論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available
論文名稱 Title |
社會比較觀點探討 Instagram 伴侶合照對關係品質與主觀幸福感之影響 Exploring Factors Affecting Instagram Users’ Relationship Quality and Subjective Well-being: A Social Comparison Perspective |
||
系所名稱 Department |
|||
畢業學年期 Year, semester |
語文別 Language |
||
學位類別 Degree |
頁數 Number of pages |
118 |
|
研究生 Author |
|||
指導教授 Advisor |
|||
召集委員 Convenor |
|||
口試委員 Advisory Committee |
|||
口試日期 Date of Exam |
2020-07-23 |
繳交日期 Date of Submission |
2020-08-03 |
關鍵字 Keywords |
Instagram、關係品質、關係社會比較解讀、社會比較、主觀幸福感 social comparison, subjective well-being, relationship quality, relationship social comparison interpretations, Instagram |
||
統計 Statistics |
本論文已被瀏覽 5808 次,被下載 0 次 The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5808 times, has been downloaded 0 times. |
中文摘要 |
隨著以視覺化呈現為主之社群平台Instagram近年的廣泛流行,人們經常在Instagram上分享與浪漫關係相關的發文,而這些訊息則可能被其他用戶當成浪漫關係社會比較的對象。本研究結合社會比較之兩大面向:外貌社會比較與關係社會比較,並且拓展關係社會比較解讀之研究,透過實驗法在Instagram上操弄觀看不同浪漫關係的伴侶合照,及照片中人物外表吸引力程度,產生向上與向下關係社會比較方向與不同外貌社會比較程度,探討經由關係社會比較解讀的中介效果後,對於受測者之關係品質以及主觀幸福感之影響。本研究結果顯示,在向上關係比較時,高外貌社會比較程度會提升個體負面解讀並降低向上正面解讀程度;此外,高外貌比較組的關係品質程度顯著低於低外貌比較組,而兩組的主觀幸福感程度則無顯著差異。另一方面,在向下關係比較時,外貌社會比較程度對於個體負面與向下正面解讀程度不會造成顯著差異,對於關係品質與主觀幸福感程度也皆無顯著差異。此外,當依變數為向上與向下正面解讀時,性別內伴侶競爭的調節作用不顯著;然而,當依變數為負面解讀時,性別內伴侶競爭的調節效果則呈現顯著。 本研究對於社群網站上關係社會比較領域之研究具重要理論貢獻,藉由觀看其他社群平台用戶的照片發文,結合外貌社會比較與性別內伴侶競爭,以社會比較之不同面向,深入探討關係社會比較解讀之運用;此外,研究也提供實務建議幫助社群網站用戶意識到社群使用產生之線上社會比較對於線下自身浪漫關係與自我心理狀態之影響。 |
Abstract |
With the recent popularity of Instagram, an image-based social platform, people often share posts about their romantic relationships on Instagram, and these messages may be regarded by other users as objects of romantic relationship social comparison. This study combines two aspects of social comparison: appearance social comparison and relationship social comparison, and expands the current study on the relationship social comparison interpretation. By manipulating participants to view posts of couples in different romantic relationships and with different levels of physical attractiveness, we create the upward and downward relationship social comparison direction and different appearance social comparison level, to explore the mediating effect of relationship social comparison interpretation on relationship quality and subjective well-being. The results of this study found that, when the comparison direction is upward, high appearance social comparison will increase the individual's negative interpretation and decrease the degree of positive upward interpretation. In addition, the relationship quality of the high appearance comparison group was significantly lower than that of the low appearance comparison group, and there was no significant difference in the subjective well-being between the two groups. On the other hand, when the comparison direction is downward, the level of appearance social comparison has no significant difference in the degree of individual’s negative and positive interpretation. there was also no significant difference in relationship quality and subjective well-being between the two groups. In addition, when the dependent variables were upward and downward positive interpretations, the moderating effect of intrasexual competitiveness for mates was not significant. However, when the dependent variable was negative interpretation, the moderating effect of intrasexual competition was significant. This study has significant theoretical contribution to the study of relationship social comparison on social networking sites. By viewing the photos of other users on the social platform, combining appearance social comparison and intrasexual competition, this study explores the application of relationship social comparison interpretations in different aspects of social comparison. In addition, the study provides practical contribution to help SNS users realize the impact of online social comparisons on their romantic relationships and well-being. |
目次 Table of Contents |
論文審定書………………………………………………………………………….i 序言………………………………………………………………………………….ii 中文摘要…………………………………………………………………………….iii 英文摘要……………………………………………………………………………. iv 第一章、緒論……………………………………………………………………….1 第一節、研究背景…………………………………………………………….1 第二節、研究目的與動機…………………………………………………….3 第二章、文獻探討………………………………………………………………….9 第一節、外貌社會比較……………………………………………………….9 第二節、關係社會比較……………………………………………………….13 第三節、關係社會比較解讀………………………………………………….15 第四節、性別內伴侶競爭…………………………………………………….17 第五節、主觀幸福感………………………………………………………….19 第六節、關係品質…………………………………………………………….20 第三章、研究假說與方法………………………………………………………….22 第一節、研究架構…………………………………………………………….22 第二節、研究假說…………………………………………………………….22 一、關係社會比較方向對於關係社會比較解讀的效果……………….22 二、外貌社會比較對於關係社會比較解讀的效果…………………….24 三、關係社會比較方向與外貌社會比較程度之互動作用對於關係社會比較解讀的效果…………………………………………………….26 四、關係社會比較解讀對於關係品質與主觀幸福感的效果………….29 五、性別內伴侶競爭的干擾效果……………………………………….30 第三節、樣本與實驗設計…………………………………………………….31 第四節、實驗刺激與前測…………………………………………………….32 第五節、變數衡量與問卷設計……………………………………………….37 第六節、資料分析方法……………………………………………………….39 第四章、資料分析………………………………………………………………….41 第一節、樣本描述性統計分析……………………………………………….41 第二節、信度與效度分析…………………………………………………….43 第三節、操弄檢定…………………………………………………………….47 第四節、假說分析…………………………………………………………….48 一、關係社會比較方向對於關係社會比較解讀的主效果…………….48 二、外貌社會比較程度對於負面解讀的效果………………………….49 三、關係比較方向與外貌比較程度對於關係社會比較解讀的效果….49 四、關係社會比較解讀之中介效果…………………………………….54 五、關係比較方向與外貌比較程度對關係品質與主觀幸福感的效果.60 六、性別內伴侶競爭的干擾效果……………………………………….61 第五章、結論與建議……………………………………………………………….65 第一節、研究結果與討論…………………………………………………….65 一、關係社會比較方向與外貌社會比較程度對關係社會比較解讀的影響…………………………………………………………………….65 二、關係社會比較解讀對關係品質與主觀幸福感的影響…………….67 三、關係比較方向與外貌比較程度對關係品質及主觀幸福感的影響.68 四、性別內伴侶競爭的干擾效果……………………………………….69 第二節、理論意涵…………………………………………………………….70 第三節、實務意涵…………………………………………………………….72 第四節、研究限制與未來研究建議………………………………………….73 參考文獻…………………………………………………………………………….76 附錄………………………………………………………………………………….88 |
參考文獻 References |
創市際市場研究顧問研究團隊(2019)。2019 台灣網路報告。財團法人台灣網 路資訊中心。取自 https://report.twnic.tw/2019/assets/download/TWNIC_TaiwanInternetReport_20 19_CH.pdf 蔡佳靜(2006)。廣告模特兒外表吸引力的迷思?—不同男性產品之探討。廣 告學研究,第二十五集,107-129。 Abed, R. T. (1998). The sexual competition hypothesis for eating disorders. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 71(4), 525-547. Andrew, F. H. (2013). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. Andrew, F. M., & Withey, S. B. (1976). Social indicators of well-being. New York and London: Plenum, 20, 31. Arnocky, S., & Piché, T. (2014). Cosmetic surgery as intrasexual competition: The mediating role of social comparison. Psychology. Aron, A., Aron, E. N., Tudor, M., & Nelson, G. (1991). Close relationships as including other in the self. Journal of personality and social psychology, 60(2), 241. Arriaga, X. B., & Agnew, C. R. (2001). Being committed: Affective, cognitive, and conative components of relationship commitment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(9), 1190-1203. Baumeister, R. F., Campbell, J. D., Krueger, J. I., & Vohs, K. D. (2003). Does high self-esteem cause better performance, interpersonal success, happiness, or healthier lifestyles? Psychological science in the public interest, 4(1), 1-44. Beaulieu, D. A. (2007). Avoiding costly mating mistakes: Ovulatory shifts in personal mate value assessment. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 24(3), 441-455. Bessenoff, G. R. (2006). Can the media affect us? Social comparison, self- discrepancy, and the thin ideal. Psychology of women quarterly, 30(3), 239-251. Bower, A. B., & Landreth, S. (2001). Is beauty best? Highly versus normally attractive models in advertising. Journal of advertising, 30(1), 1-12. Broemer, P., & Diehl, M. (2003). What you think is what you get: Comparative evaluations of close relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(12), 1560-1569. Brown, Z., & Tiggemann, M. (2016). Attractive celebrity and peer images on Instagram: Effect on women's mood and body image. Body image, 19, 37-43. Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological review, 100(2), 204. Butzer, B., & Kuiper, N. A. (2006). Relationships between the frequency of social comparisons and self-concept clarity, intolerance of uncertainty, anxiety, and depression. Personality and Individual Differences, 41(1), 167-176. Buunk, A. P., & Fisher, M. (2009). Individual differences in intrasexual competition. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 7(1), 37-48. Buunk, B. P., Oldersma, F. L., & De Dreu, C. K. (2001). Enhancing satisfaction through downward comparison: The role of relational discontent and individual differences in social comparison orientation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37(6), 452-467. Buunk, B. P., & van der Eijnden, R. J. (1997). Perceived prevalence, perceived superiority, and relationship satisfaction: Most relationships are good, but ours is the best. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(3), 219-228. Buunk, B. P., Van der Zee, K., & VanYperen, N. W. (2001). Neuroticism and social comparison orientation as moderators of affective responses to social comparison at work. Journal of personality, 69(5), 745-762. Buunk, B. P., & Van Yperen, N. W. (1991). Referential comparisons, relational comparisons, and exchange orientation: Their relation to marital satisfaction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(6), 709-717. Chang, P. F., Choi, Y. H., Bazarova, N. N., & Lo€ckenhoff, C. E. (2015). Age differences in online social networking: Extending socioemotional selectivity theory to social network sites. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 59, 221e239 Cachelin, F. M., & Regan, P. C. (2006). Prevalence and correlates of chronic dieting in a multi-ethnic US community sample. Eating and Weight Disorders-Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity, 11(2), 91-99. Castro, F. N., Hattori, W. T., Yamamoto, M. E., & de Araújo Lopes, F. (2014). Social comparisons on self-perception and mate preferences: The self and the others. Psychology, 2014. Castro-Olivo, S. M. (2014). Promoting social-emotional learning in adolescent Latino ELLs: A study of the culturally adapted Strong Teens program. School Psychology Quarterly, 29(4), 567. Chou, H.-T. G., & Edge, N. (2012). “They are happier and having better lives than I am”: The impact of using Facebook on perceptions of others' lives. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(2), 117-121. Diener, E., & Emmons, R. A. (1984). The independence of positive and negative affect. Journal of personality and social psychology, 47(5), 1105. Diener, E., & Seligman, M. E. (2002). Very happy people. Psychological science, 13(1), 81-84. Fardouly, J., Diedrichs, P. C., Vartanian, L. R., & Halliwell, E. (2015). Social comparisons on social media: The impact of Facebook on young women's body image concerns and mood. Body image, 13, 38-45. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human relations, 7(2), 117-140. Fincham, F. D., & Beach, S. R. (2010). Marriage in the new millennium: A decade in review. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(3), 630-649. Gilbert, D. T., Giesler, R. B., & Morris, K. A. (1995). When comparisons arise. Journal of personality and social psychology, 69(2), 227. Gilbert, P., Price, J., & Allan, S. (1995). Social comparison, social attractiveness and evolution: How might they be related? New ideas in Psychology, 13(2), 149-165. Groesz, L. M., Levine, M. P., & Murnen, S. K. (2002). The effect of experimental presentation of thin media images on body satisfaction: A meta‐analytic review. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 31(1), 1-16. Heatherton, T. F., & Polivy, J. (1991). Development and validation of a scale for measuring state self-esteem. Journal of personality and social psychology, 60(6), 895. Helgeson, V. S. (1994). Relation of agency and communion to well-being: Evidence and potential explanations. Psychological bulletin, 116(3), 412. Hendrick, S. S., Hendrick, C., & Adler, N. L. (1988). Romantic relationships: Love, satisfaction, and staying together. Journal of personality and social psychology, 54(6), 980. Hendrickse, J., Secharan, R., & Clayton, R. (2016). Examining women’s cognitive and emotional processing of thin, average, and plus size fashion models depicted in the media. Paper presented at the Psychophysiology. Jang, J. Y., Han, K., Shih, P. C., & Lee, D. (2015). Generation like: Comparative characteristics in instagram. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Jensen, M. P., & Karoly, P. (1992). Self-report scales and procedures for assessing pain in adults. Kelley, H. H., & Thibaut, J. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence: John Wiley & Sons. Kenrick, D. T., & Keefe, R. C. (1992). Age preferences in mates reflect sex differences in human reproductive strategies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 15(1), 75-91. Le, B., & Agnew, C. R. (2003). Commitment and its theorized determinants: A meta– analysis of the Investment Model. Personal Relationships, 10(1), 37-57. Leahey, T. M., Crowther, J. H., & Mickelson, K. D. (2007). The frequency, nature, and effects of naturally occurring appearance-focused social comparisons. Behavior Therapy, 38(2), 132-143. Librán, E. C. (2006). Personality dimensions and subjective well-being. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 9(1), 38-44. Lockwood, P., Dolderman, D., Sadler, P., & Gerchak, E. (2004). Feeling better about doing worse: Social comparisons within romantic relationships. Journal of personality and social psychology, 87(1), 80. Lucas, R. E., & Dyrenforth, P. S. (2006). Does the existence of social relationships matter for subjective well-being? Lyubomirsky, S., & Lepper, H. S. (1999). A measure of subjective happiness: Preliminary reliability and construct validation. Social indicators research, 46(2), 137-155. Manago, A. M., Graham, M. B., Greenfield, P. M., & Salimkhan, G. (2008). Self- presentation and gender on MySpace. Journal of applied developmental psychology, 29(6), 446-458. Martin, M. C., & Kennedy, P. F. (1994). Social comparison and the beauty of advertising models: The role of motives for comparison. ACR North American Advances. Michinov, E., & Michinov, N. (2001). The similarity hypothesis: A test of the moderating role of social comparison orientation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31(5), 549-555. Mills, J. S., Polivy, J., Herman, C. P., & Tiggemann, M. (2002). Effects of exposure to thin media images: Evidence of self-enhancement among restrained eaters. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(12), 1687-1699. Morry, M. M., Chee, K. C., Penniston, T. L., & Sucharyna, T. A. (2019). Relationship social comparisons: Comparison interpretations and attributions as predictors of relationship quality. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(4), 1069- 1097. Morry, M. M., & Sucharyna, T. A. (2016). Relationship social comparison interpretations and dating relationship quality, behaviors, and mood. Personal Relationships, 23(3), 554-576. Morry, M. M., Sucharyna, T. A., & Petty, S. K. (2018). Relationship social comparisons: Your facebook page affects my relationship and personal well- being. Computers in Human Behavior, 83, 140-167. Myers, T. A., & Crowther, J. H. (2009). Social comparison as a predictor of body dissatisfaction: A meta-analytic review. Journal of abnormal psychology, 118(4), 683. Nunnally, J.C, & Bernstein, I.H. (1994) The Assessment of Reliability. Psychometric Theory, 3, 248-292. O’Brien, K. S., Caputi, P., Minto, R., Peoples, G., Hooper, C., Kell, S., & Sawley, E. (2009). Upward and downward physical appearance comparisons: Development of scales and examination of predictive qualities. Body image, 6(3), 201-206. Oishi, S., Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., & Suh, E. M. (2009). Cross-cultural variations in predictors of life satisfaction: Perspectives from needs and values. In Culture and well-being (pp. 109-127): Springer. Parker, S. (2016). A long list of Instagram statistics that marketers need to know.Available at: a https://blog. hootsuite. com/instagram-statistics/(accessed on 24 August 2017). Patzer, G. L. (1983). Source credibility as a function of communicator physical attractiveness. Journal of business research, 11(2), 229-241. Pempek, T. A., Yermolayeva, Y. A., & Calvert, S. L. (2009). College students' social networking experiences on Facebook. Journal of applied developmental psychology, 30(3), 227-238. Perloff, R. M. (2014). Social Media Effects on Young Women's Body Image Concerns: Theoretical Perspectives and an Agenda for Research. Sex Roles, 71(11-12), 363-377. doi:10.1007/s11199-014-0384-6 Pew research center (2018). Social media use in 2018. 取自 https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2018/03/01/social-media-use-in-2018/ Pinkus, R. T., Lockwood, P., Schimmack, U., & Fournier, M. A. (2008). For better and for worse: Everyday social comparisons between romantic partners. Journal of personality and social psychology, 95(5), 1180. Polivy, J., & Herman, C. P. (2002). Causes of eating disorders. Annual review of psychology, 53(1), 187-213. Rhoades, G. K., Stanley, S. M., & Markman, H. J. (2010). Should I stay or should I go? Predicting dating relationship stability from four aspects of commitment. Journal of family psychology, 24(5), 543. Riggio, R. E., Widaman, K. F., Tucker, J. S., & Salinas, C. (1991). Beauty is more than skin deep: Components of attractiveness. Basic and applied social psychology, 12(4), 423-439. Rosenberg, J., & Egbert, N. (2011). Online impression management: Personality traits and concerns for secondary goals as predictors of self-presentation tactics on Facebook. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(1), 1-18. Rusbult, C. E., & Buunk, B. P. (1993). Commitment processes in close relationships: An interdependence analysis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10(2), 175-204. Schmitt, D. P., & Buss, D. M. (1996). Strategic self-promotion and competitor derogation: Sex and context effects on the perceived effectiveness of mate attraction tactics. Journal of personality and social psychology, 70(6), 1185. Shaw, A. M., Timpano, K. R., Tran, T. B., & Joormann, J. (2015). Correlates of Facebook usage patterns: The relationship between passive Facebook use, social anxiety symptoms, and brooding. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 575-580. Siibak, A. (2009). Constructing the self through the photo selection-visual impression management on social networking websites. Cyberpsychology: Journal of psychosocial research on cyberspace, 3(1). Smith LeBeau, L., & Buckingham, J. T. (2008). Relationship social comparison tendencies, insecurity, and perceived relationship quality. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 25(1), 71-86. Statista (2019). Instagram - Statistics & Facts. 取自 https://www.statista.com/topics/1882/instagram/ Stefanone, M. A., Lackaff, D., & Rosen, D. (2011). Contingencies of Self-Worth and Social-Networking-Site Behavior. Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking, 14(1-2), 41-49. doi:10.1089/cyber.2010.0049 Sternberg, R. J., & Hojjat, M. (1997). Satisfaction in close relationships: Guilford Press. Surra, C. A., & Milardo, R. M. (1991). The social psychological context of developing relationships: Interactive and psychological networks. Advances in personal relationships, 3, 1-36. Tesser, A. (1988). In L. Berkowitz,(Ed.), Toward a self-evaluation maintenance model of social behavior (Vol. 21, pp. 181-227). Advances in experimental social psychology. New York, NY: Academic Press, 10, S0065-2601. Tesser, A., & Collins, J. E. (1988). Emotion in social reflection and comparison situations: Intuitive, systematic, and exploratory approaches. Journal of personality and social psychology, 55(5), 695. Thai, S., Lockwood, P., Pinkus, R. T., & Chen, S. Y. (2016). Being better than you is better for us: Attachment avoidance and social comparisons within romantic relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 33(4), 493-514. Thompson, J. K., Coovert, M. D., & Stormer, S. M. (1999). Body image, social comparison, and eating disturbance: A covariance structure modeling investigation. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 26(1), 43-51. Thompson, J. K., Heinberg, L., & Tantleff-Dunn, S. (1991). The physical appearance comparison scale. The Behavior Therapist, 14, 174. Tiggemann, M., & McGill, B. (2004). The role of social comparison in the effect of magazine advertisements on women's mood and body dissatisfaction. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23(1), 23-44. Tiggemann, M., & Miller, J. (2010). The Internet and adolescent girls’ weight satisfaction and drive for thinness. Sex Roles, 63(1-2), 79-90. Tiggemann, M., & Zaccardo, M. (2015). “Exercise to be fit, not skinny”: The effect of fitspiration imagery on women's body image. Body image, 15, 61-67. Titus, S. L. (1980). A function of friendship: Social comparisons as a frame of reference for marriage. Human relations, 33(6), 409-431. Van der Zee, K., Buunk, B., & Sanderman, R. (1998). Neuroticism and reactions to social comparison information among cancer patients. Journal of personality, 66(2), 175-194. Vogel, E. A., Rose, J. P., Okdie, B. M., Eckles, K., & Franz, B. (2015). Who compares and despairs? The effect of social comparison orientation on social media use and its outcomes. Personality and Individual Differences, 86, 249- 256. Walther, J. B. (2007). Selective self-presentation in computer-mediated communication: Hyperpersonal dimensions of technology, language, and cognition. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(5), 2538-2557. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2006.05.002 Wang, J. L., Jackson, L. A., Gaskin, J., & Wang, H.-Z. (2014). The effects of Social Networking Site (SNS) use on college students’ friendship and well- being. Computers in Human Behavior, 37, 229-236. Wehrens, M. J., Buunk, A. P., Lubbers, M. J., Dijkstra, P., Kuyper, H., & van der Werf, G. P. (2010). The relationship between affective response to social comparison and academic performance in high school. Contemporary educational psychology, 35(3), 203-214. White, G. A. (2010). Implications of relationship social comparison tendencies among dating and married individuals. Wise, K., Alhabash, S., & Park, H. (2010). Emotional responses during social information seeking on Facebook. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 13(5), 555-562. Wong, B. B., & Candolin, U. (2005). How is female mate choice affected by male competition? Biological Reviews, 80(4), 559-571. Wood, J. V. (1989). Theory and research concerning social comparisons of personal attributes. Psychological bulletin, 106(2), 231. |
電子全文 Fulltext |
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。 論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define 開放時間 Available: 校內 Campus: 已公開 available 校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available |
紙本論文 Printed copies |
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。 開放時間 available 已公開 available |
QR Code |