論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available
論文名稱 Title |
探討僕人式領導與服務導向組織公民行為之研究-以情感性承諾為中介變數 Exploring the study of servant-style leadership and service-oriented organizational citizenship behavior--using affective commitment as the intermediary variable |
||
系所名稱 Department |
|||
畢業學年期 Year, semester |
語文別 Language |
||
學位類別 Degree |
頁數 Number of pages |
50 |
|
研究生 Author |
|||
指導教授 Advisor |
|||
召集委員 Convenor |
|||
口試委員 Advisory Committee |
|||
口試日期 Date of Exam |
2019-08-23 |
繳交日期 Date of Submission |
2019-11-21 |
關鍵字 Keywords |
便利抽樣、員工、情感性承諾、服務導向組織公民行為、僕人式領導 employee, convenient sampling, service- oriented organizational citizenship, servant leadership, affective commitment |
||
統計 Statistics |
本論文已被瀏覽 5796 次,被下載 0 次 The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5796 times, has been downloaded 0 times. |
中文摘要 |
本研究的重要性在於從員工角度驗證僕人式領導、情感性承諾與服務導向組織公民行為之關係。本研究彙整上述變數之相關文獻並做關聯性探討,針對國內員工,以便利抽樣方式進行問卷調查,共回收307份有效問卷,以SPSS統計軟體,進行樣本組成分析、敘述性統計、信度分析、效度分析及迴歸分析等。分析後獲得結論如下:1、僕人式領導對情感性承諾有顯著的正向關係;2、僕人式領導對服務導向組織公民行為有顯著的正向關係;3、情感性承諾對服務導向組織公民行為有顯著的正向關係。 |
Abstract |
The importance of this research is to verify the relationship between servant leadership, affective commitment, and service-oriented organizational citizenship behavior from an employee perspective. This study summarizes the relevant literatures of the above-mentioned studues and conducts relevant discussions. For domestic employees, questionnaires are conducted by means of convenient sampling. A total of 307 valid questionnaires are collected, and SPSS statistical software is used for sample composition analysis, narrative statistics, reliability analysis, validity analysis and regression analysis. After the analysis, the results are as follows: 1. The servant-style leadership has a significant positive relationship with the affective commitment. 2. The servant-style leadership has a significant positive relationship with the service-oriented organizational citizenship behavior. 3. There is a significant positive relationship between affective commitment and organizational citizenship behavior. |
目次 Table of Contents |
目 錄 論文審定書………………………………………………………....i 中文摘要……………………………………………………………..ii 英文摘要………………………………………………………….…iii 目錄………………………………………………………………….…iv 目錄(續) …………………………………………………………….vi 圖目次……………………………………………………………….vii 表目次 ……………………………………………………………..viii 第一章 緒論……………………………………………………...1 第一節 研究背景與動機………………………………….1 第二節 研究目的……………………………………………..2 第三節 研究範圍與限制………………………………….3 第四節 研究流程……………………………………………..4 第二章 文獻探討……………………………………........…5 第一節 僕人式領導……………………………………...…5 第二節 情感性承諾……………………………………...…6 第三節 服務導向組織公民行為……………….......7 第三章 研究方法…………………………………………....8 第一節 研究架構…………………………………....………8 第二節 研究假設………………………………...….………9 第三節 變項定義與衡量問項………………..……..10 第四節 抽樣設計…………………………………...……..14 第五節 資料分析方法……………....……………......15 目 錄(續) 第四章 研究結果………………………….…………………16 第一節 樣本結構分析……………………………………16 第二節 敘述性統計分析………………....……………17 第三節 信度分析……………………………………………18 第四節 效度分析……………………………………………23 第五節 迴歸分析……………………………………………27 第五章 結論與建議………………….....…………………30 第一節 結論……………………………………………………30 第二節 實務意涵……………………………………………31 第三節 未來研究方向……………………………………32 參考文獻……………………………………….………………..33 附錄……………………………………….………………………..37 圖 目 次 圖 1-1 研究流程圖 ............................................................................................ 4 圖 3-1 研究架構圖 ............................................................................................ 8 表 目 次 表 3-1 僕人式領導之衡量構面與衡量題項 ................................................... 10 表 3-2 情感性承諾之衡量構面與衡量題項 ................................................... 12 表 3-3 服務導向組織公民行為之衡量構面與衡量題項 ................................ 13 表 4-1 樣本結構分析表 ................................................................................. 16 表 4-2 各變數敘述性統計分析....................................................................... 17 表 4-3 僕人式領導信度分析........................................................................... 18 表 4-4 情感性承諾信度分析........................................................................... 21 表 4-5 服務導向組織公民行為信度分析 ....................................................... 21 表 4-6 僕人式領導效度分析........................................................................... 23 表 4-7 情感性承諾效度分析 .......................................................................... 25 表 4-8 服務業導向組織公民行為效度分析 ................................................... 26 表 4-9 僕人式領導對情感性承諾之簡單迴歸分析 ....................................... 27 表 4-10 僕人式領導各分構面預測情感性承諾之複迴歸分析 ...................... 27 表 4-11 僕人式領導對服務導向組織公民行為之簡單迴歸分析 .................. 28 表 4-12 僕人式領導各分構面預測服務導向組織公民行為之複迴歸分析 ... 28 表 4-13 情感性承諾對服務導向組織公民行為之簡單迴歸分析 ................... 29 表 4-14 情感性承諾之中介變項分析 ............................................................ 29 |
參考文獻 References |
一、中文 王娜玲(2009) 。臺北市國小校長領導行為與教師組織公民行為之研究。臺北市立教育大學學報,第40卷,119-156。 林岳欣(2009) 。大學學務主管僕人式領導、部屬工作士氣及服務導向組織公民行為關係模式之研究-以主管幽默為干擾變項。長榮大學經營管理系碩士論文。 林淑姬(1992) 。薪酬公平、程序公正與組織公民行為關係之研究。國 立政治大學企業管理學系博士論文。 陳祖達(2011)。導師僕人式領導與師生互動關係對學生學習滿意度之影響:以T科技大學為例。南台科技大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。 蔡培村、武文瑛(2004)。領導學-理論、實務與研究。高雄:麗文。 蔡進雄 (2004)。論教師領導的趨勢與發展。教育資料與研究,59, 92-97。 謝文全(2009)。教育行政學。臺北市:高等教育。 二、英文 Allen, D.G., Shore, L.M., and Griffeth, R.W. (2003). The Role of Perceived Organizational Support and Supportive Human Resource Practices in the Turnover Process. Journal of Management, 29(1), 99–118. Allen, T.D. and Rush, M.C. (1998). The Effects of Organizational Citizenship Behavior on Performance Judgments: A Field Study and a Laboratory Experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2), 247-260. Allen, N.J., and Meyer, J.P. (1990). The Measurement and Antecedents of Affective Continuance, and Normative Commitment to Organization. Journal of Occupational and Organization Psychology, 63(1), 1-18. Bateman, T. S. & Organ, D. W. (1983). Job satisfaction and the good soldier: The relationship between affect and employee citizenship, Academy of Management Journal, 26(4), 587-595. Bettencourt, L. A., Meuter, M. L. & Gwinner, K. P. (2001). A comparison of attitude, personality, and knowledge predictors of Service-Oriented organizational citizenship behaviors, Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 29-41.Belk, R.W. (1988). Possessions and the Extended Self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 139-168. Bettencourt, L.A., Gwinner, K.P., and Meuter M.L. (2001). A Comparison of Attitude, Personality, and Knowledge Predictors of Service-Oriented Organizational Citizenship Behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 29-41. Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life, NY: John Wiley & Sons. Eisenberger, R., Huntington R., Hutchison R.S., and Sowa D. (1986). Perceived Organizational Support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 500-507. Ferris, K. (1981). Organizational commitment and performance in a professional accounting firm. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 6(4), 317–325. Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement, American Sociological Review, 25(2), 161-178 Guy, P., and Michel, T. (2007). The Influence of High-Involvement Human Resource Practices, Procedural Justice, Organizational Commitment, and Citizenship Behaviors on Information Technology Professionals’ Turnover Intentions. Group and Organization Management, 32(3), 326-357. Hogan, J., Hogan, R. & Busch, C. M. (1984). How to measure service orientation, Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(1), 167-173. Homans, G. C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange, The American Journal of Sociology, 63(6), 97-606. Kawakubo, M. K. (1987), “Perception of authority, control, and commitment in Japanese organizations”, Dissertation Abstrcacts International, 49, 01-17. Laub, J. A. (1999). Assessing the servant organization: Development of the organizational leadership assessment instrument, Unpublished dissertation , Florida Atlantic University. Limerick, D., and Cunnington, B. (1993), Managing the new organization. Jossey-Bass, SanFransico, CA. Mitchell, T.R., Holtom, B.C., Lee, T.W., Sablynski, C.J., and Erez, M. (2001). Why People Stay: Using Job Embeddedness to Predict Voluntary Turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 1102-1121. Mowday, Porter & Steers (1982), Employee-Organization Linkage-The Psychology of Commitment Absenteeism and Tumover, N.Y. :Academic Press.Mowday, R.T., Porter, L.W. and Steers, R.M., (1979). The Measurement of Organizational Commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14, 224-247. Organ, D.W. (1977). A Reappraisal and Reinterpretation of the Satisfaction-Causes-Performance Hypothesis. Academy of Management Review, 2, 46-53. Organ, D.W. (1988). Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Good Soldier Syndrome. Lexingtion Books: Lexingtion, MA. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. & Berry, L. (1988). Communication and control processes in the delivery of service quality, Journal of Marketing, 52(2), 35-48. Peloza, J., and Hassay, D.N. (2006). Intra-Organizational Volunteerism: Good Soldiers, Good Deeds and Good Politics. Journal of Business Ethics, 64, 357–379. Porter, L.W., Steers, R.M., Mowday, R.T., and Boulian, P.V. (1976). Organizational Commitment, Job Satisfaction, and Turnover among Psychiatric Technicians. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59(5), 603-609. Rousseau, D. M. (1990). Psychological and implied contracts in organization, Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 2(2), 121-139. Sendjaya, S., and Sarros, J. C. (2002). Servant leadership: Its origin, development, and application in organizations, Journal of Leadership and Organization Studies, 9(2), 57-64. Spears, L.C. (1998).Tracing the growing impact of servant-leadership, IN L.C.Spears (Ed.), New York:John Wiley. Staw, B. M. (1977), Two side of commitment, Paper Presented at the National Academy of Management, Orlando, Florida. Steers. (1977), Antecedents and outcomes of organizational commitment, Administrative Science Quarterly, 22(1), 46-62. Van Dyne, L., Cummings, L. L. & Parks, J. M. (1995). Extra-role behaviors: In pursuit of construct and definitional clarity. In B.M. Staw, & L. L. Cummings eds., Research in organizational behavior, 17, pp.215-285. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press Van Dyne, L., Graham, J.W., and Dienesch, R.M. (1994). Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Construct Redefinition, Measurement, and Validation. Academy of Management Journal, 37(4), 765–802. |
電子全文 Fulltext |
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。 論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define 開放時間 Available: 校內 Campus: 已公開 available 校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available |
紙本論文 Printed copies |
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。 開放時間 available 已公開 available |
QR Code |