綜合評估的結果成為聯盟企業的信任基礎來源。
    誠如本研究的結果,經營者可參考企業聯盟信任基礎的來源,並依此思維評估自身及聯盟夥伴的優劣勢,成為進行聯盟合作行為初期的評估工具及如何擴展聯盟夥伴的信任程度,促成聯盟有效的合作,以期發展為優良商譽及永續經營的企業。
    摘要(英) Enterprise alliance cooperation is the most popular choice for accessing innovative, cost saving, and reducing the risk of ineffective innovation. With a concept of open innovation and co-operation model, enterprise sharing their resources, forming the complementary assets and enhance innovation capability.
    The trust is the most important key success factors of Enterprise alliances. The environment of mutual trust must set up before processing the most effective and smoothest communication, and reaching the consensus and building the shared values to generate synergy. However, the trust is an ambiguous concept, an unquantifiable emotional indicator, the guidelines of business operations and strategy could not rely on emotional factors to form an alliance. It still has to go through the integration of market information to obtain specific assessment findings and becoming the basis for decision-making.
    This study based on in-depth interview important staffs, project decision maker and business owners to discuss the enterprise alliance, assessment item analysis of the underlying source of trust. The conclusion presented needed ability assessment for the potential partner, its ability can be divided into “Explicit Competence” and “Implicit Competence”, the concept is from character of knowledge include “Implicit” and “Explicit” to form the based trust of enterprise cooperation. And these based trusts support its existence and development though the types of ability conditions in different time periods. It was also found there is a causal connection in “Explicit Competence” and “Implicit Competence”, interrelate and response each other, the results of its comprehensive assessment became the source of the trust base of enterprise alliance.
    As a result of this study, the business owner can consult the source of the trust base of the enterprise alliances and assess their own and partner’s strengths and weaknesses, to be an assessment tool of alliance cooperation and develop trust between alliance partner in the initial stage to facilitate the effective alliance cooperation, and develop an excellent goodwill and sustainable business enterprise.
    關鍵字(中)
  • 商譽
  • 隱性能力
  • 外顯實力
  • 企業信任基礎
  • 企業聯盟合作
  • 關鍵字(英)
  • Implicit Competence
  • Enterprise Goodwill
  • Enterprise alliance corporation
  • Explicit Competence
  • Enterprise trust base
  • 論文目次 口試委員會論文審定書 i
    摘要 ii
    Abstract iii
    目錄 iv
    圖次 vi
    表次 vii
    第一章 緒論 1
    第一節 研究背景與研究動機 1
    第二節 研究目的及研究問題 7
    第二章 文獻探討 8
    第一節 開放式創新 8
    第二節 組織間信任 12
    第三節 成功合作的關鍵因素 14
    第三章 研究方法 16
    第一節 研究程序設計 16
    第二節 訪談大綱的建立過程 18
    第三節 資料搜集 19
    第四節 資料分析 23
    第五節 信度及效度 24
    第四章 研究結果與分析 26
    第一節 研究結果 26
    第二節 訪談內容重點摘要描述及分析 29
    第五章 結論與建議 42
    第一節 結論 42
    第二節 建議 47
    參考文獻 50
    附錄-訪談內容 55
    參考文獻 Ahuja, G. (2000). "Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study." Administrative science quarterly 45(3): 425-455.
    Anderson, J. C. and J. A. Narus (1990). "A model of distributor firm and manufacturer firm working partnerships." the journal of marketing: 42-58.
    Bessant, J., et al. (2005). "Managing innovation beyond the steady state." Technovation 25(12): 1366-1376.
    Blomqvist, K., et al. (2008). "The role of trust and contracts in the internationalization of technology-intensive Born Globals." Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 25(1): 123-135.
    Bougrain, F. and B. Haudeville (2002). "Innovation, collaboration and SMEs internal research capacities." Research Policy 31(5): 735-747.
    Bromiley, P. and J. Harris (2006). "Trust, transaction cost economics, and mechanisms." The Handbook of Trust Research: 124-143.
    Carmines, E. G. and R. A. Zeller (1979). Reliability and validity assessment, Sage.
    Chesbrough, H., et al. (2006). Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm, Oxford university press.
    Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology, Harvard Business Press.
    Clarke, A. E. (2006). "Feminisms, grounded theory, and situational analysis."
    Cohen, W. M. and D. A. Levinthal (1990). "Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation." Administrative science quarterly: 128-152.
    Colombo, M. G. and P. Garrone (1996). "Technological cooperative agreements and firm's R & D intensity. A note on causality relations." Research Policy 25(6): 923-932.
    Corbin, J. M. and A. Strauss (1990). "Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria." Qualitative sociology 13(1): 3-21.
    Cummings, L. L. and P. Bromiley (1996). "The organizational trust inventory (OTI)." Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research 302: 330.
    Faems, D., et al. (2005). "Interorganizational collaboration and innovation: toward a portfolio approach*." Journal of product innovation management 22(3): 238-250.
    Ferres, N., et al. (2004). "Co-worker trust as a social catalyst for constructive employee attitudes." Journal of Managerial Psychology 19(6): 608-622.
    Guba, E. G. and Y. S. Lincoln (1994). "Competing paradigms in qualitative research." Handbook of qualitative research 2: 163-194.
    Gulati, R. (1998). "Alliances and networks." Strategic management journal 19(4): 293-317.
    Hagedoorn, J. (1996). "Innovation and entrepreneurship: Schumpeter revisited." Industrial and Corporate Change 5(3): 883-896.
    Hyvärinen, L. (1990). "Innovativeness and its indicators in small-and medium-sized industrial enterprises." International Small Business Journal 9(1): 64-79.
    Jones, O. and F. Tilley (2003). Competitive advantage in SMEs: organising for innovation and change, Wiley.
    Kale, P., et al. (2002). "Alliance capability, stock market response, and long‐term alliance success: the role of the alliance function." Strategic management journal 23(8): 747-767.
    Kandiah, G. and S. Gossain (1998). "Reinventing value: The new business ecosystem." Strategy & Leadership 26(5): 28-33.
    Kasper-Fuehrera, E. C. and N. M. Ashkanasy (2001). "Communicating trustworthiness and building trust in interorganizational virtual organizations." Journal of Management 27(3): 235-254.
    Kramer, R. and T. Tyler (1996). "Trust in organisations." Frontiers of theory and research, Sage.
    Kumar, N., et al. (1993). "Conducting interorganizational research using key informants." Academy of management journal 36(6): 1633-1651.
    La Londe, B. (2002). "Insights: Who Can You Trust These Days?" Supply Chain Management Review 6(3): 9-12.
    La Londe, B. (2002). "Insights: Who Can You Trust These Days?" Supply Chain Management Review 6(3): 9-12.
    Laursen, K. and A. Salter (2005). "My precious. The role of appropriability strategies in shaping innovative performance." Danish Research Unit for Industrial Dynamics, Working Paper(05-02).
    Laursen, K. and A. Salter (2006). "Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms." Strategic management journal 27(2): 131-150.
    Lee, S., et al. (2010). "Open innovation in SMEs—An intermediated network model." Research Policy 39(2): 290-300.
    Miotti, L. and F. Sachwald (2003). "Co-operative R&D: why and with whom?: An integrated framework of analysis." Research Policy 32(8): 1481-1499.
    Miotti, L. and F. Sachwald (2003). "Co-operative R&D: why and with whom?: An integrated framework of analysis." Research Policy 32(8): 1481-1499.
    Mohnen, P. and C. Hoareau (2003). "What type of enterprise forges close links with universities and government labs? Evidence from CIS 2." Managerial and Decision Economics 24(2‐3): 133-145.
    Moore, J. F. (1993). "Predators and prey: a new ecology of competition." Harvard business review 71(3): 75-86.
    Morgan, R. M. and S. D. Hunt (1994). "The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing." the journal of marketing: 20-38.
    Morgan, R. M. and S. D. Hunt (1994). "The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing." the journal of marketing: 20-38.
    Narula, R. (2004). "R&D collaboration by SMEs: new opportunities and limitations in the face of globalisation." Technovation 24(2): 153-161.
    Narula, R. and J. Hagedoorn (1999). "Innovating through strategic alliances: moving towards international partnerships and contractual agreements." Technovation 19(5): 283-294.
    Nieto, M. J. and L. Santamaría (2007). "The importance of diverse collaborative networks for the novelty of product innovation." Technovation 27(6): 367-377.
    Parida, V., et al. (2012). "Inbound Open Innovation Activities in High‐Tech SMEs: The Impact on Innovation Performance." Journal of Small Business Management 50(2): 283-309.
    Pavitt, K. (1998). "Technologies, products and organization in the innovating firm: what Adam Smith tells us and Joseph Schumpeter doesn't." Industrial and Corporate Change 7(3): 433-452.
    Pittaway, L., et al. (2004). "Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence." International Journal of Management Reviews 5(3‐4): 137-168.
    Pullen, A. J., et al. (2012). "Open innovation in practice: goal complementarity and closed NPD networks to explain differences in innovation performance for SMEs in the medical devices sector." Journal of product innovation management 29(6): 917-934.
    Robinson, D. L. and C. P. Kish (2001). Core concepts in advanced practice nursing, Mosby Incorporated.
    Rothwell, R. and M. Dodgson (1994). "Innovation and size of firm." The handbook of industrial innovation: 310-324.
    San Martín-Rodríguez, L., et al. (2005). "The determinants of successful collaboration: a review of theoretical and empirical studies." Journal of interprofessional care 19(S1): 132-147.
    Smith, K. and F. Biley (1997). "Understanding grounded theory principles and evaluation." Nurse Researcher 4(3): 17-30.
    Smith, K. G., et al. (1995). "Intra-and interorganizational cooperation: Toward a research agenda." Academy of management journal 38(1): 7-23.
    Sparrowe, R. T., et al. (2001). "Social networks and the performance of individuals and groups." Academy of management journal 44(2): 316-325.
    Tushman, M. and D. Nadler (1986). "Organizing for innovation." California management review 28(3): 74-92.
    Van de Vrande, V., et al. (2009). "Open innovation in SMEs: Trends, motives and management challenges." Technovation 29(6): 423-437.
    Veryzer, R. W. (1998). "Discontinuous innovation and the new product development process." Journal of product innovation management 15(4): 304-321.
    Vidotto, G., et al. (2008). "Assessment of organizational trust: Italian adaptation and factorial validity of the organizational trust inventory." Social Indicators Research 88(3): 563-575.
    Wijnberg, N. M. and G. Gemser (2000). "Adding value to innovation: Impressionism and the transformation of the selection system in visual arts." Organization science 11(3): 323-329.
    Wimpenny, P. and J. Gass (2000). "Interviewing in phenomenology and grounded theory: is there a difference?" Journal of advanced nursing 31(6): 1485-1492.
    Young, L. and K. Daniel (2003). "Affectual trust in the workplace." International Journal of Human Resource Management 14(1): 139-155.
    Young-Ybarra, C. and M. Wiersema (1999). "Strategic flexibility in information technology alliances: The influence of transaction cost economics and social exchange theory." Organization science 10(4): 439-459.
    口試委員
  • 黃振聰 - 召集委員
  • 高瑞新 - 委員
  • 梁慧玫 - 指導教授
  • 口試日期 2014-06-24 繳交日期 2014-07-22

    [回到前頁查詢結果 | 重新搜尋]


    如有任何問題請與論文審查小組聯繫