Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0804119-024736 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0804119-024736
論文名稱
Title
解析缺水資訊如何影響高雄市民家庭回收水之使用動機
Analyzing how water shortage information influences the household motivation of using grey water: A case study in Kaohsiung City
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
65
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2019-07-22
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2019-09-04
關鍵字
Keywords
保護動機理論、水資源缺乏、缺水訊息、家庭回收水、再利用
reuse, water shortage, water shortage information, grey water, protection motivation theory
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5692 次,被下載 0
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5692 times, has been downloaded 0 times.
中文摘要
臺灣受制於本身氣候、地形條件與氣候變遷等因素,總雨量雖豐沛,然降雨分配不平均及河川短小湍急等造成缺水的困境,而南部地區夏季尤其嚴重。本研究使用保護動機理論,先了解民眾對缺水訊息的態度,並預期民眾會在認知中介過程(Cognitive Mediating Processes)受缺水訊息的影響,經過威脅評估和因應評估後產生保護動機,意即是否使用家庭回收水以免除或降低缺水的威脅。資料蒐集方面,採用問卷調查法,並以李克特五點量表進行設計。問卷第一部份依據保護動機的構面編排題項,第二部份蒐集受訪者的性別、年齡、教育程度、居住類型、接收缺水訊息的經驗、平常使用家庭回收水的經驗等數據資料。問卷調查之對象為高雄市居民,調查時間為2019年5月,問卷發放地點為臺灣自來水公司高雄服務所,總計回收有效問卷232份。
研究結果發現,缺水資訊對於引發民眾的認知中介過程皆有顯著正向影響,而認知中介過程中,嚴重性與受創性對民眾使用家庭回收水動機無顯著影響,反而自我效能、反應效能、因應成本對民眾使用家庭回收水動機有相當顯著的影響。人們感知到威脅事件的嚴重性時(嚴重性),以及感知到威脅事件會對個人或社會造成的影響時(受創性),這兩者皆不會引發對於使用家庭回收水之保護動機;當人們自我評估自己有能力去對威脅事件做出回應(自我效能),以及人們意識到做出回應能夠減輕威脅事件所帶來的的影響時(反應效能),這兩者皆會引發對於使用家庭回收水之保護動機;做出回應所需付出或損失的成本(因應成本)越高,使用家庭回收水之保護動機則越低。本研究根據此結果推導出結論,探討出影響民眾使用家庭回收水之因素,提出需加強宣導水資源訊息給民眾、或是降低回收水使用成本等相關建議,以及後續研究可以改善之地方。
Abstract
Although the rainfall is plentiful all the year around in Taiwan, the water shortage situation is still obvious due to the special local climate, topographic conditions and global climate change including uneven distribution of rainfall in every month and rushing rivers, especially in Taiwan’s southern region during summer. To begin with, the people’s attitude for water shortage information was explored by using Protection Motivation Theory and the influence of water shortage information in people’s cognitive mediating process was also confirmed in this study. Afterwards, the people’s protect motivation was induced after the threat appraisal and coping appraisal were completed which is meaning that usage of grey water could release or weaken the threat of water shortage.
In this study, the questionnaire survey research method was adopted and questionnaire survey was designed using the Likert five-point scale to collect the research data. The first part of questionnaire was organized on the facet of protection motivation. The second part collects of questionnaire was cataloged including the gender, age, education level, type of residence, experience of receiving water shortage information, and experience of using grey water. The finite population of survey was conducted in Kaohsiung citizens. The survey period was conducted in May 2019. The questionnaire distribution was at the Kaohsiung Service Office of the Taiwan Water Corporation. A total of 232 valid questionnaires were collected. In the research result, it indicated that the cognitive mediating process of protection motivation as water shortage is significantly positively influenced by the factor of water shortage information. In the research of cognitive mediating process, the influence of severity factor and vulnerability factor in water shortage for Kaohsiung citizen on the using motivation of grey water is not significant. However, the factors including self-efficacy, response-efficacy, and response cost significantly influence the using motivation of grey water. Even though people sense the severity of water shortage, defined as severity factor, and perceive the influences of water shortage threat event on individual and society, defined as vulnerability factor, people would not induce a protection motivation of using grey water. Besides, when people can make a sense of self-assessment to response the threat event of water shortage, defined as self-efficacy factor, people would induce a protection motivation of using grey water. Also, when people has made a sense to response the threat event of water shortage and decreases the influence in threat of water shortage, defined as response-efficacy factor, people would induce a protection motivation of using grey water. The higher the response and lost costs of using grey water is, the lower the protection motivation effect of using grey water is.
In final, based on the research results as described above, the critical factors of using grey water in household were derived. How to enhance the widely use of grey water were recommended in this research and continuous research of use of grey water in future was also supported.
目次 Table of Contents
論文審定書 i
謝誌 ii
摘要 iii
Abstract iv
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景 1
第二節 研究動機 3
第三節 研究目的與問題 6
第二章 文獻回顧 8
第一節 水資源缺乏 8
第二節 水資源回收再利用 9
第三節 影響民眾對回收水接受度之因素 11
第四節 訊息涉入 12
第五節 保護動機理論 14
第三章 研究方法 17
第一節 研究架構與假設 17
第二節 問卷設計與研究對象 21
第三節 統計分析方法 23
第四章 資料分析 25
第一節 敘述統計分析 25
第二節 信度效度分析 33
第三節 結構方程式分析 38
第五章 結論與建議 41
第一節 研究發現 41
第二節 相關建議 43
第三節 研究限制 44
參考文獻 45
附錄一 正式問卷 53
參考文獻 References
中華民國內政部營建署網站。全國污水下水道用戶接管普及率及整體污水處理率統計表,2018年 11月20日。2018年 12月01日,取自:https://reurl.cc/vRmNk
水利基本政策(1986 ~ 2000年),行政院經濟部水利署,1986年 5 月。
王仁俊、張麗蓉、余光昌(2011)。中小學校雨水及中水貯留再利用系統水質分析之研。臺灣公共衛生雜誌,30(3),2011。
行政院環境保護署(1996):中華民國臺灣地區環境資訊,臺北:行政院環境保護署, pp.11-15。
李茂能(2006)。結構方程模式軟體Amos之簡介及其在測驗編製上之應用。台北:心理。
李錦地、梁壽政(2001)。再生水利用系統之規劃及推動,工業污染防治,第77期(Jan. 2001),109 – 121頁。
汪宸妁(2013),以科技接受模型探討信任理論、訊息涉入、認知風險影響消費者網購文創商品意願之研究。大仁科技大學文化創意產業研究所碩士論文。
林志墩、劉偉裕(2016),我國都市污水回收再利用發展現況,中華技術 109 (民國105年1月),144 –155。
邱皓政(2011)。結構方程模式:LISREL的理論、技術與應用(二版)。臺北市:雙葉書廊。
建築物生活雜排水回收再利用設計技術規範,內政部營建署,2012。
范楓旻、温修慧(2016),工業製程水循環再生及利用專題高科技產業用水回收率環評監督實績工業污染防治,第 136 期(July 2016),79-101。
國立臺灣博物館水資源特展,2002年8月。2018年 12月01日,取自:http://web.fg.tp.edu.tw/~earth/learn/water/main.htm
張維峻(2014)。臺灣地區生活用水型態與用水量之推估研究。國立臺北大學自然資源與環境管理研究所碩士論文,臺北。
現階段水資源政策綱領(1996年~ 2000年),行政院經濟部水利署,1996年 3 月 。
莊雯凱、闕蓓德,2018。都市水資源消耗評估指標-都市水足跡,土木水利 45卷4期(2018年8月),18–22。
莊順興、王毓正、游勝傑、陳筱華,吳依芸、謝明昌、覃嘉忠(2009)。法規研析-我國水回收及再生利用法規評析與推動建議,工業污染防治,第 112 期(Dec. 2009),107 – 121頁。
莊麗存、李晴玳(2015年04月24日)。臺灣高雄史上首次3階限水 影響96.5萬戶。大紀元。2018年12月08日,取自:http://www.epochtimes.com/b5/15/4/24/n4419663.htm
陳天航(2010),高雄市民對水再生利用方案接受度及其影響因素。國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所碩士論文。
陳正昌、程炳林、陳新豐、劉子鍵(2003)。多變量分析方法:統計軟體應用(三版)。台北:五南。
陳亮清(2005)。工業用水合理回收率與用水需求之研究。國立臺灣海洋大學河海工程學系碩士論文。
單信瑜,張又仁,2007,『農田灌溉對土壤與地下水之影響』,第三屆海峽兩岸土壤與地下水污染整治研討會,臺灣大學。
游青雲(2015年04月24日)。高雄市將於5/4進入第三階段限水,停水細節需等中央公布,市府已積極研擬因應措施,請市民配合節約用水。指傳媒,轉自高雄市政府全球資訊網。2018年12月08日,取自:http://www.epochtimes.com/b5/15/4/24/n4419663.htm
新世紀水資源政策綱領(2006年),行政院經濟部,2006 年 元 月。
新紀元水利施政綱領(2013 ~ 2022年),行政院經濟部水利署,2013年 元月。
楊光立(2010)。大專院校宿舍用水設備改善節水效率之研究評估以國立交通大學為例。國立交通大學工學院工程技術與管理學程碩士論文,新竹。
經濟部水利署(2018)。水資源類常用專有名詞,規劃工具與知識。2019年5月15日,取自:https://www.wrap.gov.tw/pro22.aspx?type=0102000000
葉欣誠、陳珊玫(2004)。都市廢污水再利用之標的選擇-以高雄市中區污水處理廠為例,高雄師大學報 16期 ( 2004年6月) ,385-402。
農業水資源再利用於民生工業用水推動研析,行政院經濟建設委員會,民國101 年4 月。
臺灣地區民國105年各標的用水統計年報,經濟部水利署。
臺灣地區民國106年各標的用水統計年報,經濟部水利署。
臺灣自來水公司第九區管理處2014 年度推動節約用水宣導計畫,臺灣自來水公司第九區管理處, 2014 年 3 月。
劉天健(2014),威脅評估,飛行安全冬季刊(飛行安全基金會民國,103年)。
蕭至惠(2016),品牌贊助商的廣告溝通效果之研究-以倫敦奧運為例,行銷科學學報,第12卷第1期,39 – 62。
韓再生(Zai-Sheng Han),2001。海河流域地下水资源保護,水文地質工程地質,28卷1期(Jan. 2001),25 – 28。
譚偉恩(2016),食品供應鏈中惡意汙染行為之防治:以美國,歐盟與國際組織的實踐為例。《歐美研究》第四十六卷第四期(民國105年12月),563 – 602。
虞國興(2014)。論臺灣水資源開發的必要性,臺灣水利,第 64 卷,第 1 期。民國 105 年 3 月出版。
Adewumi, J. R., Ilemobade, A. A., & van Zyl, J. E.(2014). Factors predicting the intention to accept treated wastewater reuse for non-potable uses amongst domestic and non-domestic respondents. Journal of the South African Institution of Civil Engineering, 56(1), 11-19.
Al-Jayyousi, O. R. (2003). Greywater reuse: towards sustainable water management. Desalination, 156(1-3), 181-192.
Anderson, J. (2003). The environmental benefits of water recycling and reuse. Water science and technology: water supply, 3(4), 1-10.
Anke D. Leroux, Vance L. Martin, Hao Zheng (2018), “Addressing water shortages by force of habit,” Resource and Energy Economics, 53, 42-61.
Arnell, N. W. (2004). Climate change and global water resources: SRES emissions and socio-economic scenarios. Global environmental change, 14(1), 31-52.
Baggett, S., Jeffrey, P., & Jefferson, B. (2006). Risk perception in participatory planning for water reuse. Desalination, 187(1-3), 149-158.
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation model. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16 , 74–94.
Baumann, D. D. (1983). Social acceptance of water reuse. Applied Geography, 3(1), 79-84.
Bentler, P. M. & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness-of –fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.
Bentler, P. M. (1989). EQS structural equations program manual. Los Angeles, CA: BMDP Statistical Software.
Christova-Boal, D., Eden, R. E., & McFarlane, S.(1996). An investigation into greywater reuse for urban residential properties. Desalination, 106(1-3), 391-397.
Dixon, A., Butler, D., & Fewkes, A. (1999). Water saving potential of domestic water reuse systems using greywater and rainwater in combination. Water science and technology, 39(5), 25-32.
Domènech, L., & Saurí, D. (2010). Socio-technical transitions in water scarcity contexts: Public acceptance of greywater reuse technologies in the Metropolitan Area of Barcelona. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 55(1), 53-62.
Dziegielewski, B. (1991, October). The drought is real: designing a successful water conservation campaign. In Inaugural Ceremony International Seminar on Efficient Water Use, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Floyd, D. L., Prentice‐Dunn, S., & Rogers, R. W. (2000). A meta‐analysis of research on protection motivation theory. Journal of applied social psychology, 30(2), 407-429.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D.F., (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
Friedler, E. (2008). The water saving potential and the socio‐economic feasibility of greywater reuse within the urban sector–Israel as a case study. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 65(1), 57-69.
Friedler, E.(2001). Water reuse—an integral part of water resources management:: Israel as a case study. Water policy, 3(1), 29-39.
Friedler, E.,(2004).Quality of individual domestic greywater streams and its implication on on-site treatment and reuse possibilities. Env. Technology, 25(9), 997–1008.
Gan, W., & Zeng, T. (2018, April). A Review of Water Reclamation Research in China Urban Landscape Design and Planning Practice. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 989, No. 1, p. 012006). IOP Publishing.
Ghisi, E., & Ferreira, D. F. (2007). Potential for potable water savings by using rainwater and greywater in a multi-storey residential building in southern Brazil. Building and Environment, 42(7), 2512-2522.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2009). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). New Jersey : Prentice-Hall.
Hartley, T. W. (2006). Public perception and participation in water reuse. Desalination, 187(1-3), 115-126.
Hoekstra, A.Y., Chapagain, A.K., Aldaya, M.M. and Mekonnen, M.M. (2011), The Water Footprint Assessment Manual, Setting the Global Standard, Earthscan, London.
Horng, J. S., Hu, M. L. M., Teng, C. C. C., & Lin, L. (2014). Energy saving and carbon reduction behaviors in tourism–a perception study of Asian visitors from a protection motivation theory perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 19(6), 721-735.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55.
Hui Wang, Tirusew Asefa, Dave Bracciano, Alison Adams, Nisai Wanakule (2019), “Proactive water shortage mitigation integrating system optimization and input uncertainty”, Journal of Hydrology, 571,711-722.
Ifinedo, P. (2012). Understanding information systems security policy compliance: An integration of the theory of planned behavior and the protection motivation theory. Computers & Security, 31(1), 83-95.
Keshavarz, M., & Karami, E. (2016). Farmers' pro-environmental behavior under drought: Application of protection motivation theory. Journal of Arid Environments, 127, 128-136.
Kim, Y., Kong, I., Park, H., Kim, H. J., Kim, I. J., Um, M. J., ... & Vörösmarty, C. J. (2018). Assessment of regional threats to human water security adopting the global framework: A case study in South Korea. Science of the Total Environment, 637, 1413-1422.
Kim, Y., Kong, I., Park, H., Kim, H. J., Kim, I. J., Um, M. J., ... & Vörösmarty, C. J. (2018). Assessment of regional threats to human water security adopting the global framework: A case study in South Korea. Science of the Total Environment, 637, 1413-1422.
Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.
Laczniak, R. N., Kempf, D. S., & Muehling, D. D. (1999). Advertising message involvement: the role of enduring and situational factors. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 21(1), 51-61.
Laczniak, R. N., Muehling, D. D., & Grossbart, S. (1989). Manipulating message involvement in advertising research. Journal of advertising, 18(2), 28-38.
Lazarova, V., Levine, B., Sack, J., Cirelli, G., Jeffrey, P., Muntau, H., ... & Brissaud, F. (2001). Role of water reuse for enhancing integrated water management in Europe and Mediterranean countries. Water Science and Technology, 43(10), 25-33.
Li, F., Wichmann, K., & Otterpohl, R. (2009). Review of the technological approaches for grey water treatment and reuses. Science of the Total Environment, 407(11), 3439-3449.
Marks, J. S., Martin, W. C., & Zadoroznyj, M. (2006). Acceptance of water recycling in Australia: national baseline data.
McGuire, W. J. (1974). Psychological motives and Communication Gratification, in J. G. Blumler and E. Katz (eds.) The Uses of Mass Communications: Current Perspectives on Gratifications Research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Mekonnen, M., & Hoekstra, A. Y. (2011). National water footprint accounts: the green, blue and grey water footprint of production and consumption. (Value of water research report 50; No. 50). Delft, the Netherlands: Unesco-IHE Institute for Water Education.
Mourad, K. A., Berndtsson, J. C., & Berndtsson, R. (2011). Potential fresh water saving using greywater in toilet flushing in Syria. Journal of environmental management, 92(10), 2447-2453.
Muthukumaran, S., Baskaran, K., & Sexton, N. (2011). Quantification of potable water savings by residential water conservation and reuse–A case study. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 55(11).
Nelson, K., Cismaru, M., Cismaru, R., & Ono, T. (2011). Water management information campaigns and protection motivation theory. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 8(2), 163.
Pechmann, C., Zhao, G., Goldberg, M. E., & Reibling, E. T. (2003). What to convey in antismoking advertisements for adolescents: The use of protection motivation theory to identify effective message themes. Journal of marketing, 67(2), 1-18.
Pechmann, C., Zhao, G., Goldberg, M. E., & Reibling, E. T. (2003). What to convey in antismoking advertisements for adolescents: The use of protection motivation theory to identify effective message themes. Journal of Marketing, 67(2), 1-18.
Prentice-Dunn, S., & Rogers, R. W. (1986). Protection motivation theory and preventive health: Beyond the health belief model. Health education research, 1(3), 153-161.
Robinson, K. G., Robinson, C. H., & Hawkins, S. A. (2005). Assessment of public perception regarding wastewater reuse. Water Science and Technology: Water Supply, 5(1), 59-65.
Rogers, R. W. (1975). A protection motivation theory of fear appeals and attitude change1. The journal of psychology, 91(1), 93-114.
Ross, B., & Sasser, M.(1998). Reduce, reuse, recycle:Water conservation and industry, Consulting - Specifying Engineer, Oct 1998, 24-4, ProQuest pg. 60.
Sheikh, B. (1993). The city of Los Angeles gray water pilot project shows safe use of gray water is possible. In Water Management in the'90s: A Time for Innovation (pp. 678-681). ASCE.
Tao Cao, Saige Wang, Bin Chen(2019), “Water shortage risk transferred through interprovincial trade in Northeast China,” Energy Procedia, 158, 3865-3871.
Torkzadeh, G., Koufteros, X., & Pflughoeft, K. (2003). Confirmatory analysis of computer self-efficacy. Structural Equation Modeling, 10(2), 263-275.
Vance, A., Siponen, M., & Pahnila, S. (2012). Motivating IS security compliance: insights from habit and protection motivation theory. Information & Management, 49(3-4), 190-198.
Vigneswaran, S., & Sundaravadivel, M. (2004). Recycle and reuse of domestic wastewater. Wastewater Recycle, Reuse, and Reclamation, 1.
Wortzel, R. (1979). Multivariate analysis. Prentice Hall, New Jersey. Zack, M.(1999) Developing a Knowledge Strategy. California Management Review, 41, 125-143.
Wurtele, S. K., & Maddux, J. E. (1987). Relative contributions of protection motivation theory components in predicting exercise intentions and behavior. Health Psychology, 6(5), 453.
Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1985). Measuring the involvement construct. Journal of consumer research, 12(3), 341-352.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus:開放下載的時間 available 2024-09-04
校外 Off-campus:開放下載的時間 available 2024-09-04

您的 IP(校外) 位址是 3.144.113.197
現在時間是 2024-04-29
論文校外開放下載的時間是 2024-09-04

Your IP address is 3.144.113.197
The current date is 2024-04-29
This thesis will be available to you on 2024-09-04.

紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 2024-09-04

QR Code