論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available
論文名稱 Title |
銀行客訴類型與處理模式之研究-以某銀行為例 A Study on Customer Compliant Types and Recovery Appraohes - Taking S Bank as An Example |
||
系所名稱 Department |
|||
畢業學年期 Year, semester |
語文別 Language |
||
學位類別 Degree |
頁數 Number of pages |
60 |
|
研究生 Author |
|||
指導教授 Advisor |
|||
召集委員 Convenor |
|||
口試委員 Advisory Committee |
|||
口試日期 Date of Exam |
2020-05-22 |
繳交日期 Date of Submission |
2020-09-03 |
關鍵字 Keywords |
公平理論、銀行產業、客訴、服務失效、服務補救 Banking Industry, Complaints, Service Failure, Service Recovery, Equity Theory |
||
統計 Statistics |
本論文已被瀏覽 6092 次,被下載 309 次 The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 6092 times, has been downloaded 309 times. |
中文摘要 |
服務提供過程具有不確定性,因此服務失效難以避免。當服務失效發生,客戶可能因察覺蒙受損失而感到不愉快,所以服務業者有必要執行客訴處理(或稱服務補救)以提供補救,使客戶的利益能夠獲得補償。過往研究表明,服務失效有不同類型,其所對應的服務補助模式也有所不同。對於銀行業者而言,這種服務補救機制是否依然有效? 本研究先以服務失效理論為依據,對某銀行的部份客訴資料進行內容分析,來探討該銀行客訴類型,再以資料所述客訴處理模式,對照公平理論驗服務補救機制,瞭解某銀行過往的客訴處理是否符合理論,以及公平理論在銀行客訴處理的實用性與有效性。之後輔以專家訪談,由資深的銀行分行主管分享客訴處理經驗及應注意事項,嘗試提出客戶抱怨的應對策略與降低客訴發生機率的預防措施。 研究發現某銀行的客訴處理模式,大致符合公平理論的服務補救機制,以實質補償的分配公平處理結果失效引起經濟損失;而有些客訴中,某銀行未能讓感覺有經濟損失的客戶,認知到分配公平的補救措施,就很容易再次遭到申訴。過程失效導致客戶產生社交損失時,合理而透明地處理服務失效的過程,並參考周延的資訊以決定如何進行服務補救(程序公平),以及注重抱怨處理速度,且誠心而有禮地向客戶道歉以取得諒解(互動公平)的做法與態度就非常重要。 |
Abstract |
Service failure is difficult to avoid in real world. When a service failure occurs, customers may feel unhappy because they are aware of losses. Therefore, it is necessary for service providers to compensate the customers. Previous studies have indicated that there is more than one type of service failures, and the corresponding service recovery models are also different. For banks, does this recovery mechanism still work? This study examines some customer complaint papers of S bank to explore the types of its customer complaints, and then compares the corresponding service recovery, which is also described in the papers, with Equity Theory, in order to learn whether the bank’s doing conforming to the theory, and the practicability and effectiveness of Equity theory in bank industry. Afterwards, this study is supplemented by expert interviews, talking with senior bank branch supervisors and having them sharing service recovery experience, to put forward customer complaints response strategies and preventive measures of service failures. This study found that S bank’s service recovery model generally stuck to the recovery mechanism of Equity Theory. The bank mainly compensated customers’ economic losses with distributive justice methods, meaning substantive remedy. And, in some cases, the bank failed to do so, it is usually to be appealed again to the competent authority by dissatisfied customers. When customers suffer from social losses, procedural justice as well as interactional justice methods matter. Procedural justice means taking care of service recovery reasonably and transparently and referring to the extensive information to determine how to perform remediation, while interactional justice pays attention to the speed of complaint handling, and sincerely and politely apologize to customers. The approach and attitude to gain understanding is important. |
目次 Table of Contents |
論文審定書 i 誌 謝 ii 摘 要 iii Abstract iv 目錄 v 圖目錄 vi 表目錄 vii 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 2 第二節 研究目的 3 第三節 研究流程 5 第四節 研究範圍與限制 6 第二章 產業現況 8 第一節 我國銀行業概況 8 第二節 我國銀行業近期趨勢 10 第三節 展望及挑戰 12 第三章 文獻探討 14 第一節 服務失效 14 第二節 公平理論 16 第四章 研究設計 19 第一節 研究架構 19 第二節 研究步驟 19 第三節 研究方法 20 第五章 實證分析 24 第一節 了解銀行客訴類型與頻率 24 第二節 了解客訴處理模式 28 第三節 提出客訴處理策略 36 第四節 提出減少客訴發生之預防措施 39 第六章 結論與建議 41 第一節 結論 41 第二節 建議 44 第三節 管理意涵 44 參考文獻 47 |
參考文獻 References |
ㄧ、中文文獻 勤業眾信(2019)。「風平浪靜:金融危機落幕十年過後,銀行產業的立足點更為穩固」。2019銀行與資本市場產業展望:轉型趨勢的重新構思,2-5。 王姿琳(2008)。薪資設計要素對組織公正認知之影響。中原大學企業管理學系碩士學位論文。 沈中華、王儷蓉(2014)。台灣銀行業走向全球關鍵:與星澳之比較分析。財團法人台灣金融研訓院。 林鉦棽、陳心怡(2006)。「組織公正對動機與信任及組織公民行為之影響」。亞太經濟管理評論,9(2):23-41。 昝家騏、高幸如(2006)。「服務失誤、服務補救與顧客後續行為意圖之關係研究-以銀行業為例」。第10屆科際整合管理研討會論文集:400-423。 侯琬蓉(2008)。薪酬滿意度與薪資公平對工程師工作態度之影響。中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。 凌儀玲(2005)。「服務補救二次滿意之研究」。管理學報,22卷4期:449-465。 黃士滔、姜博雅、郭政坪、陳昱潔、楊文欣、鄭原夆(2009)。「統一黑貓宅急便服務品質、服務失誤、服務補救、認知公平與補救後滿意度分析─以國立高雄應用科技大學學生為例」。工程科技與教育期刊,6(4):447-459。 黃台心、江典霖(2014)。「我國銀行業市場競爭度與金融創新之關聯」。中央銀行季刊,第36卷第2期:15-52。 黃明新(2012)。「探討品牌權益對服務失誤與不滿意度關係和服務補救與滿意度關係之干擾效果」。管理學報,29卷4期:355-371。 黃輝雄、蘇宏仁、曾光華、張佳榮(2012)。「不同服務失誤情況下,歸因和補償對消費者知覺價格公平性之影響」。臺大管理論叢,22(2):309-340。 陳定玉(2014)。銀行業服務失誤與服務補救策略之研究。中興大學高階經理人碩士在職專班碩士學位論文。 張宏生(2007)。「服務補救與顧客情感、社會與功能價值的結構關係研究-以旅館業為例」。經營管理論叢,Vol.3, No.1:43-61。 張景旭、范垂爐、李敏(2010)。「正義知覺對服務失誤與服務補救之探討:腳本實驗研究」,南開學報,第七卷第一期:71-83。 葉幼梅(2011)。創新育成企業的組織公正、工作生活品質、組織信任、企圖心與創新行為關係模式之研究。台北科技大學技術及職業教育研究所博士學位論文。 楊明文(2013)。組織公平、組織信任與離職傾向關係之研究-以北區國稅局為例。中國科技大學企業管理學系碩士學位論文。 廖曜生(2014)。「人力資源管理措施與工作績效-公平知覺的干擾效果」。國立屏東商業技術學院學報,第16期:189-214。 鄭仁偉、黎士群(2001)。「組織公平、信任與知識分享行為之關係性研究」。人力資源管理學報,第一卷第二期:69-93。 賴明政(2008)。「服務失誤、服務補救、工作滿意、組織承諾與處理反應關係之研究-服務端觀點」。東吳經濟商學學報,(60):105-131。 劉財龍(2009)。「商店形象與服務補救對顧客滿意之影響:以量販店為例」。輔仁管理評論,第十六卷第二期:119-158。 二、英文文獻 Albrecht, K. & Bradford 1985. Service encounter satisfaction: conceptualized. Journal of Services Marketing, 9(1): 5-14. Bell, C. R., & Zemke, R. E. 1987. Service breakdown: The road to recovery. Management Review, 76(10): 32-35. Bies, R. J. & Shapiro, D. L. 1987. Interactional fairness judgments: The influence of causal accounts, Social Justice Research, 1(2): 199-218. Bitner, M. J., Booms, B. H., & Tetreault, M. S. 1990. The service encounter: Diagnosing favorable and unfavorable incidents. Journal of Marketing, 54(1): 71-84. Blodgett, J. G., Hill, D. J. & Tax, S. 1997. The effects of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice on post complaint behavior. Journal of Retailing, 73(2): 185-210. Boshoff, C. 1997. An experimental study of service recovery options. International Journal of Service Industry, 8(2). Boulding, W., Kalra, A., & Zeithaml, V. A. 1993. A dynamic processes model of service quality: From expectations to behavioral intentions. Journal of Marketing Research, 30(1): 7-27. Brinberg, D. & Castell, P. 1982. A resource exchange theory approach to interpersonal interactions: A test of Foa's theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(2): 260–269. Brinberg, D. & Wood, R. 1983. A Resource Exchange Theory Analysis of Consumer Behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 10(3): 330-338. Brown, S. W. 2000. Practicing best-in-class service recovery. Marketing Management, 9(2): 8-9. Chan, H., & Wan, L. C. 2008. Consumer responses to service failures: A resource preference model of cultural influences. Journal of International Marketing, 16(1): 72-97. Choi, S., & Mattila, A. S. 2008. Perceived controllability and service expectation: Influences on customer reactions following service failure. Journal of Business Research, 61(1): 24-30. Clemmer, E. C., & Schneider, B. 1996. Fair service. In T. A. Swartz, D. E. Brown, & S. W. Brown (Eds.), Advances in services marketing and management: 109-126. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. Davidow, M. 2003. Organizational Responses to Customer Complaints: What Works and What Doesn’t. Journal of Service Research, 5(3): 225-250. Goodwin, C. & Ross, I. 1992. Consumer responses to service failures: Influence of procedural and interactional fairness perceptions. Journal of Business Research, 25(2): 149-163. Greenberg, J. 1996. The Quest for Justice on the Job: Essays and Experiments, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. Hoffman, K. D., Kelley, S. W. & Rotalsky, H. M. 1995. Tracking service failures and employee recovery efforts. Journal of Services Marketing, 9(2): 49-61. Holloway, B. B., Wang, S. & Beatty, S. E. 2009. Betrayal? Relationship quality implications in service recovery. Journal of Services Marketing, 23(6): 385-396. Homans, G. C. 1961. The Humanities and the Social Sciences. American Behavioral Scientist. Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. 1979. Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrical, 47(2): 263-291. Kotler, P. 2000. Marketing Management (10th edition). Engle-woods Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Levesque, T. J. & Mcdougall, G. H. 2002. Service problems and recovery strategies: an experiment. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 17(5): 20-37. Liden, S. B. & Skalen, P. 2003. The effect of service guarantees on service recovery. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 14(1): 36-58. Mattila, A. S. & Cranage, D. 2005. The impact of choice on fairness in the context of service recovery. Journal of Services Marketing, 19(5). Maxham, J. G. III & Netemeyer, R. G. 2002. A Longitudinal Study of Complaining Customers’ Evaluation of Multiple Service Failures and Recovery Efforts. Journal of Marketing, 66(4): 57-71. McColl-Kennedy, J. R. & Sparks, B. A. 2003. Application of Fairness Theory to Service Failures and Service Recovery. Journal of Service Research, 5(3): 251-266. McCollough, M. A., Berry, L. L., & Yadav, M. S. 2000. An empirical investigation of customer satisfaction after service failure and recovery. Journal of Service Research, 15(7): 583-596. Namkung, Y., & Jang, S. 2010. Service failures in restaurants: Which stage of service failure is the most critical? Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 51(3): 323-343. Parasuraman, A., Berry, L. L. & Zeithaml, V. A. 1991. Understanding customer expectations of service. Sloan Management Review, 32(3): 39-48. Seiders, K. & Berry, L. L. 1998. Service fairness: what it is and why it matters. Academy of Management Perspectives, 12(2). Shapiro, T. & Nieman-Gonder, J. 2006. Effect of communication mode in justice-based service recovery. Managing Service Quality, 16(2). Smith, A. K., Bolton, R. N. & Wagner, J. 1999. A model of customer satisfaction with service encounters involving failure and recovery. Journal of Marketing Research, 36(3), 356-389. Stefan, M. 2002. Exploring the service recovery paradox. American Marketing Association. Conference Proceedings, 13: 75-82. Tax, S. S., Brown, S. W., & Chandrashekaran, M. 1998. Customer evaluations of service complaint experiences: Implications for relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 62(2): 60-76. Walster, E., Berscheid, E., & Walster, G.W. 1973. New directions in equity research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25(2): 151-176. Weun, S., Beatty, S. E., & Jones, M. A. 2004. The impact of service failure severity on service recovery evaluation and post-recovery relationships. Journal of Services Marketing, 18(2): 133-146. Zeithaml, V. A., Parasuraman, A., & Berry, L. L. 1985. Problems and strategies in service marketing. Journal of Marketing, 49(2): 33-46. 三、網路資料 陳苓云(2011)。「客訴危機變轉機?!感覺服務是關鍵」。全國職工福利資訊中心。取自http://www.ewda.tw/modules/tadnews/index.php?nsn=563 陳蕙綾(2019)。「〈台北金融科技開展〉反洗錢成國際趨勢 台洗錢防制3年有成」。鉅亨網。取自http://news.cnyes.com/news/id/4415279 游俠兒(2019)。「金融的未來:你需知道的2019年十大FinTech趨勢」人人都是產品經理。取自http://meet.bnext.com.tw/articles/view/44462 |
電子全文 Fulltext |
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。 論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted 開放時間 Available: 校內 Campus: 已公開 available 校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available |
紙本論文 Printed copies |
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。 開放時間 available 已公開 available |
QR Code |