論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available
論文名稱 Title |
長得像人的機台讓我更生氣!探討關係規範與擁擠程度對擬人化自助服務技術服務失敗之轉換意圖的影響 Anthropomorphism Makes Me Angry? How Relationship Norms and Crowding Affect Consumers’ Switching Intention for Anthropomorphized Self-Service Technology in Service Failure Context |
||
系所名稱 Department |
|||
畢業學年期 Year, semester |
語文別 Language |
||
學位類別 Degree |
頁數 Number of pages |
181 |
|
研究生 Author |
|||
指導教授 Advisor |
|||
召集委員 Convenor |
|||
口試委員 Advisory Committee |
|||
口試日期 Date of Exam |
2019-07-22 |
繳交日期 Date of Submission |
2019-08-21 |
關鍵字 Keywords |
不滿意感、關係規範、擁擠程度、轉換意圖、擬人化、自助服務技術服務失敗 switching intention, dissatisfaction, self-service technology failure, crowding, anthropomorphism, relationship norm |
||
統計 Statistics |
本論文已被瀏覽 5847 次,被下載 90 次 The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5847 times, has been downloaded 90 times. |
中文摘要 |
擬人化被廣泛的應用在行銷與服務上,在生活周遭都可以看見擬人化的身影。本研究主要探討自助服務技術發生服務失敗的情況下,擬人化的自助服務機台,並且同時考慮擁擠程度與關係規範等兩個干擾變數,對消費者的轉換意圖(轉換成尋求服務人員服務,而不再希望使用自助服務機台)造成影響。 本研究使用實驗設計法來進行本研究兩個實驗,為擬人化(擬人化v.s無擬人化)、關係規範(共有型關係v.s交易型關係)以及擁擠程度(高擁擠程度v.s低擁擠程度)的2x2x2三因子設計,探討擬人化、擁擠程度與關係規範如何影響消費者在自助服務技術生服務失敗的情況下所產生的轉換意圖,並且進一步探討不滿意感是否作為三維交互作用影響轉換意圖之背後機制。 實驗結果顯示,在自助服務技術發生服務失敗時,擬人化、關係規範與擁擠程度會產生三維交互作用進而影響轉換意圖。擬人化在低擁擠程度環境搭配交易型關係以及高擁擠程度環境搭配共有型關係時帶來負面效果,導致人們經歷擬人化自助服務技術發生服務失敗後,產生較高的轉換意圖。相反地,擬人化在低擁擠程度環境搭配共有型關係時帶來正面效果,人們比較能容忍服務失敗,而產生較低的轉換意圖。最後,在高擁擠環境搭配交易型關係時,人們認為擬人化或非擬人化自助服務技術沒有差別,因此服務失敗後所產生之轉換意圖並無顯著差異。研究結果也發現,消費者面對服務失敗產生的不滿意感是影響上述三維交互作用對轉換意圖的中介機制。 |
Abstract |
Anthropomorphism has been widely used in markrting practice including product design and advertising presentation. In the current research, we focus on anthropomorphism in self-service technology. To be specific, we examine how anthropomorphism, relationship norm and crowding affect consumers’ switching intention (switching to find human services instead of using self-service machines) for the self-service technology. This research uses experimental design and conducts two experiments in a 2 (anthroomorphism: anthropomorphim vs. non-anthropomorphism) x 2 (relationship norm: communal vs. exchange) x 2 (crowding: crowding vs. non-crowding) factorial design. Switching intention serves as the dependent variable in this research. In Study 2, we further explore dissatisfaction as the underlying mechanism behind the effects above. The experimental results show that when the environment is perceived as not crowded, people with exchange relationship norm show higher switching intention from anthropomorphic self-service technology (vs. non-anthropomorphic self-service technology) to human employee when the self-service technology service failure. Those with communal relationship norm show the opposite behaviors. When the environment is perceived as crowded, people with communal norm encountering the anthropomorphic self-service technology (vs. non-anthropomorphic self-service technology) show higher switching intention after the self-service technology service failure. No difference between anthropomorphic and non-anthropomorphic self-service technology are found on people with exchange norm. The results also indicate that consumers’ dissatisfaction in service failure of self-service technology is an underlying mechanism behind the effects of anthropomorphism, relationship norm and crowding. |
目次 Table of Contents |
論文審定書 i 誌謝 ii 摘要 iii Abstract iv 第壹章 緒論 1 第一節 前言 1 第二節 研究背景 1 第三節 研究動機 4 第四節 研究目的與研究問題 6 第五節 研究架構與研究流程 7 第貳章 文獻探討 9 第一節 前言 9 第二節 自助服務技術服務失敗 9 第三節 擬人化 11 第四節 關係規範 16 第五節 擁擠程度 18 第六節 小結 20 第參章 研究設計與方法 21 第一節 前言 21 第二節 研究假設與架構 21 第三節 實驗設計建立 26 第四節 小結 27 第肆章 實驗一設計與分析 28 第一節 前言 28 第二節 研究變數操作型定義與衡量 28 第三節 研究設計 33 第四節 實驗一結果分析 34 第五節 小結 40 第伍章 實驗二設計與分析 41 第一節 前言 41 第二節 研究變數操作型定義與衡量 41 第三節 研究設計 47 第四節 實驗二結果分析 48 第五節 小結 57 第陸章 結論與建議 58 第一節 前言 58 第二節 研究結果討論 58 第三節 研究貢獻 60 第四節 研究限制 63 第五節 未來研究與建議 64 第六節 小結 66 參考文獻 68 附錄一:實驗一(擬人化vs. 共有型關係vs. 高擁擠程度) 75 附錄二:實驗二(擬人化vs. 共有型關係vs. 高擁擠程度) 123 |
參考文獻 References |
Aggarwal, P. (2004). The effects of brand relationship norms on consumer attitudes and behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(1), 87-101. Ahn, H. K., Kim, H. J., & Aggarwal, P. (2014). Helping fellow beings anthropomorphized social causes and the role of anticipatory guilt. Psychological Science, 25(1), 224-229. Antón, C., Camarero, C., & Carrero, M. (2007). The mediating effect of satisfaction on consumers’ switching intention. Psychology and Marketing, 24(6), 511-538. Augusto de Matos, C., Vargas Rossi, C. A., Teixeira Veiga, R., & Afonso Vieira, V. (2009). Consumer reaction to service failure and recovery: The moderating role of attitude toward complaining. Journal of Services Marketing, 23(7), 462-475. Baker, J., & Cameron, M. (1996). The effects of the service environment on affect and consumer perception of waiting time: An integrative review and research propositions. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 24(4), 338-349. Bartneck, C., Croft, E., & Kulic, D. (2008). Measuring the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence and perceived safety of robots. In Proceedings of the metrics for human-robot interaction workshop in affiliation with the 3rd ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction (HRI 2008) (pp. 37-44). Technical report 471, Amsterdam Bearden, W. O., & Teel, J. E. (1983). Selected determinants of consumer satisfaction and complaint reports. Journal of Marketing Research, 20(1), 21-28 Bell, D. E. (1985). Disappointment in decision making under uncertainty. Operations Research, 33(1), 1-27. Bitner, M. J. (1990). Evaluating service encounters: The effects of physical surrounding and employee responses. Journal of Marketing, 54 (2), 69-81. Bitner, M. J. (1992), Servicescapes: The Impact of physical surroundings on customers and employees. Journal of Marketing, 56 (April), 57-71. Bitner, M. J., Zeithaml, V. A., & Gremler, D. D. (2010). Technology’s impact on the gaps model of service quality. Service Science: Research and Innovations in the Service Economy, 197-218. Chen, R. P., Wan, E. W., & Levy, E. (2017). The effect of social exclusion on consumer preference for anthropomorphized brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 27(1), 23- 34. Chen, F. (2014). A motivational account of product anthropomorphism: Effects on product perceptions and consumer states (Doctoral dissertation). Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong. Chen, S., Lee-Chai, A. Y., & Bargh, J. A. (2001). Relationship orientation as a moderator of the effects of social power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(2), 173-187. Chernev, A. (2004). Goal-attribute compatibility in consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(1-2), 141-150. Chih, W. H., Wang, K. Y., Hsu, L. C., & Cheng, I. S. (2012). From disconfirmation to switching: an empirical investigation of switching intentions after service failure and recovery. The Service Industries Journal, 32(8), 1305-1321. Clark, M. S., Mills, J. R., & Corcoran, D. M. (1989). Keeping track of needs and inputs of friends and strangers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15(4), 533-542. Clark, M. S., Oullette, R., Powell, M. C., & Milberg, S. (1987). Recipient’s mood, relationship type, and helping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(1), 94-103. Clark, M. S., & Mills, J. (1979). Interpersonal attraction in exchange and communal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(1), 12-24. Clark, M. S., & Mills, J. (1993). The difference between communal and exchange relationships: What it is and is not. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19(6), 684-691. Collier, J., L. Sherrell, D., Babakus, E., & Blakeney Horky, A. (2014). Understanding the differences of public and private self-service technology. Journal of Services Marketing, 28(1), 60-70. Collier, J. E., Breazeale, M., & White, A. (2017). Giving back the “self” in self-service: customer preferences in self-service failure recovery. Journal of Services Marketing, 31(6), 604-617. Dabholkar, P. A. & Brian, I. S. (2012). Service failure and recovery in using technology-based self-service: Effects on user attributions and satisfaction. The Service Industries Journal, 32 (9), 1415-1432. Dhar, R., & Wertenbroch, K. (2000). Consumer choice between hedonic and utilitarian goods. Journal of Marketing Research, 37(1), 60-71. Dittmar, H., Long, K. & Meek, R. (2004). Buying on the Internet: Gender differences in online and conventional buying motivations. Sex Roles, 50(6), 423-444. Elliott, C. D. (2009). Healthy food looks serious: How children interpret packaged food products. Canadian Journal of Communication, 34(3), 359-380. Epley, N., Waytz, A., Akalis, S., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2008). When we need a human: motivational determinants of anthropomorphism. Social Cognition, 26(2), 143-155. Epley, N., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2007). On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological Review, 114(4), 864-886. Eroglu, S., & Karen, A. M. (1990). An empirical study of retail crowding: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Retailing, 66 (2), 201-21. Evans, G. W., Rhee, E., Forbes, C., Mata Allen, K. & Lepore, S. K. (2000). The meaning and efficacy of social withdrawal as a strategy for coping with chronic residential crowding. Journal of Environmental Psychology 20(4), 335-342. Eyssel, F., Kuchenbrandt, D., & Bobinger, S. (2011). Effects of anticipated human-robot interaction and predictability of robot behavior on perceptions of anthropomorphism. Proceedings of the 6th international conference on human-robot interaction, 2011 March, ACM, New York, NY, 61-68. Eyssel, F., Kuchenbrandt, D., Bobinger, S., de Ruiter, L., & Hegel, F. (2012). If you sound like me, you must be more human: on the interplay of robot and user features on human robot acceptance and anthropomorphism. Proceedings of the 7th international conference on human-robot interaction, 2012 March, ACM, New York, NY, 125-126. Fan, A., Wu, L., & Mattila, A.S. (2016). Does anthropomorphism influence customers’ switching intentions in the self-service technology failure context. Journal of Services Marketing, 30(7), 713-723. Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82 (6), 878-902. Forbes, L. P., Kelley, S. W., & Hoffman, K. D. (2005). Typologies of e‐commerce retail failures and recovery strategies. Journal of Services Marketing, 19(5), 280-292. Fiske, S. T., Amy, J. C., & Glick, P. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11 (2), 77-83. Gelbrich, K., & Sattler, B. (2014). Anxiety, crowding, and time pressure in public self-service technology acceptance. Journal of Services Marketing, 28(1), 82-94. Goodwin, C. (1996). Communality as a dimension of service relationships. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 5 (4), 387-415. Guthrie, S. E. (1993). Faces in the clouds. A new theory of religion. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: The Guilford Press. Harrell, G. D., Hutt, M. D., & Anderson, J. C. (1980). Path analysis of buyer behavior under conditions of crowding. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(1), 45-51. Heide, J. B. & Kenneth, H. W. (2006). Friends, businesspeople, and relationship roles: A conceptual framework and a research agenda. Journal of Marketing, 70 (3), 90-103. Higgins, E. T. (1998). Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 1-45. Howard, M. C. (2014). Creation of a computer self-efficacy measure: Analysis of internal consistency, psychometric properties, and validity. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 17, 677-681. Hui, M. K., & Bateson, J. E. G. (1991). Perceived control and the effects of crowding and consumer choice on the service experience. Journal of Consumer Research, 18(2), 174-184. Hur, J. D., Koo, M., & Hofmann, W. (2015). When temptations come alive: How anthropomorphism undermines self-control. Journal of Consumer Research, 42(2), 340-358. Hwang, J., Yoon, S., & Bendle, L. J. (2012). Desired privacy and the impact of crowding on customer emotions and approach‐avoidance responses. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 24(2), 224-250. Kim, H. C., & Kramer, T. (2015). Do materialists prefer the “Brand-as-Servant”? The interactive effect of anthropomorphized brand roles and materialism on consumer responses. Journal of Consumer Research, 42(2), 284-299. Kwak, H., Puzakova, M., & Rocereto, J. F. (2015). Better not smile at the price: The differential role of brand anthropomorphization on perceived price fairness. Journal of Marketing, 79(4), 56-76. Lamarque, P., Ricoeur, P., Czerny, R., McLaughlin, K., & Costello, J. (1979). The rule of metaphor: Multi-disciplinary studies of the creation of meaning in language. The Philosophical Quarterly, 29(115), 188. Landwehr, J. R., McGill, A. L., & Herrmann, A. (2011). It’s got the look: The effect of friendly and aggressive “Facial” expressions on product liking and sales. Journal of Marketing, 75(3), 132-146. Lee, H. C, Chang, C. T., Huang, Y. S., & Chen, Y. H. (2017). Eat me, eat me not: cute food and the consumer disposition, In Chandy, R., Moorman, C., & Inman, J. (Eds), In proceedings of the AMA Winter Educator’s Conference (vol. 28). Orlando, Florida: American Marketing Association. Li, X. S., Chan, K. W., & Kim, S. (2018). Service with Emoticons: How customers interpret employee use of emoticons in online service encounters. Journal of Consumer Research, 45. Lin, J. C. & Hsieh, P. (2011). Assessing the self-service technology encounters: development and validation of SSTQUAL scale. Journal of Retailing, 87(2), 194-206. Lisetti, C. L., Brown, S. M., Alvarez, K., & Marpaung, A. H. (2004). A social informatics approach to human-robot interaction with a service social robot. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews), 34(2), 195-209. Liu, W. & David, G. (2011). Bringing us together or driving us apart: The effect of soliciting consumer input on consumer's propensity to transact with an organization. Journal of Consumer Research, 38 (2), 242-259. Machleit, K., Eroglu, S., & Mantel, S. (2000). Perceived retail crowding and shopping satisfaction: What modifies this relationship? Journal of Consumer Psychology, 9(1), 29-42. Maeng, A., Tanner, R. J., & Soman, D. (2013). Conservative when crowded: social crowding and consumer choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 50(6), 739-752. McCullough, M. E., Rachal, K. C., Sandage, S. J., Worthington, E. L., Brown, S. W., & Hight, T. L. (1998). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships: II. Theoretical elaboration and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(6), 1586-1603. Meuter, M. L., Ostrom, A. L., Roundtree, R. I. & Bitner, M. J. (2000). Self-service technologies: Understanding customer satisfaction with technology-based service encounters. Journal of Marketing, 64(3), 50-64. Molm, L. D., Whitham, M. M., & Melamed, D. (2012). Forms of exchange and integrative bonds: Effects of history and embeddedness. American Sociological Review, 77(1), 141-165. Oliver, R. L. (1980). A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(4), 460-469. Ohbuchi, K. I., Fukushima, O., & Tedeschi, J. T. (1999). Cultural values in conflict management: Goal orientation, goal attainment, and tactical decision. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30, 51-71. Parasuraman, A. (1996). Understanding and leveraging the role of customer service in external, interactive, and internal marketing. Paper presented in Services Conference, Nashville, TN, October 5. Puzakova, M., Kwak, H., & Rocereto, J. F. (2013). When humanizing brands goes wrong: The detrimental effect of brand anthropomorphization amid product wrongdoings. Journal of Marketing, 77(3), 81-100. Robertson, N. & Shaw, R. N. (2009). Predicting the likelihood of voiced complaints in the self-service technology context. Journal of Service Research, 12(1), 100-116. Robertson, N., McQuilken, L., & Kandampully, J. (2012). Consumer complaints and recovery through guaranteeing self-service technology. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 11(1), 21-30. Romero, M., & Craig, A. W. (2017). Costly curves: How human-like shapes can increase spending. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(1), 80-98. Scott, M. L., Mende, M., & Bolton, L. E. (2013). Judging the Book by Its Cover? How Consumers Decode Conspicuous Consumption Cues in Buyer-Seller Relationships. Journal of Marketing Research, 50(3), 334-347. Snellman, K., & Vihtkari, T. (2003). Customer complaining behavior in technology‐based service encounters. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 14(2), 217-231. Touré-Tillery, M., & McGill, A. L. (2015). Who or what to believe: Trust and the differential persuasiveness of human and anthropomorphized messengers. Journal of Marketing, 79(4), 94-110. Triandis, H. C. (2001). Individualism-collectivism and personality. Journal of Personality, 69, 907-924. Wang, C., Harris, J., & Patterson, P. G. (2012). Customer choice of self‐service technology: the roles of situational influences and past experience. Journal of Service Management, 23(1), 54-78. Waytz, A., Cacioppo, J. T., & Epley, N. (2010). Who sees human? The importance and stability of individual difference in anthropomorphism. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 219-232. Welsh, J. (2006). Automobiles: Why cars got angry; seeing demonic grins, glaring eyes? Auto makers add edge to car 'faces'; say goodbye to the wide-eyed neon. Wall Street Journal, Eastern edition, 10 March. Xu, J., Shen, H., & Wyer, R. S. (2012). Does the distance between us matter? Influences of physical proximity to others on consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(3), 418-423. Zhou, R., & Pham, M. T. (2004). Promotion and prevention across mental accounts: When financial products dictate consumers and investment goals. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(1), 125-135. |
電子全文 Fulltext |
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。 論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted 開放時間 Available: 校內 Campus: 已公開 available 校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available |
紙本論文 Printed copies |
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。 開放時間 available 已公開 available |
QR Code |