Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0009119-000222 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0009119-000222
論文名稱
Title
個人-組織適配、薪酬分配公平、組織公民行為與建言行為之研究—以主動性人格特質為調節變項
A Study on the Relationships among Person-Organization Fit, Distributive Justice of Compensation, Organizational Citizenship Behavior, and Voice Behaviors: Proactive Personality as a Moderator
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
65
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2018-12-10
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2019-01-09
關鍵字
Keywords
薪酬分配公平、個人-組織適配、主動性人格特質、建言行為、組織公民行為
Person-Organization Fit, Proactive Personality, Voice Behaviors, Organizational Citizenship Behavior, Distributive Justice of Compensation
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5762 次,被下載 140
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5762 times, has been downloaded 140 times.
中文摘要
薪酬不僅僅是工作上的回饋,也是代表個人能力的肯定與認可,薪酬的滿意程度,更是影響員工行為的重要誘因。本研究主要探討個人-組織適配、薪酬分配公平、組織公民行為及建言行為間之關係,並分析薪酬分配公平的中介效果及主動性人格特質的調節效果。
本研究為了避免共同方法變異,採兩階段問卷調查方式進行資料蒐集。第一階段樣本共發出281份,回收260份,回收率92.5%。第二階段問卷共發出260,回收243份,回收率93.46%,最終有效問卷為211份,有效回收率為81.15%。經統計分析之結果如下:
1. 個人-組織適配對薪酬分配公平具顯著正向影響。
2. 個人-組織適配對個人導向/組織導向組織公民行為具顯著正向影響。
3. 個人-組織適配對促進性/預防性建言行為具顯著正向影響。
4. 薪酬分配公平在個人-組織適配與個人導向/組織導向組織公民行為間具完全中介效果。
5. 薪酬分配公平在個人-組織適配與促進性/預防性建言行為具顯著的中介效果。
6. 主動性人格特質在薪酬分配公平與個人導向/組織導向組織公民行為間不具調節效果。
7. 主動性人格特質在薪酬分配公平與促進性/預防性建言行為具有顯著的調節效果。
最後,依據研究結果提出具體結論與建議供實務界與後續研究參考。
Abstract
This study is to explore the influence of person-organization fit on organizational citizenship behavior and voice behavior, and the mediating effect of the distributive justice of compensation and the moderating effect of proactive personality.
This study is based on employees with direct supervisors and does not limit to specific industries. In order to reduce common method variance, the two-wave questionnaire survey was used to collect data in the study. There were 281 questionnaires distributed at the first phase and 260 valid questionnaires were returned. The valid response rate was 92.5%. Furthermore, 260 questionnaires were issued at the second phase and 243 valid questionnaires were returned. The valid response rate was 93.46% and 211 valid questionnaires ultimately. There is an 81.15% return rate. Based on the statistical analysis, results are as follows:
1. Person-organization fit is positively impact on distributive justice of compensation.
2. Person-organization fit is positively impact on organizational citizenship behavior -individuals /organizational citizenship behavior-organization, respectively.
3. Person-organization fit is positively impact on promotive/prohibitive voice behavior, respectively.
4. Distributive justice of compensation has a fully mediating effect between person-organization fit and organizational citizenship behavior-individuals/ organizational citizenship behavior-organization, respectively.
5. Distributive justice of compensation has no effect between person-organization fit and promotive/prohibitive voice behavior, respectively.
6. Proactive personality has no moderating effect between distributive justice of compensation and organizational citizenship behavior-individuals/organizational citizenship behavior-organization.
7. Proactive personality has no moderating effect between distributive justice of compensation and promotive/prohibitive voice behavior.
Based on the research results, the concrete conclusions and suggestions will provide for HRM practice and further study as the references.
目次 Table of Contents
審定書----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------i
摘要------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ii
Abstract-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ii
目錄------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------iv
圖目錄--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------v
表目錄---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------vi
第一章 緒論------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1
第一節 研究動機-----------------------------------------------------------------------------1
第二節 研究目的-----------------------------------------------------------------------------4
第二章 文獻探討------------------------------------------------------------------------------5
第一節 個人-組織適配----------------------------------------------------------------------5
第二節 薪酬分配公平------------------------------------------------------------------------6
第三節 主動性人格特質---------------------------------------------------------------------7
第四節 組織公民行為------------------------------------------------------------------------9
第五節 建言行為------------------------------------------------------------------------------------11
第六節 各研究變項之間的關係------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------13
第七節 研究架構------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------16
第三章 研究方法------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------19
第一節 研究對象與資料蒐集------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------19
第二節 各變項之操作性定義與衡量工具------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------23
第三節 測量模型------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------30
第四章 結果與討論------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------33
第一節 相關分析------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------33
第二節 薪酬分配公平中介效果分析------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------36
第三節 主動性人格特質調節效果分析------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------41
第四節 假設驗證結果------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------44
第五章 研究結論與建議------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------45
第一節 研究結論------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------45
第二節 管理實務意涵------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------47
第三節 研究限制與後續研究建議------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------47
參考文獻------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------49
附錄-問卷(第一階段)------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------53
附錄-問卷(第二階段)------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------56
參考文獻 References
一、 中文部分
田新民、解志韜、祝金龍(2009)。員工主動性人格對組織公民行為和團隊績效的影響-檢測一個路徑模型,人力資源管理學報,9(2),19-32。
林淑姬(1992),薪酬公平、程式公平與組織承諾、組織公民行為關係之研究,國立政治大學企業管理研究所博士論文。
張婷婷、陸洛、黃睦芸(2011)。工作負荷與工作行為之關聯:主動性人格為調節變項,台灣管理學刊,11(2),177-195。
彭台光、高月慈、林鉦棽(2006)。管理研究中的共同方法變異:問題本質、影響、測試和補救。管理學報,23(1),77-98.
二、 英文部分
Adams, J. S. (1965). Advances in experimental social psychology. New York: Academic Press.
Allen, T. D., & Rush, M. C. (1998). The effects of organizational citizenship behavior on performance judgments: A field study and a laboratory experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 247-260.
Ambrose, M. L., & Kulik, C. T. (1999). Old friends, new face: Motivation research in the 1990s. Journal of Management, 25(3), 231-292.
Bateman, T. S., & Crant, J. M. (1993). The proactive component of organizational behavior: A measure and correlates. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14(2), 103-118.
Bateman, T. S., & Organ, D. W. (1983). Job satisfaction and the good soldier: The relationship between affect and employee “citizenship”. Academy of Management Journal, 26(4), 587-595.
Bennis, W. G., & Nanus, B. (1985). Leaders: The strategies for taking charge. New York: Harper & Row.
Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588-606.
Brief, A. P., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1986). Prosocial organizational behaviors. Academy of Management Review, 11, 710-725.
Buss, D. M. (1987). Selection, evocation, and manipulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(6), 1214-1221.
Cable, D. M., & DeRue, D. S. (2002). The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 875-884.
Cable, D. M., & Judge, T. A. (1997). Interviewers' perceptions of person-organization fit and organizational selection decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 546-561.
Chatman, J. A. (1989). Improving interactional organizational research: A model of person-organization fit. Academy of Management Review, 14, 333-349.
Chattopadhyay, P. (1999). Beyond direct and symmetrical effects: The influence of demographic dissimilarity on organizational citizenship behaviour. Academy of Management Journal, 42(3), 273-287.
Day, D. V., & Silverman, S. B. (1989). Personality and job performance: Evidence of incremental validity. Personnel Psychology, 42(1), 25-36.
Detert, J. R., & Burris, E. R. (2007). Leadership behavior and employee voice: Is the door really open? Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 869-884.
Edward E. Lawler, III, (1971). Pay and organizational effectiveness: A psychological approach. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Erdogan, B., & Bauer, T. N. (2005). Enhancing career benefits of employee proactive personality: The role of fit with jobs and organizations. Personnel Psychology, 58(4), 59-891.
Folger, R., & Greenberg, J. (1985). Procedural justice: An interpretive analysis of personnel systems. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 3, 141-183.
Folger, R., & Konovsky, M. A. (1989). Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decision. Academy of Management Journal, 32(3), 115-130
Graham, J. W. (1991). An essay on organizational citizenship behavior. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 4(4), 249-270.
Homans, G. C. (1961). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. NewYork: Harcourt Brace and World.
Helmreich, R. L. (1984). Cockpit management attitudes. Human Factors, 26 (5), 583-589.
Katz, D. (1964). The motivational basis of organizational behavior. Behavior Science, 9, 131-133.
Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organization. New York: Wiley.
Konovsky, M. A., & Pugh, S. D. (1994). Citizenship behavior and social exchange. Academy of Management Journal, 37 (3), 656-669.
Kristof, A. L. (1996). Person-organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personnel Psychology, 49 (1), 1-49.
Lee, C. H., & Bruvold, N. T. (2003). Creating value for employees: Investment in employee development. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 14, 981-1000.
Levine, D. I. (1993). What do wages buy? Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(4), 462-483.
Lin, C. C., & Peng, T. K. (2010). From organizational citizenship behavior to team performance: The mediation of group cohesion and collective efficacy. Management and Organization Review, 6(1), 55-75.
Mahoney, T. A. (1989). Multiple pay contingencies: Strategic design of compensation. Human Resource Management, 28(3), 337-347.
Moorman, R. H. (1993). The influence of cognitive and affective based job satisfaction measures on the relationship between satisfaction and organizational citizenship behavior. Human Relations, 46(6), 759-776.
Morrison, E. W. (1994). Role definitions and organizational citizenship behavior: The importance of the employee’s perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 37(6), 1543-1567.
Morrison, E. W., & Milliken, F. J. (2000). Organizational silence: A barrier to chagne and development in a pluralistic world. The Academy of Management Review, 25, 706-725.
O’Reilly III, C. A., & Chatman, J., & Caldwell, D. F. (1991). People and organizational culture: A profile comparison approach to assessing person-organization fit. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 487-516.
O'Reilly III, C. A., & Chatman, J. (1986). Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance, identification, and internalization on prosocial behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 492-499.
Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
Parker, S. K., & Sprigg, C. A. (1999). Minimizing strain and maximizing learning: The role of job demands, job control, and proactive personality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 925-939.
Parkes, K. R. (1994). Personality and coping as moderators of work stress processes: Models, methods and measures.Work & Stress, 8, 110-129.
Podsakoff, P. M., & Ahearne, M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (1997). Organizational citizenship behavior and the quantity and quality of work group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(2) , 262-270.
Schneider, B. R. (1987). The people make the plac. Personnel Psychology, 40(3), 437-453.
Seibert, S. E., & Crant, J. M., & Kraimer, M. L. (1999). Proactive personality and career success. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 416-427.
Seibert, S. E., & Kraimer, M. L., & Liden, R. C. (2001). A social capital theory of career success. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 219-237.
Smith, C. A., & Organ, D. W., & Near, J. P. (1983). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 653-663.
Tajfel, H. (1982). Social identity and intergroup behavior. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Tang, T. L. P., & Sarsfield-Baldwin, L. J. (1996). Distributive and procedural justice as related to satisfaction and commitment. ED 396117, 1-25.
Van Dyne, L., & LePine, J. A. (1998). Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 108-119.
Whiting, S. W., & Maynes, T. D., & Podsakoff, N. P., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2012). Effects of message, source, and context on evaluations of employee voice behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(1), 159-182.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code