本研究首先探討團隊人力資本、團隊行為整合、團隊績效三者之關係，採用I-P-O模型作為理論基礎，檢視團隊行為整合對團隊人力資本及團隊績效的中介效果，此外，探討團隊競爭氣候對團隊人力資本與團隊行為整合之間的干擾效果。
本研究以台灣各產業的公司之員工為研究對象，以方便抽樣的方式共發放153個單位、787位工作者，並透過兩階段問卷調查法研究資料，最終皆共回收 123個有效單位，共計有效問卷576份。以單位作為分析單位進行統計分析，結果顯示：(1)團隊人力資本越高，團隊行為整合的程度越高；(2)團隊人力資本越高，團隊績效越高；(3)團隊行為整合的程度越高，團隊績效越高；(4)團隊行為整合對於團隊人力資本與團隊績效並無中介效果；(5)團隊競爭氣候對團隊人力資本與團隊行為整合間具有正向調節效果。本研究對於團隊行為整合在廣泛的一般單位的應用具有積極意義，以實證研究分析行為整合的影響因素及效果，亦在最後提出實務意涵及未來研究建議。

This study begins by investigating the relationship between team human capital, team behavioral integration, and team performance. Using I-P-O Model as theoretical basis, the mediating effect of team behavioral integration on team human capital as well as team performance is examined. In addition, also investigated is the interference effect that competitive team climate on the relationship between team human capital and team behavioral integration.
The study’s subjects are company employees from Taiwan’s various industries. Using convenience sampling, questionnaires are sent to 153 units, 787 workers, followed by data study using two-stage questionnaire survey. 123 effective units replied, to a total of 550 effective questionnaires recovered. Statistical analysis is then conducted using units as units of analysis. Results indicate: (1) The greater the team human capital, the higher the team behavioral integration; (2) the greater the team human capital, the higher the team performance; (3) the higher the team behavioral integration, the higher the team performance; (4) team behavioral integration has no mediating effect on relationship between team human capital and team performance; (5)team competitive climate has positive moderating effect on the relationship between team human capital and team behavioral integration. The study bears positive significance on the application of team behavioral integration on regular work teams, using empirical study to analyze the influencing factors as well as effects of behavioral integration. Lastly, practical implications as well as suggestions for future studies are proposed.

論文審定書 i
誌謝 i
中文摘要 iii
英文摘要 iv
圖次 vii
表次 viii
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 2
第二章 文獻探討 3
第一節 理論基礎 3
第二節 團隊人力資本 5
第三節 團隊競爭氣候 7
第四節 團隊行為整合 9
第五節 團隊績效 11
第六節 研究假說 13
第三章 研究方法 17
第一節 研究架構 17
第二節 研究方法及樣本 18
第三節 變數操作型定義與衡量方式 21
第四節 驗證性因素分析 27
第五節 統計分析方法 29
第四章 研究結果 31
第一節 評分者間信度分析 31
第二節 相關分析 32
第三節 多元迴歸分析 32
第五章 結論與建議 41
第一節 研究結果討論 41
第二節 研究意涵 44
第三節 研究限制與未來研究方向 47
參考文獻 49

中文部分
吳明隆(2007)，SPSS操作與應用: 問卷統計分析實務，臺北市：五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
吳萬益(2010)，企業研究方法，台北:華泰文化事業股份有限公司。 

邱家彥(2005)，轉換型領導、團隊異質性及團隊衝突與團隊學習關係之探討：團隊型為整合之中介角色。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所，未出版，高雄市。

英文部分
Ahmed, S. S., Guozhu, J., Mubarik, S., Khan, M., & Khan, E. (2020). Intellectual capital and business performance: the role of dimensions of absorptive capacity. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 21(1), 23–39.
Arnold, T., Flaherty, K. E., Voss, K. E., & Mowen, J. C. (2009). Role stressors and retail performance: The role of perceived competitive climate. Journal of Retailing, 85(2), 194–205.
Baltes, B. B., Zhdanova, L. S., & Parker, C. P. (2009). Psychological climate: A comparison of organizational and individual level referents. Human Relations, 62(5), 669–700.
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99–120.
Barney, J., Wright, M., & Ketchen, D. J. (2001). The resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after 1991. Journal of Management, 27(6), 625–641.
Bontis, N., Dragonetti, N. C., Jacobsen, K., & Roos, G. (1999). The knowledge toolbox: European Management Journal, 17(4), 391–402. 
Brown, S. P., Cron, W. L., & Slocum, J. W., Jr. (1998). Effects of trait competitiveness and perceived intraorganizational competition on salesperson goal setting and performance. Journal of Marketing, 62(4), 88–98.
Brown, S. P., & Leigh, T. W. (1996). A new look at psychological climate and its relationship to job involvement, effort, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(4), 358–368.
Campion, M. A., Medsker, G. J., & Higgs, A. C. (1993). Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups. Personnel Psychology, 46(4), 823–847.
Carmeli, A. (2008). Top management team behavioral integration and the performance of service organizations. Group & Organization Management, 33(6), 712−735.
Carmeli, A., & Halevi, M. Y. (2009). How top management team behavioral integration and behavioral complexity enable organizational ambidexterity: The moderating role of contextual ambidexterity. Leadership Quarterly, 20(2), 207–218.
Carmeli, A., & Schaubroeck, J. (2006). Top management team behavioral integration, decision quality, and organizational decline. Leadership Quarterly, 17(5), 441–453. 
Charness, G., Masclet, D., & Villeval, M. (2014). The dark side of competition for status. Management Science, 60, 38–55.
Chiu, C. Y., LIN, H. C., & Chien, S. H. (2009). Transformational leadership and team behavioral integration: The mediating role of team learning. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1, 1–6.
Coff, R. (1999). When Competitive Advantage Doesn't Lead to Performance: The Resource-Based View and Stakeholder Bargaining Power. Organization Science, 10(2), 119–133.
Cohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. E. (1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23(3), 239–290.
Delgado Piña, M. I., María Romero Martínez, A., & Gómez Martínez, L. (2008). Teams in organizations: a review on team effectiveness. Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 14(1/2), 7–21.
Dess, G.D. & Picken, J.C. (1999). Beyond productivity: how leading companies achieve superior performance by leveraging their human capital. New York: American Management Association.
Diamantopoulos, A. & Siguaw, J. A. (2000). Introducing LISREL: A guide for uninitiated. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Duffy, M., Ganster, D., Shaw, J., Johnson, J., & Pagon, M. (2006). The social context of undermining behavior at work. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 101, 105–126.
Evans, R. W., & Butler, F. C. (2011). An upper echelons view of “Good to Great”: Principles for behavioral integration in the top management team. Journal of Leadership Studies, 5(2), 89–97. 
Fletcher, T., Major, D., & Davis, D. (2008). The Interactive Relationship of Competitive Climate and Trait Competitiveness with Workplace Attitudes, Stress, and Performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29(7), 899–922. 
Gladstein, D. (1984). Groups in Context: A Model of Task Group Effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(4), 499–517.
Guilford, J. P. (1965), Fundamental statistics in psychology and education, New York: McGraw-Hill.
Guzzo, R. A., & Dickson, M. W. (1996). Teams in organizations: Recent research on performance and effectiveness. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 307–338.
Hackman, J. R. (1987). The design of work teams. In J. W. Lorsch (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior (pp. 315–342). Englewood Cliff, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Hackman, J. R. (1990). Work teams in organizations: An orienting framework. In J.R. Hackman (Ed.). Groups that work (and those that don’t)(pp. 1–1). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

Hambrick, D.C. (1994). Top management groups: A conceptual integration and reconsideration of the "team" label. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 171–214), Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. 
Hambrick, D.C. (1998). Corporate coherence and the top management team. In D. C. Hambrick , D. A. Nadler , & M. L. Tushman (Eds.), Navigating change: How CEOs, top teams, and boards steer transformation (pp. 123–140). Boston: Harvard Business School Press. 
Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P.A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top management. Academy of Management Review, 9, 193–206. 
Harris, C. (2009). Strategic human resource management at the cross-roads. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas, Arlington, USA.
Henderson, J. C. (1988). Involvement as a predictor of performance in I/S planning and design. Cambridge Mass.: Management in the 1990s, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Hill, G. W. (1982). Group versus individual performance: Are N+1 heads better than one? Psychological Bulletin, 91(3), 517–539.
Houston, J. M., Mcintire, S. A., Kinnie, J., & Terry, C. (2002). A Factorial Analysis of Scales Measuring Competitiveness. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 62(2), 284–298.
Huselid, M. A. (1995). The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 635–672.
Ilgen, D. R., Hollenbeck, J. R., Johnson, M., & Jundt, D. (2005). Teams in organizations: From input-process-output models to IMOI models. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 517–543.
James, L. R., James, L. A., & Ashe, D. K. (1990). The meaning of organizations: The role of cognition and values. In B. Schneider (Ed.), Organizational climate and culture (p. 40-84). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. 
James, L. R., Hater, J. J., Gent, M. J., & Bruni, J. R. (1978). Psychological climate: Implications from cognitive social learning theory and interactional psychology. Personnel Psychology, 31(4), 783–813.
Katzenbach, J. R., & Smith, D. K. (1993). The wisdom of teams: Creating the high-performance organization. Boston, Mass: Harvard Business School Press.
Kisfalvi, V., Sergi, V., & Langley, A. (2016). Managing and Mobilizing Microdynamics to Achieve Behavioral Integration in Top Management Teams. Long Range Planning, 49(4), 427–446.
Kohn, A. (1992). No contest: The case against competition (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Klein, K. J. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (p. 3–90). Jossey-Bass. 
Larson, C. E., & LaFasto, F. M. J. (1989). Teamwork: What must go right, what can go wrong. Newbury Park, Calif: SAGE Publications.
Le, H., Oh, I. S., Shaffer, J., & Schmidt, F. (2007). Implications of methodological advances for the practice of personnel selection: How practitioners benefit from meta-analysis. Academy of Management Perspectives, 21, 6–15.
LeBreton, J. M., & Senter, J. L. (2008). Answers to 20 Questions About Interrater Reliability and Interrater Agreement. Organizational Research Methods, 11(4), 815–852.
Li, J.T., & Hambrick, D.C. (2005). Factional groups: A new vantage on demographic faultlines, conflict, and disintegration in work teams. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 794–813.
Ling, Y., Simsek, Z., & Lubatkin, M. H. (2008). Transformational leadership’s role in promoting corporate entrepreneurship: Examining the CEO-TMT interface. Academy of Management Journal, 51, 557–576.
Liu, J., Chen, J., & Tao, Y. (2015). Innovation Performance in New Product Development Teams in China’s Technology Ventures: The Role of Behavioral Integration Dimensions and Collective Efficacy. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(1), 29–44. 
Livingstone, L., Roberts, J., & Chonko, L. (1995). Perceptions of Internal and External Equity as Predictors of outside Salespeoples' Job Satisfaction. The Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 15(2), 33-46.
Lubatkin, M. H., Simsek, Z., Ling, Y., & Veiga, J. F. (2006). Ambidexterity and Performance in Small-to Medium-Sized Firms: The Pivotal Role of Top Management Team Behavioral Integration. Journal of Management, 32(5), 646–672.
Luo, B., Zheng, S., Ji, H., & Liang, L. (2018). Ambidextrous leadership and TMT-member ambidextrous behavior: the role of TMT behavioral integration and TMT risk propensity. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 29(2), 338–359.
Magni, M., Proserpio, L., Hoegl, M., & Provera, B. (2009). The role of team behavioral integration and cohesion in shaping individual improvisation. Research Policy, 38(6), 1044–1053.
Marks, M., Mathieu, J., & Zaccaro, S. (2001). A Temporally Based Framework and Taxonomy of Team Processes. Academy of Management Review, 26(3), 356–376.
Mathieu, J., Maynard, M. T., Rapp, T., & Gilson, L. (2008). Team Effectiveness 1997-2007: A Review of Recent Advancements and a Glimpse into the Future. Journal of Management, 34(3), 410–476.
McGrath, J. E. (1964). Social psychology: A brief introduction. London: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Mitchell, T. R., & Silver, W. S. (1990). Individual and group goals when workers are interdependent: Effects on task strategies and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(2), 185–193.
Mooney, A. C., & Sonnenfeld, J. (2001). Exploring Antecedents to Top Management Team Conflict: The Importance of Behavioral Integration. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2001(1), I1–I6.
Mullen, B., & Copper, C. (1994). The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. Psychological Bulletin, 115(2), 210–227. 
Mumford, T. V., Campion, M. A., & Morgeson, F. P. (2006). Situational judgment in work teams: A team role typology. In J. A. Weekley & R. E. Ployhart (Eds.), Situational judgment tests: Theory, measurement, and application (pp. 319–343). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Nyberg, A. J., Moliterno, T. P., Hale, D., & Lepak, D. P. (2014). Resource-based perspectives on unit-level human capital: a review and integration. Journal of Management, 40, 316–346.
Ogilvie, J., Rapp, A., Bachrach, D. G., Mullins, R., & Harvey, J. (2017). Do sales and service compete? The impact of multiple psychological climates on frontline employee performance. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 37(1), 11–26. 
O'Reilly, C. A., Chatman, J., & Caldwell, D. F. (1991). People and organizational culture: A profile comparison approach to assessing person-organization fit. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 487–516.
Parker, G. M. (1996). Team players and teamwork: The new competitive business strategy. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Reichers, A. E., & Schneider, B. (1990). Climate and culture: An evolution of constructs. In B. Schneider (Ed.), Organizational climate and culture (pp. 5-39). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Rosenkranz, C., & Wulf, T. (2019). Behavioral Integration as a Relational Governance Mechanism in Family Firms—The Moderating Role of Family Involvement in Management. Journal of Small Business Management, 57(3), 801–819.
Salas, E., Dickinson, T. L., Converse, S. A., & Tannenbaum, S. I. (1992). Toward an understanding of team performance and training. In R. W. Swezey & E. Salas (Eds.), Teams: Their training and performance (pp. 3–29). Ablex Publishing.
Schrock, W. A., Hughes, D. E., Fu, F. Q., Richards, K. A., & Jones, E. (2014). Better together: Trait competitiveness and competitive psychological climate as antecedents of salesperson organizational commitment and sales performance. Marketing Letters, 27(2), 351–360.
Schultz, T. (1961). Investment in Human Capital. The American Economic Review, 51(1), 1-17.
Schultz, T. P. (1981). Economics of population. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Schweiger, D. M., Sandberg, W. R., & Rechner, P. L. (1989). Experiential effects of dialectical inquiry, devil's advocacy, and consensus approaches to strategic decision making. Academy of Management Journal, 32(4), 745–772.
Shonk, J. H. (1982). Working in Teams: A Practical Manual for Improving Work, New York: Amacom. 

Shonk, J. H. (1992). Team-based organizations: Developing a successful team environment. Homewood, Ill: Business One Irwin.
Simsek, Z., Veiga, J. F., Lubatkin, M. H., & Dino, R. N. (2005). Modeling the Multilevel Determinants of Top Management Team Behavioral Integration. Academy of Management Journal, 48(1), 69–84.
Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. (1983). Achievement-related motives and behavior. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives: Psychological and sociological approaches (pp. 10-74). San Francisco, CA: Freeman.
Spurk, D., Keller, A. C., & Hirschi, A. (2019). Competition in career tournaments: Investigating the joint impact of trait competitiveness and competitive psychological climate on objective and subjective career success. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 92(1), 74–97. 
Stewart, G. L. (2006). A Meta-Analytic Review of Relationships Between Team Design Features and Team Performance. Journal of Management, 32(1), 29–55.
Stewart, G., & Barrick, M. (2000). Team Structure and Performance: Assessing the Mediating Role of Intrateam Process and the Moderating Role of Task Type. The Academy of Management Journal, 43(2), 135-148. 
Subramaniam, M., & Youndt, M. A. (2005). The influence of intellectural capital on the types of innovative capabilities. Academy of Management Journal, 48(3), 450-463.
Subramony, M., Krause, N., Norton, J., & Burns, G. N. (2008). The relationship between human resource investments and organizational performance: A firm-level examination of equilibrium theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 778–788.
Tekleab, A. G., Karaca, A., Quigley, N. R., & Tsang, E. W. K. (2016). Re-examining the functional diversity–performance relationship: The roles of behavioral integration, team cohesion, and team learning. Journal of Business Research, 69(9), 3500–3507.
Thomas, H., Smith, R.R. and Diez, F. (2013). Human capital and global business strategy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Venkatraman, N., & Ramanujam, V. (1986). Measurement of Business Performance in Strategy Research: A Comparison of Approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 801–814. 
Venugopal, A., Krishnan, T. N., Upadhyayula, R. S., & Kumar, M. (2020). Finding the microfoundations of organizational ambidexterity - Demystifying the role of top management behavioural integration. Journal of Business Research, 106, 1–11.
Yi, Y., Ndofor, H. A., He, X., & Wei, Z. (2018). Top Management Team Tenure Diversity and Performance: The Moderating Role of Behavioral Integration. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 65(1), 21–33.
Yitzhack Halevi, M., Carmeli, A., & Brueller, N. N. (2015). Ambidexterity in SBUs: TMT Behavioral Integration and Environmental Dynamism. Human Resource Management, 54, 223–238. 
Youndt, M. A., Subramaniam, M., & Snell, S. A. (2004). Intellectual Capital Profiles: An Examination of Investments and Returns. Journal of Management Studies, 41, 335–361.
Zhang, X., & Kwan, H. K. (2019). Team behavioral integration links team interdependence with team performance: an empirical investigation in R&D teams. Frontiers of Business Research in China, 13(1), 1–19.