博碩士論文 etd-0614105-031159 詳細資訊


[回到前頁查詢結果 | 重新搜尋]

姓名 曾齡?(Ling-Hsien Tseng) 電子郵件信箱 E-mail 資料不公開
畢業系所 企業管理學系研究所(Business Management)
畢業學位 碩士(Master) 畢業時期 93學年第2學期
論文名稱(中) 公司價值、資本結構與代理問題關係之研究
論文名稱(英) The empirical study of the relation among firm value, capital structure, and agency problems
檔案
  • etd-0614105-031159.pdf
  • 本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
    請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
    論文使用權限

    電子論文:校內一年後公開,校外永不公開

    論文語文/頁數 中文/75
    統計 本論文已被瀏覽 5563 次,被下載 32 次
    摘要(中) 公司型態下,企業的經營權與所有權分離,代理問題從中而生,當經理人與股東的利益不一致時,經理人不會重視公司的資本結構是否穩健,也不在乎投資案是否可以增加公司價值,只追求自己利益的最大化。以往的研究只探討公司價值與資本結構的關係,或是只探討代理問題與公司價值的關連性,實際上,這三者之間是相互牽動的,當經理人調整公司資本結構時,不但可以看出公司價值的變化,更可以降低代理成本,因此未能同時考慮到資本結構、代理問題與公司價值的相互連動關係,所得的結論容易有偏誤。本研究以1991∼2003年間台灣上市公司為研究對象,但排除銀行、證券、產險、壽險等公司,探討公司價值、資本結構與代理問題三者之間的關連性,主要採用聯立方程式之三階段最小平方估計法(Three-Stage Least Squares, 3SLS)來研究三者相互影響之效果。
      實證結果發現負債比例越高的公司,公司價值會因此降低,而代理成本越高的公司,公司價值也較低,但是代理問題可以藉由適當的舉債,以降低對公司價值的負向影響。而公司價值越高,代表資產利用率相對較高,但是,需預防公司獲利之後,經理人開始增加特權消費,裝潢豪華的辦公室、購買豪華轎車、增加薪資等,代理成本隨之而生,值得加以重視。若從產業來看,電子業公司的負債比例影響公司價值的程度較大,即負債比例過高,會降低公司的價值,但非電子業的公司,適當的增加負債比例可以降低代理問題對於公司價值的影響。此外,有形資產比率低時,更能透過舉債降低代理問題對於公司價值的影響,因台灣許多公司所面臨的,是投資不足的問題,而適當的舉債,讓公司可以作最佳的投資,反而會提升公司的價值。
    摘要(英) Corporations are subject to agency problems resulting from the separation of ownership and control. When the managers and shareholders’ interests are not consistent, managers will not care whether capital structure is stable, and furthermore will not mind if the project would improve firm value or not. The only thing managers concern about is to maximize their own benefit. Previous work only discusses the relation between firm value and capital structure, or the connection between agency problems and firm value. However, capital structure, agency problems and firm value are multi-connected. When managers adjust firm’s capital structure, firm value changes and agency costs decreases. This research examines the relation among firm value, capital structure, and agency problems of Taiwan listed companies from 1991 to 2003, excluding banks, securities, and insurance company. We address the potentially endogenous relation among these variables by estimating a three-stage least squares regression model.
      The empirical results show that the higher the debt ratio, the lower the firm value, and the higher the agency costs, the lower the firm value. Nevertheless, raising debt can mitigate the effect of agency problems on firm value. The higher firm value implies the better asset utilization. However, after firms’ gaining profit, managers might abuse discretionary expenses, such as luxurious office, cars, and upper salaries leading to serious agency costs. In the industry aspect, debt ratio of electronic industry hurts firm value. But in the non-electronic industry, debt can mitigate the effect of agency problems, especially for firms with low tangible asset ratio, because many companies in Taiwan are facing underinvestment. Raising debt will force firms to select the best portfolio and then increase the firm value.
    關鍵字(中)
  • 代理成本
  • 公司價值
  • 資本結構
  • 關鍵字(英)
  • firm value
  • capital structure
  • agency costs
  • 論文目次 第一章 緒論 1
     第一節 研究動機 1
     第二節 研究目的 2
     第三節 研究架構 3
    第二章 文獻探討 4
     第一節 公司價值的相關研究 4
     第二節 資本結構的相關研究 9
     第三節 代理成本的相關研究 15
    第三章 研究方法 20
     第一節 研究樣本 20
     第二節 變數定義 21
     第三節 實證模式 24
    第四章 實證分析 26
     第一節 敘述統計量分析 26
     第二節 相關分析 28
     第三節 一般迴歸分析 34
     第四節 三階段最小平方法 40
     第五節 分組比較 50
    第五章 結論與建議 60
    參考文獻 62
     中文部分 62
     英文部分 63
    參考文獻 中文部分
    李詩將,2001,「台灣上市公司所有權結構、資本結構與公司績效間相關性研究」,高雄第一科技大學金融營運所碩士論文
    周淑卿、吳欽杉、陳安琳,2004,「電子資訊產業與非電子資訊產業之研究發展支出、股權結構與公司績效之關聯性研究 」,臺北科技大學學報,第37-2期,267-288
    柯莉莉,2002,「成長機會與公司融資決策及股利政策關聯性之研究」,國立中山大學企業管理研究所碩士論文
    陳柏融,2003,「股權結構、監理機制與公司價值之研究- 以台灣上市公司為例」,國立中山大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文
    葉銀華、邱顯比,1996,「資本結構、股權結構和公司價值關聯性之實證研究:代理成本理論」,臺大管理論叢,第七卷第二期,57-90

    英文部分
    Ang, J. S., R. A. Cole, and J. W. Lin, 2000, Agency costs and ownership structure, Journal of Finance, 55 (1), 81-106.
    Baber, W. R., S. N. Janakiraman, and S. H. Kang, 1996, Investment opportunities and the structure of executive compensation, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 21, 297-318.
    Bowen, R. M., L. Daley, and C. Huber, 1982, Leverage measures and industrial classification: review and additional evidence, Financial Management, 11, 10-20.
    Bradley, M., G. Jarrell, and E. H. Kim, 1984, On the existence of an optimal capital structure: theory and evidence, Journal of Finance, 39, 857-880.
    Brigham, E. F., 1995, Fundamentals of financial management, 7th ed., The Dryden Press.
    Chung, K. H., 1993, Asset characteristics and corporate debt policy: an empirical test, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 20(1), 83-98.
    Claessens, S., S. Djankov, and L. H. P. Lang, 2000, The separation of ownership and control in East Asian corporations, Journal of Financial Economics, 58, 81-112.
    Coughlan, A. and R. Schmidt, 1985, Executive compensation, management turnover, and firm performance: an empirical investigation, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 7, 43–66.
    DeAngelo, H. and R. W. Masulis, 1980, Optimal capital structure under corporate and personal taxation, Journal of Financial Economics, 8, 3-29.
    Demsetz, H. and B. Villalonga, 2001, Ownership structure and corporate performance, Journal of Corporate Finance, 7, 209-233.
    Demsetz, H. and K. Lehn, 1985, The structure of corporate ownership: causes and consequences, Journal of Political Economy, 93, 1155-1177.
    Dunn, D. J., 1987, Directors aren’t doing their jobs, Fortune (March), 117–119.
    Fama, E. F. and M. Jensen, 1983, Separation of ownership and control, Journal of Law and Economics, 26, 301-325.
    Fama, E. F., 1980, Agency problems and the theory of the firm, Journal of Political Economy, 88, 288-307.
    Faulkender, M. and M. A. Petersen, 2003, Does the source of capital affect capital structure? Working paper series, Washington University, St. Louis - John M. Olin School of Business and Northwestern University - Kellogg School of Management.
    Flannery, M., 1986, Asymmetric information and risky debt maturity choice, Journal of Finance, 41, 19–37.
    Friend, I. and L. Lang, 1988, An empirical test of the impact of managerial self-interest on corporate capital structure, Journal of Finance, 43, 271-281.
    Gaver, J. J., and K. M. Gaver, 1993, Additional evidence on the association between the investment opportunity set and corporate financing, dividend and compensation policies, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 16, 125-161.
    Gay, G. D., and J. Nam, 1998, The underinvestment problem and corporate derivatives use, Financial Management, 27, 53-69.
    Graham, J. R., 2000, How big are the tax benefits of debt?, Journal of Finance, 55, 1901-1941.
    Graham, J., M. Lemmon, and J. Schallheim, 1998, Debt, leases, taxes and the endogeneity of corporate tax status, Journal of Finance, 53, 131-162.
    Harvey, C. R., K. V. Lins, and A. H. Roper, 2004, The effect of capital structure when expected agency costs are extreme, Journal of Financial Economics, 74, 3-30.
    Hermalin, B., and M. Weisbach, 1988, The determinants of board composition, Rand Journal of Economics, 19, 589–606.
    Hovakimian, A., T. Opler, and S. Titman, 2001, The debt-equity choice, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 36 (1), 1-24.
    Jensen, G. R., D. P. Solberg, and T. S. Zorn, 1992, Simultaneous determination of insider ownership, debt, and dividend policies, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 27, 247-263.
    Jensen, M. C. and W. H. Meckling, 1976, Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and capital structure, Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-360.
    Jensen, M.C., 1986, Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers, American Economic Review, 76, 323-339.
    Kallapur, S. and M. A. Trombley, 1999, The association between investment opportunity set proxies and realized growth, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 26, 505-519.
    Kim, W. S. and E. H. Sorensen, 1986, Evidence on the impact of the agency costs of debt on corporate debt policy, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 21 (2), 131-144.
    Lang, L., E. Ofek, and R. M. Stulz, 1996, Leverage, investment, and firm growth, Journal of Financial Economics, 40 (1), 3-29.
    Leland, H. and D. Pyle, 1977, Informational asymmetries, financial structure, and financial intermediation, Journal of Finance, 32, 371–387.
    Lemmon, M. L. and K.V. Lins, 2003, Ownership structure, corporate governance, and firm value: evidence from the East Asian financial crisis, Journal of Finance, 58, 1445-1468.
    Lipton, M. and J. Lorsch, 1992, A modest proposal for improved corporate governance, Business Lawyer, 48, 59–77.
    MacKie-Mason, J. K., 1990, Do firms care who provides their financing?, Journal of Finance, 45, 1471-1495.
    Marsh, P., 1982, The choice between equity and debt: an empirical study, Journal of Finance, 37, 121-144.
    McConnell, J. J. and H. Servaes, 1995, Equity ownership and the two faces of debt, Journal of Financial Economics, 39 (1), 131-157.
    Mehran, H., 1995, Executive compensation structure, ownership and firm performance, Journal of Financial Economics, 38(2), 163-184.
    Mohd, M. A., L. G. Perry, and J. N. Rimbey, 1988, The impact of ownership structure on corporate debt policy: a time-series cross-sectional analysis, The Financial Review, 33, 85-98.
    Morck, R., A. Shleifer, and R. Vishny, 1988, Management ownership and market valuation: an empirical analysis, Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 293-315.
    Myers, S. C. and N. S. Majluf, 1984, Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have, Journal of Financial Economics, 13(2), 187-221.
    Myers, S. C., 1977, Determinants of corporate borrowing, Journal of Financial Economics, 5(2), 147-176.
    Myers, S. C., 1984, The capital structure puzzle, Journal of Finance, 39, 575-592.
    Olson, M., 1982, The rise and decline of nations: economic growth, stagflation, and social rigidities, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
    Pinegar, J. M. and L. Wilbricht, 1989, What managers think of capital structure theory: a survey, Financial Management, 18(4), 82-91.
    Rajan, R. and L. Zingales, 1995, What do we know about capital structure? Some evidence from international data, Journal of Finance, 50, 1421-1460.
    Roper, A., 2001, Leverage in young public firms: evidence of life cycle in capital structure, Unpublished Working Paper, University of Wisconsin, Madison.
    Ross, S. A., 1977, The determination of financial structure: the incentive-signaling approach, Bell Journal of Economics, 8, 23–40.
    Shaw, M. E., 1981, Group dynamics: the psychology of small group behavior, McGraw-Hill, New York.
    Shin, H. H. and Y. H. Kim, 2002, Agency costs and efficiency of business capital investment: evidence from quarterly capital expenditures, Journal of Corporate Finance, 8, 139-158.
    Singh, M. and W. N. Davidson III, 2003, Agency costs, ownership structure and corporate governance mechanisms, Journal of Banking & Finance 27 (5), 793-816.
    Skinner, D. J., 1993, The investment opportunity set and accounting procedure choice, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 16, 407-443.
    Smith Jr., and C. W., R. L. Watts, 1992, The investment opportunity set and corporate financing, dividend and compensation policies, Journal of Financial Economics, 32, 263–292.
    Stulz, R. M., 1988, Managerial Discretion and Optimal Financing Policies, Journal of Financial Economics, 26, 3-25.
    Stulz, R.M., 1990, Managerial discretion and optimal financing policies, Journal of Financial Economics, 26, 3-27.
    Titman, S. and R. Wessels, 1988, The determinants of capital structure choice, Journal of Finance, 43, 1-19.
    Titman, S., 1984, The effect of capital structure on a firm’s liquidation decision, Journal of Financial Economics, 13, 137–151.
    Wald, J. K., 1999, How firm characteristics affect capital structure: an international comparison, Journal of Financial Research, 22 (2), 161-187.
    Williamson, O. E., 1988, Corporate finance and corporate governance, Journal of Finance, 43, 567-591.
    Yermack, D., 1996, Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors, Journal of Financial Economics, 40, 185–211.
    口試委員
  • 張瑞當 - 召集委員
  • 王子真 - 委員
  • 陳安琳 - 指導教授
  • 口試日期 2005-06-03 繳交日期 2005-06-14

    [回到前頁查詢結果 | 重新搜尋]


    如有任何問題請與論文審查小組聯繫