Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0804120-140912 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0804120-140912
論文名稱
Title
善因行銷「左」、「右」你的心? 善因/產品圖片左右相對位置、產品類型與善因圖片情緒表現對廣告效果的影響
Left or Right in Cause-Related Marketing? Impacts of Product-Cause Image Position, Product Type and Emotional Expression of Cause Image on Advertising Effectiveness
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
233
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2020-07-28
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2020-09-04
關鍵字
Keywords
善因圖片情緒表現、處理流暢性、產品類型、善因/產品圖片左右相對位置、善因行銷
casue-related marketing (CRM), lateral display, product type, emotional expression, processing fluency
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5795 次,被下載 0
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5795 times, has been downloaded 0 times.
中文摘要
善因行銷是企業通過與非營利組織合作,當消費者購買善因產品時,便將一
部分金額捐給非營利組織;然而,隨著善因行銷的普及化,善因行銷廣告對消費
者所產生的廣告效果也更形重要,本研究提出在善因行銷廣告中,產品與善因在
廣告中擺放的左右位置會影響廣告效果。
本研究進行四個實驗。實驗一和二檢視產品類型來的干擾效果,進行 2(善因/
產品圖片左右相對位置:善因置於產品左邊 vs. 善因置於產品右邊)x2(產品類型:
享樂品對實用品)二因子設計,產品態度和購買意願為依變數,探討消費者在不同
情境下對善因廣告的態度和購買意願,中介變數為處理流暢性,排除感知影響、
同情心與罪惡感為可能的中介變數。實驗三和四除了考慮產品類型的干擾效果,
更進一步加上考慮善因圖片的情緒表達可能在廣告效果來的干擾影響。依變數測
量包括品牌態度、購買意圖與願付價格,另外也再次檢測處理流暢性為中介變數。
研究結果顯示,當善因行銷的產品為享樂型(實用型)產品時,產品圖片右-善
因圖片左(產品圖片左-善因圖片右),更能夠增加消費者對廣告的正面評價。除此
之外,當考慮情緒時,使用哭臉(笑臉)表情的善因圖片,會增強享樂型(實用型)產
品在產品圖片右-善因圖片左(產品圖片左-善因圖片右)的廣告效果。本研究也發現
消費者對於特定的組合有著更高的處理流暢性,從而增強對品牌態度和購買意願,本研究最後提出理論與實務貢獻。
Abstract
Cause-related marketing (CRM) is a charitable activity built between a company and a nonprofit organization. A firm donates money to a cause for every purchase that consumers makes. Advertising has been found to paly an important role in CRM effectiveness. The current research examines how lateral display between the images of product and cause (i.e., place the product and cause in a lef-right position) makes a difference in CRM effectiveness.
Four experiments are conducted in this research. The first two studies focus on the moderating role of product type and use a 2 (lateral display: product left—casue right vs. product right—cause left) x 2 (product type: hedonic vs. utilitarian) between-subjects design. Participants’ attitudes and purchase intention serve as dependent measures. Processing fluency is proposed as the underlying mechanism. Percevied impact, sympathy, and guilt are alternative mediators. The third and fourth studies further examine the emotional expression of a cause image as the other moderator on advertising effectiveness. Processing fluency is also tested as the mediator.
The experiments show that the lateral display of product left—casue right (product right-cause left) position leads to greater advertising effectiveness when the product is perceived as hedonic (utilitarian). The results further show that when emotional expression of a cause image is considered, sad (vs. happy) emotion enhances the effects of product left—casue right (vs. product right-cause left) for the hedonic (vs. utilitarian) product. Processing fluency serves as the mechanism underlying the phenomena above. The current research offers important theorectical and managerial implications.
目次 Table of Contents

第壹章 緒論​1
第一節​前言​1
第二節​研究背景​1
第三節​研究動機​4
第四節​研究目的與問題​7
第五節​研究架構​7
第貳章 文獻回顧​9
第一節 前言​9
第二節 善因行銷​9
第三節 左右位置的相關文獻​14
第四節 產品類型​17
第五節 情緒與表情​23
第六節 處理流暢性​25
第七節 小結​26
第參章 研究假設和研究架構​27
第一節 前言​27
第二節 研究假設與架構​27
第三節 小結​32
第肆章 實驗一設計與分析​33
第一節 前言​33
第二節 研究變數的操作型定義與衡量​33
第三節 研究設計​35
第四節 分析結果​37
第五節 小結​41
第伍章 實驗二設計與分析​42
第一節 前言​42
第二節 研究變數的操作型定義與衡量​42
第三節 研究設計​44
第四節 分析結果​45
第五節 小結​60
第陸章 實驗三設計與分析​61
第一節 前言​61
第二節 研究變數的操作型定義與衡量​61
第三節 研究設計​63
第四節 分析結果​65
第五節 小結​71
第柒章 實驗四設計與分析​72
第一節 前言​72
第二節 研究變數的操作型定義與衡量​72
第三節 個人差異變數​75
第四節 研究設計​75
第五節 分析結果​76
第六節 小結​88
第捌章 總結​89
第一節 前言​89
第二節 研究結果討論​89
第三節 研究貢獻​91
第四節 研究限制​93
第五節 未來研究方向​94
第六節 總結​95
參考文獻​96
附錄一 實驗一問卷​115
附錄二 實驗二問卷​131
附錄三 實驗三問卷​139
附錄四 實驗四問卷​187
參考文獻 References
Alden, D. L., & Crowley, A. E. (1995). Sex guilt and receptivity to condom advertising. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25(16), 1446-1463.
Alter, A. L., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2009). Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13(3), 219-235.
Alter, A. L., Oppenheimer, D. M., Epley, N., & Eyre, R. N. (2007). Overcoming intuition: Metacognitive difficulty activates analytic reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136(4), 569–576
Andreasen, A. R. (1996). Profits for nonprofits: Find a corporate partner. Harvard Business Review, 74(6), 9-55.
Andreoni, J. (1990). Impure altruism and donations to public goods: A theory of warm-glow giving. The Economic Journal, 100(401), 464-477.
Arnheim, R. (1974). Art and visual perception: A psychology of the creative eye. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Babin, B. J., Darden, W. R., & Griffin, M. (1994). Work and/or fun: Measuring hedonic and utilitarian shopping value. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(4), 644-656.
Bae, M. (2016). Effects of various types of cause-related marketing (CRM) ad appeals on consumers' visual attention, perceptions, and purchase intentions. Journal of Promotion Management, 22(6), 810-834.
Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(4), 577–660.
Barnes, N., & Fitzgibbons, D. (1991). Is cause related marketing in your future? Business Forum, 16(4), 20-23.
Bennett, R. (1998). Shame, guilt and responses to non-profit and public sector ads. International Journal of Advertising, 17(4), 483-499.
Berglind, M., & Nakata, C. (2005). Cause-related marketing: More buck than bang? Business Horizons, 48(5), 443-453.
Berkowitz, L., & Connor, W. H. (1966). Success, failure, and social responsibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4(6), 664.
Bolte, A., Goschke, T., & Kuhl, J. (2003). Emotion and intuition: Effects of positive and negative mood on implicit judgments of semantic coherence. Psychological Science, 14(5), 416-421.
Bowen, H. R., & Johnson, F. E. (1953). Social responsibility of the businessman. New York: Harper.
Brief, A. P., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1986). Prosocial organizational behaviors. Academy f Management Review, 11(4), 710-725.
Brønn, P. S., & Vrioni, A. B., (2001). Corporate social responsibility and cause-related marketing: An overview. International Journal of Advertising, 20(2), 207-222.
Brookshire, G., & Casasanto, D. (2012). Motivation and motor control: Hemispheric specialization for approach motivation reverses with handedness. PLoS One, 7(4), e36036.
Brown, T. J., & Dacin, P. A. (1997). The company and the product: Corporate associations and consumer product responses. Journal of Marketing, 61(1), 68-84.
Brunel, F.F. & Nelson, M.R. (2000). Explaining gendered responses to “help-self” and “help-others” charity ad appeals: the mediating role of world-views. Journal of Advertising, 29 (3), 15-28.
Bueti, D., & Walsh, V. (2009). The parietal cortex and the representation of time, space, number and other magnitudes. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1525), 1831-1840.
Burnett, M. S., & Lunsford, D. A. (1994). Conceptualizing guilt in the consumer decision‐making process. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 11(3), 33-43.
Cai, F. Y., Shen, H. & Hui, M. K. (2012). The effect of location on price estimation: Understanding number-location and number-order associations. Journal of Marketing Research, 49(5), 718-724.
Campbell, L., & Gulas, C. S. (2015). The effect of cause related marketing (CRM) on emotions and attitudes. In Proceedings of the 1996 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) Annual Conference, 238-242. Springer, Cham.
Carlson, M., Charlin, V., & Miller, N. (1988). Positive mood and helping behavior: A test of six hypotheses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(2), 211-229.
Carroll, A. B., & Shabana, K. M. (2010). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A review of concepts, research and practice. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 85-105.
Casasanto, D. (2009). Embodiment of abstract concepts: Good and bad in right- and left-handers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(3), 351-367.
Casasanto, D., & Chrysikou, E. G. (2011). When left is “right”: Motor fluency shapes abstract concepts. Psychological Science, 22(4), 419-422.
Casasanto, D., & Henetz, T. (2012). Handedness shapes children’s abstract concepts. Cognitive Science, 36(2), 359-372.
Casasanto, D., & Jasmin, K. (2010). Good and bad in the hands of politicians: spontaneous gestures during positive and negative speech. PLos One, 5(7), e11805.
Castel, A. D., McCabe, D. P., & Roediger, H. L., III. (2007). Illusions of competence and overestimation of associative memory for identical items: Evidence from judgments of learning. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14(1), 107-111.
Cavanaugh, L. A., Bettman, J. R., & Luce, M. F. (2015). Feeling love and doing more for distant others: Specific positive emotions differentially affect prosocial consumption. Journal of Marketing Research, 52(5), 657-673.
Chae, B. G., & Hoegg, J. (2013). The future looks “right”: Effects of the horizontal location of advertising images on product attitude. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(2), 223-238.
Chang, C. T. (2008). To donate or not to donate? Product characteristics and framing effects of cause‐related marketing on consumer purchase behavior. Psychology & Marketing, 25(12), 1089-1110.
Chang, C. T. (2011). Guilt appeals in cause-related marketing: The subversive roles of product type and donation magnitude. International Journal of Advertising, 30(4), 587-616.
Chang, C. T. (2012). Missing ingredients in cause-related advertising: The right formula of execution style and cause framing. International Journal of Advertising, 31(2), 231-256.
Chang, C. T. & Chu, X. Y. M. (2020). The give and take of cause-related marketing: purchasing cause-related products licenses consumer indulgence. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48, 203-221.
Chang, C. T. & Lee, Y. K. (2011). The ‘I’ of the beholder: How gender differences and self-referencing influence charity advertising. International Journal of Advertising, 30(3), 447-478.
Chang, C. T., & Liu, H. W. (2012). Goodwill hunting? Influences of product‐cause fit, product type, and donation level in cause‐related marketing. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 30(6), 634-652.
Chang, H., Chen, T., & Tseng C. (2009). How public-issue-promoted and revenue-related types of social marketing influence customer-perceived value in Taiwan's banking industry. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 21(1), 35-49.
Chatterjee, A. (2001). Language and space: Some interactions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5(2), 55-61.
Chatterjee, A., Maher, L. M., & Heilman, K. M. (1995). Spatial characteristics of thematic role representation. Neuropaychologia, 33(5), 643-648.
Chernev, A. (2004). Goal–attribute compatibility in consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(1), 141-150.
Childers, T. L., Carr, C. L., Peck, J., & Carson, S. (2001). Hedonic and utilitarian motivations for online retail shopping behavior. Journal of Retailing, 77(4), 511-535.
Christman, S., & Pinger, K. (1997). Lateral biases in pictorial preferences: Pictorial dimensions and neural mechanisms. Laterality, 2(2), 155–175.
Clark, M. S., & Mills, J. (1979). Interpersonal attraction in exchange and communal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(1), 12-24.
Cohen, J. B., & Andrade, E. B. (2004). Affective intuition and task-contingent affect regulation. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(2), 358-367.
Cone, Carol L., Feldman, M. A., & DaSilva, A. T. (2003). Causes and effects. Harvard Business Review, 81(7), 95-101.
Coulter, R. H., & Pinto, M. B. (1995). Guilt appeals in advertising: what are their effects? Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(6), 697-705.
Dang, J. N., Liu, L., Ren, D. Y., & Su, Q. (2018). Polarization and positivity effects: Divergent roles of group entitativity in warmth and competence judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 74, 74-84.
Dehaene, S., Bossini, S. and Giraux, P. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology-General, 122(3), 371-396.
De Hevia, M. D. and Spelke, E. S. (2009). Spontaneous mapping of number and space in adults and young children. Cognition, 110(2), 198-207.
Deng, X., & Kahn, B. E. (2009). Is your product on the right side? The “location effect” on perceived product heaviness and package evaluation. Journal of Marketing Research, 46(6), 725-738.
Deroy, O., Spence, C., & Noppeney, U. (2016). Metacognition in multisensory perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(10), 736-747.
Dhar, R., & Wertenbroch, K. (2000). Consumer choice between hedonic and utilitarian goods. Journal of Marketing Research, 37(1), 60-71.
Dickinson, S., & Holmes, M. (2008). Understanding the emotional and coping responses of adolescent individuals exposed to threat appeals. International Journal of Advertising, 27(2), 251-278.
Dobel, C., Diesendruck, G., & Bolte, J. (2007). How writing system and age influence spatial representations of actions: A developmental, cross-linguistic study. Psychological Science, 18(6), 487-491.
Docherty, S., & Hibbert, S. (2003). Examining company experiences of a UK cause‐related marketing campaign. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 8(4), 378-389.
Drumwright, M. E. (1994). Socially responsible organizational buying: environmental concern as a noneconomic buying criterion. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 1-19.
Eelen, J., Dewitte, S., & Warlop, L. (2013). Situated embodied cognition: Monitoring orientation cues affects product evaluation and choice. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23(4), 424-433.
Ekman, P. (1993). Facial expression and emotion. American Psychologist, 48(4), 384-392.
Endacott, R. W. J. (2004). Consumers and CRM: A national and global perspective. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 21(3), 183-189.
Feldman, J. A. (2006). From Molecule to Metaphor: A Neural Theory of Language. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Forgas, J. P. (2003). Affective influences on attitudes and judgments. In R. J. Davidson, K. R. Scherer, & H. H. Goldsmith (Eds.), Series in affective science. Handbook of affective sciences, 596-618. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Forest, D., Clark, M., Mills, J., & Isen, A. M. (1979). Helping as a function of feeling state and nature of the helping behavior. Motivation and Emotion, 3(2), 161-169.
Friedman, M. (1970). A theoretical framework for monetary analysis. Journal of Political Economy, 78(2), 193-238.
Fridlund, A. J. (1992). The behavioral ecology and sociality of human faces. In S. C. Margaret (ed.), Emotion. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Galan-Ladero, M. M., Galera-Casquet, C., & Wymer, W. (2013). Attitudes towards cause-related marketing: determinants of satisfaction and loyalty. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 10(3), 253-269.
Garrison, J. R. (1990). A new twist to cause marketing. Fund Raising Management, 20(12), 40–44.
George, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2002). Understanding when bad moods foster creativity and good ones don't: the role of context and clarity of feelings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 687-697.
Goldstone, R. L., & Barsalou, L. W. (1998). Reuniting perception and conception. Cognition, 65(2-3), 231-262.
Gorn, G. J., Goldberg, M. E., & Basu, K. (1993). Mood, awareness, and product evaluation. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2(3), 237-256.
Graf, L. K., & Landwehr, J. R. (2015). A dual-process perspective on fluency-based aesthetics: The pleasure-interest model of aesthetic liking. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19(4), 395-410.
Grau, S. L., & Folse, J. A. G. (2007). Cause-related marketing (CRM): The influence of donation proximity and message-framing cues on the less involved consumer, Journal of Advertising, 36(4), 19-33.
Gupta, S., & Pirsch, J. (2006). The company-cause-customer fit decision in cause-related marketing. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 23(6), 314-326.
Harbaugh, W. T. (1998). What do donations buy? A model of philanthropy based on prestige and warm glow. Journal of Public Economics, 67(2), 269-284.
Hibbert, S., Smith, A., Davies, A., & Ireland, F. (2007). Guilt appeals: Persuasion knowledge and charitable giving. Psychology & Marketing, 24(8), 723-742.
Hirschman, E. C., & Holbrook, M. B. (1982). Hedonic consumption: emerging concepts, methods and propositions. Journal of Marketing, 46(3), 92-101.
Herrbach, O., & Mignonac, K. (2004). How organizational image affects employee attitudes. Human Resource Management Journal, 14(4), 76-88.
Hoeffler, S., & Keller, K. L. (2002). Building brand equity through corporate societal marketing. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 21(1), 78-89.
Hood, J. (2004). The heroic enterprise: Business and the common good. Beard Books, Washington, D.C.
Hou, J., Du, L., & Li, J. (2008). Cause’s attributes influencing consumer's purchasing intention: Empirical evidence from China. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 20(4), 363-380.
Hubbard, E. M., Piazza, M., Pinel, P., & Dehaene, S. (2005). Interactions between number and space in parietal cortex. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6(6), 435-448.
IEG (2018). What sponsors want & where do dollars will go in 2018. Available at http:// https://www.sponsorship.com/Resources/What-Sponsors-Want-and-Where-Dollars-Will-Go-in-1.aspx (accessed on July 13th, 2020).
Isen, A. M. (1970). Success, failure, attention, and reaction to others: The warm glow of success. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 15(4), 294-301.
Isen, A. M. (1985). Asymmetry of happiness and sadness in effects on memory in normal college students: Comment on Hasher, Rose, Zacks, Sanft, and Doren. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114(3), 388-391.
Isen, A. M. (1999). Positive affect. In T. Dalgleish & M. Power (Eds.), The handbook of cognition and emotion, 521-539. New York: Wiley.
Isen, A. M., Daubman, K. A., & Nowicki, G. P. (1987). Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(6), 1122-1131.
Isen, A. M., Johnson, M. M., Mertz, E., & Robinson, G. F. (1985). The influence of positive affect on the unusualness of word associations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(6), 1413-1426.
Jacoby, L. L., Kelley, C. M., & Dywan, J. (1989). Memory Attributions. in H. L. Roediger & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Varieties of Memory and Consciousness: Essays in Honor of Endel Tulving, 391-422. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Jenner, J. R. (1982). Participation, leadership, and the role of volunteerism among selected women volunteers. Journal of Voluntary Action Research, 11(4), 27-38.
Kadosh, R. C., Brodsky, R., Levin, M., & Henik, A. (2008). Mental representation: What can pitch tell us about the distance effect? Cortex, 44(4), 470-477.
Kaufmann, G. (2003). The effect of mood on creativity in the innovation process. In L. V. Shavinina (Eds.), The international handbook on innovation, 191-203. Oxford: Elsevier Science.
Keltner, D. & Kring, A. M. (1998). Emotion, social function, and psychopathology. Review of General Psychology, 2 3), 320-342.
Keltner, D. & Haidt, J. (1999). Social functions of emotions at four levels of analysis. Cognition and Emotion, 13(5), 505-521.
Kim, J. C., Wadhwa, M., & Chattopadhyay, A. (2018). When busy is less indulging: Impact of busy mindset on self-control behaviors. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(5), 933-952.
Kivetz, R., & Keinan, A. (2006). Repenting hyperopia: An analysis of self-control regrets. Journal of Consumer Research, 33(2), 273-282.
Kivetz, R., & Simonson, I. (2002). Earning the right to indulge: Effort as a determinant of customer preferences toward frequency program rewards. Journal of Marketing Research, 39(2), 155-170.
Klein, J., & Dawar, N. (2004). Corporate social responsibility and consumers’ attributions and brand evaluations in a product–harm crisis. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21(3), 203-217.
Kominsky, J. F., & Casasanto, D. (2013). Specific to whose body? Perspective-taking and the spatial mapping of valence. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 266-276.
Kooijmans, M. C. (2004). Heineken: Only one thing missing. Unpublished MSc Thesis, RSM Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Kotler, P., & Armstrong, G. (2010). Principles of marketing. Pearson education.
Kotler, P., & Lee, N. (2005). Best of breed: When it comes to gaining a market edge while supporting a social cause, “corporate social marketing” leads the pack. Social Marketing Quarterly, 11(3-4), 91-103.
Krebs, D. L. (1970). Altruism an examination of the concept and a review of the literature. Psychology Bulletin, 73(4), 258-302.
Krishna, A. (1991). Effect of dealing patterns on consumer perceptions of deal frequency and willingness to pay. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(4), 441-451.
Kurucz, E. C., Colbert, B. A., & Wheeler, D. (2008). The business case for corporate social responsibility. In the Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility.
Lafferty, B. A., & Goldsmith, R. E. (2005). Cause-brand alliances: Does the cause help the brand or does the brand help the cause? Journal of Business Research, 58(4), 423-429.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh Vol. 4. New York: Basic books.
Lane, E. W. (1836). Modern Egyptians. London.
Larson, J. (1995). Sweet charity. Marketing Tools, 2(3), 68-72.
Lee, A. Y. (2001). The mere exposure effect: An uncertainty reduction explanation revisited. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(10), 1255-1266.
Lee, A. Y., & Aaker, J. L. (2004). Bringing the frame into focus: The influence of regulatory fit on processing fluency and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(2), 205-218.
Lee, Y. K., Chang, C. T., & Chen, P. C. (2017). What sells better in green communications: Fear or hope? It depends on whether the issue is global or local. Journal of Advertising Research, 57(4), 379-396.
Lee, A. Y., & Labroo, A. A. (2004). The effect of conceptual and perceptual fluency on brand evaluation. Journal of Marketing Research, 41(2), 151-165.
Lichtenstein, D.R., Drumwright, M. E., & Braig, B. M. (2004). The effect of corporate social responsibility on customer donations to corporate-supported nonprofits. Journal of Marketing, 68(4), 16-32.
Liu, G., Liston-Heyes, C., & Ko, W. W. (2010). Employee participation in cause-related marketing strategies: A study of management perceptions from British consumer service industries. Journal of Business Ethics, 92(2), 195-210.
Lourenco, S. F., & Longo, M. R. (2010). General magnitude representation in human infants. Psychological Science, 21(6), 873-881.
Maass, A., & Russo, A. (2003). Directional bias in the mental representation of spatial events: Nature or culture? Psychological Science, 14(4), 296-301.
Martin, L. L., & Stoner, P. (1996). Mood as input: What we think about how we feel determines how we think. Striving and feeling: Interactions among goals, affect, and self-regulation, 279-301. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Mayer, J. D., & Gaschke, Y. N. (1988). The experience and meta-experience of mood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(1), 102-111.
McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117-127.
Mishra, A., & Mishra, H. (2011). The influence of price discount versus bonus pack on the preference for virtue and vice foods. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(1), 196-206.
Meyer, H. (1999). When the cause is just. Journal of Business Strategy, 20(6), 27-31.
Nesler, M. S., Aguinis, H., Quigley, B. M., & Tedeschi, J. T. (1993). The Effect of credibility on perceived power 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23(17), 1407-1425.
Newcomb, K. (2007). Cause marketing: Good for humanity and good for your business. Debt Cubed, 22, 24-25.
Novemsky, N., Dhar, R., Schwarz, N., & Simonson, I. (2007). Preference fluency in choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(3), 347-356.
Okada, E. M. (2005). Justification effects on consumer choice of hedonic and utilitarian goods. Journal of marketing research, 42(1), 43-53.
Oppenheimer, D. M. (2008). The secret life of fluency. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(6), 237-241.
Ouellet, M., Santiago, J., Israeli, Z., & Gabay, S. (2010). Is the future the right time? Experimental Psychology, 57(4), 308-314
Parrott, W. G., & Sabini, J. (1990). Mood and memory under natural conditions: Evidence for mood incongruent recall. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(2), 321-336.
Peracchio, L. A., & Meyers-Levy, J. (2005). Using stylistic properties of ad pictures to communicate with consumers. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(1), 29-40.
Peracchio, L. A., & Tybout, A. M. (1996). The moderating role of prior knowledge in schema-based product evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research, 23(3), 177-192.
Prinz, J. J. (2004). Furnishing the mind: Concepts and their perceptual basis. MIT press.
Polonsky, M. J., & Wood, G. (2001). Can the overcommercialization of cause-related marketing harm society? Journal of Macromarketing, 21(1), 8-22.
Porter, M.E., & Kramer, M.R. (2002). The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review, 80(12), 56-68.
Reber, R., Winkielman, P., & Schwarz, N. (1998). Effects of perceptual fluency on affective judgments. Psychological Science, 9(1), 45-48.
Rifon, N. H., Choi, S. M., Trimble, C. S., & Li, H. (2004). Congruence effects in sponsorship: The mediating role of sponsor credibility and consumer attributions of sponsor motive. Journal of Advertising, 33(1), 30-42.
Romero, M., & Biswas, D. (2016). Healthy-left, unhealthy-right: can displaying healthy items to the left (versus right) of unhealthy items nudge healthier choices? Journal of Consumer Research, 43(1), 103-112.
Rudi, J., & Çakır, M. (2017). Vice or virtue: How shopping frequency affects healthfulness of food choices. Food Policy, 69(C), 207-217.
Rusting, C. L., & DeHart, T. (2000). Retrieving positive memories to regulate negative mood: Consequences for mood-congruent memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(4), 737-752.
Ruth, J. A., & Faber, R. J. (1988). Guilt: An overlooked advertising appeal. In Proceedings of the 1988 Conference of the American Academy of Advertising, 83-89. Austin, TX: American Academy of Advertising.
Salovey, P., & Rosenhan, D. L. (1989). Mood states and prosocial behavior. Handbook of Social Psychophysiology, 371-391.
Santiago, J., Lupáñez, J., Pérez, E., & Funes, M. J. (2007). Time (also) flies from left to right. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(3), 512-516.
Santiago, J., Roman, A., Ouellet, M., Rodriguez, N., & Perex-Azor, P. (2008). In hindsight, life flows from left to right. Psychological Research, 74(1), 59-70.
Scherer, K. R., & Ceschi, G. (2000). Criteria for emotion recognition from verbal and nonverbal expression: Studying baggage loss in the airport. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(3), 327-339.
Schlegelmilch, B., & Tynan, A. (1989). Who Volunteers? An investigation into the characteristics of charity volunteers. Journal of Marketing Management, 5, 133-151.
Schwarz, N. (2002). Situated cognition and the wisdom in feelings: Cognitive tuning. In L. Feldman Barrett and P. Salovey (Eds.), The Wisdom in Feeling, 144-166. New York: Guilford Press.
Schwarz, N., Bless, H., & Bohner, G. (1991). Mood and persuasion: Affective states influence the processing of persuasive communications. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 161-199.
Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1983). Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(3), 513-523.
Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (2003). Mood as information: 20 years later. Psychological Inquiry, 14(3-4), 296-303.
Scott, M. L., Nowlis, S. M., Mandel, N., & Morales, A. C. (2008). The effects of reduced food size and package size on the consumption behavior of restrained and unrestrained eaters. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(3), 391-405.
Seamon, J. G., Williams, P. C., Crowley, M. J., Kim, I. J., Langer, S. A., Orne, P. J., & Wishengrad, D. L. (1995). The mere exposure effect is based on implicit memory: Effect of stimulus type, encoding conditions, and number of exposures on recognition and affect judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(3), 711–721.
Shen, C. H., & Chang, Y. (2009). Ambition versus conscience, does corporate social responsibility pay off? The application of matching methods. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(1), 133-153.
Sherry Jr, J. F. (1990). A sociocultural analysis of a Midwestern American flea market. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(1), 13-30.
Small, D. A., & Lerner, J. S. (2008). Emotional policy: Personal sadness and anger shape judgments about a welfare case. Political Psychology, 29(2), 149-168.
Small, D. A., Loewenstein, G., & Slovic, P. (2007). Sympathy and callousness: The impact of deliberative thought on donations to identifiable and statistical victims. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 102(2), 143-153.
Small, D. A., & Verrochi, N. M. (2009). The face of need: Facial emotion expression on charity advertisements. Journal of Marketing Research, 46(6), 777-787.
Smith, C. (1994). The new corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review, 72(3),
105–116.
Smith, R. W., Faro, D., & Burson, K. A. (2013). More for the Many: The Influence of
Entitativity on Charitable Giving. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(5), 961-976.
Strahilevitz, M. (1999). The effects of product type and donation magnitude on willingness to pay more for a charity-linked brand. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 8(3), 215-241.
Strahilevitz, M., & Myers, J. G. (1998). Donations to charity as purchase incentives: how well they work may depend on what you are trying to sell. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(4), 434-46.
Subrahmanyan, S. (2004). Effects of price premium and product type on the choice of cause-related brands: A Singapore perspective. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 13(2), 116-124.
Sundar, S. (2007). Cause related marketing: Tactic or strategy? Paper presented in International Marketing Conference on Marketing & Society, 8-10.
The Public Pulse (1994). Marketing: When Cause-Related Marketing Counts. 9(2), 4-6.
Thomas, M., Desai, K. K., & Seenivasan, S. (2010). How credit card payments increase unhealthy food purchases: Visceral regulation of vices. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(1), 126-139.
Torralbo, A., Santiago, J., & Lupiáñez, J. (2006). Flexible conceptual projection of time onto spatial frames of reference. Cognitive Science, 30(4), 745-757.
Trimble, C. S., & Rifon, N. J. (2006). Consumer perceptions of compatibility in cause‐related marketing messages. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 11(1), 29-47.
Turner, M., Xie, X., Lanmm, E., & Southard, B. (2009). Encouraging mothers to get a mammogram: A cross-cultural examination of guilt appeals. In annual meeting of the International Communication Association, New York.
Tversky, B., Kugelmass, S., & Winter, A. (1991). Cross-cultural and developmental-trends in graphic productions. Cognitive Psychology, 23(4), 515-557.
Valenzuela, A. and Raghubir, P. (2015). Are consumers aware of top-bottom but not of left-right inferences? Implications for shelf space positions. Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied, 21(3), 224-241.
Valenzuela, A., Raghubir, P. and Mitalalis, C. (2013). Shelf space schemas: myth or reality? Journal of Business Research, 66(7), 881-888.
Vanhamme, J., Lindgreen, A., Reast, J., & Van Popering, N. (2012). To do well by doing good: Improving corporate image through cause-related marketing. Journal of Business Ethics, 109(3), 259-274.
Van Kleef, G. A., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2004). The interpersonal effects of anger and happiness in negotiations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(1), 57-76.
Van Rompay, T. J., Galetzka, M., Pruyn, A. T., & Garcia, J. M. (2008). Human and spatial dimensions of retail density: Revisiting the role of perceived control. Psychology & Marketing, 25(4), 319-335.
Varadarajan, P. R. (1986). Cooperative sales promotion: An idea whose time has come. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 3(1), 15-33.
Varadarajan, P. R., & Menon, A. (1988). Cause-related marketing: A coalignment of marketing strategy and corporate philanthropy. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 58-74.
Wansink, B., & Chandon, P. (2006). Can “low-fat” nutrition labels lead to obesity? Journal of marketing research, 43(4), 605-617.
Wall, Wendy L. (1984). Companies change the ways they make charitable donations. Wall Street Journal, 1, 19.
Walsh, V. (2003). A theory of magnitude: Common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(11), 483-488.
Wänke, M., Bohner, G., & Jurkowitsch, A. (1997). There are many reasons to drive a BMW: Does imagined ease of argument generation influence attitudes? Journal of Consumer Research, 24(2), 170-177.
Webb, D. J., & Mohr, L. A. (1998). A typology of consumer responses to cause-related marketing: From skeptics to socially concerned. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 17(2), 226-238.
Wertenbroch, K. (1998). Consumption self-control by rationing purchase quantities of virtue and vice. Marketing Science, 17(4), 317-337.
Whittlesea, B. W., Jacoby, L. L., & Girard, K. (1990). Illusions of immediate memory: Evidence of an attributional basis for feelings of familiarity and perceptual quality. Journal of Memory and Language, 29(6), 716-732.
Wiggin, K. L., Reimann, M., & Jain, S. P. (2018). Curiosity tempts indulgence. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(6), 1194-1212.
Winkielman, P., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2001). Mind at ease puts a smile on the face: Psychophysiological evidence that processing facilitation elicits positive affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6), 989-1000.
Witherspoon, D., & Allan, L. G. (1985). The effect of a prior presentation on temporal judgments in a perceptual identification task. Memory & Cognition, 13(2), 101-111.
Wood, G. and Fischer, M. H. (2008). Numbers, space, and action- from finger counting to the mental number line and beyond. Cortex, 44(4), 353-358.
Zemack-Rugar, Y., Rabino, R., Cavanaugh, L. A., & Fitzsimons, G. J. (2016). When donating is liberating: The role of product and consumer characteristics in the appeal of cause-related products. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 26(2), 213-230.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus:開放下載的時間 available 2025-09-04
校外 Off-campus:開放下載的時間 available 2025-09-04

您的 IP(校外) 位址是 18.191.171.235
現在時間是 2024-04-26
論文校外開放下載的時間是 2025-09-04

Your IP address is 18.191.171.235
The current date is 2024-04-26
This thesis will be available to you on 2025-09-04.

紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 2025-09-04

QR Code