論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available
論文名稱 Title |
慈善產品放結帳櫃檯有效嗎?探討慈善產品擺放位置、捐款幅度與關係規範對消費者購買意願之影響 Products with Causes Effective in Check-out Counters? Influences of Product location, Donation Magnitude and Relationship Norm on Consumer Purchase Intention |
||
系所名稱 Department |
|||
畢業學年期 Year, semester |
語文別 Language |
||
學位類別 Degree |
頁數 Number of pages |
176 |
|
研究生 Author |
|||
指導教授 Advisor |
|||
召集委員 Convenor |
|||
口試委員 Advisory Committee |
|||
口試日期 Date of Exam |
2020-07-10 |
繳交日期 Date of Submission |
2020-08-18 |
關鍵字 Keywords |
關係規範、捐款幅度、產品擺放位置、善因行銷、消費者質疑感 Product with a Cause, Product Location, Donation Magnitude, Relationship Norm, Consumer Skepticism |
||
統計 Statistics |
本論文已被瀏覽 5899 次,被下載 64 次 The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5899 times, has been downloaded 64 times. |
中文摘要 |
過去的研究顯示,結帳櫃檯的促銷能吸引消費者的目光誘發衝動性消費,然而現在也有些廠商選擇在入口處做促銷。本研究欲探討慈善產品擺放位置對於消費者購買意願的影響,進一步提出慈善產品擺放位置的效應可能會受到慈善產品捐款幅度與關係規範的影響。本研究採實驗設計方法,並以三個實驗來驗證假設。實驗一首先探討在實體店面中慈善產品捐款幅度的干擾效果,並以一般商品架做為對照組;實驗二以網路商店情境,比較慈善產品出現於結帳購物車和網站首頁之不同。結果顯示出當慈善產品搭配上高捐款幅度時,產品出現在結帳購物車會增強消費者購買和網站首頁相比,但若是慈善產品配上低捐款幅度時則無此差異。實驗三更進一步考慮關係規範的影響,當消費者與企業為交易型關係時,其結果跟實驗一及二相同,在高捐款幅度下,將慈善產品擺放在結帳櫃檯可以使消費者有更高的購買意願;在低捐款幅度下,擺放位置對消費者購買意願則無影響。在共有型關係規範下,慈善產品擺放位置與捐款幅度對消費者購買意願的影響並無差異,本研究發現消費者的質疑感可用來解釋消費的購買意願,研究最後提出實務管理意涵,提供未來行銷人員在選擇慈善產品的擺放位置具體建議。 |
Abstract |
Past research has shown that the promotion at the checkout counter can attract consumers' attention to induce impulsive consumption. On the other hand, some companies choose to do promotion at the entrance. This research examines how the location of a product with a cause may affect consumers' purchase intention. We further propose donation magnitude and relationship norm as two boundary conditions. Three experiments are conducted to test the proposed hypotheses. Using a physical store as the context, Study 1 shows the moderating effect of donation magnitude with normal merchandise shelf as a baseline group. Using the online store as the test scenario, Study 2 focuses on products with a cause shown on the homepage or in the shopping cart ready for the check-out. The results indicate that when a product with a cause is paired with a high donation magnitude, people exposed on the homepage. Study 3 further considers the effects of relationship norm. When consumers perceive their relationship with the company as exchange-based, the results are consistent with what are found in Studies 1 and 2: a product with a cause shown at the checkout counter leads to higher purchase intention (vs. at the entrance) when the donation magnitude is high. No such differences of product location are found when the donation magnitude is low. When the consumer-company relationship is perceived as communal, either product location or donation magnitudes makes a difference on consumers’ purchase intention. Consumer skepticism is found as the underlying mechanism to explain the phenomena above. We provide managerial implications to marketers regarding how to choose an appropriate location for products with a cause. |
目次 Table of Contents |
目錄 論文審定書 i 致謝 ii 中文摘要 iii 英文摘要 iv 第壹章 緒論 1 第一節 前言 1 第二節 研究背景 1 第三節 研究動機 3 第四節 研究目的與研究問題 6 第五節 研究架構與研究流程 6 第貳章 文獻探討 8 第一節 前言 8 第二節 擺放位置 8 第三節 捐款幅度 12 第四節 關係規範 14 第五節 善因行銷背後的消費者行為機制 17 第六節 小結 18 第參章 研究假設發展 19 第一節 前言 19 第二節 研究假設與架構 19 第三節 實驗設計建立 23 第四節 小結 24 第肆章 實驗一設計與分析 25 第一節 前言 25 第二節 研究變數操作型定義與衡量 25 第三節 研究設計 30 第四節 實驗一結果分析 31 第五節 小結 39 第伍章 實驗二設計與分析 40 第一節 前言 40 第二節 研究變數操作型定義與衡量 40 第三節 研究設計 43 第四節 實驗二結果分析 44 第五節 小結 51 第陸章 實驗三設計與分析 52 第一節 前言 52 第二節 研究變數操作型定義與衡量 52 第三節 研究設計 56 第四節 實驗三結果分析 57 第五節 小結 66 第柒章 結論與建議 67 第一節 前言 67 第二節 研究結果討論 67 第三節 研究貢獻 70 第四節 研究限制 72 第五節 未來研究與建議 74 第六節 小結 76 參考文獻 77 附錄一:實驗一(低捐款幅度x右邊商品架) 87 附錄一:實驗一(低捐款幅度x左邊商品架) 91 附錄一:實驗一(高捐款幅度x右邊商品架) 95 附錄一:實驗一(高捐款幅度x左邊商品架) 99 附錄一:實驗一(低捐款幅度x入口處) 103 附錄一:實驗一(高捐款幅度x入口處) 107 附錄一:實驗一(低捐款幅度x結帳櫃檯) 111 附錄一:實驗一(低捐款幅度x結帳櫃檯) 115 附錄二:實驗二(低捐款幅度x網站首頁) 119 附錄二:實驗二(高捐款幅度x網站首頁) 123 附錄二:實驗二(低捐款幅度x結帳購物車) 127 附錄二:實驗二(高捐款幅度x結帳購物車) 131 附錄三:實驗三(低捐款幅度x交易型關係x入口處) 135 附錄三:實驗三(低捐款幅度x交易型關係x結帳櫃檯) 139 附錄三:實驗三(高捐款幅度x交易型關係x入口處) 143 附錄三:實驗三(高捐款幅度x交易型關係x結帳櫃檯) 147 附錄三:實驗三(低捐款幅度x共有型關係x入口處) 151 附錄三:實驗三(低捐款幅度x共有型關係x結帳櫃檯) 155 附錄三:實驗三(高捐款幅度x共有型關係x入口處) 159 附錄三:實驗三(高捐款幅度x共有型關係x結帳櫃檯) 163 圖次 圖1-1將慈善產品擺放在結帳櫃檯的行銷手法 2 圖1- 2將慈善產品擺放商品架上的行銷手法 2 圖1-3 法國品牌歐舒丹推出高捐款幅度的公益皂 4 圖1-4 韓國品牌Innisfree與伊甸社會基金會合作推出低捐款幅度的DIY紙作因 樂擴音器 4 圖1-5研究流程圖 8 圖3-1 假設二之中介模型 23 圖3-2研究架構圖 25 圖4-1慈善產品擺放位置與捐款幅度對消費者購買意願 38 圖4-2消費者懷疑之中介效果分析模型 40 圖4-3衝動性購買之排除中介效果分析模型 41 圖5-1 慈善產品擺放位置與捐款幅度對消費者購買意願 52 圖5-2 消費者懷疑之中介效果分析模型 54 圖5-3 衝動性購買之排除中介效果分析模型 54 圖6-1 交易型的關係下擺放位置與捐款幅度對消費者購買意願的影響 70 圖6-2 共有型的關係下擺放位置與捐款幅度對消費者購買意願的影響 70 圖6-3 實驗三以目光吸引為中介變數的中介式調節模型 71 圖6-4 實驗三以罪惡感為中介變數的中介式調節模型 72 圖6-5 實驗三以購物計畫為中介變數的中介式調節模型 72 表次 表2-1 結帳櫃檯帶來的正負面效果 12 表2-2 捐款幅度對消費者行為影響 15 表4-1 實驗一八個版本呈現 28 表4-2實驗一樣本人口統計變數資料表 33 表4-3實驗一信度檢測 34 表4-4實驗一慈善產品擺放位置卡方檢定結果 35 表4-5慈善產品擺放位置與捐款幅度對消費者購買意願的影響 37 表4-6 擺放位置與捐款幅度對消費者購買意願之敘述統計 37 表5-1實驗二四個版本呈現 42 表5-2實驗二樣本人口統計變數資料表 46 表5-3 實驗二信度檢測 47 表5-4實驗二慈善產品擺放位置卡方檢定結果 48 表5-5 慈善產品擺放位置與捐款幅度對消費者購買意願的影響 49 表5-6 慈善產品擺放位置與捐款幅度對消費者購買意願之敘述統計 50 表6-1 交易型與共有型之短文內容操弄 54 表6-2 實驗三四個版本呈現 56 表6-3 實驗三樣本人口統計變數資料表 60 表6-4 實驗三信度檢測 61 表6-5實驗三慈善產品擺放位置卡方檢定結果 62 表6-6 慈善產品擺放位置、捐款幅度與關係規範對消費者購買意願的影響 70 表6-7 慈善產品擺放位置、捐款幅度與關係規範對消費者購買意願之敘述統計 71 |
參考文獻 References |
公益交流站(2015), Toms 捐鞋啟示錄:企業公益不是「捐一捐」就好,忽視當 地人需求可能盡失人心, 公益交流站網址https://npost.tw/archives/19206 Aggarwal, P. (2004). The Effects of Brand Relationship Norms on Consumer Attitudes and Behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(1), 87–101. Anderson, L. & Ostrom, A. L. (2015). Transformative Service Research. Journal of Service Research, 18(3), 243-249. Baberini, M., Coleman, C.-L., Slovic, P. & Västfjäll, D. (2015). Examining the Effects of Photographic Attributes on Sympathy, Emotions, and Donation Behavior. Visual Communication Quarterly, 22(2), 118-128. Baghi, I. & Antonetti, P. (2017), High-Fit Charitable Initiatives Increase Hedonic Consumption Through Guilt Reduction. European Journal of Marketing, 51(11), 2030-2053. Bagozzi, R. P. (1978). Marketing as Exchange: A Theory of Transactions in the Marketplace. American Behavioral Scientist, 21(4), 535–556. Batson, C. D. & Shaw, L. L. (1991). Evidence for Altruism: Toward a Pluralism of Prosocial Motives. Psychological Inquiry, 2(2), 107-122. Berger, I. E. & Cunningham, P. & Kozinets, R. (1999). Consumer Persuasion Through Cause-Related Advertising. Advances in Consumer Research, 26(1), 491-497. Bertacchini, E., Santagata, W. & Signorello, G. (2011). Individual Giving to Support Cultural Heritage. International Journal of Arts Management, 13(3), 41-55. Bhakat, R. & Muruganantham, G..(2013). A Review of Impulse Buying Behavior. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 5(3), 149-160. Bhattacharya, C. B., Rao, H. & Glynn, M. A. (1995) Understanding the Bond of Identification: An Investigation of Its Correlates among Art Museum Members. Journal of Marketing, 59(4), 46-57. Bristol, T. (2005). Not Telling the Whole Story: Teen Deception in Purchasing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33(1), 79–95. Brønn, P. & Vrioni, A. B. (2001). Corporate Social Responsibility and Cause-Related Marketing: An Overview. International Journal of Advertising, 20(2), 207-222. Brown, T. J. (2005). Spreading the Word: Investigating Antecedents of Consumers’ Positive Word-of-Mouth Intentions and Behaviors in a Retailing Context. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33(2), 123–138. Chang, C. T. (2008). To Donate or Not to Donate? Product Characteristics and Framing Effects of Cause-Related Marketing on Consumer Purchase Behavior. Psychology and Marketing, 25(12), 1089–1110. Chang, C. T. (2011). Guilt Appeals in Cause-Related Marketing. International Journal of Advertising, 30(4), 587–616. Chang, C. T. & Cheng, Z. H. (2015). Tugging on Heartstrings: Shopping Orientation, Mindset, and Consumer Responses to Cause-Related Marketing. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(2), 337–350. Chang, C. & Liu, H. (2012). Goodwill Hunting? Influences of Product‐Cause Fit, Product Type, and Donation Level in Cause‐Related Marketing. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 30(6), 634-652. Chen, S., Lee-Chai, A. Y. & Bargh, J. A. (2001). Relationship Orientation As a Moderator of the Effects of Social Power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(2), 173-187. Chiu, C., Dweck, C. S., Tong, J. Y. & Fu, J. H. (1997). Implicit Theories and Conceptions of Morality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(5), 923-940. Clark, M. S. & Mills, J. (1979). Interpersonal Attraction in Exchange and Communal Relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(1), 12-24. Clark, M. S. & Mills, J. (1993). The Difference between Communal and Exchange Relationships: What it is and is Not. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19(6), 684–691. Clark, M. S. & Mills, J. (2012). A Theory of Communal (and Exchange) Relationships. In Van Lange, P. A. M., Kruglanski, A. W. & Higgins, E. T. (Eds.), Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology, 2(1), 232–250. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Ltd. Cobb, C. J. & Hoyer, W. D. (1986). Planned Versus Impulse Purchase Behavior, Journal of Retailing, 62 (4). 384-409. Crowe, E. & Higgins E.T. (1997). Regulatory Focus and Strategic Inclinations: Promotion and Prevention in Decision- Making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69(2), 117-132. Dahl, D. W. & Anne M. L. (1995). Cause‐Related Marketing: Impact of Size of Corporate Donation and Size of Cause‐Related Promotion on Consumer Perceptions and Participation. In David W. S. & Naufel J. V. (Eds), American Marketing Association Winter Conference, Chicago, 476–481. De Bruyn, A. & Prokopec, S. (2013). Opening a Donor’s Wallet: The Influence of Appeal Scales on Likelihood and Magnitude of Donation. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23(4), 496–502. Derbaix, C. & Vanhamme, J. (2003). Inducing Word-of-Mouth by Eliciting Surprise a Pilot Investigation. Journal of Economic Psychology, 24(1), 99–116. Docherty, S. & Hibbert, S. (2003). Examining Company Experiences of a UK Cause-Related Marketing Campaign. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 8(4), 378–389. Elfenbein, D. & McManus, B. (2010). A Greater Price for a Greater Good? Evidence That Consumers Pay More for Charity-Linked Products. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 2(1), 28-60. Ellen, P. S., Mohr, L. A. & Webb, D. J. (2000). Charitable Programs and the Retailer: Do They Mix? Journal of Retailing, 76(3), 393–406. Folse, J. A. G., Niedrich, R. W. & Grau, S. L. (2010). Cause-Relating Marketing: The Effects of Purchase Quantity and Firm Donation Amount on Consumer Inferences and Participation Intentions. Journal of Retailing, 86(4), 295–309. Foreh, M. R. & Grier, S. (2003). When Is Honesty the Best Policy? The Effect of Stated Company Intent on Consumer Skepticism. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(3), 349–356. Giebelhausen, M., Lawrence, B. & Chun, H. H. (2020). Doing Good While Behaving Badly: Checkout Charity Process Mechanisms. Journal of Business Ethics, 10(1), 1-17 Giebelhausen, M., Lawrence, B., Chun, H. H. & Hsu, L. (2017). The Warm Glow of Restaurant Checkout Charity. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 58(4), 329–341. Goette, L. & Stutzer, A. (2020). Blood Donations and Incentives: Evidence from a Field Experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 170(1), 52–74. Grau, S. L. & Folse, J. A. G. (2007). Cause-Related Marketing (CRM): The Influence of Donation Proximity and Message-Framing Cues on the Less-Involved Consumer. Journal of Advertising, 36(4), 19–33. Grau, S. L., Garretson, J. A. & Pirsch, J. (2007). Cause-Related Marketing: An Exploratory Study of Campaign Donation Structures Issues. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 18(2), 69–91. Gremler, D. D., Gwinner, K. P. & Brown, S. W. (2001). Generating Positive Word-of-Mouth Communication through Customer-Employee Relationships. International Journal of Service Industry Management,12(1), 44-59. Gupta, S. & Pirsch, J. (2008). The Influence of a Retailer’s Corporate Social Responsibility Program on Re-Conceptualizing Store Image. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 15(6), 516–526. Guy, B. S. (1988). The Marketing of Altruistic Causes: Understanding Why People Help. Journal of Services Marketing, 2(1), 5-16. Hajjat, M. M. (2003). Effect of Cause-Related Marketing on Attitudes and Purchase Intentions: the Moderating Role of Cause Involvement and Donation Size. Journal of Nonprofit and Public Sector Marketing, 11(1), 93–109. Hamby, A. (2016). One For Me, One For You: Cause-Related Marketing with Buy-One Give-One Promotions. Psychology & Marketing, 33(9), 692–703. Hamiln, R. P. & Wilson, T. (2004). The Impact of Cause Branding on Consumer Reactions to Products: Does Product/Cause Fit Really Matter? Journal of Marketing Management, 20(7-8), 663–681. Hayes, A. F. (2015). An Index and Test of Linear Moderated Mediation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50(1), 1-22. Heide, J. B. & Kenneth, H. W. (2006). Friends, Businesspeople, and Relationship roles: A Conceptual Framework and a Research Agenda. Journal of Marketing, 70 (3), 90-103. Hibbert, S., Smith, A., Davies, A. & Ireland, F. (2007). Guilt Appeals: Persuasion Knowledge and Charitable Giving. Psychology and Marketing, 24(8), 723–742. Higgins, E. T. (1998). Promotion and Prevention: Regulatory Focus as A Motivational Principle. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30(1), 1–46. Hoch, S. J. & Loewenstein, G. F. (1991). Time-Inconsistent Preferences and Consumer Self-Control, Journal of Consumer Research, 17(4), 492–507. Holmes, J. G., Miller, D. T. & Lerner, M. J. (2002). Committing Altruism under the Cloak of Self-Interest: The Exchange Fiction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(2), 144–151. Human, D. & Terblanche, N. S. (2012). Who Receives What? The Influence of the Donation Magnitude and Donation Recipient in Cause-Related Marketing. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 24(2), 141–160. Johnson, J. W. & Grimm, P. E. (2010). Communal and Exchange Relationship Perceptions as Separate Constructs and Their Role in Motivations to Donate. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20(3), 282–294. Johnson, J. W., Peck, J. & Schweidel, D. A. (2014). Can Purchase Behavior Predict Relationship Perceptions and Willingness to Donate? Psychology & Marketing, 31(8), 647–659. Kim, Y. J. & Lee, W. N. (2009). Overcoming Consumer Skepticism in Cause-Related Marketing: The Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility and Donation Size Claim Objectivity. Journal of Promotion Management, 15(4), 465–483. Lafferty, B. A. (2007). The Relevance of Fit in a Cause–Brand Alliance When Consumers Evaluate Corporate Credibility. Journal of Business Research, 60(5), 447–453. Lafferty, B. A. (2009). Selecting the Right Cause Partners For the Right Reasons: The Role of Importance and Fit in Cause-Brand Alliances. Psychology & Marketing, 26(4), 359–382. Liu, W. & Gal, D. (2011). Bringing Us Together or Driving Us Apart: The Effect of Soliciting Consumer Input on Consumer's Propensity to Transact with an Organization. Journal of Consumer Research, 38 (2), 242-259. Mantovani, D., de Andrade, L. M. & Negrão, A. (2017). How Motivations for CSR and Consumer-Brand Social Distance Influence Consumers to Adopt Pro-social Behavior. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 36(1), 156–163. Marhana, M. A. & Osman, M. (2012). Effects of Skepticism on Consumer Response toward Cause-related Marketing in Malaysia. International Business Research, 5(9). 98-105. Mario, J. M. (2008). Determinants of Shoppers’ Checkout Behaviour at Supermarkets. Journal of Targeting Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, 16(4), 312–321. Mariri, T. & Chipunza, C. (2009). In-Store Shopping Environment and Impulse Buying. Journal of Marketing, 1(1), 102-108. McCullough, M. E., Rachal, K. C., Sandage, S. J., Worthington, E. L., Brown, S. W. & Hight, T. L. (1998). Interpersonal Forgiving in Close Relationships: II. Theoretical Elaboration and Measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(6), 1586–1603. Mohan, G., Sivakumaran, B. & Sharma, P. (2013), Impact of Store Environment on Impulse Buying Behavior. European Journal of Marketing, 40(10), 1711-1732. Mohr, L. A., Eroglu, D. & Ellen, P. S. (1998). The Development and Testing of a Measure of Skepticism Toward Environmental Claims in Marketers’ Communications. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 32(1), 30–55. Molm, L. D., Whitham, M. M. & Melamed, D. (2012). Forms of Exchange and Integrative Bonds: Effects of History and Embeddedness. American Sociological Review, 77(1), 141-165. Müller, S. S., Fries, A. J. & Gedenk, K. (2014). How Much to Give? The Effect of Donation Size on Tactical and Strategic Success in Cause-Related Marketing. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 31(2), 178–191. Murugananthaml, G. & Ravi, S. B. (2013). A Review of Impulse Buying Behavior. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 5(3), 149-160. Namita, B. & Lerzan, A. (2004). A Case for Consumer Skepticism and Backlash against Product Placements. In Barbara E. K. & Mary F. L. (Eds). Advances in Consumer Research, 31(1), 77-83. Namita, B., Lerzan, A. & Selin, A. M. (2004). Embedding Brands within Media Content: The Impact of Message, Media, and Consumer Characteristics on Placement Efficacy. In L. J. Shrum (Ed). The Psychology of Entertainment Media: Blurring the Lines between Entertainment and Persuasion, 12(1), 99-116. Newmeyer, C. , Kelting, K. , Obeng, E. & Robinson, S. (2019). Would You Like to Donate Today? Why Charity at Checkout May Backfire. Journal of Business Research, 8(1), 1-35. Obeng, E. & Newmeyer, C. E. (2017), Solicitations For Charity at Checkout and Consumer Responses: an Abstract. Creating Marketing Magic and Innovative Future Marketing Trends, Developments in Marketing Science, In Stieler, M. (Ed). Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, Cham, 11-12. Obeng, E., Nakhata, C. & Kuo, H. C. (2019). Paying it Forward: The Reciprocal Effect of Superior Service on Charity at Checkout. Journal of Business Research, 9(1), 250–260. Obermiller, C. & Spangenberg, E. R. (1998). Development of a Scale to Measure Consumer Skepticism Toward Advertising. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 7(2), 159–186. Olsen, G. D., Pracejus, J. W. & Brown, N. R. (2003). When Profit Equals Price: Consumer Confusion About Donation Amounts in Cause-Related Marketing. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 22(2), 170–180. Park, K. & Ryu, G.. (2018). The Effect of Regulatory Focus on Individuals’ Donation Behavior. Sustainability, 10(3), 1-12. Pirsch, J., Gupta, S. & Grau, S. L. (2006). A Framework for Understanding Corporate Social Responsibility Programs as a Continuum: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Business Ethics, 70(2), 125–140. Polonsky, M. J. & Wood, G. (2001). Can the Over Commercialization of Cause-Related Marketing Harm Society? Journal of Macromarketing, 21(1), 8–22. Pracejus, J. W. & Olsen, G. D. (2004). The Role of Brand/Cause Fit in the Effectiveness of Cause-Related Marketing Campaigns. Journal of Business Research, 57(6), 635–640. Pruyn, A. & Smidts, A. (1998). Effects of Waiting on The Satisfaction With The Service: Beyond Objective Time Measure. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 15(4), 321–334. Rifon, N. J., Choi, S. M., Trimble, C. S. & Li, H. (2004). Congruence Effects in Sponsorship: The Mediating Role of Sponsor Credibility and Consumer Attributions of Sponsor Motive. Journal of Advertising, 33(1), 30–42. Rook, D. W. (1987). The Buying Impulse. Journal of Consumer Research,14(2), 189–199. Rook, D. W. & Fisher, R. J. (1995). Normative Influences on Impulsive Buying Behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 22(3), 305-313. Sääksjärvi, M. & Morel, K. P. N. (2010). The Development of a Scale to Measure Consumer Doubt Toward New Products, European Journal of Innovation Management, 13(3), 272-293. Scott, M. L., Mende, M. & Bolton, L. E. (2013). Judging the Book by its Cover? How Consumers Decode Conspicuous Consumption Cues in Buyer-Seller Relationships. Journal of Marketing Research, 50(3), 334-347. Shoham, A. & Makovec, B. M. (2003). Compulsive Buying Behavior. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 20(2), 127-138. Simpson, B., Irwin, K. & Lawrence, P. (2006). Does a “Norm of Self-Interest” Discourage Prosocial Behavior? Rationality and Quid Pro Quo in Charitable Giving. Social Psychology Quarterly, 69(3), 296–306. Skarmeas, D. & Leonidou, C. N. (2013). When Consumers Doubt, Watch Out! The Role of CSR Skepticism. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 1831–1838. Skarmeas, D., Leonidou, C. N. & Saridakis, C. (2014). Examining the Role of CSR Skepticism Using Fuzzy-Set Qualitative comparative analysis. Journal of Business Research, 67(9), 1796–1805. Stilley, K. M., Inman, J. J. & Wakefield, K. L. (2010). Planning to Make Unplanned Purchases? The Role of In-Store Slack in Budget Deviation. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 264–278. Strahilevitz, M. (1999). The Effects of Product Type and Donation Magnitude on Willingness to Pay More for a Charity-Linked Brand. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 8(3), 215–241. Strahilevitz, M. & Myers, J. G. (1998). Donations to Charity as Purchase Incentives: How Well They Work May Depend on What You Are Trying to Sell. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(4), 434–446. Sun, T. & Yazdanifard, S. (2015). The Review of Physical Store Factors That Influence Impulsive Buying Behavior. International Journal of Management, Accounting and Economics, 2(9), 1048-1054. Sun, T. & Wu, G. (2011). Trait Predictors of Online Impulsive Buying Tendency: A Hierarchical Approach. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(3), 337–346. Supphellen, M. & Nelson, M. R. (2001). Developing, Exploring, and Validating a Typology of Private Philanthropic Decision Making. Journal of Economic Psychology, 22(5), 573–603. Trimble, C. S. & Rifon, N. J. (2006). Consumer Perceptions of Compatibility in Cause-Related Marketing Messages. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 11(1), 29–47. Van Gestel, L. C., Kroese, F. M. & De Ridder, D. T. D. (2017). Nudging at the Checkout Counter – A Longitudinal Study of the Effect of a Food Repositioning Nudge on Healthy Food Choice. Psychology & Health, 33(6), 800–809. Varadarajan, P. R., & Menon, A. (1988). Cause-Related Marketing: A Coalignment of Marketing Strategy and Corporate Philanthropy. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 58–74. Verplanken, B. & Herabadi, A. (2001). Individual Differences in Impulse Buying Tendency: Feeling and no Thinking. European Journal of Personality, 15(1), 71–83. Wagner, T., Lutz, R. & Weitz, B. (2009). Corporate Hypocrisy: Overcoming the Threat of Inconsistent Corporate Social Responsibility Perceptions. Journal of Marketing, 73 (6), 77–91. Wathne, K. & Heide, J. (2000). Opportunism in Interfirm Relationships: Forms, Outcomes, and Solutions. Journal of Marketing, 64(4), 36-51. Webb, D. J. & Mohr, L. A. (1998). A Typology of Consumer Responses to Cause-Related Marketing: From Skeptics to Socially Concerned. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 17(2), 226–238. Yin, B., Li, Y. J. & Singh, S. (2020). Coins are Cold and Cards are Caring: The Effect of Pregiving Incentives on Charity Perceptions, Relationship Norms, and Donation Behavior. Journal of Marketing, 10(2), 1-17. |
電子全文 Fulltext |
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。 論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted 開放時間 Available: 校內 Campus: 已公開 available 校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available |
紙本論文 Printed copies |
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。 開放時間 available 已公開 available |
QR Code |