Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0024119-111719 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0024119-111719
論文名稱
Title
動靜皆In?探討Instagram限時動態與貼文差異對自我揭露影響之過程
Instagram Influencer ? Exploring of The Impact of Instagram Stories and Posts on Self-disclosure
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
128
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2019-01-17
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2019-01-24
關鍵字
Keywords
Instagram限時動態、使用與滿足理論、自我揭露、感知永久性、感知互動性、社群回饋
Instagram Stories, Use and Gratification Theory, Self-disclosure, Perceived date permanence, Perceived interactivity, Feedback
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5716 次,被下載 27
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5716 times, has been downloaded 27 times.
中文摘要
新興媒體崛起,在圖像和影音串流的時代,社群網站也掀起一波浪潮,Instagram即是最好的例子,主張圖片搭配文字,又加入了24小時即會消失的「限時動態」,使用戶活躍數逐年升高,位居台灣社群網站第二,透過照片濾鏡、主題標籤、標記他人等功能,吸引更多閱聽人使用該平台。但是在國內的研究中,對於Instagram限時動態的研究卻少之又少,有鑑於此,本研究深入探討IG使用者使用限時動態與一般貼文,進行自我揭露的心理過程。
本研究以使用與滿足理論以及自我揭露為理論基礎,用發文者的角度,探討Instagram的使用者,為什麼使用一般貼文和限時動態兩種不同的方式進行自我揭露?是否因為感知到不同的媒體特性-感知永久性及感知互動性?這種媒體特性感知又如何透過隱私顧慮及使用動機-社會連結及娛樂,對自我揭露產生的影響?最後所獲得的滿足度,如何受到社群回饋的調節?
  本研究採用問卷調查法,請參與者依照自身所發布的貼文直接填寫具體問卷題項,研究對象以Instagram使用者並有發布貼文經驗之受眾為主,研究樣本為60位參與者,共600則貼文。研究結果發現,IG使用者的確對限時動態與一般貼文具有不同的媒體特性感知。相對而言,限時動態的感知互動性較高,感知永久性較低。感知互動性透過提升社會連結動機,讓使用者在Instagram中揭露更多正面的資訊。同時,雖然感知互動性也會提高負面自我揭露,但娛樂動機卻會降低了負面的自我揭露。另外,感知永久性無法透過提升隱私顧慮而降低自我揭露。本研究為Instagram限時動態提供理論貢獻及實務建議。
Abstract
The rise of new media, in the era of streaming image and video. Social networking sites have also gained popularity.Instagram is the best example. It advocates the picture with text and added a "Stories" that will disappear in 24 hours. Its growth rate increased rapidly after its launch and ranked second on the social networking sites in Taiwan. Through the functions of photo filters, hash tags, and tagging others, the use of the Stories attracting more audience to use the platform. However, in an academic research of Taiwan, there are very few researches on Instagram's Stories. In the viewpoint of this, this study explores the psychological self-disclosure process of IG users on their Stories and posts.
  Based on the theory of use and gratification and self-disclosure, this study explores the users of Instagram from the perspective of the author. Why they disclosure themselves in two different ways: posts and stories? Is it because they perceived data permanence and interactivity which is two different media characteristics? How does the media characteristics affect the self-disclosure through privacy concerns and the motivation of social connections and entertainment? How does the feedback moderates the achieved gratification?
In this study, the questionnaire survey method was used. Participants were asked to fill out the questionnaire in front of the interviewer. The research subjects were mainly based on Instagram users who have the experience of posting posts and collect 60 participants. The results of this research indicate that IG users exactly perceived different media characteristics for IG Stories and posts. The Stories are higher levels of perceived interactivity and lower levels of perceived data permanence compared with the posts. Perceived interactivity eliciting higher levels of motivation of the social connections. It enables users to disclosure more positive informations on Instagram. At the same time, perceived interactivity eliciting higher levels of negative self-disclosure, however,motivation of the entertainment decrease negative self-disclosure. In addition, perceived date permanence effects on improving self-disclosure are not mediated by privacy concerns. Research results provide the theoretical contributions and practical advice to the application of Instagram Storeis.
目次 Table of Contents
論文審定書 ................................ ................................ ................................ . i
誌謝 ................................ ................................ ................................ ............ ii
摘要 ................................ ................................ ................................ ........... iii
Abstract ................................ ................................ ................................ ..... iv
第壹章、 緒論 ................................ ................................ .......................... 1
第一節 、 研究背景 ................................ ................................ ................................ .. 1
第二節、 研究動機 ................................ ................................ ................................ .. 2
第三節、 研究問題及目的 ................................ ................................ ...................... 5
第貳章、 文獻探討 ................................ ................................ .................. 6
第一節、 Instagram................................ ................................ ................................ .. 6
第二節、 自我揭露( Self-disclosure)................................ ................................ 14
第三節、 使用與滿足理論( Use and Gratification Theory) ............................. 22
第四節、 社群回饋( Feedback) ................................ ................................ ........ 30
第參章、 研究方法 ................................ ................................ ................ 34
第一節、 研究方法 ................................ ................................ ................................ 34
第二節、 變數之定義及構面、問卷題項與設計 ................................ ................ 35
第肆章、 資料分析與結果 ................................ ................................ .... 43
第一節、 樣本統計 ................................ ................................ ................................ 43
第二節、 參與者描述統計分析 ................................ ................................ ............ 43
第三節、 假說檢驗 ................................ ................................ ................................ 60
第四節、 小結 ................................ ................................ ................................ ........ 85
第伍章、 結論與建議 ................................ ................................ ............ 88
第一節、 研究發現 ................................ ................................ ................................ 88
第二節、 研究問題之回答 ................................ ................................ .................... 93
第三節、 理論貢獻及實務意涵 ................................ ................................ ............ 95
第四節、 研究限制與未來方向 ................................ ................................ .... 99
第陸章、 參考文獻 ................................ ................................ .............. 102
附錄一、正式問卷 ................................ ................................ ................ 111
參考文獻 References
壹、中文部分
翁秀琪(2011)。大眾傳播理論與實證(頁135)。台北:三民。
翁秀琪(2011)。大眾傳播理論與實證(頁136)。台北:三民。
陳建文、吳紹榮、余姵歆、袁綾(2015)。Facebook粉絲專頁對網路持續使用行為意圖之影響:以使用與滿足理論與社會影響觀點。朝陽商管評論,14,19-38。
蘇柔郡、吳筱玫(2018)。高中女生使用 Instagram 之日常美學:符擔性觀點。新聞學研究,135,139-191
科技部台灣傳播資料庫(2014)取自:http://www.crctaiwan.nctu.edu.tw/AnnualSurvey_detail.asp?ASD_ID=20
數位時代(2017)取自:https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/42738/instagram-stories-hits-150m-daily-users-launches-skippable-ads
創市際(2016),取自:https://rocket.cafe/talks/45759
創市際(2018),取自:http://www.ixresearch.com/reports/%E5%89%B5%E5%B8%82%E9%9A%9B%E9%9B%99%E9%80%B1%E5%88%8A%E7%AC%AC%E4%B8%80%E4%B8%80%E4%B8%83%E6%9C%9F-20180917
Instagram,取自:http://blog.instagram.com/post/160011713372/170426-700million
貳、英文部分
Abramova, O., Wagner, A., Krasnova, H., & Buxmann, P. (2017). Understanding Self-Disclosure on Social Networking Sites-A Literature Review.
Acquisti, A., & Gross, R. (2006). Imagined communities: Awareness, information sharing, and privacy on the Facebook. Paper presented at the International workshop on privacy enhancing technologies.
Al-Kandari, A., Melkote, S. R., & Sharif, A. (2016). Needs and motives of Instagram users that predict self-disclosure use: A case study of young adults in Kuwait. Journal of Creative Communications, 11(2), 85-101.
Al-Saggaf, Y., & Nielsen, S. (2014). Self-disclosure on Facebook among female users and its relationship to feelings of loneliness. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 460-468.
Alhabash, S., & Ma, M. (2017). A Tale of Four Platforms: Motivations and Uses of Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat Among College Students? Social Media+ Society, 3(1), 2056305117691544.
Altman, I., & Taylor, D. A. (1973). Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Andalibi, N., Öztürk, P., & Forte, A. (2017). Sensitive Self-disclosures, Responses, and Social Support on Instagram: The Case of# Depression. Paper presented at the CSCW.
Archer, R. L., & Burleson, J. A. (1980). The effects of timing of self-disclosure on attraction and reciprocity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(1), 120.
Bakhshi, S., Shamma, D. A., & Gilbert, E. (2014). Faces engage us: Photos with faces attract more likes and comments on instagram. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173.
Bauer, R. A. (1964). The obstinate audience: The influence process from the point of view of social communication. American Psychologist, 19(5), 319.
Bazarova, N. N., & Choi, Y. H. (2014). Self-disclosure in social media: Extending the functional approach to disclosure motivations and characteristics on social network sites. Journal of Communication, 64(4), 635-657.
Bazarova, N. N., Choi, Y. H., Schwanda Sosik, V., Cosley, D., & Whitlock, J. (2015). Social sharing of emotions on Facebook: Channel differences, satisfaction, and replies. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work & social computing.
Blumler, J. G. K., E. (1976). The Uses of Mass Communications: Current Perspecives on Gratifications Research. American Journal of Sociology, 81(6), 1546-1548.
Burleson, B. R. (2010). The nature of interpersonal communication. CR Berger, M. Roloff, & DR Roskos-Ewoldsen, The Handbook of Communication Science.
Chang, L., & Chen, J. V. (2014). Aligning principal and agent’s incentives: A principal–agent perspective of social networking sites. Expert systems with applications, 41(6), 3091-3104.
Chen, G. M. (2011). Tweet this: A uses and gratifications perspective on how active Twitter use gratifies a need to connect with others. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(2), 755-762.
Cheung, C., Lee, Z. W., & Chan, T. K. (2015). Self-disclosure in social networking sites: the role of perceived cost, perceived benefits and social influence. Internet Research, 25(2), 279-299.
Colliander, J., & Marder, B. (2018). ‘Snap happy’brands: Increasing publicity effectiveness through a snapshot aesthetic when marketing a brand on Instagram. Computers in Human Behavior, 78, 34-43.
Cozby, P. C. (1973). Effects of density, activity, and personality on environmental preferences. Journal of Research in Personality, 7(1), 45-60.
Derlega, V. J., & Berg, J. H. (1987). Self-disclosure: Theory, research, and therapy: Plenum Press.
Derlega, V. J., & Grzelak, J. (1979). Appropriateness of self-disclosure. Self-disclosure: Origins, patterns, and implications of openness in interpersonal relationships, 151-176.
DeVito, M. A., Birnholtz, J., & Hancock, J. T. (2017). Platforms, people, and perception: Using affordances to understand self-presentation on social media. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing.
Erickson, T., & Kellogg, W. A. (2000). Social translucence: an approach to designing systems that support social processes. ACM transactions on computer-human interaction (TOCHI), 7(1), 59-83.
Fardouly, J., Willburger, B. K., & Vartanian, L. R. (2017). Instagram use and young women’s body image concerns and self-objectification: Testing mediational pathways. New Media & Society, 1461444817694499.
Fehr, B. (2008). Friendship formation. Handbook of relationship initiation, 29-54.
Forest, A. L., & Wood, J. V. (2012). When social networking is not working: Individuals with low self-esteem recognize but do not reap the benefits of self-disclosure on Facebook. Psychological science, 23(3), 295-302.
Gaver, W. W. (1991). Technology affordances. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems.
Gibson, J. J. (1979). 1986. The ecological approach to visual perception.
Greene, K., Derlega, V. J., & Mathews, A. (2006). Self-disclosure in personal relationships. The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships, 409-427.
Grinberg, N., Kalyanaraman, S., Adamic, L. A., & Naaman, M. (2017). Understanding feedback expectations on Facebook. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing.
Hanson, G., & Haridakis, P. (2008). YouTube users watching and sharing the news: A uses and gratifications approach. Journal of Electronic Publishing, 11(3).
Hendrickse, J., Arpan, L. M., Clayton, R. B., & Ridgway, J. L. (2017). Instagram and college women's body image: Investigating the roles of appearance-related comparisons and intrasexual competition. Computers in Human Behavior, 74, 92-100.
Highfield, T. (2015). Depicting social television on Instagram: Visual social media, participation, and audience experiences of# sbseurovision. Paper presented at the international communication Association conference.
Hollenbaugh, E. E., & Ferris, A. L. (2014). Facebook self-disclosure: Examining the role of traits, social cohesion, and motives. Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 50-58.
Hu, Y., Manikonda, L., & Kambhampati, S. (2014). What We Instagram: A First Analysis of Instagram Photo Content and User Types. Paper presented at the Icwsm.
Huang, H.-Y. (2016). Examining the beneficial effects of individual's self-disclosure on the social network site. Computers in Human Behavior, 57, 122-132.
Hunt, D., Atkin, D., & Krishnan, A. (2012). The influence of computer-mediated communication apprehension on motives for Facebook use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56(2), 187-202.
Ignatius, E., & Kokkonen, M. (2007). Factors contributing to verbal self-disclosure. Nordic Psychology, 59(4), 362-391.
Ilich, K. L., & Hardey, M. (2018). ‘It’s all about the packaging’: investigation of the motivations, intentions, and marketing implications of sharing photographs of secondary packaging on Instagram. Information, Communication & Society, 1-19.
Jang, S. A., & Yoo, J. H. (2009). Topic avoidance in close relationships: applying the theory of planned behavior. Human Communication, 12(2), 119-135.
Jin, S. V., & Muqaddam, A. (2018). “Narcissism 2.0! Would narcissists follow fellow narcissists on Instagram?” the mediating effects of narcissists personality similarity and envy, and the moderating effects of popularity. Computers in Human Behavior, 81, 31-41.
Johnson, P. R., & Yang, S. (2009). Uses and gratifications of Twitter: An examination of user motives and satisfaction of Twitter use. Paper presented at the Communication Technology Division of the annual convention of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication in Boston, MA.
Joinson, A. N. (2001). Self‐disclosure in computer‐mediated communication: The role of self‐awareness and visual anonymity. European journal of social psychology, 31(2), 177-192.
Joinson, A. N. (2008). Looking at, looking up or keeping up with people?: motives and use of facebook. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
Joinson, A. N., & Paine, C. B. (2007). Self-disclosure, privacy and the Internet. The Oxford handbook of Internet psychology, 2374252.
Jones, K. S. (2003). Privacy: what's different now? Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 28(4), 287-292.
Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurrivitch, M. (1974). The use of mass communications: Current perspectives on gratifications research. Beverly Hills: Ca: Sage.
Kernis, M. H., & Goldman, B. M. (2006). A multicomponent conceptualization of authenticity: Theory and research. Advances in experimental social psychology, 38, 283-357.
Kim, C., & Yang, S.-U. (2017). Like, comment, and share on Facebook: How each behavior differs from the other. Public Relations Review, 43(2), 441-449.
Krause, A. E., North, A. C., & Heritage, B. (2014). The uses and gratifications of using Facebook music listening applications. Computers in Human Behavior, 39, 71-77.
Laurenceau, J.-P., Barrett, L. F., & Pietromonaco, P. R. (1998). Intimacy as an interpersonal process: The importance of self-disclosure, partner disclosure, and perceived partner responsiveness in interpersonal exchanges. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5), 1238.
Li-Barber, K. T. (2012). Self-disclosure and student satisfaction with Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), 624-630.
Li, H., Sarathy, R., & Xu, H. (2011). The role of affect and cognition on online consumers' decision to disclose personal information to unfamiliar online vendors. Decision support systems, 51(3), 434-445.
Lin, C. A. (1999). Online service adoption likelihood. Journal of Advertising Research, 39, 79-89.
Liu, D., & Brown, B. B. (2014). Self-disclosure on social networking sites, positive feedback, and social capital among Chinese college students. Computers in Human Behavior, 38, 213-219.
Liu, Y. (2003). Developing a scale to measure the interactivity of websites. Journal of Advertising Research, 43(2), 207-216.
Manikonda, L., Meduri, V. V., & Kambhampati, S. (2016). Tweeting the Mind and Instagramming the Heart: Exploring Differentiated Content Sharing on Social Media. Paper presented at the ICWSM.
Marcus, S. (2015). Picturing'ourselves into being: assessing identity, sociality and visuality on Instagram. Paper presented at the international communication association conference. Puerto Rico: San Juan.
Marreiros, H., Tonin, M., Vlassopoulos, M., & Schraefel, M. (2017). “Now that you mention it”: A survey experiment on information, inattention and online privacy. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 140, 1-17.
Marshall, T. C., Lefringhausen, K., & Ferenczi, N. (2015). The Big Five, self-esteem, and narcissism as predictors of the topics people write about in Facebook status updates. Personality and Individual Differences, 85, 35-40.
McLeod, J. M., & Becker, L. B. (1981). The uses and gratifications approach. Handbook of political communication, 67-99.
Moon, J. H., Lee, E., Lee, J.-A., Choi, T. R., & Sung, Y. (2016). The role of narcissism in self-promotion on Instagram. Personality and Individual Differences, 101, 22-25.
Muñoz, C. L., & Towner, T. L. (2017). The image is the message: Instagram marketing and the 2016 presidential primary season. Journal of Political Marketing, 16(3-4), 290-318.
Nadkami, A., & Hofmann, S. G. (2012). Why do people use Facebook? Personality and individual differences. Nafional Center for Biotechnology Informafion. http://www. ncbi. nlm. nih. gov/pmc/arficles/PMC3335399.
Norman, D. (2013). The design of everyday things: Revised and expanded edition: Constellation.
Nosko, A., Wood, E., & Molema, S. (2010). All about me: Disclosure in online social networking profiles: The case of FACEBOOK. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(3), 406-418.
O’Sullivan, P. B., & Carr, C. T. (2017). Masspersonal communication: A model bridging the mass-interpersonal divide. New Media & Society, 1461444816686104.
Oeldorf-Hirsch, A., & Sundar, S. S. (2016). Social and technological motivations for online photo sharing. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 60(4), 624-642.
Orchard, L. J., Fullwood, C., Galbraith, N., & Morris, N. (2014). Individual differences as predictors of social networking. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 19(3), 388-402.
Palmgreen, P., Wenner, L. A., & Rosengren, K. E. (1985). Uses and gratifications research: The past ten years.
Park, N., Kee, K. F., & Valenzuela, S. (2009). Being immersed in social networking environment: Facebook groups, uses and gratifications, and social outcomes. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12(6), 729-733.
Phua, J., Jin, S. V., & Kim, J. J. (2017a). Gratifications of using Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, or Snapchat to follow brands: The moderating effect of social comparison, trust, tie strength, and network homophily on brand identification, brand engagement, brand commitment, and membership intention. Telematics and Informatics, 34(1), 412-424.
Phua, J., Jin, S. V., & Kim, J. J. (2017b). Uses and gratifications of social networking sites for bridging and bonding social capital: A comparison of Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 115-122.
Pittman, M., & Reich, B. (2016). Social media and loneliness: Why an Instagram picture may be worth more than a thousand Twitter words. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 155-167.
Piwek, L., & Joinson, A. (2016). “What do they snapchat about?” Patterns of use in time-limited instant messaging service. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 358-367.
Quan-Haase, A., & Young, A. L. (2010). Uses and gratifications of social media: A comparison of Facebook and instant messaging. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 30(5), 350-361.
Reis, H. T., & Shaver, P. (1988). Intimacy as an interpersonal process. Handbook of personal relationships, 24(3), 367-389.
Rubin, A. M. (1986). Uses, gratifications, and media effects research. Perspectives on media effects, 281-301.
Rubin, Z. (1975). Disclosing oneself to a stranger: Reciprocity and its limits. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11(3), 233-260.
Sheldon, P., & Bryant, K. (2016). Instagram: Motives for its use and relationship to narcissism and contextual age. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 89-97.
Smock, A. D., Ellison, N. B., Lampe, C., & Wohn, D. Y. (2011). Facebook as a toolkit: A uses and gratification approach to unbundling feature use. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(6), 2322-2329.
Sundar, S. S., Bellur, S., Oh, J., Jia, H., & Kim, H.-S. (2016). Theoretical importance of contingency in human-computer interaction: effects of message interactivity on user engagement. Communication research, 43(5), 595-625.
Sundar, S. S., & Limperos, A. M. (2013). Uses and Grats 2.0: New Gratifications for New Media. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media.
Tidwell, L. C., & Walther, J. B. (2002). Computer‐mediated communication effects on disclosure, impressions, and interpersonal evaluations: Getting to know one another a bit at a time. Human Communication Research, 28(3), 317-348.
Treem, J. W., & Leonardi, P. M. (2013). Social media use in organizations: Exploring the affordances of visibility, editability, persistence, and association. Annals of the International Communication Association, 36(1), 143-189.
Trepte, S., & Reinecke, L. (2013). The reciprocal effects of social network site use and the disposition for self-disclosure: A longitudinal study. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 1102-1112.
Tsay-Vogel, M., Shanahan, J., & Signorielli, N. (2018). Social media cultivating perceptions of privacy: A 5-year analysis of privacy attitudes and self-disclosure behaviors among Facebook users. New Media & Society, 20(1), 141-161.
Tufekci, Z. (2008). Can you see me now? Audience and disclosure regulation in online social network sites. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 28(1), 20-36.
Utz, S. (2015). The function of self-disclosure on social network sites: Not only intimate, but also positive and entertaining self-disclosures increase the feeling of connection. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 1-10.
Valkenburg, P. M., Peter, J., & Schouten, A. P. (2006). Friend networking sites and their relationship to adolescents' well-being and social self-esteem. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 9(5), 584-590.
Van Dyke, T. P., Midha, V., & Nemati, H. (2007). The effect of consumer privacy empowerment on trust and privacy concerns in e‐commerce. Electronic Markets, 17(1), 68-81.
Van House, N. A. (2007). Flickr and public image-sharing: distant closeness and photo exhibition. Paper presented at the CHI'07 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems.
Vaterlaus, J. M., Barnett, K., Roche, C., & Young, J. A. (2016). “Snapchat is more personal”: An exploratory study on Snapchat behaviors and young adult interpersonal relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 594-601.
Wang, Z., & Tchernev, J. M. (2012). The “myth” of media multitasking: Reciprocal dynamics of media multitasking, personal needs, and gratifications. Journal of Communication, 62(3), 493-513.
Warkentin, D., Woodworth, M., Hancock, J. T., & Cormier, N. (2010). Warrants and deception in computer mediated communication. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work.
Wheeless, L. R. (1978). A follow‐up study of the relationships among trust, disclosure, and interpersonal solidarity. Human Communication Research, 4(2), 143-157.
Wheeless, L. R., & Grotz, J. (1976). Conceptualization and measurement of reported self‐disclosure. Human Communication Research, 2(4), 338-346.
Windahl, S. (1981). Uses and gratifications at the crossroads. Mass communication review yearbook, 2(2), 174-185.
Wu, J.-H., Wang, S.-C., & Tsai, H.-H. (2010). Falling in love with online games: The uses and gratifications perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1862-1871.
Xu, H., Dinev, T., Smith, H. J., & Hart, P. (2008). Examining the formation of individual's privacy concerns: Toward an integrative view. ICIS 2008 proceedings, 6.
Yang, C.-c. (2016). Instagram use, loneliness, and social comparison orientation: interact and browse on social media, but don't compare. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 19(12), 703-708.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code