Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0511120-152405 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0511120-152405
論文名稱
Title
知覺程序公平對團隊學習行為的影響:檢視團隊信任的中介角色及主管與部屬關係品質差異的干擾效果
The Effect of Procedural Fairness on Team Learning Behavior: Mediating Role of Team Trust and Moderating Effect of Leader-member Exchange Differentiation
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
66
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2020-06-29
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2020-06-11
關鍵字
Keywords
知覺程序公平、團隊信任、主管與部屬關係品質(LMX)、社會交換理論、主管與部屬關係品質差異(LMXD)、團隊學習行為
Team Trust, Social Exchange Theory, Procedural Fairness, Leader-member Exchange Differentiation (LMXD), Team Learning Behavior, Leader-member Exchange (LMX)
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5779 次,被下載 34
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5779 times, has been downloaded 34 times.
中文摘要
在企業經營環境的劇烈變遷過程中,企業的競合關係更為密切,因此領導者逐漸開始重視團隊的學習行為,期許透過學習行為中知識與技術分享,讓企業朝多元方向成長與創新,以迅速回應外在的環境的變化。
本研究主要探討知覺程序公平、團隊信任、團隊學習行為與主管與部屬關係品質差異之間的關係,並以社會交換理論為基礎,探討團隊信任在知覺程序公平對團隊學習行為的的中介效果,以及主管與部屬關係品質差異在知覺程序公平對團隊信任的調節效果。
研究問卷採兩階段方式進行調查,蒐集資料來自臺灣的製造業、資訊科技業、服務業、運輸物流業、金融保險業、批發零售業等產業,並以單位層級進行資料分析。有效樣本包含94家公司,146個單位,共667份問卷。研究統計方法包含信度分析、評分者間信度分析、驗證性因素分析、相關分析與層級迴歸分析等。
分析結果顯示,本研究之研究架構模型適配度良好,且實證結果如下:(1) 知覺程序公平與團隊信任具有正向關係;(2)團體信任與團體學習行為具有正向關係;(3) 團體信任在知覺程序公平與團體學習行為之間具有中介效果;(4)主管與部屬關係品質差異對知覺程序公平與團體信任的關係具有負向調節效果。
根據分析結果,團隊應重視知覺程序公平,廣納團隊成員共同參與決策,驅動成員對團隊的信任感,並且鞏固主管與部屬的關係品質,進一步提升團隊學習行為。另外,也在本研究最後提出實務意涵與未來研究建議,供後續企業團隊與研究者進行參考。
Abstract
In the process of dramatic changes in the company’s operating environment, the company has more competitive and cooperative relationships, so leaders gradually begin to pay attention to the learning behavior of the team, hoping to share the knowledge and technology in the learning behavior, so that the company can grow and innovate in multiple directions to quickly respond to changes in the external environment.
This research mainly explores the relationship between procedural fairness, team trust, team learning behavior and LMXD. Based on the social exchange theory, this study also explores the mediating effect of team trust in procedural fairness on team learning behavior, and the moderating effect of LMXD in procedural fairness on team trust.
The research questionnaire is conducted in a two-stage survey. The collected data comes from major industries in Taiwan. And the unit of analysis in this research is at the group level. The valid sample was collected from 667 valid questionnaires in 146 units of 94 companies. The research statistical methods include reliability analysis, inter-rater reliability analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, correlation analysis and regression analysis.
The analysis results are as follows: (1) Procedural fairness has a positive relationship with team trust; (2) Team trust has a positive relationship with team learning behavior; (3) Team trust has a mediating effect between procedural fairness and team learning behavior; (4) LMXD has a negative adjusting effect on the relationship between procedural fairness and team trust.
According to the analysis results, the team should pay attention to procedural fairness, and through joint participation in decision-making, to encourage members to have a sense of trust in the team, and further improve team learning behavior. In addition, the practical implications and future research suggestions are also put forward at the end of this study for the reference of enterprise teams and researchers.
目次 Table of Contents
論文審定書 i
誌 謝 ii
中文摘要 iii
Abstract iv
目 錄 v
圖 次 vi
表 次 vii
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 3
第二章 文獻探討 4
第一節 社會交換理論 4
第二節 變數介紹 6
第三節 假說推導 14
第三章 研究方法 18
第一節 研究架構 18
第二節 研究樣本 19
第三節 研究假說彙整 24
第四節 操作型定義與衡量方式 25
第五節 統計分析方法 30
第四章 實證結果分析 32
第一節 原始資料整合正當性檢驗 32
第二節 模型檢測 33
第三節 相關分析 34
第四節 層級迴歸分析 34
第五章 結論與建議 43
第一節 研究分析結果 43
第二節 研究意涵 46
第三節 研究限制與未來研究建議 48
參考文獻 49
參考文獻 References
一、英文文獻
Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. Advance in Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 267-299. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park: Sage.
Alexander, S. and Ruderman, M. (1987). The role of procedural and distributive justice in organizational behavior. Social Justice Research, 1, 177-198.
Amason, A. C. (1996). Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: Resolving a paradox for top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 39(1), 123-148.
Amason, A. C., & Mooney, A. C. (1999). The effects of past performance on top management team conflict in strategic decision making. International Journal of Conflict Management, 10(4), 340-359.
Anand, S., Vidyarthi, P. R., & Park, H. S. (2016). LMX differentiation: Understanding relational leadership at individual and group levels. The Oxford Handbook of Leader-member Exchange, 263–291.
Anderson, J. C., & Narus, J. A. (1990). A model of distributor firm and manufacturer firm working partnerships. The Journal of Marketing, 42-58.
Argote, L., Gruenfeld, D., & Naquin, C. (1999). Group learning in organizations. Groups at work: Advances in theory and research, 369-411.
Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1978). Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Bauwens, R., Audenaert, M., Huisman, J., & Decramer, A. (2019). Performance management fairness and burnout: implications for organizational citizenship behaviors. Studies in Higher Education, 44(3), 584-598.
Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: Wiley.
Bradach, J. L., & Eccles, R. G. (1989). Price, authority and trust: From ideal types to plural forms. Annual Review of Sociology, 15, 97-118.
Breuer, C., Hüffmeier, J., Hibben, F., & Hertel, G. (2020). Trust in teams: A taxonomy of perceived trustworthiness factors and risk-taking behaviors in face-to-face and virtual teams. Human Relations, 73(1), 3-34.
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Testing Structural Equation Models, 136-162.
Bunderson, J. S., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2003). Management team learning orientation and business unit performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3), 552–560.
Carmeli, A., Tishler, A., & Edmondson, A. C. (2012). CEO relational leadership and strategic decision quality in top management teams: The role of team trust and learning from failure. Strategic Organization, 10(1), 31-54.
Chen, M. J., Lin, H.-C., & Michel, J. G. (2010). Navigating in a hypercompetitive environment: The roles of action aggressiveness and TMT integration. Strategic Management Journal, 31(13), 1410-1430.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Eribaum.
Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O., & Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: a meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied psychology, 86(3), 425-445.
Colquitt, JA. (2004). Does the justice of the one interact with the justice of the many? Reactions to procedural justice in teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89 (4), 633-646.
Cosier, R. A. and Schwenk, C. R. (1990). Agreement and thinking alike: Ingredients for poor decisions. Academy of Management Perspectives, 4(1), 69-74.
Costigan, R. D., Iiter, S. S., & Berman, J. J. (1998). A multi-dimensional study of trust in organizations. Journal of Managerial Issues, 303-317.
Dansereau, F. Jr., Graen, G., & Haga, W. J. (1975). A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations: A longitudinal investigation of the role-making process. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13(1), 46-78.
Dechant, K., Marsick, V. J. (1993). Team Learning Survey and Facilitator Guide. King of Prussia, PA: Organization Design and Development.
Doney, P. M., Cannon, J. P., & Mullen, M. R. (1998). Understanding the influence of national culture on the development of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 601-620.
Driscoll, J. W. (1978). Trust and participation in organizational decision making as predictors of satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 21(1), 44-56.
Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychology safety and leaning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 350-383.
Edmondson, A. C. (2002). The local and variegated nature of learning in organizations: A group-level perspective. Organization Science, 13(2), 128-146.
Edmondson, A. C. (2003). Speaking up in the operating room: How team leaders promote learning in interdisciplinary action teams. Journal of Management studies, 40(6), 1419-1452.
Edmondson, A. C., Bohmer, R. M. & Pisano, G. P. (2001). Disrupted routines: Team learning and new technology implementation in hospitals. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 685-716.
Ellis, A. P., Hollenbeck, J. R., Illgen D. R., Porter, C. O. L. H., West, B. J., & Moon, H. (2003). Team learning: Collectively connecting the dots. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 821-835.
Emelah Gentle, E., & Akhigbe, O. J. (2020). Team trust and employee affective commitment in Bayelsa state civil service. International Journal of Advanced Acdemic Research, 6(1), 98-113.
Emerson, R. M. (1962). Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 31-41.
Emerson, R.M. (1981). Social Exchange Theory. New York: Basic Books.
Erdogan B., & Bauer T.N. (2010). Differentiated leader-member exchanges: The buffering role of justice climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(6), 1104-1120.
Fiol, C. M. (1994). Consensus, diversity, and learning in organizations. Organization Science, 5(3), 403-420.
Folger, R. and Konovsky, M. (1989). Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reaction to pay raise decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 32(1), 115-130.
Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. New York: Free Press.
George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference, 11.0 Update. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Geringer, J. M. and Frayne, C. A. (1993). Self-Efficacy, Outcome Expectancy and Performance of International Joint Venture General Managers. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences,10, 322-333.
Gibson, C., & Vermeulen, F. (2003). A healthy divide: Subgroups as a stimulus for team learning behavior. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 202-239.
Glick, W. H. (1985). Conceptualizing and Measuring Organizational and Psychological Climate: Pitfalls in Multilevel Research. The Academy of Management Review, 10(3), 601-616.
Golembiewski, R. T., & McConkie, M. (1975). The centrality of interpersonal trust in group processes. Theories of Group Processes, 131-185.
Graen, G. B. (1976). Role making processes within complex organizations. Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1201-1245.
Graen, G. B., Novak, M. A. & Sommerkamp, P. (1982). The effect of leader-member exchange and job design on productivity and satisfaction: Testing a usual attachment model. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 30, 109-131.
Graen, G.B., & Cashman, J. (1975). A role-making model of leadership in formal organizations: A developmental approach. Leadership Frontiers, 143-166.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice hall..
Harvey, J. F., Johnson, K. J., Roloff, K. S., & Edmondson, A. C. (2019). From orientation to behavior: the interplay between learning orientation, open-mindedness, and psychological safety in team learning. Human Relations, 72(11), 1726-1751.
Hedlund, E., Börjesson, M., & Österberg, J. (2015). Team learning in a multinational military staff exercise. Small Group Research, 46(2), 179-203.
Henderson, D. J., Liden, R. C., Glibkowski, B. C., & Chaudhry, A. (2009). LMX differentiation: A multilevel review and examination of its antecedents and outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(4), 517-534.
Homans, G. C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63(6), 597-606.
Hooper, D. T., & Martin, R. (2008). Beyond personal leader–member exchange (LMX) quality: The effects of perceived LMX variability on employee reactions, The Leadership Quarterly, 19(1), 20-30.
Hurley, R. F. (2006). The decision to trust. Harvard Business Review, 84(9), 55-62.
Ilgen, D. R., Hollenbeck, J. R., Johnson, M., & Jundt, D. (2005). Teams in organizations: From input-process-output models to IMOI models. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 517-543.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1987). Learning Together and Alone: Cooperative, Competitive, and Individualistic Learning. Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Jones, G. R., & George, J. M. (1998). The experience and evolution of trust: Implications for cooperation and teamwork. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 531-546.
Kasl, E., Marsick, V. J., & Dechant, K. (1997). Teams as learners: A research-based model of team learning. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 33(2), 227-246.
Khan, M. N. (2019). Missing Link Between Lmx Differentiation And Envy: Does Individual Level Culture Play Any Role? Journal of Business School, 2(1), 39-56.
Kim, M., & Beehr, T. A. (2020). Making the case for procedural justice: employees thrive and work hard. Journal of Managerial Psychology.
Kim, W.C. and Mauborgne, R.A., (1998). Procedural justice, strategic decision making, and the knowledge economy. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 323-338.
Konovsky, M. A.,Pugh, S. D.(1994). Citizenship behavior and social exchange. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3),656-669.
Kramer, R. M. (1999). Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging perspectives, enduring questions. Annual Review of Psychology, 50(1), 569-598.
Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? Social Exchange: Advances in Theory and Research, 27-55. New York: Plenum.
Leventhal, G. S., Karuza, J., & Fry, W.R. (1980). Beyond fairness: A theory of allocation preferences. Justice and Social Interaction, 3(1), 167-218.
Levitt, B., & March, J. G. (1988). Organizational learning. Annual review of sociology, 14(1), 319-338.
Lewis, J. D., & Weigert, A. (1985). Trust as a social reality. Social Force, 63(4), 967-985.
Li, A. N., & Liao, H. (2014). How do leader-member exchange quality and differentiation affect performance in teams? An integrated multilevel dual process model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(5), 847-886.
Li, Y., Fu, F. M., Sun, J. M., & Yang, B. (2016). Leader-member exchange differentiation and team creativity: An investigation of nonlinearity. Human Relations, 69(5), 1121–1138.
Liden, R. C., Erdogan, B., Wayne, S. J., & Sparrowe, R. T. (2006). Leader-member exchange, differentiation, and task interdependence: Implications for individual and group performance. Journal of Organization Behavior, 27, 723-746.
Liden, R.C., & Graen, G. B. (1980). Generalizability of the Vertical Dyad Linkage Model of Leadership. Academy of Management Journal, 23, 451-465.
Lind, E. A. & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. New York: Plenum.
Lynn, G.S., Reilly, T., & Akgun, A.E. (2000). Knowledge Management in New Product Teams : Practices and Outcomes. IEEE Transaction on Engineering Management, 47(2), 221-231.
Masterson, S. S., Lewis, K., Goldman, B. M., & Taylor, M. S. (2000). Integrating justice and social exchange: The differing effects of fair procedures and treatment on work relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 738-748.
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of management review, 20(3), 709-734.
McAllister, D. J. (1995). Affect-and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. The Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 24-59.
McCauley, D. P., & Kuhnert, K. W. (1992). A theoretical review and empirical investigation of employee trust in management. Public Administration Quarterly, 265-284.
McKnight, D. H., Cummings, L. L., & Chervany, N. L. (1998). Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 473-490.
Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-266.
Rousseau, S. B., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393-404.
Sari, F. K., & Palupiningdyah, P. (2020). The effect of mediation work engagement to procedural justice and organizational learning on the innovative behavior. Management Analysis Journal, 9(2), 152-160.
Schermerhorn, Jr., J. R., Hunt, J. G., & Osborn, R. N.(1994). Managing Organizational Behavior, 5th Ed. John Wiley & Sons.
Senge P. 1997. Sharing knowledge: the leader’s role is key to a learning culture. Executive Excellence, 4(11), 17–18.
Senge, P.M. (1990). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of The Learning Organization. New York: Doubleday.
Serva, M. A., Fuller, M. A., & Mayer, R. C. (2005). The reciprocal nature of trust: A longitudinal study of interacting teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(6), 625-648.
Shapiro, D., Sheppard, B. H., & Cheraskin, L. (1992). Business on a handshake. Negotiation Journal, 8(4), 365-377.
Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7(4), 422-442.
Simons, T. L., & Peterson, R. S. (2000). Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: The pivotal role of intragroup trust. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 102-111.
Sitkin, S. B., & Roth, N. L. (1993). Explaining the limited effectiveness of legalistic "remedies" for trust /distrust. Organization Science, 4(3), 367-392.
Sole, D., & Edmondson, A. (2002). Situated knowledge and learning in dispersed teams. British Journal of Management, 13(2), 17-34.
Somech, A., & Naamneh, M. (2019). Subject coordinators as boundary managers: The impact on team learning and organizational outcomes. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 47(1), 56-73.
Thibaut, J. & Walker, L. (1975). Procedure Justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The Social Psychology of Groups. John Wiley.
Turner, J. C., Midgley, C., Meyer, D. K., Gheen, M., Anderman, E. M., Kang, Y., & Patrick, H. (2002). The classroom environment and students' reports of avoidance strategies in mathematics: A multimethod study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(1), 88-106.
Tyler, T.R. and Griffin, E. (1989). Managing the Allocation of Scarce Resource: Using Procedures to Justify Outcomes, Northwestern University.
Vidyarthi, P. R., Liden, R. C., Anand, S., Erdogan, B., & Ghosh, S. (2010). Where do I stand? Examining the effects of leader-member exchange social comparison on employee work behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(5), 849-861.
Walsh, J.P. (1995). Managerial and organizational cognition notes from a trip down memory lane. Organization Science, 6, 280-321.
Walster, E., Walster, G. W., & Berscheid, E. (1978). Equity: Theory and research. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Wanous, J. P. and Yountz, M. A. (1986). Solution diversity and the quality of group decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 149-159.
Watkins, K. E., & Marsick, V. J. (1993). Sculpting the Learning Organization. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Williamson, O. E. (1993). Calculativeness, trust and economic organization. Journal of Law and Economics, 36, 453-486.
Wilson, J. M., Goodman, P. S., & Cronin, M. A. (2007). Group learning. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1041-1059.
Wright, P. M., & Boswell, W. R. (2002). Desegregating HRM: A review and synthesis of micro and macro human resource management research. Journal of Management, 28(3), 247-276.
Zellmer-Bruhn, M., & Gibson, C. (2006). Multinational organization context: Implications for team learning and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49(3), 501-518.
Zucker, L. G. (1986). Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure. Research in Organizational Behavior, 8, 53-111.
二、中文文獻
林鉦棽(1996)。組織公正、信任、組織公民行為之研究:社會交換理論之觀點。管理科學學報,13(3),391-415。
劉麟書(2001)。人際信任整合模型之研究。銘傳大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。
吳明隆(2009)。結構方程模式AMOS的操作與應用。臺北市:五南。
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code