在企業組織管理方面而言，部門團隊要如何有效管理團隊中組員的組成從而提升團隊的績效表現是一個非常重要的議題。本研究發現雖然團隊組成多樣性對於團隊績效表現的議題越來越被重視，但迄今為止，除了少數學者分析了團隊組成多樣性對於團隊績效表現的影響外，多數研究人員卻很少關注團隊多樣性對團隊績效在混合團隊中的影響; 因此，作者認為，透過鎖定在競爭大於合作的混合動機團隊中，分析其中團隊組成中的年齡多樣性，以及國藉多樣性對團隊績效表現所產生的效果;此結果可以用來完善在不同性質的團隊背景中，團隊組成對團隊績效表現的所造成影響的信息。並進一步用來將其作為企業用來推斷在複雜的混合動機團隊為特徵的人力資源團隊規劃中生產率和發揮潛力的信號，將其價值變動。我們使用泊松回歸模型(Poisson)模型，來分析從Transfermarkt（TM）數據庫中，選擇了英國足球團隊中觀察期為在2006年到2015年共10年間，每年度的9月季度的比賽紀錄中，第一級的足球隊(共20隊)、及第二級的足球隊(共38隊)，共計58個球個球隊的國際競賽數據，以及團隊中共計14698位組員在Transfermarkt（TM）所登錄的人口統計資訊做為本研究之樣本數據。研究結果得知:(1)在競爭大於合作的混合動機團隊中，年齡多樣性對於團隊績效沒有正面的影響；(2)在競爭大於合作的混合動機團隊中，國籍多樣性對於團隊績效有正面的影響。也就是說，在競爭大於合作的混合動機團隊模型中，國藉多樣性愈高，對團隊的績效表現結果也愈高。但此研究不支持年齡多樣性正向團隊績效表現之假設。

In terms of corporate organization management, how the department effectively manages the composition of the team members to improve the team’s performance is a very important issue. This study found that although the diversity of team composition is becoming more and more important to the issue of team performance, so far, except for a few scholars who have analyzed the impact of team composition diversity on team performance, most researchers have paid little attention to the impact of team diversity on team performance in a mixed motivation team; therefore, the author believes that by targeting on a mixed motivation team where competition is greater than cooperation, to analyze the effect of age diversity and nationality diversity on team performance ; this result can be used to improve the information on the effect of team composition on team performance in different types of team backgrounds. And further use it as a signal for companies to infer productivity and potential in the department characterized by complex mixed-motivation teams, and change its value.
We use the Poisson regression model to analyze the date from the Transfermarkt(TM) database, the observation period of the British football team is selected for a total of 10 years from 2006 to 2015, in the annual September quarter game record , The first-level football team (a total of 20 teams), and the second-level football team (a total of 38 teams), a total of 58 football teams, international competition data, and a total of 14,698 team members in Transfermarkt (TM) The registered demographic information is used as the sample data for this research. The research results show that: (1) In a mixed motivation team where competition is greater than cooperation, age diversity has no positive effect on team performance; (2) In a mixed motivation team where competition is greater than cooperation, nationality diversity has a positive effect on team performance Impact. In other words, in the mixed-motivated team model where competition is greater than cooperation, the higher the diversity of nationality, the higher the performance results of the team. However, this study does not support the hypothesis that age diversity is positive for team performance.

Table of Contents
Paper review……………………………………………………………….……..…. i
gratitude…………………………………….…………………………….…………. ii
Chinese abstract………………………………………………………………..…… v
Abstract …………………………………………………………………….….…… vi
1. Introduction…………………………………………………………………..…… 1
2. theory and hypotheses…………………………………………………..……..….. 4
2-1-1. cooperative and competitive team; mixed motivation team…….…. 4
2-1-2. Use professional football teams to study……………………..….… 6
2-1-3. Professional football teams are mixed-motivated teams…….….…… 7
2-1-4. Competition in professional football teams is greater than cooperation…………………………………………………………… 7
2-2-1. Diversity of Team Composition: How to configure team composition in a mixed situation of competition and cooperation? ………………………………………………………… 8
2-2-2. Demographic variables……………………………………………… 9
2-2-3. Age and Nationality diversity variables…………………….….…… 9
2-2-4. Age diversity variable……………………………………….……… 10
2-2-5. Nationality diversity…………………………………………………14
3. Data and methods………………………………………………………………… 17
3-1. Dependent variable………………………………………………… 17
3-2. Independent variable…………………………………………… 18
3-3. Control variable…………………………………………………… 18
4-4 models……………………………………………………………… 20
4. Research analysis and results……………………………………………………… 21
4-1. Team age diversity and team performance in professional football Team………………………………………………………………… 21
4-2. Team nationality diversity and team performance……………… 24
4-3. Supplementary analyses………………………..……………..… 25
5. Discussion and conclusion………………………………………………….… 27
5-1. conclusion………………………….……………………………… 27
5-2 Implications and suggestions for management practices………..… 28
5-3 Research limitations and recommendations………………………... 29
Reference…………………………………………………………………………. 31



Table
Table 1.…………………………………………………………………………… 21
Table 2.…………………………………………………………………………… 22
Table 3.…………………………………………………………………………… 25


Attachment
Attactment1.……………………………………………………………………… 41
Attactment2.……………………………………………………………………… 46

1. Alesina, A., & La Ferrara, E. (2005). Ethnic diversity and economic performance. Journal Economic Literature, 43, 762-800. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/002205105774431243
2. Avery, A. D., McKay, P. F., & Wilson, D. C. (2008). What are the odds? How demographic similarity affects the prevalence of perceived employment discrimination. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 235–249. DOI:10.1037/ 0021-9010. 93.2.235
3. Bain, A. (2005) ‘Constructing and Artistic Identity’, Work, Employment and Society 19(1): 25–46.
4. Baker, D. P., & Salas, E. (1997). Principles and measuring teamwork: A summary and look toward the future. In M. T. Brannick, E. Salas, & C. Prince (Eds.), Team performance assessment and measurement: Theory, methods, and applications (pp. 331–355). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Bicchieri, C. (2002). Covenants without swords: Group identity, norms, and communication in social dilemmas. Rationality and Society, 14, 192–228.
6. Blair, H. (2003) ‘Winning and Losing in Flexible Labour Markets: The Formation and Operation of Networks of Interdependence in the UK Film Industry’, Sociology 37(4): 677–94.
7. Brickman, P. (1974). Role structures and conflict relationships. In P. Brickman (Ed.), Social conflict: 1-33. Lexington, MA: Heath.
8. Byrne, D. E. (1971), The Attraction Paradigm, Academic Press, New York, NY. Cannella, A. A., Park, J. and Lee, H. (2008), “Top management team functional background diversity and firm performance: Examining the roles of team member colocation and environmental uncertainty”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 51, pp. 768–784.
9. Byrne, J. (1971). The attraction paradigm (vol 11). New York: Academic Press.
10. Cady, S. H., & Valentine, J. (1999). Team innovation and perceptions of consideration: What difference does diver- sity make? Small Group Research, 30: 730-750.
11. Carroll, G.R. and Harrison, J.R. (1998), “Organizational demography and culture: insights from a formal model and simulation”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 43 No. 3, pp. 637-67.
12. Carton, A. M., & Cummings, J. N. (2012). A theory of subgroups in work teams. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 441–470. DOI: 10.5465/amr.2010.0322
13. Chattopadhyay, P. (1999). Beyond direct and symmetrical effects: The influence of demographic dissimilarity on organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 273–287. DOI: 10.2307/256919
14. Chattopadhyay, P., Glick, W. H., Miller, C., & Huber, G. P. (1999). Determinants of executive beliefs: Comparing functional conditioning and social influence. Strategic Management Journal, 20: 763-789.
15. Cherrington, D. J. (1974). Effects of competitive, cooper¬ active, and individualistic reinforcement contingencies. J. Pers. Soc. PsychoL 30:748-58
16. Collinson, D.L. (2000) ‘Strategies of Resistance: Power, Knowledge and Subjectivity in the Workplace’, in K. Grint (ed.) Work and Society: A Reader, pp. 163–95. Cambridge: Polity Press.
17. Copeland, L. (1988). Valuing diversity: Making the most of cultural differences at the workplace. Personnel, 65(6): 52-60.
18. Cox, T., & Blake, S. (1991). Managing cultural diversity: Implications for organizational competitiveness. Academy of Management Executive, 5(3): 45-56.
19. Cremer, J. (1986). Cooperation in on going organizations. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 101(1),33-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1884640
20. Deutsch, M. (1949). A theory of cooperation and competition. Human Relations, 2: 129–152.
21. Devine, D. J. (1999). Effects of cognitive ability, task knowledge, information sharing, and conflict on group decision-making effectiveness. Small Group Research, 30, 608–634.
22. Duarte, R., Araújo, D., Correia, V., & Davids, K. (2012). Sport teams as superorganisms: Implications of sociobiological models of behavior for research and practice in team sports performance analysis. Sports Medicine, 42, 633–642.
23. Dunn, R., & Goldman, M. (1966) Competition and noncompetition in relationship to satisfaction and feelings toward own group and nongroup members. Journal of Social Psychology, 1966, 68, 299-311.
24. Earley, P. C., & Mosakowski, E. (2000). Creating hybrid team cultures: An empirical test of transnational team functioning. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 26-49.
25. Elron, E. (1997), “Top management teams within multinational corporations: effects of cultural heterogeneity”, Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 8 No. 4, pp. 393-413.
26. Ely, R.J. and Thomas, D.A. (2001), “Cultural diversity at work: the effects of diversity perspectives on work group processes and outcomes”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 46 No. 2, pp. 229-73.
27. Esty, K. (1988). Diversity is good for business. Executive Excellence, 5(1): 5-6.
28. Ezzy, D. (2001) ‘A Simulacrum of Workplace Community: Individualism and Engineered Culture’, Sociology 35(3): 631–50.
29. Gardner, H. (1993). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. London: Fontana.
30. Gearing, B. (1997) ‘More than a Game: The Experience of Being a Professional Footballer in Britain’, Oral History 25(1): 63–70.
31. Goffman, E. (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday Anchor Books.
32. Grund, C., & Westergaard-Nielsen, N. (2008). Age structure of the workforce and firm performance. International Journal of Manpower, 29, 410–422. DOI: 10.1108/01437720810888553
33. Hambrick DC, Davidson SC, Snell SA, Snow CC. (1998). When groups consist of multiple nationalities: towards a new understanding of the implications. Organization Studies 19(2): 181–205.
34. Hammond, L., & Goldman, M. (1961). Competition and non-competition and its relationship to individual and group productivity. Sociometty. 1961, 24, 46-60.
35. Harrison, D. A., & Klein, K. J. (2007). What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32: 1199-1228.
36. Harrison, D.A., Price, K.H. and Bell, M.P. (1998), “Beyond relational demography: time and the effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on work group cohesion”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 40 No. 1, pp. 96-107.
37. Hobman, E. V., Bordia, P., & Gallois, C. (2004). Perceived dissimilarity and work group involvement: The moderating effects of group openness to diversity. Group & Organization Management, 29, 560–587. DOI: 10.1177/1059601103254269
38. Hofstede G, Hofstede GJ. (2005). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. McGraw-Hill: New York.
39. Hoggart, A. C. (1959). An experimental business game. Behavioral Science, 4: 192-203.
40. Horwitz, S. K & Horwitz, I. B. (2007). The effects of team diversity on team outcomes: A meta-analytic review of team demography. Journal of Management, 33, 987–1015. DOI: 10.1177/0149206307308587
41. House, J.S. (1981) Work Stress and Social Support. London: Addison-Wesley.
42. Jackson, S.E., Joshi, A. and Erhardt, N.L. (2003), “Recent research on team and organizational diversity: SWOT analysis and implications”, Journal of Management, Vol. 29 No. 6, pp. 801-30.
43. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (1974). Instructional goal structure: Cooperative, competitive, or individualistic. Review of Educational Re- search, 44, 213-240.
44. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Edina, MN: Interaction book.
45. Keidel, R. W. (1987). Team sports models as a generic organizational framework. Human Relations, 40, 591-612.
46. Kelley, H. H., & Thibaut, J. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York: Wiley.
47. Kelley, H. H., Thibaut, J. W., Radloff, R., Mundy, D. (1962). The development of cooperation in the "minimal social situation." Psychol. Monogr. 76 (1 9, Whole No. 538)
48. Kirkman, B.L. and Shapiro, D.L. (2001), “The impact of cultural values on job satisfaction and organizational commitment in self-managing work teams: the mediating role of employee resistance”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 44 No. 3, pp. 557-70.
49. kohn, A. (1992). No contest: The case against competition (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
50. Komorita, S. S., & Parks, C. D. (1995). Interpersonal relations: Mixed-motive interaction. Annual Review of Psychology, 46,183–207.
51. Kuhlman, D. M., & Marshello, A. F. (1975). Individual differences in game motivation as moderators of preprogrammed strategy effects in Prisoner's Dilemma. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32: 922-931.
52. Kunze, F., Boehm, S., & Bruch, H. (2011). Age diversity, age discrimination climate and performance consequences: A cross organizational study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32, 264–290. DOI: 10.1002/job.698
53. Lattimer, R.L. (1998), “The case for diversity in global business, and the impact of diversity on team performance”, Competitiveness Review, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 3-17.
54. Lawrence, B. S. (1980). The myth of the midlife crisis. Sloan Management Review, 21, 35–49.
55. Lee, N., & Nathan, M. (2011). Does cultural diversity help innovation in cities: evidence from London firms. LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 33579, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
56. Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L. (1998). Small groups. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology, (4th ed.), vol. 2: 415– 469. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
57. Luce, R. D., & Raiffa, H. (1957). Games and detectives: Introduction and critical survey. Lon- don: Wiley.
58. Maehr, M., & Midgley, C. (1991). Enhancing student motivation: A school-work approach. Educational Psychologist, 26, 399-427.
59. Maznevski, M. L. (1994). Understanding our differences: Performance in decision-making groups with diverse members. Human relations, 47: 531-552.
60. McGarry, T., Anderson, D., Wallace, S., Hughes, M., & Franks, I. (2002). Sport competition as a dynamical self-organizing system. Journal of Sports Sciences, 15, 171–181.
61. McGillivray, D., Fearn, R. and McIntosh, A. (2005) ‘Caught Up in and By the Beautiful Game: A Case of Scottish Professional Footballers’, Journal of Sport and Social Issues 29(1): 102–23.
62. McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a Feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415
63. Michaels, J. (1977). Classroom reward structures and academic performance. Review of Educational Research, 47, 87-99.
64. Miller, L., & Hamblin, R. (1963). Interdependence, differential rewarding, and productivity. American Sociological Review, 28, 768-778.
65. Montagu, A. (1973). Darwin, cooperation and competition. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press. (Original work published 1952)
66. O’Reilly, C. A. III, Williams, K. Y., & Barsade, S. (1998). Group demography and innovation: Does diversity help? In M. A. Neale & E. A. Mannix (Eds.), Research on managing groups and teams (Vol. 1, pp. 183-207). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
67. Ozgen, C., Nijkamp, P., & Poot, J. (2011). The impact of cultural diversity on innovation: Evidence from Dutch RM-level data. IZA Discussion Papers.
68. Passos, P., Araújo, D., & Davids, K. (2013). Self-organization processes in field-invasion team sports: Implications for leadership. Sports Medicine, 43, 1–7.
69. Pelled, L. H. (1996). Demographic diversity, conflict, and work group outcomes: An intervening process theory. Organization Science, 7, 615-631.
70. Pelled, L. H., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Xin, K. R. (1999). Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 1-28.
71. Pelled, L. H., Xin, K. R., & Weiss, A. M. (2001). No es como mi: Relational demography and conflict in a Mexican production facility. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 74, 63–84. DOI: 10.1348/ 096317901167235
72. Pfeffer, J. (1983). Organizational demography. Res. Organ. Behavior 5 299-357.
73. Pruitt, D. G., & Kimmel, M. J. (1977). Twenty years of experimental gaming: Critique, synthesis, and suggestions for the future. Annual Review of Psychology, 28, 363–392.
74. Richard, O.C. and Shelor, R.M. (2002), “Linking top management team age heterogeneity to firm performance: juxtaposing two mid-range theories”, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 13 No. 6, pp. 958-974.
75. Riordan, C. M., & Shore, L. M. (1997). Demographic diversity and employee attitudes: An empirical examination of relational demography within work units. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 342–358. DOI: 10.1037/ 0021- 9010. 82.3.342
76. Sander Hoogendoorn, & Mirjam Van Praag. (2012). Ethnic diversity and team performance: A field experiment. Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 12-068/3, Tinbergen Institute.
77. Schelling, T. C. (1960). The strategy of conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
78. Sennett, R. (1998) The Corrosion of Character: The Personal Consequences of Work in the New Capitalism. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.
79. Skinner, B. (1968). The technology to teaching. New York: Appleton- Century-Crofts.
80. Sodano, A. G., & Baler, S. G. (1983). Accommodation to contrast: Being different in the organization. New Directions for Mental Health Services, 20(December): 25-36.
81. Sumpter, D. J. T. (2006). The principles of collective animal behaviour. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 361, 5–22.
82. Tajfel, H. (1981), Human Groups and Social Categories: Studies in Social Psychology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York, NY.
83. Thomas, D.A. and Ely, R.J. (1996), “Making differences matter”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 74 No. 5, pp. 79-90.
84. Tjosvold, D., (1991), The Conflict-Positive Organisation, Addison Wesley.
85. Travassos, B., Araújo, D., Correia, V., & Esteves, P. (2010). Eco-dynamics approach to the study of team sports performance. The Open Sports Sciences Journal, 3, 56–57.
86. Tsui, A. S., & Gutek, B. A. (1999). Demographic differences in organizations: Current research and future directions. New York: Lexington Books/Macmillan.
87. Tsui, A. S., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1989). Beyond simple demographic effects: The importance of relational demography in superior-subordinate dyads. Academy of Management Journal, 32: 402-423.
88. Tsui, A. S., Egan, T. D., & O’Reilly, C. A. III, (1992). Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 549–579. DOI: 10.2307/2393472
89. Turner, B.S. and Wainwright, S.P. (2003). Corps de ballet: The case of the injured ballet dancer. Sociology of Health and Illness, 25, 4: 269–88.
90. Turner, J.C. (1982), “Towards a cognitive redefinition of social group”, in Tajfel, H. (Ed.), Social Identity and Intergroup Relations, European Studies in Social Psychology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 15-40.
91. Turner, J.C., Hogg, M.A., Oakes, P.J., Reicher, S.D. and Wetherell, M.S. (1987), Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory, B, Blackwell, New York, NY.
92. Uschi Backes-Gellner, & Stephan Veen. (2013). Positive effects of ageing and age diversity in innovative companies – Large-scale empirical evidence on company productivity. Human Resource Management Journal, 23(3), 279-295. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12011
93. van Dijk, H., & van Engen, M. L. (2013). A status perspective on the consequences of work group diversity. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 86, 223–241. DOI:10.1111/joop.12014
94. van Knippenberg, D. A., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Homan, A. C. (2004). Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89: 1008-1022.
95. Wagner, W. G., Pfeffer, J., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1984). Organizational demography and turnover in top-management groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29: 74-92.
96. Wiersema, M. F., & Bantel, K. A. (1992). Top management team demography and corporate strategic change. Academy of Management Journal, 35: 91-121.
97. Williams, K. and O'Reilly, C. (1998), “Demography and diversity in organizations: A Review of 40 Years of Research”, in Staw, B. M. and Cummings, L. L. (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior. JAI Press Greenwich, CT, Vol. 20, pp. 77–140.
98. Williams, K. Y., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1998). Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. In B. M. Staw, & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 20, pp. 77–140). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press
99. Williams, K., & O’Reilly, C. (1998). The complexity of diversity: A review of forty years of research. In B. Staw & R. Sutton (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 21, pp. 77-140). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.