Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0707120-202753 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0707120-202753
論文名稱
Title
轉換型領導對組織公民行為、建言行為、工作滿意度之影響-部屬使命感的調節角色
The influence of Transformational Leadership on Organizational Citizenship Behavior, Voice Behavior and Job Satisfaction: The moderating role of subordinate’s Sense of Calling
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
88
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2020-07-30
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2020-08-07
關鍵字
Keywords
使命感、工作滿意度、建言行為、組織公民行為、轉換型領導
job satisfaction, voice behavior, organizational citizenship behavior, transformational leadership, sense of calling
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5775 次,被下載 1
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5775 times, has been downloaded 1 times.
中文摘要
面對當代快速變化的內、外在環境,企業除了需要員工能增進現有的工作績效外,亦期待員工能展現超出角色職責的組織公民行為與協助企業改進的建言行為,以協助組織能有效的因應內外環境的變化。現有研究雖已指出轉換型領導確實能提高部屬的組織公民行為、建言行為與工作滿意度;但對強調工作對個人意義的員工而言,因部屬所具備的高使命感而能將個人生命終極意義與工作合而為一,故本研究認為使命感對轉換型領導與非直接績效(組織公民行為、建言行為、工作滿意度)間之關係應會產生調節的作用。
本研究採用問卷調查法,共收集國軍組織中380份主管與部屬配對的對偶問卷,並採用階層迴歸分析從部屬的角度去探討主管轉換型領導對部屬非直接績效(組織公民行為、建言行為、工作滿意度)的影響以及使命感對該關係之調節效果。
研究結果顯示:(1)主管魅力典範對部屬個人導向組織公民行為具有正向影響,轉換型領導對組織導向組織公民行為無顯著影響;(2)相較於魅力典範、智性啟發與個別關懷,鼓舞激勵對部屬組織公民行為並未具有更強的預測效果;(3)主管轉換型領導對部屬促進性建言與抑制性建言無顯著影響;(4)相較於魅力典範、智性啟發、個別關懷,主管鼓舞激勵對部屬建言行為並未具有更強的預測效果;(5)主管魅力典範、鼓舞激勵、個別關懷對部屬工作滿意度有正向影響;(6)主管個別關懷比魅力典範、鼓舞激勵,對部屬工作滿意度具有更強的預測效果;(7)轉換型領導與使命感的交互作用,對轉換型領導與非直接績效(組織公民行為、建言行為與、工作滿意度)均不具調節效果。
Abstract
In order to survive in contemporary world which the internal and external environment change rapidly, companies need employees to increase not only their performance but show more extra-role behavior, which is organizational citizenship behavior and receive more improvement advises from subordinates, which is voice behavior, so that they can cope with the rapid-changing business environment successfully. Although studies have pointed out that the supervisor’s transformational leadership has a significant positive impact on subordinate’s indirect performances, including organizational citizenship behavior, voice behavior and job satisfaction. However, for employees who have a higher sense of personal meaning calling, they will consider it is hard to separate their ultimate life meaning from job, so we believe that a sense of calling will play an moderate role in the influence of transformational leadership on organizational citizenship behavior, voice behavior and job satisfaction.
The study is conducted with questionnaire to collect 380 dyads (supervisor-subordinate relationship) from Taiwanese military and taken analysis of hierarchical regression.
The results show that (1) the idealized influence of transformational leadership has a significant positive effect on OCB-I, and the transformational leadership has no significant effect on OCB-O; (2) compared to inspirational motivation, intellectual stimulation and individualized consideration, the idealized influence of transformational leadership has more effect on OCB-I;(3) the transformational leadership has no significant effect on both promotive and prohibitive voice behavior; (4) none of idealized influence, intellectual stimulation, inspirational motivation and individualized consideration of transformational leadership have more effect on promotive voice behavior; (5) the idealized influence, inspirational motivation and individualized consideration have a significant positive effect on job satisfaction; (6) compared to idealized influence, intellectual stimulation and inspirational motivation, the individualized consideration of transformational leadership has more effect on job satisfaction; (7) there are no significant interactions of calling between the relationships of transformational leadership and indirect performance (organizational citizenship behavior, voice behavior, and job satisfaction). Finally, the contributions and limitations of this study will be discussed.
目次 Table of Contents
論文審定書 i
誌謝…... ii
中文摘要....... iii
英文摘要 iv
表目次... vii
圖目次... viii
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 4
第二章 文獻探討 5
第一節 轉換型領導 5
第二節 組織公民行為 7
第三節 建言行為 10
第四節 工作滿意度 14
第五節 使命感 16
第六節 使命感對轉換型領導與非直接績效之關係 20
第三章 研究方法 24
第一節 研究架構與假設 24
第二節 研究樣本 26
第三節 研究程序 28
第四節 研究工具 29
第五節 資料收集方式與分析方法 35
第四章 研究結果 37
第一節 各變項間之相關 37
第二節 轉換型領導對組織公民行為、建言行為、工作滿意度之影響 42
第三節 使命感對組織公民行為、建言行為、工作滿意度之交互作用效果 54
第五章 討論與建議 57
第一節 研究結論 57
第二節 結果討論 59
第三節 研究貢獻 63
第四節 研究限制 64
參考文獻 66
附錄一、部屬問卷量表 75
附錄二、主管問卷量表 79
參考文獻 References
一、中文文獻
余一鳴. (2003). 軍隊社會化的理論與實際. 復興崗學報(77), 219-245.
吳志仁. (2009). 以需求理論探討選擇志願役士兵從軍動機之研究. 碩士 (Master),
吳欣蓓, 陸洛, 顧家祈, & 張妤玥. (2010). 轉換型領導行為, 部屬工作壓力及主管滿意度的關聯─ 人格特質為調節變項. In: 中華管理學報.
吳隆增, 曹昆鵬, 陳苑儀, & 唐貴瑤. (2011). 變革型領導行為對員工建言行為的影響研究. [Transformational Leadership and Employee Voice Behavior: An Examination of the Mediating Mechanisms]. 管理學報, 8(1), 61-66+80.
周麗芳, 任金剛, & 林守紀. (2013). 轉型領導與建言行為:文化價值觀的關鍵角色. [Cultural Values as a Critical Moderator between Transformational Leadership and Voice Behaviors]. 組織與管理, 6(2), 115-159.
紀乃文, & 李學佳. (2018). 員工為何建言?探討員工利社會動機與印象管理動機對建言行為的影響:求成型焦點、情感性組織承諾與公民行為壓力的干擾效果. [Why do Employees speak up? The Effects of Employees' Prosocial and Impression Management Motives on Voice Behaviors: Moderating Roles of Employee Promotion Focus, Affective Commitment, and Citizenship Pressure]. 管理學報, 35(1), 1-25. doi:10.6504/jmbr.201803_35(1).0001
莫大華. (2008). 軍人基本信念調整與軍人價值觀教育. 國防大學: 復興崗學報(91).
許庭婷. (2006). 國軍志願役士 (官) 兵招募作業之研究.
蔡坤地. (2014). 轉化型領導, 交易型領導, 動機觀點與組織公民行為關聯性之研究. 勞資關係論叢, 16(1), 45-68. 

二、英文文獻
Aiken, L. S., West, S. G., & Reno, R. R. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions: sage.
Ashford, S. J., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Christianson, M. K. (2009). Speaking up and speaking out: The leadership dynamics of voice in organizations. Voice and silence in organizations, 175-202.
Asif, M., Jameel, A., Hussain, A., Hwang, J., & Sahito, N. (2019). Linking Transformational Leadership with Nurse-Assessed Adverse Patient Outcomes and the Quality of Care: Assessing the Role of Job Satisfaction and Structural Empowerment. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(13), 15. doi:10.3390/ijerph16132381
Avolio, B. J., Bass, B. M., & Jung, D. I. (1999). Re‐examining the components of transformational and transactional leadership using the Multifactor Leadership. Journal of occupational and organizational psychology, 72(4), 441-462.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51(6), 1173.
Bass, A., Bruce J. (1990). Transformational leadership development: Manual for the multifactor leadership questionnaire: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Bass, B., & Avolio, B. (1995). MLQ multifactor leadership questionnaire: Mind Garden.
Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations.
Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1990). Transformational leadership development: Manual for the multifactor leadership questionnaire: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1994). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership: Sage.
Blau, P. M. (1964). Justice in social exchange. Sociological Inquiry, 34(2), 193-206.
Bolino, M. C., Turnley, W. H., Gilstrap, J. B., & Suazo, M. M. (2010). Citizenship under pressure: What's a “good soldier” to do? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(6), 835-855.
Bowen, F., & Blackmon, K. (2003). Spirals of silence: The dynamic effects of diversity on organizational voice. Journal of management Studies, 40(6), 1393-1417.
Bryman, A. (1992). Charisma and leadership in organizations: Sage Pubns.
Bryman, A. (2004). Qualitative research on leadership: A critical but appreciative review. Leadership Quarterly, 15(6), 729-769. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.09.007
Bunderson, S., & Thompson, J. (2009). The Call of the Wild: Zookeepers, Callings, and the Double-Edged Sword of Deeply Meaningful Work. Administrative Science Quarterly - ADMIN SCI QUART, 54, 32-57. doi:10.2189/asqu.2009.54.1.32
Burris, E. R., Detert, J. R., & Chiaburu, D. S. (2008). Quitting before leaving: the mediating effects of psychological attachment and detachment on voice. Journal of applied psychology, 93(4), 912.
Bycio, P., Hackett, R. D., & Allen, J. S. (1995). Further assessments of Bass's (1985) conceptualization of transactional and transformational leadership. Journal of applied psychology, 80(4), 468.
Cohen, J. (1983). Applied multiple regression: correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Retrieved from
Dalton, J. C. (2001). Career and Calling: Finding a Place for the Spirit in Work and Community. New directions for student services, 95, 17-25.
De Vries, R. E., Van den Hooff, B., & de Ridder, J. A. (2006). Explaining knowledge sharing: The role of team communication styles, job satisfaction, and performance beliefs. Communication research, 33(2), 115-135.
Detert, J. R., & Burris, E. R. (2007). Leadership behavior and employee voice: Is the door really open? Academy of management Journal, 50(4), 869-884.
Detert, J. R., & Edmondson, A. C. (2005). No Exit, No Voice: The Bind of Risky Voice Opportunities in Organizations. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Proceedings.
Dik, B. J., & Duffy, R. D. (2009). Calling and vocation at work: Definitions and prospects for research and practice. The counseling psychologist, 37(3), 424-450.
Downton, J. V. (1973). Rebel leadership: Commitment and charisma in the revolutionary process: Free Press.
Duane, P. S., & Sydney, E. S. 2006. Psychology and work today: An innovation to industrial and organizational psychology (9th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
Duffy, R. D., Autin, K. L., & Bott, E. M. (2015). Work volition and job satisfaction: Examining the role of work meaning and person–environment fit. The Career Development Quarterly, 63(2), 126-140.
Duffy, R. D., Dik, B. J., Douglass, R. P., England, J. W., & Velez, B. L. (2018). Work as a calling: A theoretical model. Journal of counseling psychology, 65(4), 423.
Dyne, L. V., Ang, S., & Botero, I. C. (2003). Conceptualizing employee silence and employee voice as multidimensional constructs. Journal of management Studies, 40(6), 1359-1392.
Farrell, D., & Rusbult, C. (1985). Understanding the retention function: A model of the causes of exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect behaviors. Personnel Administrator, 30(4), 129-140.
Graham, J. W. (1991). An essay on organizational citizenship behavior. Employee responsibilities and rights journal, 4(4), 249-270.
Grant, A. M., & Mayer, D. M. (2009). Good soldiers and good actors: prosocial and impression management motives as interactive predictors of affiliative citizenship behaviors. Journal of applied psychology, 94(4), 900.
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. (1995). Multivariate data analysis New York. NY: Macmillan.
Hall, D. T., & Chandler, D. E. (2005). Psychological success: When the career is a calling. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 26(2), 155-176.
Harrison, D. A., Newman, D. A., & Roth, P. L. (2006). How important are job attitudes? Meta-analytic comparisons of integrative behavioral outcomes and time sequences. Academy of management Journal, 49(2), 305-325.
Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states (Vol. 25): Harvard university press.
Hoppock, R. (1935). Job satisfaction.
Katz, D. (1964). THE MOTIVATIONAL BASIS OF ORGANIZATIONAL-BEHAVIOR. Behavioral Science, 9(2), 131-146. doi:10.1002/bs.3830090206
Konovsky, M. A., & Pugh, S. D. (1994). Citizenship behavior and social exchange. Academy of management Journal, 37(3), 656-669.
Lawer, E. E., & Porter, L. W. (1967). The effect of performance on job satisfaction. Industrial relations: A journal of Economy and Society, 7(1), 20-28.
Lee, K., & Allen, N. J. (2002). Organizational citizenship behavior and workplace deviance: The role of affect and cognitions. Journal of applied psychology, 87(1), 131.
LePine, J. A., & Van Dyne, L. (1998). Predicting voice behavior in work groups. Journal of applied psychology, 83(6), 853.
LePine, J. A., & Van Dyne, L. (2001). Voice and cooperative behavior as contrasting forms of contextual performance: evidence of differential relationships with big five personality characteristics and cognitive ability. Journal of applied psychology, 86(2), 326.
Liang, J., Farh, C. I., & Farh, J.-L. (2012). Psychological antecedents of promotive and prohibitive voice: A two-wave examination. Academy of management Journal, 55(1), 71-92.
Locke, E. A. (1969). What is job satisfaction? Organizational behavior and human performance, 4(4), 309-336.
Milliken, F. J., Morrison, E. W., & Hewlin, P. F. (2003). An exploratory study of employee silence: Issues that employees don’t communicate upward and why. Journal of management Studies, 40(6), 1453-1476.
Morrison, E. W. (2011). Employee voice behavior: Integration and directions for future research. Academy of Management annals, 5(1), 373-412.
Morrison, E. W., & Milliken, F. J. (2000). Organizational silence: A barrier to change and development in a pluralistic world. Academy of Management review, 25(4), 706-725.
Morrison, E. W., Wheeler-Smith, S. L., & Kamdar, D. (2011). Speaking up in groups: a cross-level study of group voice climate and voice. Journal of applied psychology, 96(1), 183.
Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome: Lexington Books/DC Heath and Com.
Organ, D. W., & Lingl, A. (1995). Personality, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behavior. The journal of social psychology, 135(3), 339-350.
Pettigrew, A. M. (1979). On studying organizational cultures. Administrative science quarterly, 24(4), 570-581.
Petty, M. M., McGee, G. W., & Cavender, J. W. (1984). A meta-analysis of the relationships between individual job satisfaction and individual performance. Academy of Management review, 9(4), 712-721.
Piccolo, R. F., & Colquitt, J. A. (2006). Transformational leadership and job behaviors: The mediating role of core job characteristics. Academy of management Journal, 49(2), 327-340.
Podsakoff, P. M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (1997). Impact of organizational citizenship behavior on organizational performance: A review and suggestion for future research. Human performance, 10(2), 133-151.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Bommer, W. H. (1996).
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code